- hace 8 minutos
Europe Today: Trump prevé el fin de la guerra en Ucrania y la UE retira sanciones a 2 oligarcas
El presidente Donald Trump afirma que la guerra en Ucrania podría acabar antes de lo que muchos piensan. En Bruselas, dos oligarcas rusos fueron retirados de la lista negra de la UE tras negociaciones. Además, hablamos en exclusiva con el primer ministro letón Andris Kulbergs.
MÁS INFORMACIÓN : http://es.euronews.com/2026/09/23/europe-today-trump-afirma-que-un-acuerdo-entre-ucrania-y-rusia-para-acabar-la-guerra-esta
¡Suscríbete a nuestro canal! Euronews está disponible en 12 idiomas
El presidente Donald Trump afirma que la guerra en Ucrania podría acabar antes de lo que muchos piensan. En Bruselas, dos oligarcas rusos fueron retirados de la lista negra de la UE tras negociaciones. Además, hablamos en exclusiva con el primer ministro letón Andris Kulbergs.
MÁS INFORMACIÓN : http://es.euronews.com/2026/09/23/europe-today-trump-afirma-que-un-acuerdo-entre-ucrania-y-rusia-para-acabar-la-guerra-esta
¡Suscríbete a nuestro canal! Euronews está disponible en 12 idiomas
Categoría
🗞
NoticiasTranscripción
00:14Good morning, it's Wednesday, September 23rd, you're watching Euronews and this is Europe Today.
00:22Coming up, Vladimir Zelensky and Donald Trump have met at the UN General Assembly in New York
00:28as strikes continue to cross Ukraine.
00:31Trump called the meeting very fruitful.
00:34Both leaders were figuring out a way to end the war, Trump said.
00:38But there's been no let-up in Russia's bombardment across Ukraine,
00:42with more attacks on the capital, Kiev, as well as ballistic missile and drone strikes on railways,
00:48energy facilities and residential homes.
00:51The U.S. president and the leaders of Greenland and Denmark signed an agreement
00:56that permits a larger U.S. military presence on the territory.
01:00It may resolve a standoff over the strategically located and mineral-rich island.
01:05The agreement, signed during Trump's visit to the UN General Assembly in New York,
01:10stops short of Trump's demand that the U.S. adopt Greenland as a U.S. territory
01:15to head out the growing Arctic presence of Russia and China.
01:19Leaders of Denmark and Greenland had argued against the complete U.S. takeover.
01:24And conflicting reports emerged from Tehran yesterday
01:28over whether Iran had privately offered to reopen the Strait of Hormuz within seven days.
01:34News agencies quoted unnamed Iranian officials as saying
01:38that the proposal had been conveyed to Washington through mediators,
01:42a claim Iranian state-affiliated media quickly denied.
01:46The proposal reportedly aims to achieve a permanent end to the war between the two countries
01:51and revive diplomatic relations.
01:54This is not the first time Tehran has sent conflicting signals about a potential agreement.
02:00Welcome to the program. I'm Stefan Grobe.
02:03Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy have met in New York
02:07as Washington steps up efforts to end the war in Ukraine.
02:11Trump told the U.N. that the U.S. is working closely with both Kiev and Moscow
02:16and that he expects the war to end sooner than many people think.
02:20But Zelenskyy is bringing a more immediate proposal to the table,
02:24a reciprocal halt to attacks on energy infrastructure and in the Black Sea.
02:29Our Ukraine correspondent, Sasha Vakulina,
02:32joins us now to bring us up to speed.
02:34Good morning, Sasha.
02:35So let's start with Ukraine's proposal.
02:39What is Zelenskyy asking for?
02:41A full and total energy ceasefire for all of the attacks on both sides,
02:46for Kiev and for Moscow.
02:48This is something that Ukrainian officials have been trying to push forward for months now,
02:52specifically after a very harsh winter last year, Stefan.
02:56And now, you know, when the weather is already changing
02:59and Russia is deliberately attacking Ukraine's energy infrastructure,
03:04this is something that Kiev insists upon.
03:06And this is the idea that Zelenskyy is trying to pitch to Trump.
