- 7 weeks ago
Gianni Infantino’s World Cup vision is facing one of its most serious political and sporting backlashes yet.
What was promoted as a bold global expansion of football now appears to be meeting resistance from multiple confederations at once.
Across Europe, South America, and parts of Africa, the debate has shifted from enthusiasm to concern, skepticism, and open criticism.
For FIFA, that is more than a public-relations problem.
It is a challenge to the legitimacy of a project that was meant to redefine the tournament’s future.
What was promoted as a bold global expansion of football now appears to be meeting resistance from multiple confederations at once.
Across Europe, South America, and parts of Africa, the debate has shifted from enthusiasm to concern, skepticism, and open criticism.
For FIFA, that is more than a public-relations problem.
It is a challenge to the legitimacy of a project that was meant to redefine the tournament’s future.
Category
🛠️
LifestyleTranscript
00:00Gianni Infantino built his FIFA presidency by keeping football's confederations on his side.
00:06Now UEFA, CONCACAF, and the Asian Football Confederation are pushing back at the same time.
00:12A plan to reshape the World Cup has triggered FIFA's biggest internal revolt in years.
00:17Let's start with what actually landed on the table.
00:20Less than two weeks after the 2026 World Cup wrapped up, soccer was back to being front-page
00:26news thanks to a new private investment proposal by FIFA President Gianni Infantino that triggered
00:32significant backlash. The vehicle for all of this has a name, FIFA Forward Enterprise, or FFE for short.
00:39Here's what FFE actually is. FIFA proposed creating FIFA Forward Enterprise and selling a 20% stake in
00:46it to private investors, with Joshua Kushner's Thrive Eternal earmarked as the lead of the investor
00:52group. Put plainly, Infantino wants to hand over a piece of the World Cup's commercial engine to
00:58outside money. And the name attached to that money is a Kushner. The core investor would be a New York
01:03investment firm created by Joshua Kushner, the brother of U.S. President Donald Trump's son-in-law
01:10jarred Kushner. This isn't a small side deal either. Infantino unveiled the FFE as a new organization
01:16that would oversee commercial rights and operational delivery, via a $20 billion company, with private
01:23investors, including the Kushner family. So how did the confederations react? Let's go one by one,
01:30because this is the heart of the story. UEFA moved first and moved hard. UEFA said it and its 55
01:36members
01:37will boycott FIFA competitions, rejecting FIFA's proposed plan to sell stakes to private investors,
01:43confirming the decision after an emergency meeting. This wasn't a handful of unhappy federations
01:49grumbling on the sidelines. Sources told ESPN that over 50 associations took the floor during the
01:56virtual meeting, and expressed unanimity in their anger at Infantino's proposals. 55 countries,
02:02essentially all of them, on the same page. UEFA's own language was blunt. Some things are simply too
02:08important to sell. The World Cup belongs to football, full stop. CONCACAF came next. CONCACAF,
02:16North America and the Caribbean's Confederation, also publicly rejected the sell-off plan. Their
02:21statement laid out exactly what bothered them. CONCACAF convened a meeting of the presidents of
02:27its 41 member associations to discuss the FFE proposal. And during that meeting, the membership
02:33expressed deep concerns about the lack of due process, the artificially short deadline imposed,
02:39and the absence of any review or approval by the relevant FIFA governance bodies. They even
02:45questioned the money angle directly. The need for private equity investment to fund new and existing
02:51FIFA forward programs, following the most profitable FIFA World Cup in history, was questioned.
