- 1 day ago
Join us on Beyond the Headlines as we break down the heated Senate exchange after Senator Imee Marcos presented a controversial video alleging a supposed Charter change plot tied to the 2028 elections.
The presentation sparked strong backlash from minority senators, who called it propaganda, fake news, and disinformation, leading to tense debates inside the chamber and the eventual withdrawal of the video.
What really happened inside the Senate—and what does it say about the current political climate?
The presentation sparked strong backlash from minority senators, who called it propaganda, fake news, and disinformation, leading to tense debates inside the chamber and the eventual withdrawal of the video.
What really happened inside the Senate—and what does it say about the current political climate?
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:38Good afternoon. I'm DJ Moises. And today on Beyond the Headlines, we will talk about the heated exchange inside the
00:46Senate after Senator Aimee Marcos presented a controversial video alleging a supposed charter change plot linked to the 2028 elections.
00:58The presentation immediately drew strong pushback from several senators who called it propaganda, fake news, and misinformation, with some even
01:09saying the Senate is starting to look like a circus.
01:12So what really triggered the backlash and why was the video eventually withdrawn? Let's break it down.
01:20Fake news, propaganda, conspiracy theories, and a Senate being called a circus.
01:26These are at the center of a fresh controversy in the Philippine Senate after lawmakers crashed over a video presented
01:36by Senator Aimee Marcos during her privileged speech on May 25.
01:42The video claimed there were efforts to amend the 1987 Constitution through a Constitutional Assembly or CONAS.
01:52Details are found on the video. Let's watch this.
01:56Leader, the ladies and gentlemen of the Senate, I rise today on a matter of personal and collective privilege to
02:03address a pressing issue of utmost national importance.
02:06For far too long, our Filipino people have been left uncertain, confused, deliberately kept in the dark regarding the true
02:15intentions behind the continuing and increasingly belligerent efforts to append the new Senate leadership, and worse, to amend the Constitution.
02:25The Filipino people deserve clarity. The Filipino people deserve honesty, and above all, the Filipino people deserve at least the
02:34truth.
02:35Madam President, today I will not rely solely on my own words.
02:39I will present before this chamber a short video containing documentation, footage, and statements directly connected to the ongoing efforts
02:48toward term extension and charter change.
02:52With your permission, therefore, may we now direct the technical team to play the video presentation.
03:01Bakit nagpalit ng lederato sa Senado?
03:03May I be allowed to humbly move to declare all seats vacant, Mr. President?
03:10With 13 affirmative votes, 10 negative votes, and 1 abstention, the positions, and all the positions in the Senate is
03:18here I declare vacant.
03:20Bakit ito nilusog?
03:26Bakit patuloy ang pananakot?
03:29Talagang garamalan, obvious na obvious, hindi isa-isa ang majority.
03:33Bakit may panggigipit?
03:34Pinakakasuhan ng ombudsman si Sen. Notante Marcoleta ng plunder and indirect bribery.
03:40Bakit may pambabaluktot ng kwento?
03:42Nililito nila ang publiko.
03:44Ang kainan ay naganap palas 4 ng hapon.
03:47Ang barilan, alas 7.
03:49Nagmamalaki nilang may nangamusta.
03:51Eh si Camille Villar ang unang nag-adding.
03:54Saka sila nagsireply.
03:55Last convo, 4 p.m.
03:58Next chat, 10 p.m.
04:00Bakit may demolisyon diya?
04:01Bakit may pai?
04:02Bakit hindi mapanggap napakarambaki?
04:06But this is where the controversy intensified.
04:10Minority Senators immediately pushed back,
04:13describing the presentation as propaganda, fake news, and disinformation.
04:18And here is a reaction video coming from Senators Bam Aquino, Risa Ontiveros, and MIG Zubiri.
04:38Madam President, the point of order.
04:40Under Section 93, 94, and 95 on Unparliamentary Acts and Language,
04:45I just want to point out that the video that the lady senator presented
04:50was obviously opinionated, a propaganda tool, right?
04:54It should be stricken off the record, Madam President.
05:00And it's unparliamentary.
05:02We've seen videos presenting evidence, evidences, or evidence,
05:07on issues that are taken up on the floor.
05:10You know, Senator Tulfo always comes out with videos
05:13showing people being mobbed, people being abused
05:18for the information of this body to act on that particular issue.
05:23But to come up with an opinionated piece like that,
05:26ganong klaseng video,
05:28na propaganda,
05:30na sowing intrigue.
