00:00Blanchy, in France, I don't know what that means.
00:03From my point of view, it doesn't mean anything to say.
00:06The rule in France is that is the presumption of innocence.
00:09It's what we preserve all and all, a priori,
00:12of condemnation arbitraire of the state.
00:14It's not a sot that says that you are innocent.
00:20The non-lieue neither does the accusation, nor does the validate.
00:25It's a decision of what we call a judge of instruction,
00:28who does an inquiry, if you want.
00:31According to him or her, there is no enough elements,
00:35there is no charge to continue.
00:38There is no trial.
00:40Now, the nature of this inquiry,
00:42that the judge has seen or not seen,
00:46the way he thought or not thought,
00:48all of that, we don't know.
00:50There is still about 70% of non-lieue orders.
00:54We assist, I think, these last few times,
00:57to a return on the subject of the proof.
01:01After that, when it comes to violence sexuelle,
01:03we have to exige a degree and quality of proof
01:09particularly high.
01:11We have more and more to support the proof
01:14that if there is no material proof,
01:18of the DNA,
01:19of the videos,
01:20we could not prove the sexual aggression.
01:22But it's not like that it works.
01:25There is what we call a intellectual proof,
01:28if you want to call it the indices,
01:31which is not only for the violence sexuelle.
01:33These elements must be examined
01:35in terms of the circumstances.
01:38Not only the circumstances
01:40of the penetration,
01:41but even if we could,
01:44I don't know,
01:45the violence,
01:47in him retirating his jeans,
01:49easily or not.
01:51These are not the circumstances
01:52that we talk about.
01:53It's the global relationship,
01:56the usual practices,
01:58the research of consent,
02:00etc.
02:01They often confond finally violence sexuelle
02:04and sexualité qui tourne mal
02:06and have not understood
02:07that the violence sexuelle
02:08is an act of domination.
02:10Like there is a lot of violence,
02:13sexual aggression,
02:14finally,
02:15we minimize it.
02:16If we really are not in a caricature
02:19if I say,
02:19with act of torture and barbarie,
02:22couteau sous la gorge,
02:23etc.
02:24In fact,
02:25we have almost the impression
02:26that it's not as grave.
02:28Finally,
02:29it's a penetration
02:30that has made a little bit worse
02:31than the other.
02:32What the European Court
02:33has told us this year
02:34to three reprises
02:35this year,
02:36we, France,
02:37who are signataires
02:38of this convention,
02:39is that we do not respect
02:41the rights of victims,
02:42that our procedure
02:44created a secondary victimization
02:46that the investigation
02:47was not effective,
02:49that we did not understand
02:51what they were
02:53of sexual assaults,
02:54what was
02:55consentement
02:56and non-consentement,
02:57and so we had
02:58a lot of work to do.
Comments