02:56Then came the Asian Football Confederation. And this is the one that turned a European problem
03:02into a global one. The AFC didn't just object to the substance of the plan. It objected to how it
03:09found out about it. The AFC said it was not consulted on the proposal and was disappointed that a matter
03:15of such significance entered the public domain. Before the AFC family had been afforded the opportunity
03:21to examine and discuss it through the appropriate and established governance channels. And then the AFC
03:28said the words that made this a three-continent story. The AFC stands in solidarity with UEFA and
03:34CONCACAF in expressing serious concerns over FIFA's proposal to introduce private investment into FIFA's
03:41flagship competitions and the decision-making process around FFE. The AFC statement went further than a
03:48polite objection. It named the fear directly. The fact that the situation reached the point where the
03:54real possibility of a FIFA World Cup boycott entered public discourse should concern everyone who cares
04:00about the future of the game. And football should never have been placed in such a position. That's not a
04:06confederation quietly registering a complaint. That's a confederation saying the sport's biggest event
04:12is now hostage to a fight nobody asked for. And while three continents were lining up against him
04:18in public, Infantino got hit from inside his own house. Carlos Cordero, his senior advisor, the man
04:25who represented FIFA on the White House task force for the World Cup, walked out the door. Senior FIFA
04:30advisor and former U.S. soccer president Carlos Cordero, who represented the world soccer body on the
04:37White House task force for the World Cup, resigned in protest at its private equity plan.
04:42He didn't soften it either. Cordero said he could not stand by while FIFA considers selling a stake in the
04:48World Cup, resigning as advisor to Infantino and urging other senior FIFA staff to speak out. And he made sure
04:55everyone knew he had nothing to do with drafting it. Cordero said he had no involvement in the proposal and
05:02opposed it unequivocally, calling the $20 billion commercial subsidiary a bad deal for football. So that's the
05:09shape of it. A $20 billion plan, a Kushner waiting in the wings. And by Friday of that same week,
05:16UEFA in boycott mode, CONCACAF rejecting it outright. The AFC standing with both of them. And Infantino's
05:24own advisor walking out the door calling it a bad deal. Three continents, one resignation, one embattled
05:31president scrambling to hold his own organization together. Now let's dig into how each piece of this
05:36actually built up. Starting with the plan itself, and why Infantino thought this was worth the fight.
05:42To understand why this blew up the way it did, you have to understand what Infantino was actually
05:47selling to the member federations. Because on paper, it looked generous. The mechanics, FIFA would spin off
05:54its commercial and operational rights into a new subsidiary. FIFA had proposed creating a $20 billion
06:00subsidiary, FIFA Forward Enterprise, to run the World Cup and its other events. With a stake of up to 20
06:06%
06:07to be offered to external investors. That 20% slice is where the private money comes in. And Joshua
06:14Kushner's firm was positioned to lead that group. FIFA is planning to raise an estimated $4.2 billion in
06:212026. By selling a reported 20% minority, stake in a new subsidiary, at an equity valuation of $20
06:29billion. FIFA even brought in serious financial muscle to get this done. The global soccer body
06:35is being advised on the plan by JP Morgan, with Joshua Kushner's Thrive Capital serving as the lead
06:41investor. Now why would Infantino think member federations, the very people who vote on this,
06:46would say yes. Because he attached a number to it, a big one, he told them their funding would jump.
06:52Infantino wrote to the 211 members that if they approve FFE, their promised $10 million basic
06:59funding for the next four years will double to $20 million. Projecting their FIFA funding through
07:042038 would be $86 million each, instead of about $36 million. Other reporting on the same pitch
07:12framed it similarly. The proposal would trigger over $80 million in payouts to each of FIFA's 211
07:19member associations between now and 2037. That's the carrot every single federation from the smallest
07:26island nation to the biggest European power was being told, sign off on this and your check gets
07:31bigger. FIFA even sweetened it further once the backlash started, promising money regardless of how
07:37anyone voted. FIFA announced that each of its 211 member associations would receive $20 million
07:43through the FIFA Forward Development Program between 2027 and 2030, regardless of their position
07:50on the proposal. That's an unusual move, offering the reward even to federations that reject the deal.
07:56And it tells you how hard FIFA was working to keep the temperature down. But there was a catch built
08:01into the pitch, and it's the catch that turned allies into critics. Infantino wasn't giving
08:06federations months to think this over. He gave them weeks. In a letter to the associations, revealed by
08:12The Athletic, Infantino said a decision on the proposal must be made by SEPT-19, in order for any
08:19future funds to be available from Jan. 1. A deadline that tight, on a decision this size, is exactly the
08:26kind of thing that makes federation presidents suspicious, rather than grateful. And Infantino
08:31didn't back off when the criticism started. If anything, he leaned into the sales pitch harder.