05:32Kasi ako, Madam President,
05:33hindi naman ako sangayon sa people's charter change.
05:38I was the first one in this institution who fought that kind of move with the PI.
05:46And all of us together,
05:48kaming lahat,
05:49for the first time in the history of the Senate,
05:5124 senators tumayu dyan at pinasapun natin yung
05:56Contra People's Initiative,
05:58the fake people's initiative.
05:59Kaya wala kaming kinalaman dyan,
06:02but napasinama kami dyan sa propaganda na yan,
06:05na dahil kami,
06:07ano yan,
06:08Duwag 11?
06:09Ano ba yan?
06:10Bulaga 11?
06:11At grade 13?
06:13That should not be shown here.
06:14Because what will stop us now,
06:17Madam President,
06:18for that lady senator,
06:19that we come up also with a propaganda video here,
06:22papalabas din namin,
06:23yung mga sala nila.
06:26Oo, kung ano-ano,
06:28hindi naman kami ganyan.
06:29To gain traction,
06:32to gain views and publicity,
06:37will destroy our fellow colleagues here.
06:40Walang ganyan, han.
06:42You recognize, Senator?
06:45Ano pong balikan yung video?
06:47Ano po ba yung sinasabi ng video?
06:49Sinasabi po ng video,
06:50nagkaroon ng leadership change dito sa Senado
06:53dahil pinipigilan
06:55ang charter change o CONAS.
06:58Niho ba?
06:59Yan po yung ibig sabihin ng video,
07:01na yung bagong mayorya
07:03nagsama-sama
07:04para pigilan ang isang charter change.
07:07Tama ba ako, mga kasama?
07:09Yan yung ibig sabihin ng video eh.
07:11Kung yun po yung ibig sabihin ng video,
07:13at dahil nagkaroon ng leadership change
07:15para pigilan ng CONAS,
07:17eh marami pong naniwala sa fake news.
07:20Dahil wala po yan
07:21sa kahit anumang plano ng mayorya.
07:23When we were in the majority,
07:25there were 15 members of the majority.
07:27Apat po dyan,
07:28kasama na po ngayon
07:29ng bagong mayorya.
07:30Ni isang beses po,
07:31hindi na pag-usapan
07:32ang charter change.
07:34Ano mang...
07:34Sinusugundahan ko rin po
07:36ang motion ni Sen. Mig Zubiri
07:38na istrike
07:39ang video po na iyan
07:40sa record nitong sesyon.
07:42Uhulitin ko lang po
07:43ang sinabi ko last week
07:45sa sarili ko namang
07:46privileged speech.
07:47Ganito na ba kababa
07:49ang inaabot ng politika
07:50sa Pilipinas.
07:52Na hanggang dito sa floor
07:53ay magbabatuhan tayo
07:55ng putik.
07:56Sanay naman tayo
07:56sa pakikipagdebate,
07:58pagtanggap ng batikos
07:59at pagsagot.
08:00So,
08:01hindi ako sensitibo
08:02sa puna.
08:02Sanay ako dyan.
08:03Pero,
08:04ang pinakita po na video
08:06ay fake news.
08:09Hindi ko yan pwedeng hayaan
08:10na andyan na lang
08:12unchallenged.
08:13Delivering a privileged speech
08:15is not the same
08:16as having the privilege
08:18to have fake news
08:19entered into the official record
08:22as if it were ever.
08:25in case you missed
08:27certain details
08:28of the video.
08:30So,
08:30this was
08:31a video
08:32that
08:34shared
08:35an alleged
08:36meeting
08:37between
08:38then-Senate
08:39President
08:39Tito Soto
08:40with
08:41current
08:42House Speaker
08:43Boji D.
