00:00it will need to move somewhere cheaper. May I just ask you on that specific point because I did read
00:05your op-ed in the Daily Mail today where you mentioned this and you say it means cutting
00:11housing allowance because poorer taxpayers shouldn't pay for people on housing benefits
00:17to live in areas they could never afford. Am I wrong to interpret that and you've just said
00:23something very similar just now. Am I wrong to interpret that as you saying there should be
00:28areas where rich people live and that and that if you are not rich you should not live in those
00:34areas you shouldn't aspire to live in an area that has I don't know better services. I think I think
00:41you should aspire to live wherever you want to live but you shouldn't aspire for the government
00:46ie other taxpayers to pay for you to live wherever you don't want to mix kind of wealthy people and
00:53people on benefits in areas. No not at all.
Comments