Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 3 minutes ago
A lot of these range topping models do have more affordable options that sit below them in the range. So, in this video Sam Gupta answers explores how much difference there really is between a top of the range road bike and the one which costs much, much less.

We have looked at the Cannondale SuperSix EVO Lab 71 and the Cannondale SuperSix EVO 3 as our points of comparison with each bike representing it's corner very well. The LAB71 model is no doubt sat amongst some of the most desirable road bikes currently available while the EVO 3 represents itself as a bike of the people with a Shimano 105 Di2 groupset, hydraulic brakes and some very honest wheels and finishing kit.

$4000 vs $16,000 Road Bike
Transcript
00:00How does your dream bike compare to the one that you can actually afford, the bike that
00:05embodies the same spirit but is more realistically priced?
00:09The question is, if you go for the better value option, will you be disappointed?
00:14I'm going to put these two bikes head to head to tease out the nuances and explain
00:19what these two very different price points mean for the everyday rider.
00:23The bikes in question are these two Super 6s from Cannondale.
00:27We have the Super 6 Evo 3, which comes in at £4,000 or $4,200.
00:33And we also have the range-topping Lab 71 model, which comes in at £12,500 or $16,000.
00:47The first thing many of us will jump to as a very obvious point of comparison is weight.
00:53There is no doubt that a bike using Cannondale's most sophisticated carbon fiber layup, along
00:59with carbon finishing kit, lightweight wheels and the best components SRAM has to offer will
01:04be lighter than a bike with box section alloy rims and Shimano's third tier groupset.
01:09But the question is, by how much?
01:13Well, according to these scales, the Lab 71 tips the scales at 6.95 kilos, and the Super 6 Evo
01:203 comes
01:21in at 8.49 kilos. That's a difference of around 1.5 kilos. That means you're paying about £5.52
01:30per gram of weight saved over and above the Evo 3.
01:34If we put that weight difference into the context of overall rider and bike weight,
01:39you're looking at roughly a difference of 1-2%. The reality is, if your main concern is weight,
01:46then opting for a heavier bike, which also saves you a fair chunk of cash, but in turn may require
01:53you to work slightly harder, resulting in more calories being burnt, then I'm confident that's
01:59going to net a far greater return. That being said, between the two bikes,
02:04there is a clear weight difference. It's up to you to decide how much value you can
02:09attribute to saving the equivalent of two 500ml bottles of water.
02:18I'm sure you've heard myself and many others bang on about the fact that upgrading a bike's wheels
02:24should be the first thing you consider changing, and this advice is especially apparent when looking
02:30at these two bikes. The Evo 3 comes with some reliable, but not flashy, alloy wheels from DT
02:37Swiss, and the Lab 71 comes with a 2.5 grand set of wheels from Reserve, featuring aerodynamically
02:44optimised lightweight carbon rims and spokes with ceramic bearings. The wheels on the Lab 71 are really
02:51very nice. They're a great example of wheels that manage to combine lightweight and impressive
02:57stability, especially in crosswinds. They're a thought-after choice for a cyclist who enjoys
03:02riding a variety of parkours, fast on the flat, fast on the climbs, and stable on the descents.
03:08And it's not just the weight and the profile of these wheels which impresses, but they also feature
03:14a semi-hooked rim for good tyre compatibility, along with a wide internal rim width, making them a great
03:20pairing with the very on-trend 28 and 30c road bike tyres that we often see today.
03:27These wheels really are a highlight of the Lab 71 build. However, the Evo 3's box section alloy rims
03:34really aren't anything to write home about. Sure, they are strong, reliable wheels from a brand with
03:41a great reputation, of course being DT Swiss, but they aren't the most inspiring things to ride on.
03:47However, this is where I will put it to you. While the wheels on the Lab 71 are a great
03:54choice,
03:55they're still not your choice. Would you instead prefer to purchase a better value bike which is in
04:01need of a wheel upgrade, allowing you to find the pair which is right for you? Perhaps you want to
04:07go
04:07deeper or shallower. At least then you have a set of wheels which matches the riding you do,
04:13with the bonus being that you then have a spare set of alloy wheels at home for either winter riding
04:19or as a fallback for when your fancy ones are being serviced. In that same vein of thinking,
04:25if you were to buy the better value bike and then upgrade the wheels and tyres, due to the huge
04:31improvement in ride feel, performance and saved weight, you're going to take a quantum leap forwards
04:37towards the kind of performance one would experience on the Lab 71, but for a much smaller cost.
04:44You can buy the reserve wheels found on the Lab 71 for around two and a half grand, which would
