00:00Ahora, en Tribunal Justice.
00:30Gracias por ver el video.
01:01Gracias por ver el video.
01:30Gracias por ver el video.
01:44Gracias por ver el video.
03:26Gracias.
16:58The court is now on recess.
17:00All parties will be recalled.
17:08Gracias por ver el video.
17:10The way I see it, he's arguing breach of contract.
17:13Breach of an oral contract that she agreed to pay $7,000 and therefore she should be held to that
17:19agreement.
17:20I think we've all been through it
17:22There is no meeting of the minds
17:24There was no agreement as to the $7,000
17:26So his breach of contract claim
17:28In my opinion must fail
17:29Then there's unjust enrichment
17:31That would she be unjustly enriched
17:34By having exclusive use of this vehicle
17:37Despite the fact that he made
17:38A substantial contribution
17:40Well no
17:42If because it's solely in her name
17:44And he wanted it solely in her name
17:46It was giving him a benefit
17:48Both of them a benefit
17:49Well both of them
17:50But most certainly him a benefit
17:51Because it was only him who had inheritance money
17:54The fact that he wanted her name
17:57And only her name
17:58Benefited on the title
18:00The insurance and all that
18:02Really only benefited him
18:04And so his unjust enrichment argument
18:07So too should fail
18:09And while there are a lot of people
18:10That may say as you did
18:12You should give him something
18:13Because he contributed to it
18:14I say unless there's another cause of action
18:17That I didn't think about
18:19I don't think that that applies
18:21When he put her name on everything
18:23He was thinking right there
18:25And he wasn't considering
18:26What was going to happen
18:27If they split up
18:29Because he didn't see that happening
18:30Well that happens
18:31And so as a result of all of that
18:34I believe that his lawsuit
18:36Should be dismissed
18:37I'm right there with you
18:39I think that the decision
18:40To put her name solely
18:41On the title
18:43I don't think those were like shenanigans
18:45Or they were playing fast and loose
18:46I think it was a choice
18:47She would be on the hook
18:48For potential liabilities
18:50And the flip side of that
18:52Is that it is her car
18:53So I'm with Adam
18:55I think they did it both for themselves
18:57I think it was a benefit
18:58That was going to inure to both of them
18:59I think they didn't count on breaking up
19:01So therefore his several hundred thousand dollars
19:03Was going to be in a pot
19:05That they were all going to use
19:06She had nothing
19:07So they were going to be living off of that
19:09I think that she made it clear
19:11That she was willing to give him
19:13Some of the money that he contributed
19:15I think she made it clear
19:17It wasn't going to be seven thousand dollars
19:19And I think that he is entitled to something
19:21He is basically selling her
19:23His portion of the vehicle
19:25That's valued at today's value
19:27And so I feel very comfortable
19:29Giving him a buyout amount
19:31That would reflect that sale
19:32Do you think she offered to pay him something
19:34But I think that those were offers
19:36To try to settle a dispute
19:37I wouldn't bind her to those
19:39I don't think he has any legal entitlement
19:40And just to put a further pin on it
19:43As we just established
19:44Before we left the bench
19:45There was an accident
19:46She's bearing the burden of that accident
19:49It's on her insurance
19:50So he just wants to like
19:51Get all of the benefits of owning something
19:53Without really having to step up
19:54On the other side
19:55I agree with that
19:56And also Pat to your point
19:58About this was an agreement that they had
20:00The car was going to be put in her name
20:02And that they were both going to use it
20:03And she was going to benefit
20:04By the additional monies
20:05That he had from this
20:06That they were protecting
20:07In case of something
20:08But at the same time
20:09What she was expecting
20:10Was a little better lifestyle
20:11She was expecting a bit of a better place
