Skip to playerSkip to main content
In this ultimate showdown of artificial intelligence, we dive deep into the contrasting features of ChatGPT Image 2 and Nano Banana 2.0! 🤖✨ Discover which UGC platform reigns supreme – whether it's ChatGPT's advanced capabilities or Nano Banana's innovative approach to AI generation.

Are you ready to enhance your content creation experience? Dive into these powerful tools and unlock the potential of your creativity! Check out the links below for your chance to explore these platforms:

Registration Link: [Nano Banana](https://Tava.short.gy/aibanana)

Don't forget to like, subscribe, and drop your thoughts in the comments! Your opinion matters! 💬👍

#ChatGPT #NanoBanana #AIShowdown #ContentCreation #UserGeneratedContent #TechTrends #ArtificialIntelligence #UGC

Category

📚
Learning
Transcript
00:00Hello everyone, welcome back to the channel. In this video we're going to be talking about
00:04ChatGPT images 2.0 that just dropped an hour ago. Now this is actually a lot more important than I
00:10think a lot of people think. AI images have absolutely taken over when it comes to YouTube
00:16thumbnails, images on meta ads, just about everywhere. Here you can see a UGC example
00:22where I gave it this AG1 product photo with big text, medium-sized text, and small text.
00:30And when you look at this image that it one-shot, you can see that the text looks perfect on
00:36the
00:36product that the man is holding up, and the man looks extremely realistic. And as an AI marketer,
00:43one of the most common things people use image models for is start frames for videos. So this
00:48is an example of GPT-2 creating a start frame for what would be a piece of content, as you
00:54can see
00:54very similar to this one, of a video that I would post on my Lifehack brand on Instagram that I've
01:00gotten over 900 million views creating this type of content. And if you want the behind the scenes on
01:07how I got over 900 million views on Instagram this year, as well as all the templates and automations
01:13that I use, as well as joining over 1,300 members that are absolutely obsessed with AI image and video
01:20generation, make sure to join my school community. The link will be down in the description.
01:26So really quickly breaking this down, I think the aesthetic looks really good. It looks somewhat
01:30realistic, but also cartoony. You can see the two faces right here. And then another little detail is
01:36it was able to embed the Lifehack watermark really well into the middle. So I think it did a really
01:41good
01:41job at this image. I'm going to try to keep this video pretty short and to the point on all
01:46the use
01:47cases that I think are valuable with GPT 2.0. One thing to note is you can use it on
01:52ChatGPT directly,
01:53just asking for images and it could do 9 by 16 here, as well as they integrated it directly into
02:00FreePick. I'll have my referral link in the description. And just so you can see right here,
02:04you can choose only these dimensions. I'm pretty sure they're going to be updating them with more
02:09shortly as ChatGPT supports more. But one thing I wanted to note right here is you can generate on
02:16high version and I can generate about 400 of these with my $45 a month plan. And then on medium,
02:22I can do about 1300 images just for reference if you're planning on subscribing to FreePick.
02:29And on ChatGPT, you could basically ask it for free. I have the $20 plan and I've asked it quite
02:35a
02:35few times and it hasn't stopped me yet. But yeah, one thing I noticed with GPT is it's a really
02:41good
02:41image creation model. It's not as good, I think, at editing images as much as Nano Banana 2 is. But
02:48I
02:48really think that it's going to put up a very strong fight when it comes to comparing this to
02:53Nano Banana 2. So let's go through some of the first examples. This is just a selfie from an iPhone
02:59of a woman. And the whole point of this model really is to try to make it look as realistic
03:04as
03:05possible. So I think this looks pretty good. I don't really see any flaws with it. I think it's
03:09almost imperfect to a level that it looks more realistic. And then let's scroll down right here.
03:15We have the man selfie in the gym. As you can see, the sweat looks pretty good on this one.
03:20It just
03:20looks overall realistic. And every month we're essentially getting more and more realistic AI
03:26and it's becoming harder and harder to tell between reality. So all my prompts I took from an AI
03:33and basically this one was supposed to test motion and everything. As you can see, the person looks
03:39really good. But there is a little bit of glitching up on the skateboard. You can tell this is AI
03:44because the skateboard has definitely changed. So, you know, overall the person, the aesthetic,
03:49really, really good. But you can definitely tell that the model can still make mistakes
03:54based on this render. This is another test right here trying to test how realistic an image would look
04:01like of someone just writing on the piece of paper. As you can see, if you really like look at
04:08it
04:08closely, you can see there's some kind of like mistake right here. But some of the letters just
04:13look a little bit too good. Maybe it's just my handwriting. But overall, it's very impressive,
04:18but maybe not completely perfect. Going down to this one, this is supposed to be a test of a piano
04:25player with a wedding ring on the left hand. As you can see, it got that detail and the hands
04:30and the
04:31piano and everything look very realistic to me. Music notes right here, you can tell, you know,
04:37it doesn't fully understand what the music notes are supposed to look like. But other than that,
