Skip to playerSkip to main content
Independent MP Helen Haines has launched a fierce attack on the federal government’s proposed gambling legislation, warning that Australia’s more than $31 billion annual gambling losses represent a major public health crisis. Haines argues that partial restrictions are too weak to stop gambling companies from relentlessly targeting children and vulnerable Australians. She is demanding the full implementation of the 31 recommendations from the parliamentary Murphy Inquiry, including a total ban on gambling advertising over three years. Her proposed amendments would also ban gambling ads during all G-rated programs and require gambling corporations to publicly report key indicators of gambling-related harm, intensifying pressure on the government to take tougher action.

#HelenHaines #GamblingAds #GamblingAdvertising #AustraliaGambling #GamblingReform #MurphyInquiry #GamblingCrisis #GamblingHarm #GamblingBan #BanGamblingAds #AustralianPolitics #GamblingLegislation #PublicHealthCrisis #ProtectChildren #GamblingIndustry #GamblingAddiction #AustraliaNews #BreakingNews #GamblingReformAustralia #GamblingInquiry

~HT.178~PR.460~ED.194~GR.508~VG.HM~

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Every day, Australians are exposed to a relentless stream of gambling ads.
00:06The gambling industry does not spend hundreds of millions of dollars on advertising every
00:11year because it has no effect.
00:14They do it because it works.
00:17Studies show a clear and consistent link between gambling ads and gambling activity and consequently
00:22gambling harm.
00:24Now, not all gambling is harmful.
00:27It's a legal activity that many Australians enjoy safely.
00:31And banning gambling advertising does not mean banning gambling.
00:37This is not about those who enjoy having a flutter now and then, perhaps on the grand
00:41final or even the Eurovision winner, or even at the Datorang races and under other wonderful
00:46country carnivals.
00:47I grew up as a kid on a racetrack.
00:50My grandfather owned and trained racehorses.
00:52Back then, though, there were no inducements or advertisements flooding our screens.
00:59It was impossible to lose thousands of dollars in a few taps of a smartphone without leaving
01:04home or without even talking to another human being.
01:07Online gambling is a completely different beast.
01:12And we know that, for some Australians, it is incredibly harmful.
01:16From March last year to March this year, we lost $36 billion to gambling.
01:23Our per capita losses are the highest in the world.
01:27In my own home state of Victoria, gambling cost us more than $14 billion in 2023.
01:33And that includes the direct financial impacts as well as the wider costs of things like job
01:39losses, divorce, family violence, police and court processes, and physical and mental health
01:47care.
01:48Because, as the Murphy report laid out in heartbreaking detail, gambling losses have a massive human cost.
01:57Australians experiencing gambling harm are significantly more likely to experience physical and mental
02:02health issues.
02:03Gambling is linked to a fourfold increase in the risk of suicide.
02:10Family violence is three times more likely to occur alongside harmful gambling.
02:18For every person experiencing gambling harm, we know six more are directly affected.
02:24Husbands, wives, children, parents, colleagues, friends and communities all suffer.
02:30However, gambling harm is most certainly a serious, a deeply serious public health issue that has
02:39become normalised through constant exposure.
02:42Gambling ads sell false hopes, easy wins and good times that obscure the very real and significant
02:50damage that gambling addiction can cause.
02:53And that's why the Murphy report recommended a complete ban on gambling ads and inducements.
03:00Again, I want to be clear, this is not about banning gambling.
03:03It's not about telling people what they're allowed to do.
03:07Adults can and will continue to make their own choices.
03:10Make no mistake.
03:12This is about greed.
03:15This is about whether we allow multi-million dollar companies to boost their profits by bombarding
03:22us with ads and inducements for a product that we know and they know causes profound devastation.
03:31It's about the greed of recruiting our children.
03:36This is a most pernicious and massive public health problem.
03:43I acknowledge there are concerns from media organisations and sporting codes about the potential effect
03:48on their financial viability if we were to ban advertising for gambling.
