00:00If the goal of the process is the truth, and you are interested in the truth,
00:05if you have a declaration that takes responsibility completely to Mr. Ramón Peralta,
00:11why do you do not apply those elements of the proof that they should be applied?
00:15Why do you hide that information in another process,
00:18which we had to find out for azar?
00:21So, oculting that proof relevant to the innocence of Peralta
00:25is what makes us think that the Public Minister has no interest for the truth.
00:30In other words, we seem to despreciate the truth
00:34while oculting that information that was expulpatible.
00:37In the case of Pagán, you say that Pagán is valid?
00:42No, the testimony of Pagán is not valid because Pagán is a imputator in this case.
00:47No, he is condemned in another case, but in this case he is a imputator.
00:52It is a imputator because Pagán also confessed that it is illicit,
00:56and the Public Ministerial Public has accepted a abbreviation in this process,
01:00nor has accepted a principle of opportunity,
01:03so that by no having produced any conclusion,
01:07any conclusion with an article or something like this,
01:10this case of the purposes of Pagán,
01:13although it is not presented in this case.
01:15It is a imputator, tomorrow could be an imputator.
01:18Can we wait for something else?
01:20Of course, I am telling you that the State of the State will be gone.
01:27Would Peralta talk about his personal autodefense?
01:33Would Peralta talk about Peralta?
01:34Yes, we will see.
01:35Okay.
01:36Pedro Balboa.
Comments