Zum Player springenZum Hauptinhalt springen
  • vor 2 Tagen
China ist "Krebs"? Angebliche Kallas-Aussage geht viral

Virale Beiträge werfen Kaja Kallas vor, China als "Krebs" bezeichnet und zu Krieg gegen Russland und China aufgerufen zu haben. Ein Blick auf die Originalaussagen zeigt: Mehrere Zitate wurden verkürzt oder aus dem Zusammenhang gerissen.

LESEN SIE MEHR : http://de.euronews.com/2026/05/26/china-kallas-aussage-viral

Abonnieren Sie! Euronews gibt es in 12 Sprachen.

Kategorie

🗞
News
Transkript
00:04Welcome to your news fact-checking show. This is Noah Schumann and you're watching The Cube.
00:08This video of EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas in Estonia has prompted a wave of posts and
00:14headlines. In Europe we have a very clear understanding of the diagnosis of the disease
00:21but we don't have agreement on the cure and if you have a very very difficult disease
00:29like you have a cancer then you have two choices either you increase the morphine or you start
00:36chemotherapy. While Kallas remarks were controversial some online users are portraying them as are calling
00:42China a cancer and separately engaging in warmongering. Both blunt her interpretations
00:48that what she actually said. Unlike what the post claimed Kallas did not call China a cancer rather
00:54she was using a medical metaphor while discussing Europe's response to what she described
00:59as Chinese economic coercion and trade pressure. She spoke of morphine referring to subsidies helping
01:05European countries compete and chemotherapy in the context of tougher EU measures that could trigger
01:11Beijing's retaliation. In separate viral posts user also accused Kallas of warmongering by attributing to
01:18her the quote if Europe cannot defeat Russia how then are we supposed to defeat China? But Kallas did not
01:25actually say this. These comments are from a discussion hosted by the Hudson Institute in 2025 where Kallas
01:32argued that failing to pressure Russia over the war in Ukraine would weaken Europe's credibility in
01:37responding to a larger China. Since then short-term extract from the discussion have repeatedly resurfaced
01:43online and misleadingly been presented as fresh comments.
Kommentare

Empfohlen