Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago
Transcript
00:00Charles shut down Andrew's outrageous request.
00:03King Charles III allegedly refused to comply with Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's wild request
00:08that would have set back the firm thousands of dollars.
00:12In the book The Windsor Legacy, A Royal Dynasty, author Robert Jobson claims that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor
00:18once asked for $42,000 to cover the cost of live-in spiritual gurus to treat him at his home.
00:25King Charles III was allegedly horrified by the request and said no.
00:28Their mother, Queen Elizabeth II, however, previously passed the request through.
00:34The refusal from King Charles III is part of an effort to streamline the royal family's spending.
00:39The palace began to shift, not loudly, but unmistakably.
00:43His mark was there, quiet but undeniable, Robert Jobson wrote of the monarch.
00:48One senior insider reportedly told him,
00:50This isn't about financial cuts. It's about getting value for money and efficiency.
00:56Sometimes, less truly is more.
00:58However, King Charles III isn't only cutting off Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.
01:03He's also reportedly making moves to stop all non-working members of the royal family
01:07from securing housing that's bankrolled by the firm.
01:10A second source told Robert Jobson,
01:12Properties will be let at commercial rates going forward and to people outside the family.
01:17Where it is in a palace environment, they will, of course, be security vetted.
01:21A third source added,
01:22The king isn't running a housing association for distant relatives.
01:26The tightening of the purse strings is an opportunity for King Charles III to strengthen the royal family as an institution.
01:32There have been the staff cutbacks.
01:34That started straight away.
01:36The buzz phrase in the household now is,
01:38Value for money,
01:39a fourth source told Robert Jobson.
01:42The cash flow shift is paying off.
01:44According to the Daily Express,
01:46In the 2024-2025 financial year,
01:49The official net expenditure of the firm was $111,910,626,
01:57a decrease of 4% compared with the previous year.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended