Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 7 weeks ago
The 100th anniversary World Cup is expected to be one of the most symbolic sporting events in modern football history, but the celebration may be overshadowed by structural, political, and commercial risks.

As anticipation grows, so does concern that the tournament could be undermined by scheduling disputes, logistics failures, climate pressures, and escalating commercial ambitions.

Instead of becoming a once-in-a-century celebration of the global game, the event could be remembered for controversy, uneven planning, and poor competitive balance.
Transcript
00:00Football's biggest stage turns 100 years old in 2030. Spain, Portugal and Morocco are set
00:06to host it, with commemorative matches in Uruguay, Argentina and Paraguay to mark the exact spot
00:12where it all began. And right now, the tournament that's supposed to celebrate a century of
00:16the World Cup is caught in the middle of a fight between FIFA and the very countries
00:21that are supposed to play in it. So this week, something happened that nobody saw coming.
00:26Europe's 55 football nations got on a call, and by the end of it, they'd agreed to walk away from
00:31FIFA entirely, World Cup included, unless one plan gets pulled off the table. Here's how the 100th
00:37anniversary World Cup ended up on the brink. Let's start with what actually happened this week,
00:43because this is the part everyone's talking about. On July 30, UEFA held an emergency virtual meeting
00:49with all 55 of its member associations. Sources told ESPN that over 50 of those associations took
00:57the floor during that call, and every single one of them was angry. By the end of the meeting,
01:01UEFA had agreed to boycott all future FIFA competitions until the sell-off plan is abandoned.
01:07Read that again. All future FIFA competitions. Not just a strongly worded letter. Not a symbolic
01:15protest vote. A full boycott. And here's what that actually means in practice. The decision means
01:21that major nations including Germany, France, England and world champion Spain would not
01:27participate in the men's or women's World Cups. Spain the team that just won the whole thing.
01:32Germany. France. England. Gone. Not competing. That's four of the biggest footballing nations on
01:39the planet. And that's before you even count the other 51 UEFA countries standing behind them. The
01:45first place this gets tested isn't even the World Cup itself. The first test of this stance will come
01:51in September, when Poland is due to host the women's U20 World Cup. If UEFA holds the line there,
01:57that tournament could be missing European teams within weeks, not years. Now UEFA didn't just quietly
02:03notify FIFA and move on. They put out a statement, and it does not read like typical football
02:09association language. It reads like a declaration. The statement says UEFA and its national associations
02:15will not participate in FIFA competitions, and that UEFA and its 55-member associations stand as one.
02:22Unanimously and unequivocally rejecting FIFA's proposal to transfer ownership interests in the
02:27World Cup and other FIFA competitions to private investors. They go further. The statement calls the
02:34World Cup, a sporting legacy built over generations by players, national teams and supporters across
02:40every continent, and says no part of it should ever be surrendered to private investors. The World Cup
02:46is not for sale. That's not diplomatic wording. That's a governing body telling the president of world
02:52football, in public, that he's crossed a line. And UEFA didn't leave any wiggle room on how long this
02:58boycott lasts either. No UEFA national teams will participate in any FIFA competition, for as long
03:05as the proposals remain alive. Unless the proposal is abandoned, in its entirety and binding assurances,
03:11are given that FIFA will never again open its governance or competitions to private ownership.
03:17Not will reconsider, not lets negotiate the percentage, full abandonment or nothing. The statement closes with a
03:23line that's already being repeated across every football outlet covering this. There are
03:28moments when institutions are judged not by what they are prepared to accept, but by what they refuse
03:33to compromise. This is one of those moments. Some things are simply, not for sale, is how UEFA finishes
03:40that thought. So why would UEFA blow up their relationship with FIFA entirely, over one financial
03:46proposal? To understand that, you have to go back a few days, to the moment this whole plan became public.
03:52And once you see what Infantino actually proposed, you'll understand why 50-plus football
03:57associations got on a call, and decided this was worth burning the relationship down over.
04:02Because this isn't just a disagreement about money. It's a disagreement about who the World Cup
04:08even belongs to. And that question is about to get a lot messier, before it gets any clearer.
04:14So here's what set this whole thing off. Earlier in the week, days before that emergency call,
04:19FIFA President Gianni Infantino, revealed a plan to bring outside investors into the World Cup itself.
04:25Specifically, into a new company. That company is called FIFA Forward Enterprise, or FFE for short.
04:32The plan would form a company, FIFA Forward Enterprises, to run FIFA's commercial operations.
