00:00What happens is that there are subordinates, pool, intelligence, investigation and following main features in the group discussion.
00:10I will tell you all about it.
00:14First of all, more information and knowledge.
00:17It is obvious that if we have more people to make a certain decision, they can provide greater information and
00:24knowledge.
00:25The problem is that we are trying to make a group decision making.
00:33There are 7-8 people who have met and decide.
00:36If there are 7-8 managers and someone who is big, then we have a pool.
00:42And there is a pool such that we have subordinates of our subordinates.
00:46Just like you have made a form of genetics research.
00:53If there is a new innovation, then we will use it or not.
00:59More alternatives in order to make a decision of alternative-based plays a great role.
01:04The more a person or team have alternatives, the better decision would be there for a great of people can
01:12provide various alternatives as compared to an individual decision maker.
01:18Higher accuracy.
01:19If there are a large number of people to think about something, the chance of error is minimized.
01:33If there are many people involved in this decision, it takes a lot of time to reach on a particular.
01:41It would be a process that you must delay your use for a long time.
01:48And the cost of a procedure is needed.
01:50As you can see it, you can see it as a person for thousands of people under the court.
01:53If there are many people who are superb individuals and they have a interview, then it will be a egalitarian
01:56decision.
01:58If there are many of the people who are committed in this decision, you just continue to have a change.
02:04If you have had a change, you can have a change.
02:12I'm going to have a commitment to see my one-man show at the end.
Comments