- 3 hours ago
- #truecrime
- #mystery
- #crime
- #investigation
- #news
Dive into our brand new series, La Última Pista! From shocking influencer mysteries in India to decades-old cold cases cracked by DNA and beer cans, we cover the wildest true crime stories making headlines. Get your detective hat on and join the investigation! Subscribe for more jaw-dropping cases and comment below your favorite moment from this episode. #TrueCrime #Mystery #Crime #Investigation #News
👉 This channel was created in collaboration with https://www.youtube.com/@paul_lando
0:06 - Introduction and Series Overview
1:08 - Influencer Manjit Kaur Murder Case
11:34 - Marilyn Wallman Disappearance in Australia
27:34 - Yolanda Herrera Cold Case Solved by DNA
39:56 - Show Conclusion and Viewer Feedback
We're now available on Spotify! Listen now https://open.spotify.com/show/033MgMUOXQEOYvZBJxmxir
👉 This channel was created in collaboration with https://www.youtube.com/@paul_lando
0:06 - Introduction and Series Overview
1:08 - Influencer Manjit Kaur Murder Case
11:34 - Marilyn Wallman Disappearance in Australia
27:34 - Yolanda Herrera Cold Case Solved by DNA
39:56 - Show Conclusion and Viewer Feedback
We're now available on Spotify! Listen now https://open.spotify.com/show/033MgMUOXQEOYvZBJxmxir
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:06Today we're starting a new series on YouTube called La Ultima Pista because we want to offer
00:13you a space where we'll be talking about current cases that are making headlines in different parts
00:19of the world but that still don't have enough information to be a complete case. Obviously,
00:24the idea is that when the investigations into these cases move forward we can cover them with
00:31all the details. Today we have the murder of an influencer from India and then an Australian case
00:37from 1972 that's about to be solved and another super interesting story where something has now
00:43been discovered thanks to a can of beer. Welcome to La Ultima Pista
01:09Influencer murdered in India
01:13That's the headline in all the media outlets in that country about this case which is currently
01:18the most talked about. Manjit Kauru was an influencer 28 years old with 146 000 followers on Instagram
01:28and who had been hospitalized for two months after being found with severe burns. On August 26 her death
01:36was announced. With her passing a lot of things that didn't make sense began to come to light.
01:44Manjit Kauru created different types of content on social media mainly about lifestyle beauty and makeup
01:51but she was also popular for doing lip syncs with songs in Punjabi and Hari Ambi languages.
02:00On July 9 2026 Manjit had been admitted to the hospital with severe burns covering 40 to 45 percent of
02:08her body.
02:11In the hospital records she was admitted with the description that she had suffered those burns
02:17due to an accidental leak from a liquefied petroleum gas cylinder.
02:24That's what was mentioned in this document. At that time when she was hospitalized the family was called and
02:32went to the hospital. They saw the condition Manjit was in and were notified that Manjit was unconscious.
02:41The only concern that family obviously had at that moment was that their daughter would survive.
02:48In those first days they tried to talk with friends and acquaintances. We're talking about the family
02:55to find out what had happened. But they couldn't talk to anyone. No one who had been at the scene.
03:02Everything was a mystery.
03:04That was until a month later Manjit woke up.
03:09It was on August 5th 2026 almost a month after the accident and
03:16nobody had much information about what had happened. Manjit woke up briefly and at that moment asked to speak with
03:23the police
03:23to tell what had been agreed upon. But the police never showed up. This is according to the statement.
03:30The statement from the mother. The authorities supposedly said that they did go to take her
03:36statement and that they forwarded the complaint to the investigators and also to the prosecutor's office.
03:42What the media reports is that Manjit woke up briefly.
03:49So, if the police went to the place, as they say, maybe it was already too late.
03:55There is no information that Manjit then fell into a coma again or that he was unconscious.
04:01But there is a lot of talk that he briefly regained consciousness, which could mean that after this
04:09moment he was no longer able to speak. But the mother confirmed that during that period of time,
04:15when Manjit was awake, her daughter told her what had happened. So, what is known about the case so far
04:22is
04:22purely thanks to the testimony of the mother who was able to speak with her daughter according to her
04:27account. Guarding to these statements, on the night of July 3rd to 4th, Manjit had disappeared.