03:09Now, the U.S. president also last week, as you remember,
03:11preemptively announced the energy truce,
03:14but that did not anyhow materialize,
03:16with Moscow continuing to attack Kiev
03:20and Kiev continuing its long-range strikes against Russia's oil refineries.
03:25Now, Kiev insists it is ready to stop at any moment,
03:28but only when Russia stops.
03:31And that has not happened.
03:32So Trump told the UN that Washington is working closely
03:36with both Russia and Ukraine,
03:38and that a deal will come sooner than people understand.
03:42So after this meeting with Zelenskyy,
03:44is there now a clear path towards a ceasefire and peace?
03:48Not yet.
03:49No clear path and no concrete proposal.
03:51But yes, indeed, Donald Trump sounded more optimistic
03:53when he made that statement,
03:55when he was addressing the United Nations General Assembly.
03:57Let's take a listen to it.
04:09Donald Trump did not reveal all the details
04:12of how exactly he's going to get that done,
04:14but he did mention that he can also impose more sanctions
04:17and tariffs to add that pressure on Moscow
04:21to stop its war against Ukraine.
04:22And one more, Sasha.
04:24How does this fit into the, say, wider U.S. diplomatic effort,
04:29especially the work of Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner?
04:33We have been seeing Washington's renewed push
04:36and diplomatic push trying to put an end
04:39to Russia's war against Ukraine.
04:42And on Tuesday evening, reportedly,
04:44there was a meeting between U.S. Envoyist Witkoff and Kushner
04:47and the Ukrainian negotiating team
04:49alongside the national security advisors
04:52from the U.K., France and Germany.
04:54And also then, today, we're going to keep an eye
04:56on the meeting between Marco Rubio and Sergei Lavrov,
04:58who is in the U.S. staff.
05:01Now, another thing here on the agenda
05:03is something that Zelensky also spoke about on Tuesday,
05:06possible trilateral meeting
05:08between Donald Trump, Volodymyr Zelensky
05:10and Vladimir Putin.
05:11Now, Zelensky said he is ready to meet Putin at any moment,
05:14and this is something that is now on the agenda,
05:16possibly for a meeting at the G20 summit
05:18in Miami in December.
05:20All right, Sascha, thank you very much.
05:22Our Ukraine correspondent, Sascha Vakulina,
05:25on the Trump-Selensky meeting.
05:27The Latvian Prime Minister Andris Kulberg
05:30spoke exclusively to Euronews about
05:32the nitty-gritty of a sanctions saga
05:34that gripped Brussels,
05:35which ultimately resulted in two Russian businessmen
05:39coming off the EU's blacklist.
05:41While the Latvian leader welcomed
05:43getting tough on Moscow,
05:44he expressed concern about the legacy it leaves.
05:46For more on this,
05:48I'm now joined by our defence correspondent,
05:50Angela Skudjins.
05:52Good morning, Angie.
05:53Bring us up to speed on this.
05:55Good morning, Stefan.
05:56So, yes, I spoke exclusively
05:58with the Latvian Prime Minister Andris Kulbergs
06:00yesterday after the news broke
06:02that Latvia had dropped its veto
06:04against the EU's latest sanctions package
06:07against Russia.
06:08The reason that rigour dug its heels
06:10in so significantly against this
06:12is that France successfully lobbied
06:15for the removal of Alisha Uzmanov
06:17from the sanctions list
06:18as part of a prisoner swap deal
06:20with Azerbaijan
06:21and Slovakia
06:23with the removal of Mikhail Friedman.
06:24Riga didn't want this,
06:26as well as a range of other nations,
06:29particularly the Baltics.
06:30This means now that these individuals
06:32can travel to the European Union
06:35and access money frozen
06:37within the European Union.
06:39They haven't been able to do this
06:40since 2022.
06:41But the gist of why
06:43the Latvian Prime Minister
06:45dropped his veto,
06:46instead moving to an abstention,
06:48is that he didn't want to risk
06:49the 2,600 other individuals
06:52and entities
06:53that are a part of this package,
06:55effectively now sanctioned
06:57for the next three years.