03:53However, these concerns must be balanced against the rights of the community and especially children
03:59to be protected from harm.
04:01Young Australians are growing up associating sport, entertainment and gambling as though they just
04:07naturally belong together.
04:09And, of course, we've heard these arguments before when tobacco companies tried to convince us
04:14that our sporting codes would die out without their advertising and sponsorship,
04:17or when alcohol companies claimed the industry would collapse if we put a small warning about the
04:22dangers of drinking during pregnancy on bottles and cans.
04:26But, you know what, I've got faith in the ability of Australian sports and media to evolve and to adapt
04:34and to have a business model that is not dependent on gambling advertising.
04:41The Murphy Report laid out a comprehensive action plan to address gambling harm,
04:46including the immediate phased introduction of an ad ban.
04:50If the government had acted on that recommendation, the process would be complete.
04:54Online gambling, advertising and sponsorship would already be banned.
04:58Instead, more than three years later, we've been presented with a tepid and, frankly,
05:05insulting imitation of real action.
05:08Because the problem is clear, the expert evidence is unanimous,
05:12the Australian public is screaming for action.
05:16If ever we have needed a social licence to do something important and radical,
05:22then we've got it.
05:25Yet, this parliament has not acted and the government has refused to take up
05:31these recommendations from the Murphy Report in full.
05:34I am concerned about the effect of inducements on individual gamblers.
05:40And I have to wonder, really, about the effect of inducements to political parties who take
05:46political donations from gambling companies.
05:50We have real problems with trusted government in this country and across the world.
05:55And we have to look at an issue such as that.
06:00Despite the Murphy Report's unequivocal conclusion that partial bans do not work,
06:05this bill establishes a complicated maze of half measures and exceptions.
06:09Gambling advertising is banned in some instances, at some times of day,
06:14for some kinds of programs, on some kinds of platforms.
06:18If you want to know whether your children are about to be exposed to gambling ads,
06:22you need to work through a multi-step checklist.
06:25What time of day is it?
06:26Which platform are we on?
06:27Whose account is it logged in?
06:29How many ads have already been shown in the last 59 minutes?
06:33It shouldn't be that difficult.
06:34The answer should simply be no.
06:38One of the most frustrating things about this legislation is the unnecessary complexity
06:43of these advertising restrictions.
06:45And in trying to include so many loopholes, carve-outs and compromises,
06:49the government has created an unfathomably complex regime.
06:53In some cases, these amendments may actually weaken existing protections,
06:58allowing the broadcast of more ads during live sports than would currently be permitted.
07:03I mean, go figure.
07:04It makes the government's approach even more baffling, actually.
07:08It would have been so much easier to just implement a comprehensive ban.
07:14As well as the limited and frankly inadequate reforms to advertising,
07:18this bill makes some other changes to gambling regulation.
07:21And these include additional restrictions on illegal gambling, including new requirements
07:25for financial institutions to prevent related payments and transfers,
07:30improvements to the BetStop legislative framework in line with recommendations from the recent statutory
07:35review and prohibition of online keynote and foreign match lotteries.
07:39Well, these are small, but they are welcome improvements.
07:42But unfortunately, there's a lot more this bill chooses not to do.
07:48Despite the Murphy reports finding that they are a significant incubator of harm,
07:52the bill does not ban inducements.
07:55Bonuses and two-for-one deals might be okay in a supermarket aisle,
07:59but they have no place as a tool to exploit people at risk of gambling harm.
08:04Because let's be clear, these promotions are not intended to keep you winning.
08:09If you're making money from online gambling, you'll get kicked off the platform,
08:12not flown to the Gold Coast.
08:15Gambling companies offer inducements as a calculated investment in the continued suffering
08:20of their most vulnerable customers. Make no mistake about that.
08:26And just last week, we heard extraordinary testimony about the lengths to which gambling companies
08:31will go to, to make sure that people keep losing money.