04:38Though FIFA itself, which has non-profit status in Switzerland, would continue both as the governing
04:43body of soccer, and a majority shareholder in FFE. On paper, FIFA keeps control. In practice,
04:50a chunk of the World Cup's commercial engine, broadcasting, sponsorship, ticketing, licensing,
04:55would now have private shareholders sitting at the table. And the number attached to this thing
05:00is not small. FIFA publicly announced the proposal to create the subsidiary, instantly valued at $20
05:06billion. With a plan to seek out investors to buy roughly 20% of these shares for the grand sum
05:12of $4.2
05:13billion, spread between FIFA's member associations. $20 billion is the number people keep repeating,
05:20but the actual sale on the table is that 20% slice, valued at just over $4 billion.
05:26Now, who's actually buying in? This is where it gets interesting, because the names involved aren't
05:31random hedge funds nobody's heard of. Thrive Capital, which is run by Joshua Kushner,
05:36whose brother, Jard, is the president's special peace envoy and son-in-law, is reportedly expected
05:42to lead the investor group. On top of that, Apollo Global Management, whose CEO Mark Rowan is both on
05:48Trump's board of peace and a major campaign contributor, has also been linked as a potential investor,
05:54and handling the numbers on FIFA's side. Joey Paul
05:57Morgan is acting as FIFA's financial advisor. So you've got a sitting American president's
06:03brother-in-law's investment firm, a political ally's private equity fund, and one of the largest banks
06:09in the world, all-circling football's showcase tournament. That combination alone was enough to
06:14raise eyebrows before a single euro or dollar changed hands. Infantino didn't just float this
06:20quietly and wait for feedback either. He attached a deadline and a financial incentive. Infantino has
06:27set a SEPT-19 deadline for associations to accept the plan. And according to multiple reports,
06:33the reason associations might say yes is an abstract. Infantino had sent a letter to FIFA's member
06:39associations, saying they will each receive $40 million if they back the plan, but they must sign
06:45up by September 19. $40 million is life-changing money for a lot of FIFA's 211 member federations.
06:53Places that can't afford proper training pitches, let alone academies. And that's exactly the point
06:59Infantino has been making publicly. In a video responding to the backlash, he argued that too
07:05little of football's commercial value reached the parts of the game that need it most. His pitch to the
07:10smaller nations is simple. This money builds academies and infrastructure that would otherwise
07:15never exist. And here's the part that explains why Infantino is pushing this so hard despite the anger
07:21from Europe. Every member nation, 211 in total, receives one vote regardless of whether it is
07:27Spain or San Marino. And the smallest federations collectively possess far greater electoral power
07:33than Europe's traditional heavyweights. Infantino has spent years building relationships with those
07:38smaller federations. Since his election in 2016, Infantino has consistently strengthened his position
07:45by increasing development funding to these smaller national associations, and this proposal follows the
07:50same blueprint, only on a much bigger scale. So this isn't a plan built for the countries,
07:55who already have billion-dollar broadcast deals and sold-out stadiums. It's built for the majority
08:01of FIFA's membership, who have never seen money like this in their federation's history. Which is
08:06exactly why UEFA, representing the confederation with the deepest pockets and the most leverage,
08:12felt like it was being outflanked before it even had a say. FIFA has been careful about how
08:17it frames the control question too. In an earlier statement, the organization insisted it would
08:22retain sole control of FFE and exclusive authority over football governance, competitions, match
08:28calendar, and all regulatory and sporting decisions. The message from Zurich is,
08:33relax, we're not selling the World Cup, we're selling a slice of the spreadsheet behind it.
08:38But that message did not land the way FIFA hoped. Because almost the second the plan became public,
08:43it wasn't just UEFA that pushed back. It was pretty much everyone. Here's the thing,
08:49this isn't a UEFA vs Infantino story. Within days of the plan going public, reactions started stacking
08:55up from every direction, and none of them were kind. Start with the person who used to run FIFA.
09:01Sepp Blatter, Infantino's predecessor, a man who spent years fighting off his own corruption allegations,
09:07came out swinging. Blatter posted that the close relationship between the FIFA president
09:11and the US president has reached a financial dimension that is deeply damaging football.
09:17He followed that up with a blunt line that's been quoted everywhere since.
09:21No one has the right to sell our game. When the guy who himself became a symbol of FIFA corruption
09:25is telling you you've gone too far, that's a signal worth paying attention to.
09:30Then there's the political reaction. Andy Burnham, the UK's new Prime Minister,
09:35weighed in publicly against the plan, joining a chorus that stretched well past football's usual circles.
09:40From European football's governing body, UEFA, to the United Kingdom's new Prime Minister,
09:46Andy Burnham, FIFA's plan has been slammed. And the European Union didn't hold back either.
