Saltar al reproductorSaltar al contenido principal
  • hace 1 día
Christopher Nolan estrenó en cines una nueva adaptación de La Odisea, el poema épico atribuido a Homero sobre el largo regreso de Odiseo a Ítaca. Aunque el director tomó como referencia la introducción de Emily Wilson, reconocida por su lectura feminista de la obra, la película ha abierto un debate por la forma en que representa a sus personajes femeninos. ¿Nolan logró hacer una representación femenina más fiel? Le contamos.

Categoría

🗞
Noticias
Transcripción
00:00Is the new Odyssey movie feminist?
00:02Although its director used a translation considered feminist as a reference,
00:06The film is not a critical darling.
00:08We'll tell you.
00:09First, remember that The Odyssey is a story about the return home of a fictional hero,
00:14Odysseus, from ancient Greece.
00:15The story begins where the Iliad ends,
00:18and recounts the 10 years following the fall of Troy.
00:21It was written hundreds and hundreds of years ago,
00:23and since then it has been reinterpreted in virtually every possible format.
00:27This 2026 a new version arrived directed by Christopher Nolan.
00:32The film, which is currently in theaters,
00:33Among her references was the introduction written by Emily Wilson,
00:37the first woman to complete a full translation of The Odyssey into English.
00:41And this did not go unnoticed,
00:43because Wilson made history in 2017 with a version that was praised
00:47for using accessible language and representing female characters more fully.
00:52A translation described by some as a progressive abomination.
00:56And for others, such as one of the most faithful modern interpretations of Homer,
01:00from a linguistic point of view.
01:02Emily Wilson is a professor of classical studies at the University of Pennsylvania,
01:05and a specialist in Greek and Roman literature.
01:08But he must know very little about the subject, as his critics say, right?
01:12Wilson presents Odysseus as a complex character,
01:15not only as a man devoted to war,
01:17It focuses on other emotional and psychological depths.
01:20and describes him as the most human hero of the Greek world.
01:23The same expert also questions sexist interpretations
01:26which, according to her, were added without justification in previous translations.
01:30For example, a word used to refer to several women
01:33It was translated for years as whores or prostitutes,
01:36although in ancient Greek it simply meant women.
01:39Wilson decided to translate it as girls.
01:42He also gave Penelope another place,
01:43She no longer appears only as the protagonist's obedient wife,
01:47who is waiting for her husband,
01:48but as a politically brilliant woman,
01:51full of contained rage
01:52and capable of sustaining a kingdom virtually on her own.
01:54For her, it wasn't about inventing feminist characters,
01:57but rather to remove the layers of sexist interpretation
02:00that they imposed on them for years
02:02readings done primarily by men,
02:05playing over and over again
02:06the archetypes they have about women.
02:09Having said all that,
02:10And having a reference like Emily Wilson,
02:12It's a feminist film, as they say.
02:14The truth is that once again his film fails the Bechtel test.
02:18which raises a fairly basic point,
02:20that two women with their own names
02:22talk to each other about something other than a man.
02:24Nolan brought together some of the most renowned actresses of the time
02:27to put them back in secondary roles,
02:30in charge of accompanying the protagonist's journey.
02:33She stripped them of their complexity as advisors,
02:36political strategists, oath-takers, and goddesses
02:38to turn them into women at the service of a man or into victims.
02:42Athena, for example, ceases to be a warrior
02:44and a key strategist to become Odysseus's advisor.
02:48Or that the only relevant conversation between two women
02:50It's about betrayal and the struggle for a man's attention.
02:54This happens with Penelope,
02:55despite the fact that in the poem his life in the palace
02:57She is surrounded by other women.
02:59Without them, Odysseus gets nowhere.
03:02There is no journey, no hero, and no story.
03:05But Nolan didn't give them that place.
03:07It was not a decision based on literary fidelity to the work.
03:09Nolan himself said that he intentionally excluded
03:12several parts considered misogynistic.
03:15Nor can it be said that there was no space.
03:16because the movie lasts almost three hours.
03:19Why, out of all the information he was able to reinterpret from the Odyssey
03:22Did he choose to only recount the silence and devotion of the women?
03:25Something that already seems to be a pattern.
03:26The truth is that not everything is black and white.
03:29It's clear that Nolan tried to read the work from the current context.
03:32and transform some characters.
03:34Penelope, for example, was given more autonomy
03:37and showed her making decisions beyond her son's orders.
03:40It also removed all scenes of sexual violence,
03:43But in that zeal, he even eliminated any kind of intimate encounter.
03:46and in doing so, he concealed women's stories
03:48who freely lived their pleasure like Circe.
03:51That's why, once again, he ended up agreeing with them.
03:54to those who joke that he doesn't really know any women.
03:57Because she still doesn't know how to write them.
04:00Wilson, the literature specialist,
04:02She was not satisfied either.
04:03He said he would have been ashamed to write any part of that script.
04:07and questioned the lack of complexity of the story
04:10and of its female characters.
04:12She herself took care of interpreting them very well.
04:15Furthermore, from conservative groups,
04:17The film received transphobic and racist attacks
04:19against Elliot Page and Lupita Nyjong,
04:22disguised as criticisms of forced inclusion.
04:25Even so, the odyssey is breaking box office records.
04:27Have you seen it yet?
04:29What do you think?
04:29We read them.
Comentarios

Recomendada