08:44And
08:45among the things
08:46as you've seen
08:47in the video
08:47that were discussed
08:48was a
08:49constitutional
08:50assembly
08:51and the objective
08:52of such
08:53would
08:54number one
08:55extend
08:56the term
08:57of the
08:58legislators
08:59so that
09:01allegedly
09:02that would
09:03encourage them
09:04to vote
09:05for impeachment
09:05and then
09:07the other one
09:07is a possible
09:08increase
09:09of presidential
09:10of presidents
09:11of
09:12okay
09:13possible increase
09:14to 50 years old
09:15for those who would
09:16qualify to run
09:17for presidency
09:18and this is
09:19allegedly intended
09:20to
09:21disqualify
09:23Vice President
09:24Sara Duterte
09:25and then the other
09:27thing also that
09:28were allegedly
09:28discussed
09:29were the
09:30election of
09:32senators
09:32per region
09:33and so if
09:34there are
09:3518 regions
09:36they were
09:36talking about
09:37possibly
09:37electing
09:38two per region
09:39or three
09:40per region
09:41but as you
09:42can see
09:42eventually
09:43on the
09:44reaction
09:44of the
09:45minority
09:46senators
09:47they were
09:48saying that
09:49these
09:49are all
09:50fake
09:51news
09:52so the
09:53bigger
09:53question
09:53now
09:54is
09:54how
09:54far
09:55does
09:55a
09:55privileged
09:56speech
09:57protection
09:57go
09:58and when
09:59does
09:59political
10:00messaging
10:00cross
10:01the line
10:02into
10:03misinformation
10:05so as we
10:06can see
10:06from the
10:06video
10:07several
10:07minority
10:08senators
10:08then took
10:09turns
10:09to challenge
10:09the video
10:10that was
10:11presented
10:12by
10:12senator
10:13Aimee
10:13Marcus
10:14among them
10:15is
10:15former
10:16senate
10:16president
10:16Tito
10:17Soto
10:18while he
10:19acknowledged
10:20the meeting
10:21with
10:21house
10:22speaker
10:22Faustino
10:23D
10:23in the
10:23past
10:24he firmly
10:25denied
10:25discussing
10:26any
10:28chartered
10:28change
10:28conspiracy
10:29or plans
10:30for no
10:31election
10:32senator
10:33ping
10:33laxon
10:34described
10:35parts
10:35of the
10:36video
10:36as
10:36outright
10:37lies
10:37meanwhile
10:38senator
10:39kiko
10:40palingilinan
10:40pointed out
10:41that the
10:42senate
10:42committee
10:42on
10:43constitutional
10:43amendments
10:44did not
10:45conduct
10:46a single
10:47hearing
10:47on
10:48charter
10:48change
10:49from
10:502025
10:51to
10:522026
10:53senator
10:54Risa
10:55Ontiveros
10:55also
10:56expressed
10:56frustration
10:57over
10:58the
10:58continuing
10:59controversy
11:00inside
11:00the
11:00chamber
11:01and
11:01as
11:02we
11:02can
11:02see
11:03or
11:03as
11:04we
11:04saw
11:04in
11:04the
11:04video
11:05she
11:05even
11:06asked
11:06is
11:06this
11:07what
11:07we're
11:08going
11:08to
11:08do
11:09every
11:09day
11:10she
11:11stressed
11:12in
11:12her
11:13privileged
11:13speech
11:14that
11:14speeches
11:15should
11:15not
11:15be
11:16used
11:16to
11:17place
11:17alleged
11:18fake
11:18news
11:18into
11:19senate
11:20records
11:21still
11:22not
11:22everyone
11:23agreed
11:23with
11:24the
11:24criticism
11:25senator
11:26rodante
11:26marcoleta
11:27opposed
11:28the
11:28motion
11:28to
11:29strike
11:29the
11:29video
11:30from
11:30the
11:30records
11:31he
11:31argued
11:32that
11:32senators
11:33should
11:33not
11:33be
11:34onion
11:34skinned
11:35and
11:35that
11:36the
11:36public
11:36should
11:37be
11:37allowed
11:37to
11:37judge
11:38the
11:39claim
11:39for
11:39themselves
11:40senate
11:41president
11:41alan
11:42peter
11:42cayetano
11:43also
11:43defended
11:44the
11:44right
11:44of
11:44senators
11:45to
11:45express
11:46their
11:46views
11:46during
11:47session
11:48however