08:37Speaking to FIFA's own channels, he insisted this was voluntary, not forced. He called it a proposal,
08:43an offer, not an obligation, part of a democratic consultation process. And above all an opportunity,
08:49but not an obligation, calling it a golden opportunity to turbocharge the development of the game globally.
08:55That's Infantino's language, opportunity, consultation, growth, not sale, not privatization,
09:01not surrender of control. FIFA's official position, once the backlash hit full volume,
09:07doubled down on that same defense. The organization put out a statement trying to calm things,
09:12insisting the whole thing had been misread. FIFA said it had heard the feedback from the
09:16confederations, respected the concern aired in public, reaffirmed its commitment to an open
09:22and democratic consultation. And said its planned consultation process was disrupted by incorrect
09:28media reports. And then came the line that's now attached to this entire saga. Nobody is selling
09:33football, FIFA said. This is not something FIFA would ever entertain. FIFA also pushed back
09:39specifically on the idea that any one confederation speaks for everybody. The statement appeared to
09:45criticize the regional bodies UEFA, CONCACAF and AFC, saying no single entity can claim to represent
09:52all of FIFA's 211 member associations. That's Infantino's math. Essentially, if UEFA, CONCACAF and
10:00the AFC together don't equal all 211 votes, there's still a path to a majority. And FIFA was careful to
10:06stress that nothing was locked in yet. FIFA confirmed that without the support of the majority of member
10:12associations, its commercial activities would remain unchanged, and FFE would not be established.
10:18There's also a wrinkle worth knowing, because it explains part of why people don't fully trust
10:23the reassurances. Reporting has suggested Infantino himself has a personal stake in how this plays out
10:30down the line. Infantino is up for re-election as FIFA president in March 2027, and even if he wins,
10:36term limits mean he can only serve until the end of 2031. With one report suggesting he could take
10:42over as FFE commissioner after that, earning a salary comparable to NFL commissioner Roger Goodell's.
10:49So the plan isn't just about federations getting bigger checks. There's a future role for Infantino,
10:55baked into how this thing could play out. And that's exactly the kind of detail that made critics
10:59inside football even less comfortable signing off on a six-week deadline. That's the pitch,
11:05the money, and the defense. Next, we need to get into, why the money offer wasn't enough to stop UEFA
11:11from doing something it has never done before. UEFA is the wealthiest, most powerful confederation
11:17in world football. It's also the one that moved first and hit hardest, and the way it did it matters
11:22just as much as what it decided. This wasn't a press release from a UEFA office building. UEFA and its
11:28national associations will not participate in FIFA competitions. The European soccer body said,
11:34after an urgent online meeting of its 55 member nations, every single European federation,
11:40France, Germany, Italy reigning champions Spain, all four home nations of the UK, took part.
11:46And the vote wasn't close. On 30 July 2026, the 55 UEFA associations unanimously voted to boycott
11:54future World Cups, including the 2027 Women's World Cup and the 2030 World Cup,
12:00and all FIFA competitions should the proposal be implemented. Think about what that unanimity
12:06actually means. 55 countries with wildly different politics, different football cultures,
12:11different levels of power inside FIFA. And every one of them landed on the same answer.
12:17Sources told ESPN that over 50 associations took the floor during the meeting and expressed
12:23unanimity in their anger at Infantino's proposals. That's not a boardroom disagreement. That's the
12:30sport's spiritual home saying no. UEFA's public language leaned into exactly the emotional register
12:36you'd expect from a governing body defending its identity. The organization framed the World Cup
12:42as something that transcends commerce entirely, telling member federations that certain things
12:47simply shouldn't be up for sale. It's worth remembering, this is the confederation whose members
12:52include the nation that just won the tournament weeks earlier. Spain lifted the trophy, and within days
12:58its own football federation was voting to potentially sit out the next one. Over a financial restructuring
13:04plan, it wasn't consulted on. The reaction outside UEFA's own membership was almost as fast.
