Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 6 hours ago
Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi strongly criticised the Government of India after the price of domestic LPG cylinders was increased by ₹60.Reacting to the decision, Chaturvedi said the move was “absolutely shameful” and urged the Government of India to immediately roll back the price hike.The increase in cooking gas prices has triggered political reactions and debate over the impact on household expenses across India.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00How do you see these energy prices?
00:02It is absolutely shameful and the government of India should withdraw this immediately.
00:06And I'll tell you why.
00:08It was through sources-based information that media was being fed
00:11that no impact of the war will be borne by the people of this country.
00:15At the very first instance, in the very first week, you've gone and raised the prices.
00:19And you're making the cost of war should be borne by the citizens of this country.
00:23Why was it that the benefits of oil prices that you all got,
00:27the discounted oil that you all got,
00:28the Indians didn't get the benefit of it?
00:31You all kept hoarding the money that you all got.
00:32The oil companies kept making money.
00:34The government of India kept making money.
00:36The advantage was not passed on to the people of this country.
00:39And at the first instance of risk that we are seeing,
00:43and for the government to be able to absorb it,
00:45for all the money you have collected by not passing on the discounted oil price to the Indians,
00:50you all have gone and raised the prices?
00:51It's a shame and they need to roll this back.
00:54The cost of the war won't be borne by the people of this country.
00:57It is for the government of India, which has been not just the taxpayers' money,
01:02but also not passing off the benefits of the cheap oil that they purchased over the years,
01:05made profit out of.
01:07They cannot have the citizens of this country pay for it.
01:12There's a debate going on, the language used by the U.S. official when it comes to giving exemption to
01:17India,
01:17for buying U.S. wine, that is to allow, the word was used allowed.
01:20How do you see the language used by U.S. officials?
01:23You know, it smacks of, and the silence coming from the government of India,
01:28smacks of total surrender to the whims and fancies of a U.S. president.
01:33U.S. president first, you know, the trade that was going on between India and the United States
01:39was a healthy trade, strategic interest and strategic deepening of friendship has happened,
01:44but it was disrupted.
01:45From a 3% tariff, it moved to 55% tariff, to now an 18% tariff,
01:50and BGP is trying to tell us that it's a success story.
01:53And this tariff has come at what cost?
01:55That we have surrendered our strategic rights, our strategic interests,
02:00and our energy security needs on the whims and fancies of United States of America.
02:04And the language is exactly that.
02:07The language comes from a space of arrogance that they know that India has surrendered
02:13the choice that they can make, the independent choices that they can make.
02:16So it's shameful, and the government of India needs to clarify to us,
02:19and we have been repeatedly saying this,
02:21this trade agreement has not come at the back of equal opportunities on equal terms.
02:26It's an unfair trade agreement.
02:27Tell us what was compromised for you to get this trade deal,
02:31and why were these compromises made with United States of America?
02:36There are nobody to tell us where we buy oil from,
02:38at what price we buy it, who we buy it from.
02:41This is not something that comes in U.S.'s domain.
02:43That is one and only India's responsibility,
02:46Indian's responsibility, the government of India's responsibility,
02:48which they have sacrificed at the altar of power.
Comments

Recommended