11:49to
11:49avoid
11:50deeper
11:50confrontation
11:51on the
11:51senate
11:52floor
11:52cayetano
11:53later
11:53urged
11:54senator
11:54ime marcos
11:55to
11:55voluntarily
11:56withdraw
11:57the
11:58video
11:58presented
11:59marcos
12:00eventually
12:01agreed
12:02but
12:03beyond
12:03the
12:03heated
12:03exchange
12:04the
12:05controversy
12:05also
12:06highlights
12:06a much
12:07bigger
12:08issue
12:08confronting
12:09the
12:10senate
12:10today
12:11the
12:12incident
12:12comes
12:13just
12:13days
12:14after
12:14the
12:15leadership
12:15coup
12:15inside
12:16the
12:16chamber
12:17tension
12:18surrounding
12:19senator
12:19ronald
12:20bato
12:20de la
12:20rosa
12:20and
12:21the
12:21controversial
12:22shooting
12:23incident
12:23within
12:23the
12:24senate
12:24complex
12:25because
12:26of
12:26these
12:26events
12:27several
12:28senators
12:28themselves
12:29admitted
12:30that
12:30the
12:30credibility
12:31and
12:31image
12:32of
12:32the
12:33institution
12:33are
12:34now
12:34under
12:35public
12:36scrutiny
12:36so
12:37now
12:37the
12:38public
12:38is
12:39left
12:40asking
12:40is
12:41this
12:41still
12:42democracy
12:43in
12:43action
12:43or
12:44is
12:45the
12:45senate
12:45becoming
12:46consumed
12:46by
12:47political
12:47theatrics
12:48and
12:49in
12:49a
12:49time
12:50of
12:50completing
12:50narratives
12:51and
12:51accusations
12:52who
12:53should
12:53the
12:54public
12:54believe
12:55and
12:56I
12:56will
12:56start
12:57my
12:57commentary
12:57from
12:58that
12:58question
12:59because
13:00in
13:01my
13:01view
13:01this
13:03is
13:03beyond
13:04the
13:05idea
13:06of
13:06whether
13:06we
13:07show
13:07the
13:07video
13:07or
13:08we
13:09don't
13:09I
13:10think
13:10the
13:11larger
13:11question
13:11is
13:12what
13:12is
13:13the
13:13required
13:14standard
13:15that
13:16an
13:17honored
13:18institution
13:19such
13:19as
13:19the
13:20senate
13:20be
13:21allowed
13:22to
13:22show
13:22prior
13:23to
13:24it
13:24being
13:25an
13:25information
13:26that's
13:27already
13:27proven
13:28to be
13:28true
13:29so
13:30is
13:31a
13:31senator
13:31through
13:32his
13:33or her
13:34privilege
13:34speech
13:35be
13:36allowed
13:36to
13:37risk
13:38presenting
13:38fake
13:39news
13:39or
13:41misinformation
13:41and I
13:42say
13:42risk
13:43because
13:43I'm
13:43not
13:44saying
13:44that
13:44what
13:45senator
13:45Ayme
13:46Marcos
13:46presented
13:47was
13:47entirely
13:48fake
13:48news
13:49or
13:49entirely
13:49misinformation
13:50because
13:50we
13:51still
13:51do
13:52not
13:52know
13:52but
13:53the
13:53question
13:53here
13:54which
13:54we
13:54don't
13:54have
13:55to
13:55answer
13:55today
13:55but
13:56it's
13:56a
13:56reflection
13:56for
13:57all
13:57of
13:57us
13:57because
13:57these
13:58are
13:58also
13:59unprecedented
13:59and
14:00works
14:00in
14:00progress
14:01when
14:02can
14:02we
14:02draw
14:02the
14:03line
14:03between
14:04being
14:04transparent
14:05and
14:06keeping
14:06the
14:06public
14:07informed
14:07and
14:08at
14:08the
14:09same
14:09time
14:09making
14:10sure
14:11that
14:11what
14:12we
14:12are
14:12informing
14:14the
14:14public
14:14has
14:15a
14:16higher
14:16chances
14:17of
14:18it
14:18being
14:19true
14:19because
14:20the
14:21precedence
14:22that
14:22I
14:23think
14:23we
14:23are
14:23avoiding
14:24here
14:24is
14:25there
14:25may
14:25be
14:26potential
14:26abuse
14:27of
14:28the
14:28privileged
14:29speech
14:29and
14:30the
14:30protection
14:30that
14:31it
14:32allows
14:32on
14:33the
14:34reverse
14:34we
14:35also
14:36don't
14:36want
14:37that
14:37we
14:37curtail
14:38transparency
14:39because
14:40topics
14:41like
14:41this
14:42are
14:42also