13:11England's football association didn't wait to see which way the wind was blowing,
13:15it planted a flag immediately. England's FA said it stands shoulder to shoulder with European teams
13:21after the vote. With a spokesperson saying the FIFA World Cup belongs to football and always will.
13:27That's a federation with genuine World Cup pedigree, hosting ambitions of its own. Choosing to stand
13:33publicly against the man who runs the organization that governs their sport. Politicians got involved
13:39too, which tells you this had stopped being a purely footballing argument. European Commissioner of
13:44Sport Glenn Micheleff said he fully supported UEFA's position, posting that he was proud to see Europe's
13:50football associations, leading on governance, and defending the integrity of the game. And in Britain
13:56specifically, government ministers weighed in directly on the FIFA president's plan. Britain's
14:02sport minister Lisa Nandy called the boycott, a principled decision that the UK supports. Adding
14:07that football belongs to the fans, not billionaire investors, and that it was time to take a stand.
14:13That's a government minister, not a football official, telling FIFA's president that fans,
14:18not billionaire investors, own the sport. When elected officials in a G7 country start using that
14:24kind of language about a FIFA commercial proposal. That's a sign the story had already jumped well
14:29past the back pages. Why did UEFA move first and hit hardest? Part of it is simple math. Europe's
14:36federations already generate enormous broadcast and sponsorship revenue on their own, through their
14:41leagues and their own competitions. They have less to gain from FIFA's promised payout increases,
14:46and more to lose if a private equity partner starts steering decisions. About how the World Cup is
14:52scheduled, marketed, or expanded. Part of it too is governance pride. UEFA has spent years positioning
14:58itself as the confederation with the strongest institutional processes. In being told about a
15:03$20 billion restructuring plan through media, leaks rather than formal consultation cut directly
15:10against that self-image. There's also the calendar problem. UEFA pointed out that a boycott
15:15isn't a hypothetical, distant threat. It has teeth almost immediately. The next scheduled FIFA tournament
15:21is only weeks away in Europe. The Women's Under-20 World Cup, hosted by Poland, starting September 5.
15:28And the four British federations comprise FIFA's only bidder to host the 2035 Women's World Cup,
15:34with that decision due November 23. In other words, UEFA has real, near-term leverage points it can use
15:41to make a boycott threat costly for FIFA almost immediately, not just in some distant World Cup
15:46cycle. So UEFA didn't just object. It organized, voted, and locked in a unified position within days
15:53of the plan becoming public. And once Europe moved, it put enormous pressure on every other confederation
15:59to decide which side of the argument they wanted to be standing on. That's exactly what happened next
16:04with CONCACAF and the AFC. And it's why this became a three-continent story, instead of a European
16:10one. Once UEFA locked in its boycott vote, the question became whether it would stay isolated to
16:16Europe, or whether other confederations would follow. Within the same day, the answer arrived,
16:21and it came fast. CONCACAF moved almost immediately behind UEFA. Later that day, CONCACAF and its 41 member
16:30associations rejected the proposal, citing concerns over the lack of due process, transparency, governance,
16:37and the involvement of private investors in FIFA assets. What's notable about CONCACAF's language
16:43is how procedural it was. This wasn't just we don't like private money in football, it was a direct
16:49critique of how the decision was being pushed through. The membership expressed deep concerns about the
16:54lack of due process surrounding the proposal, the artificially short deadline imposed, and the absence of
17:00any review or approval by the relevant FIFA governance bodies. CONCACAF also made a point
17:06that cut right at the heart of Infantino's financial pitch. If the World Cup had just made more money
17:12than ever, why does FIFA need outside investors at all? The need for private equity investment to fund
17:18new and existing FIFA forward programs following the most profitable FIFA World Cup in history was
17:24questioned. That's a confederation representing the very region that just co-hosted the tournament.