06:59He did warn, however,
07:00that this could set
07:01a dangerous precedent
07:02when it comes to haggling
07:04over the sanctions packages
07:06in particular.
07:06He doesn't want this
07:08to be a political bargaining chip
07:10in the future.
07:12So I spoke to Andrus Kulbergs
07:14and I started by asking him
07:15whether he was disappointed
07:17by Paris and Bratislava
07:20when it comes to this issue.
07:22Generally, yes,
07:23because Latvia stood to the end,
07:26the last one in Europe
07:27to be against this,
07:29because we consider
07:30if war is continuing
07:32and the aggression
07:33and the occupation
07:34of Ukraine is happening,
07:36there cannot be any discussion
07:38of any sanctions.
07:39Either it is sports,
07:41what we've seen,
07:42either culture,
07:43and now,
07:44one by one,
07:45cherry-picking out of sanctions,
07:46that is not the way to go.
07:48That is normalizing Russia.
07:50So,
07:50but there,
07:52I cannot communicate
07:54and I cannot know
07:55the reasons behind
07:57the national security aspects
07:58of each of those
08:00countries' positions.
08:01I can't speak for them,
08:03but I speak for Latvia
08:05and for our position
08:06and for Europe's unity.
08:08It's important.
08:09You spoke on the phone
08:10to French President Emmanuel Macron.
08:12Did he not communicate
08:13why he needed
08:14that individual in particular
08:15to be delisted?
08:17I understand it's a matter
08:18of France's national security,
08:21a very highly important matter
08:23which should be communicated
08:24by Macron himself, Emmanuel.
08:27So,
08:28I would
08:29not be comfortable
08:31on communicating this
08:33further
08:33because that's not
08:34my business
08:36at the moment.
08:37I'm worried
08:38an important point
08:39is about Latvia,
08:40the eastern flank security.
08:43That's because
08:44these two individuals
08:45directly are associated
08:47also in Latvia
08:48because we have
08:49their frozen assets here
08:51and that's the reason
08:52we are worried
08:54about our security,
08:55Europe's eastern flank security,
08:58thus I have pushed
08:59as well
09:00for this not to happen.
09:02So,
09:02that's why
09:02we were the last ones standing
09:04and we said
09:06we had a choice.
09:07We had a choice
09:08to stand to the end
09:09but that was a high risk
09:10of European unity
09:12and it was an issue.
09:14Do we let go
09:152,600
09:17by end of today?
09:19And we consulted
09:20with Ukraine about it
09:22with Mr. Zelensky
09:23and the Prime Minister
09:24and it's also
09:25their point
09:26and they also said
09:28it's not worth risking
09:29that we let loose
09:30all 2,600
09:31including Putin himself.
09:34Thus,
09:35it's better
09:36to keep the unity
09:37and have this compromise
09:39and we stressed as well
09:41that we have to have
09:42more allied forces
09:44in Latvia
09:45and we need
09:46the support
09:46of France
09:47and France
09:48already did good
09:49with the Rafael jet fighter
09:52fighting off the drones
09:53what we have
09:54but we need more presence
09:55here
09:55and that is something
09:56we both agreed
09:57Mr. Macron
09:58has also agreed
09:59to come over
10:00to Latvia
10:01to see himself
10:02the situation
10:03on the eastern flank.
10:04You're talking a lot
10:05about unity here
10:06particularly from
10:07French President
10:08Emmanuel Macron
10:08but still
10:09are you not disappointed
10:10in the way
10:11that this has played out?
10:12You've managed
10:12to save face
10:13but what message
10:14does it send
10:15to the 2,600
10:17individuals
10:17and entities
10:18that are still listed
10:19could they compromise
10:21or negotiate
10:21to try and get delisted
10:22as well?
10:23We spoke all night
10:25and this day
10:26very important matter
10:28is that we all
10:29have in place
10:3136 months
10:33instead of 6 months
10:34so 36 months
10:35frozen
10:36nothing can be taken
10:37out of 2,600
10:38no one can just
10:40go and cherry pick
10:41that's it
10:42we close the books
10:43and you spoke
10:44to Ukrainian President
10:45Volodymyr Zelensky
10:46on the phone
10:47is this what he
10:47communicated to you
10:48that it's better
10:49to have these sanctions
10:50locked in for 36 months
10:52or risk derailing
10:54it all?