14:43important
14:43so
14:44the
14:44question
14:45now
14:45and
14:45we
14:45don't
14:46have
14:46to
14:46answer
14:46today
14:47but
14:47it's
14:47a
14:47point
14:48of
14:48reflection
14:48is
14:49where
14:49should
14:50we
14:50draw
14:50the
14:51line
14:51now
14:53I
14:53did
14:53some
14:53little
14:54research
14:54but
14:55there
14:55is
14:56a
14:56psychology
14:57term
14:58and
14:59psychologists
14:59would
15:00call
15:00this
15:00the
15:01primacy
15:01effect
15:02which
15:03is
15:03the
15:03tendency
15:04to
15:04believe
15:05the
15:05first
15:06version
15:06of
15:07a
15:07story
15:07we
15:08hear
15:08and
15:09the
15:10primacy
15:11effect
15:11actually
15:12presents
15:12that
15:13once
15:13a
15:14narrative
15:14takes
15:15hold
15:16online
15:17correcting
15:18it
15:18becomes
15:19more
15:19difficult
15:20than
15:21spreading
15:22it
15:22and
15:23I
15:23did
15:23recall
15:24and
15:25with
15:26no
15:26use
15:27of
15:27political
15:28colors
15:28but
15:29I
15:29did
15:29recall
15:30in
15:30one
15:30of
15:31the
15:31interviews
15:31that
15:33then
15:34presidential
15:35candidate
15:35and now
15:36the mayor
15:36of
15:37Naga
15:37City
15:37she
15:38was
15:38asked
15:38about
15:39if
15:39there's
15:40something
15:40that she
15:41would
15:41change
15:42in
15:43the
15:43narrative
15:44of
15:44her
15:44campaign
15:45what
15:45would
15:45it
15:46be
15:46and
15:47then
15:47her
15:47response
15:48was
15:48she
15:49did
15:49not
15:50respond
15:51directly
15:51to
15:52the
15:52allegations
15:53that
15:54were
15:54hurled
15:55about
15:56her
15:56that
15:57by the
15:58time
15:58they
15:58did
15:58so
15:59months
15:59later
16:00it
16:01was
16:01already
16:01too
16:02difficult
16:02for
16:03them
16:03to
16:04turn
16:04it
16:04around
16:05whether
16:06true
16:06or
16:06false
16:07so
16:07this
16:08is
16:08not
16:09of
16:09any
16:09political
16:10color
16:10and
16:11this
16:12is
16:12not
16:12also
16:13to
16:13say
16:13whether
16:13the
16:14allegations
16:14of
16:15then
16:15presidential
16:16candidate
16:16and
16:17Naga
16:17City
16:18Mayor
16:18Lenny
16:18Robledo
16:19was
16:19correct
16:20or
16:20not
16:20but
16:21it
16:21also
16:22underscores
16:23the
16:23primacy
16:24effect
16:24that
16:25once
16:26we
16:26hurl
16:27something
16:27online
16:28it's
16:29already
16:30harder
16:30to
16:31correct
16:32it
16:32so
16:32spreading
16:33becomes
16:33easier
16:34for
16:34people
16:35to
16:35believe
16:36correcting
16:36it
16:37becomes
16:37harder
16:38now
16:39these
16:40conversations
16:40are
16:41important
16:41because
16:42some
16:42of
16:42us
16:42would
16:43argue
16:43okay
16:43if
16:44Senator
16:45Aimee
16:46Marcos
16:46did not
16:47present
16:47it
16:48on the
16:48floor
16:48that
16:49information
16:50can still
16:50be released
16:51online
16:52and as
16:53we can
16:53see
16:53there's
16:54just
16:55too
16:55many
16:55noise
16:56and
16:56information
16:57that we
16:57see
16:57on
16:58social
16:58media
16:58and
16:59I'm
16:59not
16:59just
16:59referring
17:00to
17:00this
17:01alleged
17:01constitutional
17:02change
17:02or
17:03constitutional
17:03assembly
17:04I'm
17:05sure
17:05we've
17:05also
17:05read
17:06several
17:06noise
17:07and
17:07materials
17:08about
17:08the
17:08impeachment
17:09about
17:11Senator
17:12Bato
17:12De La
17:12Rosa
17:13being
17:13fugitive
17:14and
17:15these
17:15are
17:16also
17:16alleged
17:17information
17:17coming
17:18from
17:18lawyers
17:19or
17:19claiming
17:20to be
17:20lawyers
17:21or
17:21analysts
17:22or claiming
17:23to be
17:23analysts
17:24so
17:24there's
17:24just
17:24plenty
17:25of
17:26news
17:26so
17:26that's
17:27where
17:27I was
17:28coming
17:29from
17:29earlier