17:29The United States, Mexico, and Canada were the joint hosts, turning around and asking why the profits
17:35from that success weren't enough on their own. Then came the AFC, and this is the moment the story
17:41stopped being regional and became something closer to a full institutional revolt. Asia represents an
17:47enormous chunk of FIFA's membership, and its federations aren't natural allies of Europe on
17:52most governance questions. So when the AFC lined up publicly with UEFA and CONCACAF, it signaled
17:58something bigger than shared grievance. It signaled that Infantino had managed to unite continents
18:04that don't normally agree. The AFC's statement did two things at once. First, it criticized the process,
18:10echoing exactly what CONCACAF had said about being blindsided. The AFC said it was not consulted on the
18:17proposal and was disappointed that a matter of such significance entered the public domain,
18:22before the AFC family had been afforded the opportunity to examine and discuss it through
18:28appropriate and established governance channels. Second and more pointedly, it called for FIFA's
18:33entire decision-making structure to be examined, not just this one plan. A damning statement from the AFC
18:39called for an urgent review of FIFA's governance, saying it stood in solidarity with UEFA and CONCACAF,
18:46and pointing to fundamental weaknesses in FIFA's consultation and decision-making processes that
18:51must now be addressed. That's a confederation saying the problem isn't just this one proposal,
18:57it's how FIFA operates at the top. The AFC went as far as saying the plan, as it stood,
19:03had no realistic path forward. The AFC stated that the proposal cannot realistically achieve the
19:09necessary broad consensus and unity required to move forward. Now put the numbers together,
19:14because this is where the story becomes undeniable. UEFA has 55 members, CONCACAF has 41. Add the AFC's
19:23membership on top of that, and you get a block that dwarfs anything Infantino can rally on his own.
19:28The combined opposition of UEFA, CONCACAF, and the AFC represents a block of 143 member associations,
19:36placing the proposal's approval in serious doubt. Out of FIFA's 211 total members,
19:42that's not a minority complaint. That's a majority standing against the plan, before a single formal
19:48vote has even been scheduled. And it wasn't just the three big confederations. Other corners of the
19:53football world watched and waited to see how far this would spread. It remained to be seen what other
19:59continental confederations, such as South America's CONMEBOL, would do following UEFA's boycott.
20:05Given the widespread uproar over FIFA's FFE proposal, even without every confederation weighing in
20:11publicly yet, the three that had spoken already represented enough votes to sink the plan outright.
20:17If Infantino needed a simple majority to move forward, the proposal is subject to approval
20:22by a majority of those national associations and FIFA's 37-member council. This is also where the
20:29story stopped being purely about football governance and started touching Infantino's own political
20:34standing inside the sport. The controversy didn't just threaten one project, it started raising a much
20:40bigger question. The controversy also raised questions over Infantino's future as FIFA president,
20:46with federations reportedly expressing doubts about his leadership during meetings over the proposal.
20:52That's a serious escalation, this didn't just become a fight over a commercial subsidiary.
20:57Federations were reportedly using these meetings to question whether Infantino himself should keep
21:03running the organization. So by the end of that week, Infantino wasn't managing one confederation's
21:09objection. He was managing three, representing a clear majority of FIFA's membership, using nearly
21:15identical language about transparency and governance. All while his own advisor had just walked out the
21:21door in protest. That combination, the numbers, the coordinated language, and the internal resignation,
21:27is what turned this from a controversial proposal into a full-blown crisis for the FIFA president.
21:33Which brings us to where things stand now, and what happens next. So where does this leave Gianni
21:38Infantino, and what actually happens between now and the deadline he set? FIFA hasn't backed down,
21:44at least not publicly. The organization's official position remains that nothing is decided,
21:50and that the criticism has been based on a misreading of the plan.