04:36Manjit told her mother that two acquaintances of hers told her they would wait for her near
04:43a liquor store in sector 34 of the city of Chandigarh. Chandigarh. Manjit went to this place and met with
04:53at least three people who at that moment forced her into a vehicle, kidnapped her and took her to a
04:58wooded area in the city of Morinda. When they arrived at the place, Manjit was dragged out of the vehicle.
05:07They beat her and then tied her to a mulberry tree. They soaked the base of the tree and the
05:15victim's
05:16legs with gasoline and then they set her on fire. According to the mother's statement, there were two
05:23people whom her daughter accused, but she only knew their nicknames, which were Shubi, in some media they
05:29mentioned the name, Shubi A, but most say Shubi. And the other person's nickname was Pinda.
05:37The mother couldn't confirm the gender of these people and she also didn't know the name of the
05:42third person her daughter said was involved. When she told her everything that had happened,
05:48everything she had experienced, then something happened that we don't really know where it came
05:54from. The mother got this information because it could have been that Manjit told her or maybe
05:59by then. Manjit had already lost consciousness and the mother was able to verify this account
06:06by talking to friends. But according to this part of the story, when the fire was still burning Manjit's
06:12body, a friend arrived at the scene. Here we can only speculate. Maybe he found out what had happened
06:19and went there to try to save her because we really don't know how this person, who we also believe
06:28is a man, got to where all this was happening and he was. Friend of Manjit, what we do know
06:37is that
06:38this friend put out the fire with a sheet he had in the car, untied her and took her in
06:43his vehicle to
06:44the Morinda hospital. We don't know if this was the friend who stated at the hospital that this had
06:53been an accident because in the hospital records it only says that the reason for admission was
07:00accidental burns. It doesn't say that it was a statement from the person who took her to the
07:05hospital but at the same time this was the person who brought the victim to that place and normally in
07:12hospitals they asked the companion questions if the victim is already unconscious which apparently
07:19is how Manjit ended up at that facility. If this were true why would this friend say something like
07:28that knowing it wasn't an accident? It was obvious according to Manjit's account to his mother that she
07:34had been kidnapped and someone had tried to kill her and the crime scene with her being tied up and
07:41beaten would also confirm that it was definitely not an accident. Now even though we don't know who
07:49this third person is it could have been one of those involved who later regretted it or it could have
07:56simply been a friend who found out about the situation but so far we don't really know who it is.
08:03After 54 days in the hospital Manjit Kaur unfortunately passed away the official cause is not well known
08:12because the autopsy documents were not released but several media outlets mentioned sepsis or multiple
08:20organ failure due to severe burns. What was made public was that Manjit was pregnant. One media outlet
08:29reported that she was seven weeks pregnant but the deputy sub-inspector of the police said something
08:34completely different. The autopsy determined that she was 12 weeks pregnant either way this raised the
08:45big question about the motivation for the crime. Was the pregnancy the motive for the murder? As for
08:53Shubi and Pinda the people that the mother mentioned as the possible culprits of the murder.
08:59They were listed as suspects but so far they have not been captured. Later a third name would come to
09:07light which would be Rinku. But again we don't know if this is the third person that Manjit mentioned who
09:15also kidnapped her. The last thing that was known about the case because the mother spoke to the media
09:21was that Manjit had allegedly had a romantic relationship with one of the suspects and that's
09:26when the theory about the pregnancy which was also unwanted gains strength. The mother stated just a few
09:34days ago that the relationship was with the third suspect with Rinku. The mother said in the media she
09:41told the press that Rinku told Manjit that she should terminate the pregnancy but she didn't want to do it.