10:55No, no
10:56we coordinated
10:58the information
10:59through also
11:00the Prime Minister
11:01of Ukraine
11:02and Zelensky
11:04that in the interests
11:06and he has talks
11:08in New York now
11:09in UN
11:10and there's a discussion
11:11with Macron himself
11:12as well as Mr. Trump
11:14and Wanderlion
11:15these all meetings
11:16take place
11:16and it's important
11:17that we support Ukraine
11:19to the most
11:20their position
11:20but we all understood
11:22it's not worth risking
11:23for these two individuals
11:25the whole 2,600
11:26so it's a better position
11:28that there is no country
11:29which can go
11:30and now
11:31in 6 months
11:32again
11:33have anyone taken out
11:35so 36 months
11:36even if there's peace talks
11:38even if there's anything
11:39changing
11:40will remain
11:41what do you think
11:42this saga
11:43in Brussels
11:44regarding the sanctions
11:45what message
11:46does that send
11:46Russia
11:47regarding peace
11:49I don't
11:50I don't consider myself
11:52that this will
11:53this is something
11:54to
11:54to
11:55to impact
11:56the peace talks
11:57no
11:57this is something
11:59this is not a good message
12:00generally
12:01not
12:01this
12:03I'm worried here
12:04about the
12:06playbook
12:07which it leaves
12:08I don't
12:08I don't think
12:09this is a very good example
12:11because that
12:12gives a message
12:13oh
12:13hey
12:14we
12:15we arrest
12:16some politicians
12:17somewhere
12:17and then we can
12:18ask for a sanctions
12:19package
12:20you know
12:20this is
12:21this is not
12:22a good playbook
12:23and that's exactly
12:23why we freeze
12:24it's 36 months
12:25that's it
12:26no discussion
12:27you've also joined
12:28us on
12:29Euronews
12:30before
12:30we've previously
12:31spoken about
12:32the Baltic security
12:33situation
12:33but what is your
12:34assessment today
12:35has it changed
12:36do you think
12:37Russia could mount
12:37a more aggressive
12:38threat when it comes
12:40to the Baltics
12:41and in particular
12:42Latvia
12:43yes we've had
12:44definitely our
12:45security meetings
12:46over here
12:47at the moment
12:48there is no
12:49direct
12:50information
12:51we've seen also
12:52the Belarusian
12:53exercises
12:54military exercises
12:56they were
12:56lacking the Russian
12:58counterpart there
12:59so they don't have
13:01the man force
13:01at the moment
13:02but things can change
13:07all right
13:08Angela Skucin
13:09speaking to the
13:10Latvian minister
13:11prime minister
13:12of course
13:12now
13:13the US
13:14Denmark
13:14and Greenland
13:15have signed
13:16a deal
13:16aimed at
13:17strengthening
13:17Arctic security
13:19the deal
13:20also ends
13:20over a year
13:21of tensions
13:22between the US
13:22and its Nordic
13:23allies
13:24with US
13:24President Donald
13:25Trump
13:25after the
13:26President
13:27threatened
13:27to take
13:28the world's
13:29largest island
13:30which is also
13:31a semi-autonomous
13:32territory of
13:33Denmark
13:33our NATO
13:34correspondent
13:35Shona Murray
13:36joins me now
13:37good morning
13:38Shona
13:38so first question
13:40what's in the deal
13:41well I think the point
13:42that you made at the start
13:43there is very important
13:44because if this works out
13:46it does end
13:46a highly corrosive
13:47and unprecedented
13:48moment at NATO
13:49where one ally
13:50the United States
13:51with the one
13:52with the biggest army
13:53was going to take
13:54a territory
13:55of another ally
13:56and so
13:57really if this
13:58is resolved
13:59then everyone's
13:59for the better
14:00in terms of the alliance
14:01now what it does
14:02is it really
14:02builds on an already
14:04existing pact
14:05between the US
14:05and Denmark