21:53The fate of the FIFA Forward Enterprise project rests entirely on whether Infantino can convince a
21:59majority of member associations to back the venture. And FIFA has confirmed that if the proposal fails
22:05to secure majority support, commercial operations will remain completely unchanged, and FFE would not
22:11be established. That's FIFA's fallback position. If the votes aren't there, the whole structure simply
22:17doesn't happen, and the sport continues exactly as it operates today. But Infantino set a clock running,
22:23and that clock hasn't stopped. Infantino had set a SEPT-19 deadline for associations to accept the plan,
22:30with a majority vote needed for it to be implemented. That means this doesn't drift on for years. Within
22:36roughly seven weeks of the AFC's statement, FIFA's membership either backs this, or it doesn't.
22:41And given that UEFA, CONCACAF and the AFC together already represent a majority of the votes,
22:48the math right now doesn't favor Infantino getting to yes. Cordero's resignation adds a layer to this
22:54that's harder for FIFA to wave off with a statement. He didn't just quit quietly. He used his exit to
23:00make
23:00a financial argument directly against Infantino's numbers. Cordero pointed out that the FIFA president
23:06himself had highlighted $15 billion in revenue generated between 2022 and 2026. Saying FIFA
23:13already had the financial capacity to provide additional support to member associations from
23:19its existing resources. And he went further, questioning the entire premise of needing outside
23:24investors in the first place. Against that backdrop, Cordero said, selling a permanent stake in
23:30football's most valuable asset to raise $4.2 billion makes little sense. That's not a governance
23:36objection like the confederations raised. That's a former Goldman Sachs banker, someone Infantino
23:42personally brought in to advise on strategy. Saying the finances don't add up. And Cordero didn't resign
23:48quietly into the background. He used his statement to call on others inside FIFA to do the same.
23:54He wrote that he hoped others would speak up too, because decisions of this magnitude should be made in the
23:59interests of football, not those who stand to profit from it. There's also the personal history that
24:05makes his intervention carry weight. Cordero isn't some outside critic with an axe to grind,
24:10he was handpicked for this exact role. Cordero built a long career in business and global investment
24:16banking across Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia. Advising governments and some of the world's
24:22largest international companies. When Infantino brought him on, he specifically framed Cordero as the
24:27person who'd help modernize FIFA's financial thinking. Infantino had said Cordero was the
24:32right person to advise FIFA as it modernized its regulatory framework and grew the sport for men,
24:38women and youth across the globe. Now that same person is on record,
24:42saying the president's signature financial idea is a mistake. The politics around Infantino,
24:48personally, aren't getting any simpler either. He's due to stand for re-election as FIFA
24:53president in the coming months, and this entire episode has become the backdrop for that campaign.
24:59Infantino has been president of FIFA for more than 10 years and had seemed sure to be re-elected
25:04unopposed next March. With FIFA setting a NAV-18 deadline for challengers to come forward.
25:11Whether this controversy produces an actual rival candidate before that deadline is one of the open
25:17threads hanging over the rest of this year. What's clear is that FIFA is still trying to keep the door
25:22open,
25:22rather than admit defeat. The organization's language has consistently been about consultation,
25:28not retreat. Insisting the process is ongoing and that member associations will get to vote based on
25:34the facts once the incorrect media reports are cleared up. Whether that consultation process produces
25:39a genuine change of heart among UEFA, CONCACAF and the AFC, or whether it collapses entirely before
25:46September, is still playing out in real time. What isn't in question anymore is the shape of the
25:52standoff. Three confederations, representing a clear majority of FIFA's global membership,
25:57stood up publicly within days of each other and said no to the same plan, using strikingly similar
26:02language about transparency and process. Inside FIFA's own leadership structure, the president's own
26:08senior adviser walked out the door and told his former colleagues to do the same. And hanging over all of
26:14it is a September deadline that Infantino himself set, now running down, while the votes he needs
26:19look further away than ever. The World Cup didn't get sold, not yet and maybe not at all. But for
26:25the
26:25first time in Gianni Infantino's decade running FIFA, he's the one who looks like he's fighting to keep
26:30his own plan, and possibly his own job, alive.
Le meilleur du foot en vidéoDécouvre le Corner Football