Skip to playerSkip to main content
The proposed Digital Media Anti-False Information Act, which imposes a six- to 12-year prison term and fines of up to P2 million on persons found guilty of deliberately spreading fake news that seriously threatens national security, has been approved on second reading in House of Representatives.

Embodied in House Bill (HB) No. 9465, the measure was approved via simple voice vote (ayes vs. nayes) during the marathon plenary session Tuesday night, May 26. (Video courtesy of House of Representatives via Ellson Quismorio | MB)

READ: https://mb.com.ph/2026/05/27/fake-news-peddlers-beware-house-advances-proposed-digital-media-anti-false-information-act


Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5664f6TkaeHgwBly50DWZQ/join

Subscribe to the Manila Bulletin Online channel! - https://www.youtube.com/TheManilaBulletin

Visit our website at http://mb.com.ph
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/manilabulletin
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/manila_bulletin
Instagram: https://instagram.com/manilabulletin
Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@manilabulletin

#ManilaBulletinOnline
#ManilaBulletin
#LatestNews
Transcript
00:00Madam Speaker, today we take up a measure that touches two things that every democracy must
00:06protect, truth and freedom. And let me state at the outset, this bill is not about choosing one
00:14over the other. It is about preserving both. There are those who will say that any law
00:21addressing false information is a threat to free expression. That concern deserves respect.
00:30In a democracy, skepticism toward government power is not a weakness, it is a virtue. But there is
00:38another question that we must also have the courage to ask. What happens to freedom when truth itself
00:45becomes the casualty? What happens when lies destroy reputations, manipulate markets, incite panic,
00:53undermine public safety, interfere with elections, or cause real and measurable harm to ordinary
01:02citizens? What happens when falsehood is no longer an accident, but a deliberate weapon? Because
01:09freedom of speech was never intended to be freedom to knowingly deceive. We live in a time when
01:17information travels faster than verification. A fake emergency advisory can trigger panic. A fabricated
01:25election notice can mislead voters. A manipulated video can destroy reputations, inflame tensions,
01:32or undermine trust in institutions before truth has a chance to catch up. But let me be equally clear,
01:40in confronting disinformation, we must not become a threat to the very freedoms we seek to protect.
01:48Freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and freedom of the press are not obstacles to democracy.
01:55They are among its strongest safeguards. That is precisely why this measure attempts to draw careful lines.
02:02This bill does not criminalize ordinary mistakes, unpopular opinions, criticism of government,
02:10satire, journalism, advocacy, academic discourse, or legitimate political speech.
02:19Instead, it narrowly targets knowing and willful conduct involving false information disseminated with
02:26actual knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for truth coupled with specific intent to cause
02:34verifiable public harm or a serious threat to national security. The measure also recognizes that today's
02:41information environment is shaped not only by individuals but by digital platforms whose systems
02:49influence visibility, amplification, and public discourse.
02:54I move to vote on second reading house bill number 9465 as amended.
03:04Those who are in favor say aye, those who are against say nay, the I-7th house bill 9465 is
03:13approved
03:13on second reading. Congratulations.
03:18Majority Leader.
03:20Thank you very much and a very nice day.
Comments

Recommended