04:49mean
04:49you could buy the Evo 3 and the wheels and have thousands left over. But for a bike like the
04:56Evo 3,
04:57I think a set of wheels from Hunt would be a better matchup. I will put this to you now
05:02though,
05:02we actually swapped the wheels from the Lab 71 into the Evo 3 to see what the weight difference would
05:08be and it almost knocked off a kilo. Wheels are not the only thing that you may want to play
05:19around
05:19with. All too often we see brands releasing bikes with handlebars which we believe are far too wide
05:25for the riders for which they're intended and Cannondale is not innocent in this regard.
05:32These quite frankly beautiful integrated carbon bars that come on the Lab 71 are a full 42cm wide
05:40and the Evo 3's coming at 40cm. The difference here though is that the bars on the Evo 3 are
05:46not
05:47part of a one-piece cockpit and instead can fairly easily be changed for an alternative.
05:53You could either go for the same specification of bar but in the correct width or you could opt
05:59for an upgrade. It's your choice. The key here being is that they would not be nearly as expensive
06:05as replacing and fitting the right size of bar on the Lab 71 which Cannondale is currently listing
06:12for £450 or $650. We've tested the effect narrow handlebars have in the wind tunnel on what's saved.
06:22And even by sizing down from a 42cm bar to a modest 38cm bar there are savings to be had
06:30in the realms
06:31of 17 to 35 watts. That's a huge amount and would go a long way to making you tangibly faster.
06:44One of the common buzzwords that we're peppered with by marketing departments
06:48is ceramic or ceramic bearings. These silky smooth bearings are pretty mesmerising by how freely they
06:56spin and if you've got the cash you can expect a full suite of them on the Lab 71 bike
07:01in both the
07:02bottom bracket and the wheels. However, I'm confident that in a blind test your everyday rider would never
07:09be able to tell the difference. Still bearings, when well maintained and manufactured by a good brand,
07:15will perform at a level so incomprehensibly close to ceramic ones and will also save you a fair bit
07:22of cash in the long run. So, while it is nice to know that they're there, I don't think this
07:27is
07:28something you're going to be missing out on by opting for a better value bike.
07:37Until now, I have talked a lot about what makes these bikes so different, but it's important to
07:43look at what makes them so similar. Of course, they share the same name and that means they share the
07:48same frame mould, just with different carbon fibre and layups. They do though share the same geometry
07:55and the same engineering quirks such as a triangular shaped steerer tube. Even parts of the specification are
08:02similar. Both have hydraulic disc brakes and both have wireless 12 speed group sets. These are the
08:09things that as riders we interact with most when cycling. So, for these parts of the bike to be so
08:14similar brings me back to my original question. Would you be disappointed with the better value bike?
08:22I think that question will always be completely subjective. It entirely depends on what your point
08:28of reference is. If you've never had a carbon road bike with electronic gears and disc brakes,
08:34then no, you absolutely will not be disappointed with the EVO 3. Unless, of course, you're in love with
08:41the beauty of old bikes and nothing will ever change that. However, if you already own a swish bike with
08:47all of these same features and more, then yes, it may feel like a downgrade. In which case, the need
08:54to buy
08:55a bike like this would become questionable, unless you really wanted something to race on or take on
09:00holiday. If you want consumer advice, then I'm sure you can see where I'm going. Buy the better value bike,
09:08upgrade the wheels and tyres and make sure you have the right width of handlebars. You'll be golden.
09:14But, if you have the cash and you just want it, then buy the range topper. It won't disappoint you
09:20and
09:21you will have loads of fun on it. Loving your bike is important because that plays a big role in
09:27your
09:27desire to want to ride it. Bikes like these are an emotional purchase. We all know that if you want
09:34to ride on the road, you can do that for a much lower price than either of these bikes. The
09:3912 and a
09:39half grand option is just an even more emotional one. Nobody buying the Lab 71 build can claim to need
09:46it for the marginal gains. Because those that need marginal gains aren't buying bikes. They're being
09:53paid to be on them. We buy bikes because we want them and because we like them. We like how
09:58they
09:58look, how they make us feel and the enjoyment they enable of propelling ourselves down the tarmac.
10:04So, while I'm sure we'd all love to have a beast like this sat in our garage, we all know
10:10that we'd be
10:11just as quick on something costing much less. For most of us, speed isn't the biggest factor. It's
10:17about something far more intangible. Let's not forget, if it is speed you're after, it's about you, not the bike.
Comments

Recommended