Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 1 day ago
The Sram Red 1x13 XPLR gravel bike groupset can be found on some of the best road bikes, including this new Cervelo S5, but is it really better than 2x road bike groupsets?

In this video we explore the advanatges and disadvantages of a 1x vs 2x road bike and our impressions of the Sram 1x13 XPLR AXS groupset. Is it better than the current Shimano Dura-Ace or Sram Red AXS road bike groupsets?
Transcript
00:00This is the bike that I've been riding for the last few weeks. It's the new Cervelo S5 and it
00:05is very good. It's more aero than the last one, it's more comfortable than the last one, and it's
00:12lighter than the last one. There is just one thing about it though which I'm not too sure about.
00:18You see, you can choose the new S5 with either a Dura-Ace groupset, an Ultegra groupset,
00:24a SRAM Red groupset, a SRAM Force groupset, or this, a Gravel groupset. Now this might seem like
00:34a little bit of an odd choice. This is about as race bike as race bikes get and yet it
00:40has a cassette
00:41that is quite literally bigger than the one on my Gravel bike. It's a 1046 in fact. Now Cervelo
00:49aren't the only people offering this either. 3T are offering something similar and if you
00:53project 1 a Trek you can also spec this groupset onto the latest Madone.
00:58But should you? Is 1x13 the future of groupsets? Does it offer any meaningful advantages over a 2x
01:06system or indeed a 1x12 speeds groupset? And should more road bikes start offering it?
01:13Well, this is Cycling Weekly and I've been finding out.
01:21I've been wanting to test this groupset out on the road for a little while now,
01:25ever since Lidl Trek used this groupset at the Spring Classics. More on that later.
01:30Why? Well, I'm a self-confessed fan of 1x. I think that it adds simplicity,
01:36I like not having to switch between front rings mid-climb and I also like the clean looks.
01:42In fact, I like 1x so much that I now not only run it on my gravel bike, but also
01:47on one of my road
01:49bikes. I've found it great for the criterium racing that I do and the rolling terrain around where I
01:54live, but this isn't all about me. I think that it has benefits for lots of other riders too. Riders
02:00just getting into the sport for example. Riders who can't help but cross-chain. And anyone who wants to
02:07get rid of the seven or so gears that are literally overlapping. Let me explain. But before I do,
02:13make sure you're subscribed to the channel because it really does help us out.
02:17So, this bike here. Right, it's got a 50 tooth ring at the front. Now that is fairly big by
02:241x standards,
02:25but fairly small by usual road race bike standards. And these are the gear proportions that you get
02:31when it's paired with that 1046 tooth cassette. You can see that there are 13 unique gear combinations.
02:4013 gear combinations that give me the following speeds when ridden at 100 rpm. So, the easiest gear
02:48down here gives me a speed of 14 kilometers an hour when peddled at 100 rpm. Obviously I can comfortably
02:54pedal a fair bit slower than that if I need to, but 100 rpm does make the maths a fair
02:59bit easier. In the
03:00hardest gear, so using the 10 tooth cog up here, I can get to a speed of 64.3 kilometers
03:07per hour,
03:08again when peddling at 100 rpm. In a sprint finish, I might be able to pedal a bit faster than
03:13that. And
03:14so this can be stretched depending on what cadence you find comfortable. So now let's compare that to
03:20a more conventional setup. As you can see, there is a lot more gears going on here. Now I rather
03:27like
03:28the look of this Cervelo S5 with the Dura-Race groupset. And that has quite a generous 11 34 tooth
03:35cassette at the back. And then at the front it's got a 54 tooth big ring and a 40 tooth
03:42little ring.
03:43Now type in those numbers and we can see that in the big ring at the front and the smallest
03:47cog at the
03:48back I can now travel at 63.1 kilometers per hour, again in the hardest gear at 100 rpm. Now
03:56that is
03:57about 1.2 kilometers per hour slower than on the 1x13 system. So maybe I get an easier gear as
04:06a result.
04:07Well actually no. When peddled at 100 rpm, little ring at the front, in the 34 at the back, you
04:14can see
04:15it gives me a speed of 15.1 kilometers per hour. 1.1 kilometers per hour faster than on the
04:231x setup.