09:50That's when the threats supposedly began. It's important to mention. In this case there are
09:56basically two or three versions of what happened. What the police are saying which right now isn't much
10:02because they're still investigating and what the media are reporting which sometimes doesn't fit the
10:08official narrative. And there have also been many leaks from the investigation reported in the media
10:15and most of the information comes from what the mother says. The mother said that she spoke with
10:22her daughter when she was briefly conscious. She keeps releasing information and accusations that have
10:30not yet been proven by the authorities. The mother's main theory is that Rinku decided to get rid of Manjit
10:36because she was pregnant and because she didn't want to end that pregnancy. With this information we can
10:43speculate about everything. Maybe the other possible people involved were friends of this man. Or maybe
10:51Rinku could have had a relationship with another woman who was official and the pregnancy could affect
10:58her. But the truth is that little to nothing is officially known about this case other than what the
11:04mother keeps mentioning publicly. The remnants will keep appearing and probably when they catch those
11:10involved charge them and everything goes to trial. We'll know exactly what happened to the influencer Manjit Kaur.
11:33This case even though it's already 54 years old is being talked about a lot because now it was
11:40announced that in a week it will be reopened to try to solve it. Marilyn Joy Wallman was 14 years
11:47old and
11:48lived with her family on a sugar cane farm on the outskirts of Mackay. This is located in the province
11:54or state of Queensland in Australia. Today this area is much more populated. But in 1972 when this event
12:02happened there were hardly any houses and for the most part they were farms or country houses. On Tuesday
12:09March 21 1972 Marilyn had to go to school with her siblings. They would live on their bicycles all
12:18together up to the school bus stop that was at the corner of Wallman Road and Aimeo Road.
12:28At a place called Rural Youth Hall where they would leave their bicycles and wait for the 8 o'clock
12:34bus.
12:37Marilyn apparently was ready before her two brothers. The brothers are named David who was 11 years old
12:45at the time and Brex who was 8. So Marilyn left the house first. Marilyn said goodbye to her mother
12:53first
12:54and at 7 42 am she left the house to go to the bus stop. Ten minutes later her brothers
13:03left. They thought
13:05they could catch up with Marilyn so they tried to go as fast as possible. When they were about to
13:12reach
13:13the stop a kilometer from the house next to a sugar cane field they saw that their sister's bicycle and
13:20backpack were lying on the road and several books and notebooks were scattered on the street. The two
13:28brothers got off their bicycles looked around and started shouting Marilyn's name but no one answered.
13:36At that moment David the older brother decided to go back home to notify their parents while Rex the
13:45younger brother stayed at the scene. Rex who as I said is the younger brother would later state that while
13:52he was left alone he claimed that he had someone talking on the other side of the sugar cane field.
14:01To put ourselves in this situation so it's easier to understand there was the bicycle, the backpack,
14:06the books scattered on a road, a street that wasn't an avenue, it wasn't a highway, it was just an
14:15ordinary
14:16street so to speak. Next to this, next to this street there was a sugar cane field. Yes there were
14:24plants. I mean you
14:26couldn't see to the other side but the younger brother at that moment when he was waiting he heard some
14:33voices.
14:33The younger brother's statements. The statements from that exact moment changed over the years but that's
14:41because we're talking about a child who over time started to remember more things. Or at least that's
14:48what the police say. In 2015 for example he stated that he remembered hearing a voice saying I hurt my
14:57leg
14:57which was possibly his sister talking to someone else whose identity is unknown.
15:05He also said that he heard murmurs coming from the sugar cane field.
15:11When David, the older brother, arrived at the house distraught he told their parents what they had seen.
15:18And at that moment the parents went to the area with their son and saw that scene. The bicycle. The
15:24bicycle was
15:25lying on the ground, the backpack and books scattered. And Rex, the younger brother, was next to the bicycle,
15:32waiting and scared. The father and mother started searching the area at that moment. Specifically,
15:39the sugar cane field. But they couldn't find Marilyn anywhere. That same day other searches were carried
15:47out. This time with the authorities. And that's when they found the hat Marilyn was wearing to go to school.
15:54That morning inside the sugar cane field. I mean, yes, the hat was found inside the sugar cane field.
16:02In the following days, the largest search in the history of that city would be carried out,
16:08but nothing new was found. Marilyn's father went out every day to look for his daughter,
16:16and her mother was so affected that she started needing medication to calm herself down.
