Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago
Australia has launched a massive legal case against US manufacturing company 3M, seeking billions in damages over toxic “forever chemicals” allegedly linked to firefighting foam used at defence sites. The government claims the chemicals contaminated land and water across multiple military bases and accuses 3M of failing to properly warn about the environmental risks. Officials say the cleanup has already cost taxpayers more than a billion dollars. 3M denies wrongdoing and says it stopped selling the foam in Australia two decades ago. The lawsuit marks one of the country’s biggest environmental legal battles in recent years.

Follow for the latest updates.
.
.
.
.
#Australia #3M #ForeverChemicals #PFAS #EnvironmentalNews #BreakingNews #ToxicChemicals #Pollution #ClimateNews #WorldNews #LegalBattle #EnvironmentalDamage #HealthRisks #CorporateNews #GlobalNews #NewsUpdate #LatestNews #TrendingNow #HeadlineNews #CurrentAffairs #NewsAlert #TopStory #LiveUpdates #InternationalNews #ViralNews #DevelopingStory #MediaUpdate #thenewswhirl

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00The Commonwealth has today commenced legal action in the Federal Court of Australia
00:04against 3M Company and 3M Australia for allegedly withholding information and
00:11making false statements about the long-term environmental impacts of the
00:15use of 3M firefighting foam containing PFAS. The Commonwealth is seeking more
00:22than two billion dollars in damages to recover significant past and future
00:28expenses incurred in investigating and managing contamination resulting from
00:33the historical storage and use of this foam. Let me be clear this is the largest
00:40legal claim ever brought by the Commonwealth. Our position is that 3M
00:47withheld a range of information and misrepresented the effects of this
00:52substance. This included withholding 3M's own environmental laboratory testing
00:59which showed there was significant adverse environmental effects associated with the
01:04use of 3M firefighting foam. Representing that 3M firefighting foam could be
01:11safely disposed of was biodegradable and not toxic and there were no significant
01:17adverse environmental effects even when disposed of in the way
01:22recommended by 3M and limiting or insufficiently disclosing the effects of
01:283M firefighting foam in a manner that was inconsistent with their own knowledge of
01:34the potential impacts.
Comments

Recommended