04:24What this means then is that without a doubt, the 1x setup offers me more range than the 2x setup
04:32that
04:32I would go for. And there's more. So if you look at these gear ratios, you can see there's loads
04:37of
04:38overlap. In fact, 9 out of the 24 gears are overlapped. And what that means is that you're lugging
04:45around some gear combinations that you will quite literally never use. This one for example. That
04:53would be a horrendous cross chain. I'm never going to use that. All of these, Shimano won't even let me
05:00use these ones because my chain will be too baggy. What this comes down to is the fact that if
05:05we've been
05:05using 1x since the dawn of time, I don't think that anyone would come along and invent such an
05:13overcomplicated and, frankly, inefficient system as 2x and manage to convince anyone that it's the
05:19way to go. So why is it still so popular in 2025? Well, the way I see it for three
05:27reasons. Number one,
05:28it's not actually any heavier than the 1x setup. Despite adding a front mech and a chainring,
05:34the rear mech is much, much smaller and lighter, and this 13-speed cassette is not that light. I mean,
05:41it is light for how big it is, but it's not that light. In fact, it's about 100 grams heavier
05:47than
05:47the one you might see on SRAM's 2x setup. Number two, efficiency. Now, I don't have any figures,
05:54but I will be trying to get some. But we do know that big cogs are more efficient than little
05:59ones,
06:00and that a nice straight chainline is more efficient than a cross chain. That's why,
06:04in time trials, we see such massive chainrings. Whichever way you look at it, I just don't think
06:10that a 1x system is advantageous from a purely efficiency point of view. Feel free to disagree
06:17with me in the comments, though. And finally, and this is the kicker, the jumps in between the gears
06:22are much bigger on the 1x system than they are on the 2x group set. So what's that like to
06:29ride with?
06:30Well, I've been using this bike for just over a month now on a range of rides, ranging from slow
06:36bimbals to races and fast group rides and chain gangs, like the bike's intended for. Towards the lower
06:43end of the gears, and it feels fairly normal, and there shouldn't be much surprise by that,
06:47because if you look, a lot of the gear combinations are actually very similar. 10 versus 11, 11 versus
06:5212, 12, 13, 13, 14, 15, 15, 17, 17, 19, 19, even 21, 21, 24, 24. It's this bit where
07:02things get
07:02slightly more weird. When you're on this bit, you're normally travelling at speeds of, let's say,
07:0830 kilometres an hour and less. The jumps, well, they just feel like they're a bit too much.
07:15Out on rides, I've found myself staying in gears longer, sometimes churning a big one,
07:21and other times spinning a smaller one than I ordinarily would. And that is not an efficient
07:26way of riding. And on rides where you're on your limit, the last thing that I want to be thinking
07:31about is my cadence. The truth is, I never normally think about my cadence, and yet on this bike,
07:41I've been forced to. And no, that's not just because I was making a video on it. It is, in
07:47fact,
07:47the reason I'm making the video on it, because I thought that 13 speed was going to be the answer
07:51to all my prayers, and was then, frankly, slightly surprised.
07:57The other thing I've noticed when out riding is the dragginess in the easiest gear. And I can show
08:03you what I mean now. So if I spin this and put it up to the biggest gear, you can
08:10almost hear it.
08:11You can hear how much drag is on that gear. And if I put it down here, it's much quieter,
08:19and the cranks spin freer. Now, like I said before, I really, really want some data to back this up,
08:26and I will be trying very hard to get some. But if I can feel the difference in the cranks
08:33with my
08:33hands, then I think that this is in magnitudes of full watts, rather than points of watts.
08:39Now, I said earlier that Lidl Trek had been using this groupset during the classic season in 2025,
08:45including at races such as Paris-Roubaix. They were extremely complimentary about it,
08:50and even went so far as to say that they'd never go back to 2x for those races.
08:56Whilst the likes of Mads Pedersen did use a 10-46 tooth cassette like this for some of the races,
09:02they too clearly wanted some closer ranges and less jumps in between gears when it came to races
09:08that are a bit flatter, such as Paris-Roubaix. And on those races, they modified their mechs,
09:13and they used a more conventional 10-33 tooth cassette. Now, I am all for tailoring your gearing to
09:21the terrain that you're riding, but I just don't think that switching out cassettes is as necessary
09:27on a 2x setup. And let's face it, cassettes really aren't cheap.
09:33As I said before, I am a big fan of 1x groupsets, and I really do think that they have
09:38a place on the
09:39road. This 13-speed Explore groupset though, it's exactly what it says it is, a gravel groupset. And
09:47although I've loved trying it, I would personally buy a bike like the Cervelo S5 with one of Shimano
09:52or SRAM's 2x options. Fair play to Cervelo though, for giving the consumer the choice,
09:58and speccing the 2x version with rings that suits the bike's purpose. Going fast.
10:04Circling back to 1x and the crux of it is that to get all this lovely gear range, I simply
10:09think that
10:10for me, the jumps in between the gears are too big for performance road use. I hope that we continue
10:16to see more endurance road bikes and all road bikes with 1x on them, and for select rides I will
10:22still
10:22be very happy on my 1x setup. For me though, the maximum size cassette that I want to be running
10:28on
10:28road is about a 10-36, not a 10-46. Anything above a 10-36, and I find that the
10:35changes in cadence
10:36are just too big of a sacrifice to make. Let me know if your next road bike will be 1x
10:41or 2x down
10:42in the comments below, that will be controversial I'm sure. Do you wish that more bike brands offered
10:47both? The full review of this bike will be live on Cycling Weekly shortly, and before you go,
10:53make sure you like, comment and subscribe. We'll see you next time.
Comments

Recommended