16:23The investigation was intense, but the only thing that could be confirmed thanks to witnesses,
16:29was that a suspicious vehicle had been seen circling the area, driving around repeatedly,
16:34and moving slowly. And this vehicle was a two-tone Holden sedan, light blue and white. Although it was
16:43significant evidence, they were never able to confirm if that vehicle was the one that kidnapped Marilyn.
16:51The case went cold until two and a half years later. In October 1974, a fragment of human skull was
17:00found
17:00near a place called McGregor Creek, about four kilometers from where Marilyn went missing.
17:10We're talking about the 1970s. At that time, there was no way to analyze the DNA from the skull to
17:16confirm
17:17it belonged to the girl, but even so this remained as evidence in the case.
17:24It wasn't until 2001, almost 30 years after the disappearance, that they were able to do a
17:30mitochondrial DNA test, which made it possible to discover that the skull fragment found had a link to
17:37Marilyn's mother. It should be said that although this was a significant breakthrough, it couldn't be
17:45confirmed 100 percent that it belonged to the victim, but that link was enough to assume that
17:51Marilyn had been murdered. In 2006, that's when the authorities officially confirmed that the remains
18:00were those of Marilyn Wallman. The FBI helped with the investigation by comparing the skull fragment with
18:07the mother's DNA. But it wasn't until 2015 that this information became public because everything was
18:16sealed because obviously the investigation was ongoing. They were still investigating. They couldn't release such
18:24important confidential information. After more than 40 years, it was a kind of closure for the family.
18:32They always had hope that their daughter could still be alive somewhere in the world. It's something
18:38normal when we talk about families of kidnapped victims, that even though they know that their relative
18:45could be dead, could be dead. Every now and then there are news stories about victims being found.
18:51After years, after decades of being missing. So that leaves the families who still haven't found anything with
19:01the hope of being reunited soon with their loved ones who were kidnapped. At the same time being able to
19:09confirm this was being able to give his daughter an official burial and thus begin to fight
19:15to find the person or people responsible for the murder. These remains that were found were given to the
19:23family and on March 6, 2015 the funeral was held. Exactly on the date of marrying Joy Wallman's 57th birthday.
19:34Even though they didn't have the whole body. This is done symbolically to have an official place for the
19:41family to visit and also to honor their daughter's short life. More than 300 people dressed in yellow
19:49attended this event and this was because that color was Marilyn's favorite. In 2016 excavations were carried
20:00out again with specialists and geologists in the same area where the skull fragment had been found.
20:07But unfortunately there were no positive results in this process. The last thing that was known
20:14about the case before what has been happening in recent weeks was that in 2018 the police increased the
20:22reward for information related to the case. They went from a reward of 180 000 US dollars to 360 000
20:33dollars.
20:35And also the police said they were looking for additional information to try to solve the case.
20:45Which at the end of the day was something positive because Marilyn's story came out again in the media
20:51and it meant that it was still relevant. And it also gave hope to many people obviously to the family
20:59as
20:59well. When the authorities made this statement something unexpected occurred.
21:07The media outlet Nine News went to the house of a man in the area because this man had a
21:13vehicle very
21:13similar to the one described by witnesses. I'm gonna clarify that apparently the man no longer had that
21:21vehicle but this media outlet found out that at that time he did. In that year when the disappearance
21:28first happened this man had that vehicle. This man's name is Noel Morris and he was indeed a person of
21:38interest in the investigation precisely because of the car that as I said he had at the time the crime
21:45was committed. A journalist from that television network went to a mobile home park where this
21:52man was living in 2018. They knocked on his door and when this man opened the door they put a
21:59camera in
21:59front of him and the journalist asked him directly if he had killed Marilyn Wallman to which Noel said
22:08I didn't do it. I assure you now I didn't do it and that was it. Subscribe. This person was
22:17a person of
22:18interest but was never charged. Eight years passed since this last update but now this story is being
22:27talked about again because on October 7th of this year this hearing will take place a hearing about this
22:35case with 14 witnesses. We don't know if Noel Morris will be one of the witnesses because the the list
22:44wasn't published in the media but it's speculated that he could be part of this hearing. What they are
22:52going to try to answer with this new process are several questions. When and where did Marilyn die?