04:41the image is really good. Scrolling down, this is just supposed to be an iPhone with a SAS splash
04:47screen. You know, it's very simplistic, but it does look good. And the text looks really sharp,
04:52unlike probably how it would be in the past. Scrolling down here, we have Tokyo at 2am.
04:58The lighting looks really cool. The reflections look really cool. I think it did a really good job
05:03at this. Then we have a macro photo of a raspberry. I'm not sure how realistic this looks like, but
05:10I
05:10mean, I think it did a good job overall. Then scrolling down, we have three people of different
05:16generations. So this is supposed to be the grandmother, the mother and the daughter.
05:20You can see it looks pretty good. One thing I do notice and start to notice when I generate this
05:25is you get these little kind of like imperfections. It's kind of hard to describe,
05:30but there's just this like stylization that I see really hard here and here that I just noticed
05:36quite a bit in a lot of the Chachupis generations. But other than that, it looks very impressive.
05:42Okay. And then going on to this, this is a macro shot of a bee. I mean, this one looks
05:46pretty
05:47impressive to me. You can tell, um, you know, the little pollen and stuff like that. Um, but the
05:53little cross hatching, or I don't even know how to describe it, but it's a little bit obvious in this
05:58photo too. And then here is the last test I did directly on ChatGPT. This is a really cool one.
06:04Something GPT, even from image 1.0 a year ago could do. It can create transparent images. And as a
06:10designer slash, you know, creator on YouTube, like this is actually really huge because, you know,
06:16the fact that it's extremely transparent and usable when put into other images and stuff like that
06:23manually, it just goes a long way. And then lastly here, I had it create this, which you may recognize
06:31from my actual background. This is not actually where I am. I've been recording this entire time
06:37with a background that was generated by GPT 2.0. Now let's quickly go to the generations I did
06:44on FreePick. These ones have reference images. So we're testing a little bit more, but the first ones
06:49are just the same prompts as I give on ChatGPT. As you can see, this woman looks like a very
06:55realistic
06:56selfie. Definitely something you could catfish people with. I think I like this one even more.
07:01This is the guy in the gym. Just the details of like the sweatiness and the skin, ChatGPT has nailed
07:08on this update for sure. Now this one right here, which I'm going to pop up, if you guys know
07:14Jin Yang
07:14from Silicon Valley, all these images are just based on him. This one is him flexing with the
07:20Lamborghini. I thought this one was pretty funny. I think the chains kind of look a little unrealistic
07:25how the pendants are, and it doesn't look exactly like him. So I wouldn't give this the best rating,
07:30but here is him on Wall Street. I thought this one was a lot better. It looks just like him.
07:35I really
07:36like how the settings work and how you have all these people and the screens very similar. This part
07:40looks a little weird right there. Other than that, I think it looks pretty good. You have
07:44Jin Yang in UFC. I thought this one was pretty funny, but it looks pretty realistic in my opinion
07:51and a lot like him. Then we have Jin Yang as a samurai. You know, not too much there. Then
07:59we have
07:59Jin Yang as a space explorer with the SpaceX logos. I mean, that looks really good. I think overall,
08:05I really like this photo that JGPT created. And then here is the new test. The new test,
08:13I gave it this reference image, and I gave it specifically this AG1 boxing because it has
08:20packaging, because it has this big text here, medium-sized text, small text, and then extremely
08:25small text. So when we look at this image, you can see one of the improvements is the text is
08:31substantially better. On other AI models, it would really mess up small text. But here you can see
08:36the big text is perfect. This text is perfect. You know, this looks really, really good and really,
08:42really good. And you can't see it perfectly, you know, without zooming in, but it is miles beyond
08:47what it used to be. And then we had this test that I started the video with, you know, very
08:52realistic
08:52skin. The box looks really good in this one. Then we have this image. I thought this image was also
08:58great. You know, this is a perfect way to start a UGC video. You just need to generate these images
09:04and then animate them with C-Dance or VO. This one was good, except for the guy has two arms
09:09on the
09:10right. So it definitely messes up. But like the solar flare right here, the box, everything else about
09:16it is very, very impressive. Now here is the thumbnails. Now, oftentimes it would create these like
09:21three side by side. I think it's just how my prompts are that are kind of like messed up.
09:25But this image that I showed you in the past, it was a really good start frame for my videos.
09:32And then right here, I did one more test where I put Jin Yang into an actual manga that was
09:38colored.
09:39And as you can see, it looks like him. It's able to create all the cells and everything in one
09:44image
09:44with all the instructions. So this just illustrates how good the model is at coming up with more graphic
09:50designs. That's something that they demoed a lot in the video and that I'll maybe go into more
09:55detail in the future. Anyways, these are all the tests I wanted to show. I want to get this video
10:00out as soon as possible. Thanks for watching and I'll see you guys later.
Comments

Recommended