Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago
Ownership of recordings is an area of contention between artists and labels, but experts say even a major star like Swift can’t do anything about a $300 million sale that includes her catalog.
Transcript
00:00Things don't seem to be calming down in the public battle between Taylor Swift
00:09and Scooter Braun, after he bought her former label and acquired her music catalog.
00:13So will Swift sue Braun to get her masters? Legal experts say it's not likely. Here's why.
00:19But first, here's a quick breakdown of just what went down. After it was announced that a company
00:23fronted by Braun would pay $300 million for Big Machine Label Group, the Me singer checked
00:28a Tumblr to say she was blindsided by the news and wasn't given the opportunity to buy her master
00:34recordings. Meanwhile, Big Machine's CEO Scott Borchetta defended the deal and posted a partial
00:38screenshot of the last deal memo he says he sent Swift, saying it would have given her ownership
00:43of everything she'd created. He claimed she rejected the deal. However, Swift's attorney
00:47Dawn Passman told The Hollywood Reporter on Tuesday, Scott Borchetta never gave Taylor Swift
00:52an opportunity to purchase her masters or the label outright with a check in the way he is now
00:57apparently doing for others.
00:58So what does this all mean for Taylor's future? Well, according to music attorneys consulted
01:08by THR, she likely doesn't have grounds for a lawsuit. Music specialist Howard King said
01:14she has no legal recourse. However, James Amataro, who represents both artists and companies in
01:19the music industry, says there may be a confidentiality provision that could have been breached when
01:23Borchetta posted the proposed deal terms online. But it's just as likely that he could argue Swift
01:29breached it first by posting on Tumblr. Still, he says, I don't think it's going to result in
01:33litigation of any sort.
01:39Now, Samataro also notes that Swift will still have some control over certain exploitations of her
01:44masters that require permission from the owner of the underlying composition. For example, a film
01:49studio can't license Shake It Off for a movie without the green light from both Braun and Swift.
01:54And public pressure might make Braun think twice about exploiting her work in ways she wouldn't
01:58be happy with.
01:59Alright, for much more on this story, head to THR.com. Until next time, for The Hollywood Reporter
02:03News, I'm Tiffany Taylor.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended