Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 4 hours ago
A woman who took Uber to the Federal Court after she and her guide dog were refused rides more than 30 times says she's frustrated it took her case to compel the company to commit to an external review of its operations. She and her legal team say the problem is endemic and are demanding Uber be held accountable.

Category

📺
TV
Transcript
00:00Look, Paula Hobley, a Victorian woman who is blind, took Uber to the federal court and
00:08argued that the company had broken discrimination law by drivers refusing to pick her guide
00:16dog up on more than 30 occasions.
00:19Now, Uber and Ms Hobley have settled the case without an admission of liability, and within
00:27that settlement, Uber has agreed to an external review of its operations.
00:33Now, that review and the details of it, any recommendations made and the implementation
00:38of those recommendations won't actually be released until 2028.
00:43So some would be questioning, well, that's a fairly long time between now and then for
00:49Uber to sort of be held accountable.
00:52But particularly Ms Hobley, who took the case to the federal court and her legal team who
00:57represented her from the Justice and Equity Centre, say, yes, it is a period of time,
01:02but it is a time where Uber can have their processes analysed, recommendations made, those
01:10recommendations be put in place, and then them actually be tested and then they'll have
01:14to report back.
01:15So there is a level of accountability that the legal team and Ms Hobley are quite pleased
01:21with.
01:21Of course, they acknowledge that it does not straightaway fix the problem, that between now
01:26and 2028 people still may be refused rides, whether you have an assistance animal or a
01:34guide dog.
01:34Ms Hobley said that even while she was going through the legal action, that she was refused
01:39on multiple times, her and her guide dog being picked up by Uber drivers.
01:44So it is still a significant problem.
01:46They acknowledge that, but also really happy that something has finally happened in this space
01:51because it is a significant problem for that community.
01:53Yeah.
01:54And what has Uber had to say?
01:56Look, Uber has said, of course, that the details of the settlement are confidential.
02:02It has acknowledged that.
02:03But it's also said that it does not take the practice of, you know, the instances of drivers
02:10refusing to pick up people with assistance dogs or guide dogs lightly.
02:15It has introduced policies and procedures and technology to ensure that drivers know their
02:20legal obligations and that it has done everything it possibly can to ensure that those processes
02:27are effective and that it will be obviously, you know, it has therefore agreed to this external
02:34review of its practices as well.
02:37And as, I mean, do we know how significant this problem is of drivers refusing people with
02:41guide dogs or other assistance animals?
02:43Look, it is a really significant issue.
02:46It's an issue that has been happening for years, probably more than five and upwards of
02:5110 years.
02:52People report being denied both Uber trips and also in taxis as well, where they refused
03:00entry because they're with a guide dog or an assistance dogs.
03:04Here at the ABC, you know, my team and I have definitely reported on this year in, year out,
03:10multiple times and multiple instances of sort of legal action being taken.
03:16So it definitely is a significant issue.
03:18The community definitely will be marking, I guess, this particular review as a step forward,
03:27but wanting to ensure now that action is taken to really stamp out what they describe as an
03:32endemic problem.
Comments

Recommended