14:07from 1951
14:08from the Cold War
14:08era which gave
14:09the United States
14:10considerable access
14:11to Greenland
14:11for fear of the
14:12Soviet Union
14:13now the idea
14:14is that the next
14:15threat comes from
14:16Russia and China
14:17so just let's take
14:18a look at how
14:19both sides are
14:19interpreting the deal
14:20Meta Frederiksen
14:21the Danish
14:22Prime Minister
14:22here
14:2775 years ago
14:28we entered into
14:30an agreement
14:30about the defence
14:31of Greenland
14:32today we are
14:34signing an even
14:35bigger and better
14:36agreement
14:37a deal that
14:38can last
14:39forever
14:40this deal
14:41is good
14:42for the United
14:43States
14:43it's good
14:44for Greenland
14:45for Denmark
14:46for the NATO
14:47alliance
14:48and therefore
14:48also good
14:49for Europe
14:51and then we
14:51look at the
14:52tweet from
14:52Katie Miller
14:53who is the
14:53wife of
14:54Stephen Miller
14:54we know the
14:55very highly
14:55influential
14:56Deputy Chief
14:57of Staff
14:57in Trump's
14:58administration
14:58she said
14:59this
15:00which is
15:01effectively
15:01what Donald
15:02Trump is
15:02saying
15:03which is
15:03that the
15:03United States
15:04has full
15:04control
15:04over Greenland
15:06now
15:06now
15:07it does
15:08when you
15:09look at
15:09the deal
15:09have a lot
15:10to say
15:10about Danish
15:11sovereignty
15:11and Greenlandic
15:12sovereignty
15:12but at the
15:13same time
15:14there is
15:14quite a
15:14considerable
15:15almost
15:16untrammeled
15:16access for
15:17the United
15:17States
15:18within the
15:18territory
15:18and if you
15:19look at
15:19one line
15:20here it
15:20says
15:20the United
15:21States
15:21aircraft
15:21may fly
15:22over
15:22and land
15:23in any
15:23territory
15:24in
15:24Greenland
15:24including
15:25territorial
15:25waters
15:26the United
15:27States
15:27public
15:27vessels
15:28may have
15:28undersea
15:29access
15:29and movement
15:30within the
15:31waters
15:31without
15:31restriction
15:32so there
15:33is also
15:34within it
15:34a veto
15:35for the
15:36United
15:36States
15:37to not
15:37allow
15:38countries
15:38that are
15:39not in
15:39NATO
15:40or the
15:40European
15:40Union
15:41to have
15:41commercial
15:42interest
15:42there
15:43as well
15:43so I
15:43think
15:44the devil
15:44is in
15:45the detail
15:45but there
15:46is a bit
15:46of constructive
15:47ambiguity
15:47there
15:48what I
15:48want to
15:49know
15:49now
15:49Shona
15:50is
15:50is this
15:51the end
15:51of this
15:52matter
15:52this is
15:53a really
15:53interesting
15:54question
15:54because I
15:55think if it's
15:56put to the
15:56test it may
15:57not be
15:57but for now
15:58I think there's
15:58at least a sigh of
15:59relief that this
16:00confrontation is
16:01over
16:02well what a
16:03story I hope
16:04you're gonna keep
16:05covering this
16:06for us
16:06our NATO
16:07correspondent
16:07Shona
16:08Murray
16:08Morocco
16:10goes to the
16:10polls today
16:11in legislative
16:12elections that
16:13come at a
16:13critical moment
16:14for the
16:14country
16:15the economy
16:16is growing
16:16and Morocco
16:17is investing
16:18heavily in
16:18infrastructure
16:19but many
16:20young
16:20Moroccans
16:21remain
16:21frustrated
16:22by
16:23unemployment
16:23public
16:24services
16:25and the
16:26political
16:26system
16:26they often
16:27feel
16:27disconnected
16:28from
16:28so what
16:30is really
16:30at stake
16:31in this
16:31election
16:31and can
16:32it restore
16:33trust in
16:33politics
16:34to discuss
16:35this I'm
16:35now joined
16:36by Abubakar
16:37Jamai
16:38a Moroccan
16:38writer and
16:39dean of
16:40the Donna
16:40Dill Manning
16:41School of
16:41Global Affairs
