Saltar al reproductorSaltar al contenido principal
  • hace 7 semanas
Christopher Murray está presentando la película "El cristo ciego" en el Ficci 2017. El director chileno habló sobre el origen de los mitos religiosos y la relación entre el cine y la democracia moderna.

Para mayor información ingresa a http://www.elespectador.com/

Sigue a El Espectador en Redes Sociales
YouTube: https://goo.gl/jLpssG
Twitter: https://twitter.com/elespectador @elespectador
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/elespectadorcom
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/elespectador
Google+: https://goo.gl/HhJOSA

Otros Canales de El Espectador
La Pulla: https://www.youtube.com/c/LaPulla Suscribirse
Claro Oscuro: https://goo.gl/cqBNJe Suscribirse
Colombia 2020: https://goo.gl/Gs3U86 Suscribirse

Nuestra red de canales
El Espectador: https://goo.gl/YtSr28 Suscribirse
Noticias Caracol: https://goo.gl/oaAkxa Suscribirse
Blu Radio: https://goo.gl/OrmS44 Suscribirse
Caracol Next: https://goo.gl/5NRoAH Suscribirse
Caracol Televisión: https://goo.gl/xXqv7e Suscribirse
Gol Caracol: https://goo.gl/6W8Xh8 Suscribirse
Cromos: https://goo.gl/NS88ph Suscribirse
Shock: https://goo.gl/Qq7XPQ Suscribirse

