Skip to playerSkip to main content
The last major nuclear arms control treaty between the United States and Russia has expired, removing limits on the world’s two largest nuclear arsenals. With no inspections, caps, or verification mechanisms in place, experts warn that the risk of miscalculation, accidents, or escalation has increased. While there is no direct indication that Russia will attack the U.S., the collapse of the treaty raises global fears and uncertainty. Watch this video to understand the implications of this historic moment and how it could affect global security.

#NuclearTreaty #USRussiaTension #GlobalSecurity #ArmsRace #NuclearThreat #ColdWar2 #NewSTART #RussiaUS #NuclearRisk #WorldOnEdge #Geopolitics #NuclearWeapons

~HT.178~ED.194~

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00The world is entering a dangerous nuclear era. This week, the last nuclear arms control treaty
00:25between the United States and Russia expires. With it goes the final set of rules limiting
00:33the world's two largest nuclear arsenals. For the first time since the Cold War, there
00:40will be no caps, no inspections, no verification. New START was the last treaty limiting strategic
00:50nuclear warheads and missiles. Signed in 2010, it required sharing information and on-site
00:59checks between Washington and Moscow. That helped reduce risk and made global nuclear
01:06postures more predictable. Now it is collapsing. Russia has suspended participation and both
01:15sides refuse New Deal negotiations. The United States and Russia together hold nearly 90%
01:24of the world's nuclear weapons and without any rules, they are free to build and deploy more.
01:32So the big question arises. If the United States attacks Iran, could Russia retaliate even against
01:40the U.S.? The short answer from experts is, there is no direct indication Russia would launch
01:48a nuclear attack on the U.S. But without trust, transparency or treaty guarantees, global risk
01:57and misunderstanding could skyrocket. Experience from past analysis shows that when strategic limits
02:05disappear, decision-makers tend to plan for worst-case scenarios, not peaceful outcomes. The lack
02:13of limits can make nations more prone to assume hostile intent. An attack on Iran, a country already at the
02:23center of nuclear and regional tensions, could force Russia to respond in a range of ways. Military support
02:31or sanctions could escalate diplomatic strain. Russia might boost its own military postures to signal
02:40deterrence, not attacks. Experts emphasize that nuclear strikes are an extreme last resort, especially when
02:49mutual assured destruction remains a factor. The risk is not so much direct disaster, but miscalculation, accident, or a
03:00cycle of escalation. In a world without treaty guardrails, all sides must trustlessly guess at intentions, which
03:10is dangerous. Global leaders, including the United Nations, have warned that this is the most serious nuclear
03:18moment in decades. The Pope and other world figures have called for urgent action to avert a new arms race. The
03:29the bottom line. The expiry of the U.S.-Russia treaty does not mean Russia will attack the United States if
03:38the U.S. attacks Iran, but it does mean the world has fewer safeguards to prevent escalation if regional
03:46conflicts, like a U.S. action against Iran, spread beyond control. The rules have changed, and the calculus is no
03:56longer clear, making every conflict more dangerous than before.
04:01Subscribe to one India and never miss an update. Download the one India app now.
04:11Subscribe to one India and never miss an update. Download the one India app now.
04:22Download the one India app now.
Comments

Recommended