16:42at the
16:42American
16:43College of
16:43the
16:43Mediterranean
16:44in
16:44Exxon
16:45Provence
16:45good morning
16:46good to
16:47have you
16:48good morning
16:49thank you
16:49for having
16:50me
16:50so some
16:51critics argue
16:52that Moroccan
16:53elections can
16:54change governments
16:55without fundamentally
16:56changing where
16:57power lies
16:58aka the
16:59monarchy
17:00is that a
17:01fair description
17:01of the
17:02system
17:05absolutely
17:06suffice to
17:07read the
17:08Moroccan
17:08constitution and
17:09to look at the
17:09recent history of
17:10Morocco to see
17:11that when it
17:12comes to the
17:12biggest issues
17:13there are
17:14decision making
17:15processes with
17:16the royal cabinet
17:16and not with
17:17the parliament
17:18the economy
17:20in Morocco
17:20has grown
17:21infrastructure
17:22has expanded
17:23and Morocco
17:24is preparing
17:25for the
17:252030 World
17:26Cup
17:26yet many
17:27young people
17:28feel left
17:29behind
17:29why has
17:30economic
17:31growth not
17:32translated into
17:33enough jobs
17:35because first of
17:36all these economic
17:37growth numbers need
17:38to be put into
17:38perspective so when
17:39we when we talk
17:40about growth in
17:41Morocco and the
17:42last years we had
17:43an average growth
17:44of 4% it might
17:45seem impressive
17:45from a western
17:46country's
17:47perspective but
17:48from an
17:49immersion market
17:50perspective this is
17:51not impressive at
17:51all because Morocco
17:52needs at least 6 to
17:537% growth to
17:55absorb only the
17:56newcomers to the
17:57job market that
17:57launch absorbs
17:58those who are
17:59already unemployed
17:59the second problem
18:01with the Moroccan
18:02system is that it's
18:03kind of a trickle
18:03down system which
18:05is not really
18:06trickling down
18:07resources to the
18:08bottom of the
18:09of the pyramid
18:10so you see this
18:11very shiny project
18:12but they do not
18:12translate into
18:14money in people's
18:15pockets and in
18:16better jobs
18:18and finally
18:19yesterday EPP
18:21leader Manfred
18:22Weber called on
18:23Morocco to take
18:24back all irregular
18:25migrants who entered
18:26the Spanish
18:27enclave Ceuta
18:28warning there would
18:29be consequences if
18:30Rabat wouldn't
18:31act now what do
18:33the elections mean
18:34for Morocco's
18:35relations with the
18:36EU I don't think
18:38much the the
18:39function of a
18:40parliament in a
18:40hybrid or
18:41authoritarian regime
18:42is a shock
18:43absorber absorber
18:45so it means that
18:45really the equation
18:46for the regime is
18:47to give a little bit
18:48of credibility
18:48because to be a
18:49shock absorber you
18:50need to absorb the
18:51shock so you need a
18:52little bit of
18:52credibility without
18:53having really any
18:54political decision
18:56making making power
18:57and the real issue
18:58here which is really
18:59a thorny one is that
19:00Morocco will continue
19:01produce producing you
19:03discontent it's in the
19:04numbers it's inevitable
19:05given the demographic
19:06evolution of the
19:07country and the
19:08failure of the
19:09political economic
19:09system to produce
19:10jobs and hence this
19:11migration pressure
19:13actually are here to
19:14stay with us so
19:16something creative
19:17needs to be found
19:18between the EU and
19:18Morocco to solve that
19:19problem all right
19:21Aboubakar Jamai on the
19:22elections in Morocco
19:23thank you for your
19:24insights that does it
19:26for us today stay tuned
19:28to Euronews throughout
19:29the day thank you for
19:30watching I'm Stefan Grobe
19:32see you tomorrow
19:43you are
19:44you
19:57you
19:58you
20:01you
Comentarios