23:00What was the cause of death and who might have been involved? What is worth clarifying is that
23:07today it is known that Noel Morris ended up being a person of interest because he had a vehicle similar
23:13to the one that had been seen in the area. When did the disappearance happen? But after the hearing
23:19we'll know whether or not this man is involved in the murder. Another piece of information that came out
23:28was that Noel also knew the family because he had married into the Wallman family. He wasn't a stranger.
23:36He was practically a relative who drove the same vehicle that was seen and who lived in the area in
23:441916.
23:45Also if he a knew the kids maybe he had seen them in the past. This is speculation. Maybe he
23:56had seen in
23:57the past that Marilyn used to arrive alone at the stop. Like I said this is just speculation.
24:05But let's hope these are the details that can be clarified as soon as the hearing on the case is
24:12held.
24:15And what makes this story even stranger is that there was another person who drew attention
24:21because of the connections that were found with the case.
24:27When all this happened with the media, when they went to Noel Morris' house, he was with another
24:32person named Graven Bretzel.
24:37And why is this man important? Because he was the one who found the fragment of Marilyn's skull in 1974.
24:47I mean, it had been 44 years between the skull fragment being found and Noel Morris' interview from 1974 to
25:002018.
25:05In 2018, the outlet that published this didn't claim that this man was accused nor did they accuse Noel Morris.
25:16Until now, it's not known if they are involved.
25:19But that's a detail that's pretty crazy about this case.
25:22The one who found the skull two and a half years after Marilyn disappeared.
25:27And the man who was driving a similar vehicle to the one seen in the area who also had ties
25:34to the family.
25:35They were together when the nine-news reporter asked Noel Morris if he had killed the girl.
25:43Again, 44 years after the skull was found.
25:4946 years later, from the disappearance and death of Marilyn, it seems really crazy to me.
25:57Over the years, there were another possible suspect, not officially identified by the authorities.
26:03But this was talked about a lot on social media.
26:06And it's an old criminal case that happened in a city near where Marilyn's case took place.
26:12Arthur Stanley Brown was charged in 1970 with kidnapping and murder of the sisters Judith and Susan McKay, aged five
26:23and seven respectively.
26:25He never went to trial because the first trial was declared a mistrial if they couldn't reach a decision.
26:34And in the second trial, they determined that he was medically unfit to stand trial due to having dementia and
26:43Alzheimer's.
26:44And this case had happened in the city of Townsville, not in Mackay, which are two different cities located in
26:53Queensland.
26:53I think this case is going to get people talking because that coincidence of the two men, one who found
27:00the skull and was in the house of the person of interest, 44 years later, makes me feel like it's
27:07not really a coincidence.
27:08Obviously, we're not confirming it, but like I said, we'll probably know more about this later on as the investigation
27:16progresses.
27:32This is a case that apparently is about to be solved.
27:36On August 31, 2026, after more than 45 years of this mystery, the police announced that some time ago they
27:46had found DNA.
27:47This would finally bring closure to what happened to a woman named Yolanda Herrera.
27:55And I'm going to explain to you first what happened and then the developments they uncovered.
28:00In 1981, in the early morning of Saturday, April 11th, Yolanda was 23 years old and had disappeared after leaving
28:09work.
28:10She worked at a bar called Johnny's Inn, located in the city of Universal City in Texas, and this place
28:17is on the outskirts of San Antonio.
28:21Witnesses who saw her at that bar said that Yolanda had left work at 2.30am, which was when the
28:30place closed its doors.
28:33She had started working at that bar because it was very close to her grandmother's house, so she would walk
28:40there and back.
28:41And it's estimated that the distance between her grandmother's house and the bar was about 700 meters.
28:49At that time, Yolanda was living at her grandmother's place because she was going through a divorce.
28:56And every time she went back to the bar, she just had to walk straight down the street called Aviation
29:03Boulevard.
