Skip to playerSkip to main content
A fiery Senate exchange saw Jacky Rosen accuse Pete Hegseth of letting personal disputes influence a major national security decision involving Anthropic. Rosen suggested the move to label the company a security risk may be tied to a public contract disagreement. Hegseth strongly rejected the claim, launching a sharp critique of Anthropic’s leadership. The confrontation highlights growing tensions over the role of artificial intelligence in defense, potential conflicts of interest, and how political and personal dynamics may shape high-stakes policy decisions.


#PeteHegseth #Anthropic #AI #USPolitics #SenateHearing #BreakingNews #NationalSecurity #TechPolicy #ArtificialIntelligence #Government #PoliticalDebate #Defense #USNews #WorldNews

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00So I just want you to help me understand this.
00:02In February, on the eve of Operation Epic Fury,
00:05you publicly designated Anthropic as a supply chain risk.
00:10However, this week it's been reported that the White House is now helping agencies
00:14get around this decision to access Anthropics technology.
00:17So the administration cannot credibly make both claims simultaneously.
00:24So before I ask you about the inconsistency,
00:26I just want you to reconfirm what it is you plan to use this technology for.
00:32It's been publicly reported that the decision to label Anthropic a national security risk
00:36was influenced by your personal and very public contract dispute with Anthropic
00:41when the company said that its technology could not be used for fully autonomous weapons
00:46targeting or mass surveillance of Americans.
00:49So following up on your response to Senator Rounds earlier,
00:53can you confirm whether or not there will always be a human in the loop
00:58when AI is used for lethal targeting decisions?
01:03Well, first of all, on Anthropic, they would not agree to our terms of service.
01:07That would be like Boeing giving us airplanes and telling us who we can shoot at.
01:11This is not just about Anthropic, though.
01:13I just want to be clear.
01:15And also, Anthropic is run by an ideological lunatic who shouldn't have a...
01:19But that's not my question.
01:20My question is AI writ large.
01:21Decision-making over what we do.
01:23Writ large.
01:23We follow the law, Senator.
01:25Should AI...
01:25Will you confirm?
01:26You said this to Senator Rounds earlier, so I'm just asking for you to...
01:29We follow the law, but we don't have to sign a different terms of agreement with Anthropic.
01:33That's not...
01:33This is not the question.
01:35This is not about Anthropic.
01:36This is just an example.
01:37I want you to confirm that whether or not there will always be a human in the loop
01:43when AI is used in a kill chain for lethal targeting decisions,
01:47will there always be a human in a loop, or will AI make the decision?
01:51You said this to...
01:53We follow the law and humans make decisions.
01:58So you will confirm what you said to Senator Rounds, that a human will always be in the loop
02:03when AI is used.
02:05Which is why...
02:06I've just...
02:06That's part of our terms of service anyway.
02:10You know...
02:11It's how we operate.
02:12All I want to say is this.
02:14There is a DOD directive, 3000.09, which mandates that autonomous and semi-autonomous weapon systems
02:25be designed to allow commanders and operators to exercise appropriate levels of human judgment
02:30over use of force.
02:32That is in the DOD directive.
02:34That's why we follow the law, Senator.
02:36So the answer is yes, Mr. Secretary.
02:39The answer is we follow the law.
02:40Absolutely.
02:41I think this is more important than following the law.
02:44I think that people want to know that AI isn't going to make lethal decisions, and it
02:49is critically important.
02:49AI is not making lethal decisions.
02:52That's what we want to hear.
02:53We're going to follow on that one.
02:57Subscribe to One India and never miss an update.
03:02Download the One India app now.
Comments

Recommended