Categoría

🗞
Noticias
Transcripción
00:05Good evening, we are in the section Conversemos
00:08in the Cartagena Festival with the director chileno Christopher Murray
00:12Welcome, thank you for being with us on El Espectador
00:16Thank you for the invitation
00:17We are presenting a film called El Cristo Ciego
00:20which leads us to a very important topic
00:24You said in a documentary about the birth of the religious myth
00:30or something like that
00:31how does that birth of the religious myth
00:35according to you?
00:38Well, the movie has components of the documentary
00:40but I don't think it's a documentary
00:45and I think for me it's a question
00:48about how we fill the void
00:52how we build the meaning
00:55and I don't think it's a question
00:57in terms of a theory
01:00but it's like asking
01:05that these little myths
01:06are not imposed
01:08but are something that emerges naturally
01:10through the everyday life of people
01:12and through their own personal experiences
01:16and that's what I think
01:17is what the movie is developing
01:20and working on throughout this story
01:24How did these doubts arise in you personally?
01:28I mean, the religious doubts
01:30that are so important in Latin America
01:34and in the world, right?
01:36Well, I think it's difficult
01:39in a certain sense
01:40to be outside of that topic
01:44and it's true that Latin America
01:46is something that one can palpare
01:49in Chile
01:50in an 85%
01:52or 80%
01:53in a country that becomes a believer
01:55and even if one is not a believer
01:56it's also a way to be relacion
01:58with the topic
01:58it's not a topic that can't escape
02:00and on the contrary
02:01I think it's a topic
02:01that by being transversal
02:03it's extremely interesting
02:03to be wondering
02:04in its differences
02:05what is what is manifest
02:07what is what is expressing
02:08and what types of transformations
02:10it is experiencing
02:11because it's something dynamic
02:12not something that is fixed
02:13something that is constantly
02:13and I don't know
02:15I think it's fascinating
02:16because it's a mystery
02:17because it's something
02:19that one can't give
02:22as a totally closed answer
02:27and the contrary
02:28it's an open question
02:29and therefore
02:30it's natural
02:31that an art like the cinema
02:32that can't be
02:33and that the people
02:34and contribute
02:36to believe
02:38let me tell a story
02:43there is a child
02:44there is a child
02:45that went to the desert
02:45with his best friend
02:48the dude put the hand on the way
02:50and told him to the friend
02:51that he clavoured
02:53and suddenly the child
02:54felt something
02:56the sacrifice
02:56and the pain
02:58of his hands
02:58They called the attention of God, and God opened that fire.
03:02He realized that God was not outside, he was inside.
03:04That if he understood that, he could be a Christ.
03:08The title of the film is The Christ is Ciego, right?
03:12No.
03:13The Christ is Ciego.
03:16Where is the title?
03:19Why is that title?
03:20How did it happen?
03:21Or who did it happen?
03:27The title...
03:28I think it happens to me.
03:35Basically, it plays with the idea of the Christ that always is...
03:41that has clear his path, that always is looking at,
03:43that has the ability to look at what others do,
03:46and in a certain sense, to build a negation to that.
03:50To build a person who loses, who loses, who loses, who doubts, who doesn't know, who doesn't know, who doesn't
03:57know, who doesn't know.
03:58And that confusion was beautiful.
04:01It was my first idea.
04:02So I decided to keep it in mind,
04:08in doute,
04:13I don't know,
04:14and feel the person who uses other government.
04:14So what I think that's the amount of Dwight does is…
04:29What does it mean?
04:31It's not an official topic, right?
04:35Where do you go?
04:37What repercussions have you had for these topics?
04:42Propaganda is a movie about political myths.
04:48First, a collective movie,
04:50a movie that was made with other directors.
04:52I was the director of the project, in a certain sense.
04:53And yes, I think it's also a movie that, in a certain sense,
04:59talks about the construction of the political image,
05:02the construction of the campaigns
05:04and, in a certain way, the construction of the message
05:08from the political official to the citizens,
05:15in moments of tension and crisis of representation
05:17and low approval of the political class,
05:20in a context of elections.
05:22So, yes, I think that a collective project,
05:26if one had to compare it to this,
05:28which is a totally individual project,
05:30at least from the direction,
05:31because there are a lot of people involved,
05:33I think both talk about how to build a myth,
05:36how to build a image.
05:38So, the question is about the construction,
05:39what is, in a certain sense, the artesanity
05:42of how that is the final result
05:43and what talks about us, how to build.
05:47I think that we are what we build,
05:49we are what we do.
05:49So, the question about what we do,
05:52more than the result,
05:53sometimes it's the question,
05:54or at least that I think it's a good suggestion.
06:06So, I want to ask you the vote,
06:07thank you very much.
06:09Thank you very much.
06:39Yeah.
06:39I think it's not only in Chile, but in other places where we have seen the movie dialogue with local
06:45realities and local elections.
06:47I think it's something quite transversal, like the contemporary democracy, the modern democracy, how it takes place in the elections.
06:55And I think what it does is a little pessimistic perspective, but there is also a...
07:04The counterpile to that also are the movements of the citizens, the people who express themselves, who speak,
07:09whether from the indignation or from the action, I think it's at least talking about a certain movement that confronts
07:17that system that actually looks like a system
07:20super-desgastable, a system that is quite questionable, and I believe it.