29:04This means that in those few minutes, we can estimate between 5 to 10 minutes, which is how long it
29:12might take to walk 700 meters.
29:14That's when she was kidnapped or ran into someone she knew.
29:18Two days later, on Monday, April 30, 1981, her body was found by two miners.
29:26These kids were walking to school when they crossed the 500 block of East Aviation Drive.
29:35And at that moment, they saw Yolanda's completely naked body in a vacant lot.
29:41Something the police clarified was that even though many vehicles passed by there,
29:48the weeds and mounds of dirt kept the body from being seen from the street.
29:54Yes, from where the vehicles were passing by.
29:59But if a person was walking on the sidewalk, then it was different.
30:04In fact, the miners mentioned that they saw something strange and approached out of curiosity.
30:10After this, it is mentioned that the children reported it to the police.
30:14But since it was 1981, no, there were no cell phones.
30:19Most likely, they alerted an adult about this situation or about what was happening.
30:25Maybe a neighbor or someone who was walking in the area.
30:30And then the authorities were called.
30:33The body was identified as that of Yolanda Herrera.
30:37And in the autopsy, it was confirmed that the cause of death was multiple injuries from blows all over the
30:43body.
30:44In addition, there were signs that she had been abused.
30:47According to the police report, the body was in such bad condition from the blows that it was almost unrecognizable.
30:55What couldn't be confirmed was whether Yolanda had been killed in that vacant lot or if she was killed somewhere
31:02else.
31:03But later, they transported the body and dumped it there.
31:07This scene had several pieces of evidence, many of which consisted of genetic evidence that was preserved.
31:14The difficult thing about cases from the 80s was that there was still no way to compare the samples.
31:22For this case, they had found genetic material under Yolanda's fingernails, as well as biological fluid from a man.
31:29Do you know what I mean when I say that?
31:31At the same time, it's interesting to see that in these cases, these genetic materials were kept.
31:39So that eventually, in the coming years, with all the advances in genetic research that were coming, they could provide
31:48answers.
31:49It's like they knew that at that moment they couldn't do much.
31:53But eventually, these would be the most compelling pieces of evidence in the case.
31:58That could solve it, and they were right.
32:03After this, Yolanda's case went cold for years.
32:07And in the next 30 to 40 years, there were dozens of suspects, although no names were given.
32:14At that time, there was a lot of talk about the divorce.
32:17So, as usually happens, the closest people are investigated first.
32:23And the reason for the separation could mean that the ex-husband should have been investigated.
32:31Now we need to talk about exactly what I just mentioned.
32:34The advances in DNA.
32:38In the late 1980s, between 1988 and 1999, that people started talking about the possibility of solving cases through these
32:50methods.
32:51That didn't mean they were going to start solving cases, but rather, tests were being done to be able to
32:59use this in criminal investigations.
33:02It was only in the mid-90s that Texas started using a very basic method to try to solve cases.
33:10And in 1998, Yolanda's story would be back in the media thanks to these advances.
33:19The problem was that, given the state of DNA testing in 1998, there was only so much they could compare
33:26at that time.
33:28They could only compare genetic profiles from other cases that were already solved or that still didn't have any suspects.
33:37For example, they would enter the genetic profile from Yolanda's case into the database.
33:43And if there was a match, they would check which case it was from.
33:47If it was an unsolved case, then there was no way to find the suspect.
33:54But they could investigate the cases together to find more evidence, or also to compare other details that could help
34:02solve them.
34:05When this was done, no match was found.
34:09Unfortunately, comparisons were attempted with several suspects, including the ex-husband, but all of them came back negative.
34:16So the list of potential culprits kept getting smaller until it reached zero, and that's how the case went cold.
34:25The strongest hypothesis that was considered, once everyone closest to the victim had been ruled out,
34:33was about a man who possibly saw Yolanda at the bar that early Saturday morning.
34:39He followed her when he saw she was leaving, and then, at some point, during those five to ten minutes
34:47of walking, he attacked her.
34:51Since he was someone who hadn't committed other crimes, it was thought that this man might have been drunk,
34:59tried to seduce Yolanda, she refused, and the man reacted in the worst possible way.