17:29that
17:30this
17:30is
17:31not
17:31just
17:31about
17:31whether
17:32to
17:32show
17:32the
17:32video
17:33or
17:33not
17:33number
17:34one
17:34this
17:35is
17:35the
17:35Senate
17:35it's
17:36an
17:36honor
17:37institution
17:37so
17:38what
17:39standard
17:39should
17:40we
17:40observe
17:40and
17:41number
17:41two
17:41for
17:42us
17:42viewers
17:42because
17:43we
17:43will
17:43still
17:44see
17:44so
17:44many
17:44information
17:45such
17:45as
17:45this
17:46how
17:47discerning
17:47should
17:48we
17:48be
17:49and the
17:50level
17:50of
17:50due
17:50diligence
17:51should
17:52we
17:52use
17:52because
17:52in
17:53the
17:53past
17:54when
17:54we
17:54say
17:54fake
17:54news
17:55we
17:55validate
17:56it
17:56as
17:59we
18:00were
18:00frequently
18:01advised
18:01with
18:02legit
18:02sources
18:02but
18:03in
18:03this
18:04case
18:05if
18:06this
18:07is
18:07fake
18:07news
18:07this
18:08is
18:08also
18:08coming
18:08from
18:09a
18:09senator
18:09so
18:10that
18:11should
18:11have
18:11also
18:12been
18:12classified
18:12as
18:13a
18:13legit
18:13source
18:14then
18:15how
18:16can
18:16we
18:16draw
18:16the
18:16line
18:17as
18:17a
18:17public
18:18about
18:19whether
18:19to
18:20believe
18:20a
18:21particular
18:21video
18:22or
18:22a
18:22particular
18:24information
18:25so
18:26I
18:27have
18:27a few
18:28tips
18:28here
18:28that's
18:29also
18:30what
18:30I
18:30use
18:30personally
18:31number
18:32one
18:32is
18:32it's
18:33important
18:33that
18:33once
18:34we
18:34see
18:34information
18:35such
18:35as
18:35this
18:35first
18:36is
18:37we
18:37would
18:37ask
18:37ourselves
18:38could
18:38this
18:39be
18:39true
18:40and
18:41then
18:41on
18:42the
18:42reverse
18:42how
18:43could
18:43this
18:44be
18:44false
18:46so
18:46that
18:47we
18:47would
18:47our
18:47minds
18:48would
18:48be
18:48trained
18:48to
18:48always
18:49look
18:49at
18:49the
18:49other
18:50side
18:50and
18:51then
18:51the
18:51second
18:51piece
18:52is
18:52if
18:53this
18:53happens
18:54to be
18:54a
18:54video
18:55or
18:55an
18:55information
18:56that
18:57does
18:57not
18:58support
18:58the
18:59narrative
18:59I
19:00want
19:00would
19:01I
19:01still
19:02favor
19:03releasing
19:05it
19:05so
19:06these
19:07are
19:07questions
19:08including
19:08the
19:08standards
19:09of
19:10what
19:10the
19:12scope
19:13of a
19:13privileged
19:13speech
19:14of a
19:15senator
19:15should
19:15be
19:16these
19:16are
19:17standards
19:17know
19:17that
19:17we
19:18are
19:18yet
19:18to
19:18continue
19:19to
19:19ponder
19:20and
19:20reflect
19:21but
19:22this
19:23is
19:23also
19:23a
19:24moment
19:24for
19:25us
19:25to
19:25teach
19:26ourselves
19:27to
19:27always
19:27take
19:28a
19:28step
19:28back
19:29considering
19:29all the
19:30things
19:30that
19:30we
19:30see
19:31in
19:31social
19:31media
19:32when
19:32we
19:32scroll
19:32up
19:33and
19:33down
19:33and
19:34at
19:34the
19:34same
19:34time
19:34be
19:35more
19:35discerning
19:36of
19:37what
19:37we
19:37see
19:38and
19:39what
19:40we
19:40hear
19:40so
19:42that's
19:42the
19:42story
19:43here
19:43on
19:43Beyond
19:43the
19:44headlines
19:44and
19:45the
19:45video
19:45may
19:45have
19:46been
19:46eventually
19:47withdrawn
19:47but
19:48the
19:48debate
19:49inside
19:49the
19:49Senate
19:50continues
19:50over
19:51truth
19:51accountability
19:53and
19:54the
19:54growing
19:54tension
19:55within
19:56the
19:56chamber
19:56I'm
19:57DJ
19:58Moises
19:58thank
19:58you
19:59for
19:59joining
19:59us
19:59this
20:00afternoon
20:00this
20:01is
20:01Beyond
20:01the
20:01headlines
20:02see
20:02you
20:03again
20:03tomorrow
20:15and
20:21and
20:26and
20:28the
20:29and
20:29and
Comments