20:14Yeah but so they both
20:14Screwed each other in the relationship
20:16But that doesn't have to do
20:17With the legal aspect of the case
20:18She had cat hair
20:19She had dog hair
20:20And no electricity
20:21She hated that
20:21Well listen
20:22I understand your position
20:24And I disagree
20:25That's all
20:25Okay so I am willing
20:27To give him back something
20:28I'm willing
20:28The car is valued right now
20:29At $4,700
20:30I'm willing to give him
20:32About $2,350
20:33I'm at zero
20:34I'm at zero
20:35Okay I'm willing to do that
20:36Okay
20:3723 and zero
20:39Zero
20:40Got it
20:41Go away
20:46Court is back in session
20:47All parties are reminded
20:48That you're still under oath
20:49All right
20:50Well we have deliberated
20:51And we have reached
20:52A decision
20:53But it is not unanimous
20:55I have two things
20:56That I want to mention
20:56One I would like to put up
20:57On the monitor
20:58Please
20:58O2
21:00Just want to put that photograph up
21:01And say rest in peace
21:02Tiger 5
21:04Yeah
21:04All right
21:05Thank you
21:05You're welcome
21:06I know it's tough
21:08The other thing
21:08I wanted to mention
21:09Mr. Duckett
21:10We've been asked
21:11By Ms. Anderson
21:12Just send
21:13A very polite message
21:14That right now
21:15She would much prefer
21:16To have no further communication
21:18At this time
21:19And if there is going to be
21:20Further communication
21:21In the future
21:21Let it come from her
21:22Great
21:23Fair
21:23Thank you
21:25Now
21:26Back to the case
21:27Judge DiMango's position
21:29Taking depreciation
21:30Into consideration
21:32She would award you
21:34$2,350
21:36And that it would in effect
21:38Be unjust
21:39For you
21:40Ms. Anderson
21:41To take full 100%
21:43Control of a vehicle
21:44That's been fully paid off
21:46That he contributed money to
21:47However
21:48The majority
21:49Between Judge Acker
21:50And myself
21:51We've discussed the email
21:53And we now know
21:53She never agreed to $7,000
21:55So there was no meaning
21:56In the minds
21:57Then that last issue
21:58Then becomes one
21:59Of unjust enrichment
21:59Is she being unjustly enriched
22:02By getting a car
22:03That you contributed
22:04Half to
22:05Part of your burden
22:07Under an unjust
22:08Enrichment claim
22:09Is to prove
22:10That the circumstances
22:12Surrounding all of this
22:14Are unjust
22:15And that she in fact
22:17Had the benefit
22:18By getting possession
22:19Of this vehicle
22:20But the benefit
22:21That you were receiving
22:23Was that you were
22:24Liability free
22:25And that she was assuming
22:27All liability
22:28For future accidents
22:30And so your unjust
22:31Enrichment claim
22:32Cannot succeed
22:33You agreed to have
22:35The vehicle
22:35Put solely in
22:37The defendant's name
22:38To protect you
22:39From any and all liability
22:41Therefore
22:41The judgment of the court
22:43Is that your claim
22:45For $7,000
22:46Denied
22:47And your lawsuit
22:48Sir is dismissed
22:49Thank you
22:51This case has concluded
22:52All parties are excused
22:57Basically I get nothing
22:59For a car that I bought
23:00He thought I was robbing him
23:02Yeah
23:02She's been taking stuff
23:03Out of the house
23:04And I noticed
23:05And then she just
23:06Left
23:06There were dog beds
23:08Everywhere
23:08There were clothes
23:09Everywhere piled
23:10I would clean the kitchen
23:12And then it would be
23:13Cluttered again
23:14I offered to
23:15Take her to dinner
23:16Last night
23:16And said we won't
23:17Talk about anything
23:18We'll just be
23:18Have a friendly dinner
23:19She didn't want to do that
23:21Because we're broke up
23:23And he's suing me
23:24She doesn't like me now
23:25Because I asked for my money
23:27I don't ever want
23:28To see him again
23:29Life goes on
23:29And I'm pretty unhappy
23:31Did a bad breakup
23:32Cost you more
23:33Than a broken heart?
23:34Commit to letting
23:35Tribunal justice
23:36Make it right
23:37Find us on social media
23:41Let's get over this
23:42Let's get over this
24:14Gracias por ver el video.
Comments