35:07Almost 30 years later, at the end of 2020, Yolanda's case was chosen to be part of an initiative to
35:15analyze old cases.
35:17With genetic material preserved, along with an advancing sample comparison,
35:22a year later, the case was once again put on hold because the preserved genetic material was not, it was
35:29not enough.
35:31There wasn't enough to reach a conclusion.
35:35In 2021, they were able to do another test, but the only thing they could identify was a last name.
35:43They still couldn't build a family line to isolate the DNA to a single person,
35:49and the last name that was found at that time was Brower or Brower.
35:56If the only difference was an O and an E, Brower, Brower.
36:02In the same way, this was significant for the case in the year 2025.
36:07We're talking about four years after what I just mentioned.
36:11A private company called O-Tram was able to produce a profile suitable for forensic genetic genealogy.
36:20What they did was look for family connections, and that way they were able to identify a possible suspect.
36:26This profile was identified as Kelly Lee Peregrination.
36:31There we can see that what they found about the last name four years earlier matched this profile.
36:39The problem was that this process produces an investigative lead,
36:45but it doesn't replace direct forensic comparison.
36:48I mean, the authorities had a first and last name,
36:53and now they had to start working to officially link this man to the case.
37:01In October 2025, the authorities made a plan.
37:05They picked up a garbage bag from the potential suspect's house,
37:10and there they found a can of curse-like beer.
37:13When they analyzed the beer can, they found genetic material, and the result came back positive.
37:19The sample on the beer can was connected to the first and last name that the company O-Tram produced
37:25in their analysis.
37:28Now, this, again, was not enough.
37:31Now, they had to compare these samples with the genetic material found at the crime scene,
37:36but not until August 13th, 2026.
37:41Recently, the investigation had solid evidence to confront him.
37:46That was when Kelly Lee Brower, who at that time was 68 years old,
37:52was interrogated in Arizona where he was living at that time.
37:56At first, he denied having known Yolanda.
37:58But on August 18th, according to the police, Kelly confessed to having murdered Yolanda.
38:04And this was in his second interview.
38:06What we know about this man is that he has no criminal record except for a theft report.
38:12And so far, it's not known if he was the customer at the bar that morning,
38:17or if he ran into Yolanda when she was walking to her grandmother's place.
38:21This will eventually be known at the time of the crime.
38:25He was the same age as Yolanda.
38:28He was 23 years old.
38:29And shortly after the crime, he went to Arizona, which was where he lived until the moment of his arrest.
38:37That's how this case finally got an official suspect.
38:41Until now, the hearing where Kelly has to plead guilty or not guilty hasn't happened yet.
38:47And depending on that, it will be known if there will be a trial.
38:51Kelly Lee Brower could face the death penalty if the prosecution decides to request it.
38:56But if not, she could receive life imprisonment.
39:00That also happens.
39:02Something interesting.
39:03Because it's an old crime, according to Texas law, capital murders, committed between 1977 and 1983.
39:13If they are sentenced to life imprisonment, they have the right to the possibility of parole after serving 20 years,
39:21since currently there is also life imprisonment, but without the possibility of parole.
39:28What's the difference between a case from 1981 and the current one?
39:32I mean, I just want to clarify, there is also, the possibility of parole in Texas nowadays,
39:40but there's also the possibility of no parole, that's what changes, I don't know if that makes sense.
39:47That would mean that Kelly would be in prison until he's almost 90 years old.
39:56Since this is a new show we're launching, I want to know what you think.
40:00What do you think?
40:01Do you like hearing about new cases?
40:04Do you want us to keep looking for stories that have just been solved or happened recently?
40:09Since these cases usually don't have that much information,
40:13I think it's ideal to tell them this way, and we can also do them weekly.
40:17What do you think?
40:18I want to read your opinions, because you should know that we really take your opinions into account.
40:24We read the comments you leave us, and just to emphasize, we really take your opinions into account.
40:32At the end of the day, this is a channel made for you, and your opinions are more than welcome.
40:38This was La Ultima Pista.
40:41Kita.
41:07This was La Ultima Pista.