07:24I am a person who strongly believes in democracy, but in democracy in serious, in real democracy,
07:30democracy that, in a certain sense, they come coartated by economic power,
07:35they come pre-designed in terms of their messages to convince,
07:39more than an electorate or a consumer,
07:40of an image, of a country, more than a country.
07:45And what would be that democracy in serious?
07:48I think it would be a democracy that would be in serious,
07:50I think it would be in the redundancy, the participation.
07:54The participation free.
07:55You know, there is a legitimate participation and legitimate,
07:58in terms of real influence.
08:01In China, and in other parts, we realize how the economic system,
08:06finance and campaigns,
08:07how many times those interests are dialoging in Chile for a long time,
08:12well, even now,
08:12today, it is just a big scandal,
08:15but it is something that everyone knew,
08:16that the national policy was financed by a large group of economic groups,
08:19and, therefore, that that one felt that they were two separate powers,
08:23in a certain sense,
08:24they were more or less similar to what they were doing.
08:26With a electoral system that,
08:27that one could vote for one another,
08:29for the system,
08:30they always chose one of each band,
08:32so that the election would have to win before.
08:36And so, I think there are a lot of elements
08:38that have to do with the constitution,
08:39which is the constitution of Pinochet,
08:41which has changed,
08:43and there are many clues that, in a certain sense,
08:46I believe,
08:47I believe,
08:47that they have made the democracy in Chile
08:49to have a lot of left to advance.
08:51I know that it doesn't have to do with the cinema,
08:54but the constitution of Pinochet,
08:57why did it not change the constitution?
08:59Because, to change a constitution,
09:01we have to have a very high forum,
09:05and we have to say that,
09:07as much as the horror of it was,
09:10a lot of people who were there,
09:12particularly Jaime Guzmán,
09:13which was the brain behind the constitution,
09:16it was so intelligent to create a constitution
09:18that, to be changed,
09:20it would have been a forum so high,
09:23and a electoral system,
09:24so,
09:25between one side and the other,
09:27that it would have been impossible
09:28to exist for the forum to be changed.
09:29So, it's like a constitution with candado.
09:31They are pressed by the constitution.
09:33A little bit,
09:34it's a bit of that.
09:35And now,
09:36it's a process,
09:37to talk about,
09:38some groups propose
09:39a constitutional assembly,
09:40but it's still something
09:41that, in the final,
09:42it's still not a notion
09:44of a civil support
09:46and a massive support.
09:48And a lot of people,
09:48we have to be honest,
09:49they don't even know what is the constitution,
09:52and they worry about it.
09:52When one sees the list of interests,
09:56the people,
09:56the first one is the security,
09:57the second one is the health,
09:58education,
09:59and the number 15 in the constitution,
10:01because it is so abstract.
10:01The people are concerned
10:02about surviving day-to-day.
10:04So,
10:05wow,
10:05it's a very high,
10:07very abstract,
10:08and complex,
10:09and we are talking about a country like Chile,
10:11and Colombia,
10:12where the education civics
10:13was taken out of the schools,
10:14and now it's going to be again
10:15to instaurated.
10:16So,
10:17it's a long way to go ahead.
10:19One last question.
10:21A Neruda
10:22once they asked
10:23why the poesies served
10:25for the revolution,
10:26and they said
10:27that the only thing
10:28he could answer
10:29was that some of his poems
10:31were in the pocket
10:32of some great revolucionaries
10:33like the Czech.
10:34Do you think
10:34that with the cinema
10:35could happen something like that?
10:38Well,
10:39the question about
10:39the revolution today
10:40is kind of terrible.
10:42In the sense,
10:43what is the revolution today?
10:46What is the revolution today?
10:47What is the revolution
10:47contemporary?
10:48And it's a great question,
10:50because I think
10:50when you talk about the revolution,
10:51I imagine that
10:52it's the revolution
10:53of the...
10:53I imagine that
10:55it's the revolution
10:55of the left.
10:56That is a project
10:58that today
10:58we have to know
11:00to understand
11:02and to understand
11:02that we are in a moment
11:04of a great question
11:05about how in Causal
11:06in Latin America.
11:06In a moment
11:07where everything is changing.
11:10Where the political
11:11projects
11:11are being very dangerous.
11:13And I think
11:15that the cinema
11:16is a tool
11:17of opening
11:17and understanding
11:18and exchange.
11:19For me,
11:20I'm very pragmatic
11:21in that sense.
11:23For me,
11:23a movie,
11:24when it has a sense,
11:25as a cineast,
11:26it's when the movie
11:27is able to
11:28to open
11:29a space of reflection
11:31where it doesn't exist.
11:32Or to contribute
11:33to a space of reflection
11:34where it doesn't exist.
11:35So, I don't think
11:36that it has to do with
11:37to inspire
11:39or to give messages
11:39or to make
11:40propaganda of ideas.
11:41I think that that is
11:42too fixed for what
11:43is the image.
11:43It's something that is
11:44quite dynamic,
11:46more liquid,
11:47more open,
11:49and that,
11:49in general,
11:50has to do with
11:50experiences of meeting.
11:52In the case of my movie,
11:53when I work with people
11:54in a place,
11:55like a meeting
11:55between people
11:58who are co-creating
11:59something,
11:59and then that will be
12:01shared in a place
12:01like Colombia
12:03and that creates dialogue
12:05and influences,
12:06let's say,
12:07that I think
12:09are important
12:10and that sometimes
12:10give a dynamic
12:11to a reality
12:12that is rather
12:14more static
12:15than what they did.
12:16And that movement,
12:17I don't know,
12:19is fundamental
12:20both for cinema
12:21and for democracy.
12:23Well, Christopher,
12:24thank you for this time.
12:26Thank you very much.
12:26Thank you very much.
Comentarios

Recomendada