08:35And like the rest of Australia, I was absolutely gobsmacked by Luke Bateman's evidence about being
08:41offered flights, accommodation, alcohol and even illegal drugs.
08:44But the truly predatory nature of inducements was also illustrated by Russell North,
08:50who described repeatedly being offered inducements after, after closing his accounts.
08:56Now, Russell knew he was in trouble. He took steps to protect himself,
09:01and the gambling companies sought to actively undermine that.
09:06Deputy Speaker, it is unconscionable.
09:10The bill also does not establish a gambling regulator, despite the Murphy report identifying
09:16a glaring need for a national regulatory framework, overseen by a dedicated body with the sole
09:22objective of reducing harm. It reflects the reality that gambling companies operate nationally
09:27and should be regulated nationally. Right now, responsibility is fragmented across multiple
09:32regulators, different resources, powers and enforcement. And they face varying levels of criticism,
09:38some of it scathing. A regulator established for the sole purpose of reducing harm would,
09:43in the words of the Murphy report, put people above profits and public health before commercial
09:48interests. Members of the Crossbench have suggested a number of amendments to the bill, all of them,
09:54seeking to bring it closer to being something that offers real protections from gambling harm.
09:59Consistent with the Murphy report, I will be voting to implement a full ban on advertising,
10:03a full ban on inducements and the establishment of a dedicated national regulator.
10:09And I note it's the crossbench, not the government nor the opposition, that is carrying the torch for
10:13the Murphy report, an inquiry that was grounded in the lived experience of people whose lives were
10:19devastated by this predatory industry practice.
10:24I've also circulated two small reasonable amendments to improve the bill. Firstly, a complete ban on gambling
10:30ads during G-rated television programming. Ratings are designed to help viewers make informed choices
10:35about what they and their families watch. And a G rating indicates a program is suitable for all ages,
10:41including very young children. A G rating is a green light for a family-friendly viewing, and that
10:47shouldn't change when the ad break starts. Secondly, I'm proposing a requirement for gambling companies
10:53to collect and publicly report on harm indicators, including aggregate customer losses, self-exclusion
11:00requests and complaints. It's information they already have, and it would provide a vital evidence
11:05base to help understand whether these reforms are effective in reducing and preventing gambling harm.
11:11And if this bill results in only limited improvement to industry practice, then the data will be even more
11:16important when it comes to reviewing our laws in the years to come.
11:20It's been widely reported that there will be further changes to this bill. In its current form,
11:24the bill is unpassable, so it seems the government will be dragged, kicking and screaming,
11:28to take stronger action to get it through the parliament.
11:32I can't speak to any government amendments at this point because they haven't been circulated.
11:39Deputy Speaker, so often in this place, we're dealing with problems that don't have an obvious solution.
11:45This is not one of those times. The evidence couldn't be clearer. Everyone in Australia except the
11:52gambling companies, and apparently this government knows what needs to be done.
11:57Since this bill was introduced, I have received hundreds of emails from people in my electorate
12:02who are not just disappointed that the government won't commit to a full ban. Deputy Speaker,
12:09they are outraged. Outraged. Now, I've grappled with whether I should support this bill because
12:17it falls so far short of what we know is needed. As a legislator, I ask myself,
12:24when we know what good looks like, then how low are we willing to set the bar?
12:32It's a very important consideration. The Murphy report gave parliament a clear road map,
12:43but this bill has chosen a shortcut. Make no mistake, Australians will pay the price for that.
12:53In the time I've been speaking, Australians have lost more than half a million dollars to gambling.
13:00Just consider that. Acting Deputy Speaker, the clock is ticking. The opportunity is here.
13:08The moment is now. The time for courage is right before us, and I call on every member of this
13:15parliament to do the right thing. Pass a law that fulfils the recommendations of the Murphy report
13:24and do the right thing for the Australian people.
Comments

Recommended