09:51Glenn Micheleff, the EU's Commissioner for Sport, posted a three-word reaction that's now become
09:56something of a rallying cry. Hands off our game, Glenn Micheleff, the EU Commissioner for Sport,
10:02posted on X. It wasn't just Europe's politicians and Europe's federations either. This is the part that
10:08really seemed to catch FIFA off guard. The other confederations around the world felt blindsided
10:13too. CONCACAF, which runs football across North and Central America, put out its own statement
10:19saying it was deeply concerned by the lack of due process. Meanwhile, over in Asia,
10:24the Asian Football Confederation said it was disappointed, it had not been consulted. Think about
10:29that for a second. This wasn't Europe throwing a tantrum, because they didn't like the terms.
10:35Confederations representing Asia and North and Central America were saying they found out about
10:40this the same way everyone else did, through leaks and media reports, not through FIFA actually
10:45talking to them first. UEFA's own language, in its first response before the full boycott vote,
10:51described the plan as something that crosses a line that football's governing institutions
10:55should never cross. They followed it with a line that's been repeated across nearly every outlet
11:01covering this story. The sole and governance of football are not assets to trade, especially
11:06with zero transparency, as to who gains financially. None of us are the owners of football. It is not
11:12FIFA's to sell. That phrase, zero transparency, as to who gains financially, is doing a lot of work.
11:19Because nobody outside FIFA's inner circle has seen the full list of who's actually going to own a piece
11:25of this thing, how the profits get split. Or what kind of say those investors get behind closed doors,
11:31regardless of what FIFA's public statements promise about retaining control. Infantino,
11:36for his part, hasn't backed down publicly. He's framed this as opportunity rather than obligation.
11:42FIFA President Gianni Infantino said the proposed launch of a private subsidiary
11:47to exploit the commercial benefits of the World Cup was an opportunity but not an obligation.
11:52Behind the scenes though, the pressure campaign looks a lot less relaxed.
11:56Multiple reports say Infantino has warned that federations who don't get on board risk
12:01losing out entirely. According to multiple reports, Infantino has given members a 53-day deadline
12:08until sept 19 to back his plans to sell stakes in the World Cup or face a 75% reduction
12:15in potential
12:16funding. So it's carrot and stick at the same time. 40 million dollars if you sign by
12:21September. A massive funding cut if you don't. For federations that already run on shoestring
12:27budgets, that's not really a choice, it's coercion dressed up as an offer. And that dynamic is a big
12:33part of why so many associations, even outside UEFA, are uneasy, even if they haven't gone as far as
12:39threatening a boycott themselves. And just when you think the temperature can't rise any further,
12:44reports emerged that FIFA wasn't planning to wait around for everyone to get comfortable with the idea.
12:49This is where the story takes a turn that made an already tense situation even worse. Because while
12:55UEFA was organizing its emergency meeting and federations across the world were publicly demanding
13:01more transparency, FIFA was apparently working on a plan to speed the whole thing up in private.
13:06According to reporting from Sky News, Infantino had put together a confidential presentation,
13:11laying out how the deal could close far sooner than anyone outside FIFA realized. In the face of rampant
13:17backlash from national and player associations alike, FIFA President Gianni Infantino has reportedly put
13:24together a confidential presentation demonstrating how funding for his plan to sell off stakes of the
13:30World Cup could be completed by October. Let that sink in. The plan only became public a few days earlier.
13:37It was only on Tuesday, July 28, that FIFA publicly announced the proposal to create a subsidiary company,
13:43the FIFA forward enterprise. Instantly valued at $20 billion, which would control the commercial
13:49interests of FIFA's biggest men's and women's competitions, namely the World Cup and Club World
13:55Cup. And yet, according to the documents Sky News reviewed, Infantino expects to have all the funding
14:01acquired by the end of October. Barely three months after every association discovered this proposal,
14:06desperately short of any detail through the media. Three months. From here's the idea to money in the
14:13bank, while federations were still trying to figure out who the investors even were. And that's really
14:18the piece that turned frustration into fury. It wasn't just the money, or even the involvement of
14:24politically connected investors. It was the sense that this whole thing was being run on a track,
14:29designed to outpace anyone's ability to organize resistance. FIFA's own public messaging,
14:35tried to soften that, by insisting the investors wouldn't hold real power. FIFA insists that the
14:40private investors, the first of which has already been confirmed to be Thrive, a venture capital firm
14:45run by Joshua Kushner, the younger brother of Jard Kushner, US. President Donald Trump's son-in-law,
14:52will have no controlling stake in operations, and instead offer their expertise. The language in
14:57Infantino's presentation, as described by Sky News, framed the deal as something that would unlock. In his
15:03words, the next era of growth for the sport commercially. But no controlling stake, doesn't
15:08mean no stake. And that distinction is exactly what UEFA's statement zeroed in on, when it talked
15:14about institutions being judged, by what they refuse to compromise on. Because once you sell 20% of the
15:20commercial engine behind the World Cup, to outside investors, even without formal voting control,
15:26those investors have a financial interest in how the tournament is run. How it's scheduled, how it's
15:31marketed, for decades to come. That's the backdrop the emergency UEFA call happened against. 55
15:38federations, watching a deal that was originally pitched as a slow, careful, transparent process
15:43suddenly looked like it was on a fast track toward completion by autumn, with a September 19 signing
15:49deadline attached, and financial penalties, for anyone who didn't fall in line. And it's worth
15:54remembering what year this all lands, in the middle of. The World Cup UEFA is threatening to sit out,
16:00isn't just any World Cup. The 2030 edition will make history again, with Morocco, Portugal and Spain
16:06serving as the main hosts, while also celebrating the tournament's 100th anniversary. With a special
16:12event and match held at Uruguay's Estadio Centenario in Montevideo, the site of the first World Cup final,
16:19in 1930. Argentina and Paraguay will also host one match each in Buenos Aires and Asuncion,
16:25making 2030 the first World Cup played across multiple confederations. Six countries. Three
16:31continents. A tournament literally built to honour 100 years of history, stretching back to that first
16:37final in Montevideo. And right now, the countries who have won the majority of those 100 years of World
16:43Cups are the ones threatening not to show up. So where does this actually leave the 2030 tournament,
16:49and everything before it? Right now nothing is settled. The deadline in Fantino, set for federations
16:55to sign onto the FFE plan, is September 19. UEFA's boycott holds only as long as the plan stays alive
17:02in its current form. Unless the proposal is abandoned, in its entirety and binding assurances
17:07are given that FIFA will never again open its governance or competitions to private ownership.
17:13That's an all-or-nothing condition, and it means there's no obvious middle ground on the table right
17:18now. The nearest test comes fast. The first test of this stance will come in September,
17:24when Poland is due to host the Women's U20 World Cup. If European teams actually sit that one out,
17:30it stops being a threat on paper, and starts being a real, visible gap in a FIFA competition,
17:35broadcast to the world. Missing a huge chunk of the continent's best young talent. But the leverage
17:41question cuts both ways. Europe has produced the winner of six of the last eight World Cups,
17:47despite having just above a quarter of FIFA's membership. Take Germany, France,
17:51England and Spain out of a World Cup, and you've gutted the tournament's biggest broadcast draws,
17:56and its most successful footballing nations in one move. That's not a threat FIFA can just shrug off,
18:02no matter how many smaller federations are ready to take the $40 million and sign.
18:07At the same time, Infantino's political math hasn't gone anywhere either. Every member nation gets one
18:13vote regardless of whether it's Spain or San Marino. And the smallest federations collectively possess
18:19far greater electoral power than Europe's traditional heavyweights. If enough of FIFA's 211 members take the
18:26offer and back the plan by September, Infantino could push it through on a vote even with Europe standing
18:31against it, setting up a genuine standoff between the confederation with the money and the prestige,
18:37and the majority with the votes. FIFA hasn't blinked publicly. Infantino's message has stayed consistent.
18:44This is an opportunity, not an obligation, and the goal is getting more resources to parts of the game
18:49that have never had access to this kind of money. Whether that message is enough to hold his coalition
18:54together through September, while UEFA, CONCACAF, and the AFC all continue voicing versions of the
19:00same complaint about being shut out of the process. Is the question hanging over the rest of the summer?
19:06What isn't really in dispute anymore is how personal this has got. When a former FIFA president
19:11is out there warning that football's being sold off through Trump-adjacent financial connections,
19:17when a sitting prime minister is weighing in. When an EU commissioner is posting three-word
19:21demands to leave the game alone, this stopped being an internal FIFA finance discussion a while ago.
19:27It's now a fight over who actually gets to decide what happens to the tournament that's supposed to
19:32mark a hundred years of the sport's biggest stage. And that centenary date isn't moving.
19:38The 2030 FIFA World Cup will take place from June 8, 2030 to July 21, 2030, and will mark the
19:45tournament's 100th anniversary. Whatever gets resolved, or doesn't, between now and September,
19:50that's the deadline that matters most. Not Infantino's September 19 signing date. The one four years
19:57away, in Montevideo, Madrid, Casablanca, and Lisbon, where a hundred years of history is supposed to be
20:03celebrated by every football nation on earth showing up to play. Right now, more than 50 of them have just
20:09said they might not.
20:10But if that has been hundred years you can see it, aren't even fake, and they're not.
20:10So that's it.
20:10You
Le meilleur du foot en vidéoDécouvre le Corner Football

Recommended