Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago
Transcript
00:00So there's this phenomenon about controversial works of art, that there's the establishment
00:09that wants to suppress and take down and attack controversial works of art. And this arises
00:20because there's a viewership or a viewer base, listeners, watchers, whatever, that don't
00:30know how to receive the art. And so they may get depressed or they might get angry at something
00:35that's controversial. They watch it and they get in a bad mood and they're ticked off. So
00:43what happens is the establishment then goes after the art, the song, the movie, the picture,
00:49whatever it is. And then they take that down, they suppress it, they eliminate it. But that's
00:54the wrong thing to do. The problem is not the art or the artist or the platform it's on.
01:00The problem is that you have this viewer base, these people, these listeners, these watchers
01:06that don't know how to receive the art. It's not the artist's fault. It's not the song or
01:11the movie. The problem is that you have a group of people that receive the art poorly. They
01:17don't know how to take it. They don't know how to listen to it and think about it and digest
01:21it correctly. They don't think about how is this going to affect me? How do I want this
01:26to affect me the right way? Am I going to let it affect me negatively or positively? So
01:32it's up to the listener, the viewer to decide for themselves. It's not the responsibility of
01:37the artist to live the life of their viewer or to take care or to raise the viewer. It's
01:48up to the viewer. It's their responsibility. So the problem is not the song or the movie
01:53or whatever it is. They shouldn't be taken down. These songs and movies and such shouldn't
01:59be banned. They should be left up. It's art. Art should not be suppressed. Rather, we need
02:05to foster in the public people who receive art correctly, intelligent, strong, smart people
02:14who know how to look and receive and view art and appreciate it correctly and not blame and
02:21insult and attack it. We need an establishment that's intelligent enough to support art, even if
02:27it's deemed so-called controversial, quote, controversial or dirty or explicit, whatever you want to call
02:35it. We need a more intelligent system that supports art, even if it's naughty or nasty. These labels
02:43we put on them there are totally ridiculous and absurd and not even worth discussing because they're
02:54they're so wrong. But the art is good. Leave the art up. That's the point.
Comments