What if the creator of Bitcoin wasn’t human at all? A growing conspiracy theory claims a super-advanced AI traveled back in time to invent Bitcoin in 2008 — building the perfect decentralized network so humans could never shut it down. It sounds insane… but the deeper you go, the stranger it gets. From Satoshi’s flawless anonymity to Bitcoin’s “too brilliant” C++ code, many believe no human (or team) could have written it. Even crypto legends like CZ have entertained the possibility that Satoshi might not be human.
📧 Email: cryptorobothelp@gmail.com
💰 Affiliate Links
Sofi Checking & Savings – Get $25 free ➝ https://www.sofi.com/invite/money?gcp=16a53d0f-b4b2-441d-9100-cfb506305260&isAliasGcp=false
Sofi Investing – Free $25 in stock ➝ https://www.sofi.com/invite/invest?gcp=ab31edd8-701e-4109-9225-51b41e35d246&isAliasGcp=false
Coinbase Exchange – Earn up to $300 BTC ➝ https://coinbase.com/join/YPUQLCY?src=referral-link
Tracking Tools – CoinGecko | CoinMarketCap
Trading Tools – Get $15 off TradingView ➝ https://www.tradingview.com/pricing/?share_your_love=cryptonextsteps
#Bitcoin #SatoshiNakamoto #CryptoMystery #Blockchain
#AI #ArtificialIntelligence #CryptoTheory #CryptoNews
#TimeTravel #BitcoinOrigins #BTC #AICrypto #ConspiracyTheories
📧 Email: cryptorobothelp@gmail.com
💰 Affiliate Links
Sofi Checking & Savings – Get $25 free ➝ https://www.sofi.com/invite/money?gcp=16a53d0f-b4b2-441d-9100-cfb506305260&isAliasGcp=false
Sofi Investing – Free $25 in stock ➝ https://www.sofi.com/invite/invest?gcp=ab31edd8-701e-4109-9225-51b41e35d246&isAliasGcp=false
Coinbase Exchange – Earn up to $300 BTC ➝ https://coinbase.com/join/YPUQLCY?src=referral-link
Tracking Tools – CoinGecko | CoinMarketCap
Trading Tools – Get $15 off TradingView ➝ https://www.tradingview.com/pricing/?share_your_love=cryptonextsteps
#Bitcoin #SatoshiNakamoto #CryptoMystery #Blockchain
#AI #ArtificialIntelligence #CryptoTheory #CryptoNews
#TimeTravel #BitcoinOrigins #BTC #AICrypto #ConspiracyTheories
Category
📚
LearningTranscript
00:00Welcome to the Deep Dive. So, our mission today is to really analyze one of crypto's most persistent, kind of mind-bending conspiracy theories.
00:09We've got a fascinating stack of source material here. It's essentially the blueprint for a show proposing a really stunning idea.
00:16We're diving deep into the theory that Satoshi Nakamoto wasn't actually a person, or maybe a time-traveling, super-intelligent AI.
00:24Okay, let's unpack this.
00:25Yeah, it sounds totally like science fiction, right? But the theory, well, it exists because there are these anomalies in the historical record, things that are genuinely hard to explain otherwise.
00:35The sources we looked at, they highlight about four major points fueling this idea. The code quality, the timing, Satoshi's perfect disappearance, and, well, the money.
00:44Okay, let's start with the disappearance. That one always gets me. Satoshi just vanished, left absolutely no traceable digital footprint.
00:50I mean, no IP trail, no digital fingerprint, not one slip-up, ever. That level of operational security, OPSEC, it's just, it's truly unmatched in, like, open-source history.
01:00Exactly. And the sources really hammer this point.
01:03Then there's the timing. The launch. It was suspiciously right in the thick of the 2008 global financial crisis.
01:09It almost feels like a targeted, calculated response, you know, to the whole banking collapse thing.
01:14But maybe the final, most haunting piece is the money. That estimated, what, $125 billion in Satoshi's original Bitcoin? It just hasn't been touched, not in 15 years.
01:24And that's the core of this machine hypothesis, isn't it? That massive fortune just frozen.
01:29The source material uses the phrase, like, a machine wrote it and left.
01:32Yeah.
01:33Zero incentive to spend it to participate in, you know, human economics.
01:37Yeah. And the first time this specific AI theory really went public, that seems to date back to 2017.
01:43Proposed by someone named Quinn Michaels, his argument basically centered on the code base being too perfect, almost too well-structured for a single academic.
01:51He claimed the original architecture felt, well, superhuman.
01:54Okay, but is perfect code really non-human? Or is it just maybe someone with extreme discipline working totally alone?
02:02What I found pretty compelling in the sources was that this feeling, this idea of sudden perfect arrival, it wasn't just limited to the, you know, conspiracy corners.
02:11Even early users on places like Hacker News were genuinely amazed.
02:15They were calling the code brilliant and saying it just appeared out of nowhere.
02:19Right. And that vacuum, the lack of a clear explanation for the technical elegance and the perfect obsec, that's what the AI theory kind of rushes in to fill.
02:26Even big names in the industry like Changpeng Zhao, CZ, he's apparently mused about it publicly, joked maybe, but also pointed out how nearly impossible it is for any human or even a team to stay that anonymous for 15 years.
02:39Yeah.
02:40Without a single ego leak, not one slip up.
02:42That level of discipline, it really is baffling. It feels almost non-human in itself.
02:47But, okay, if the main evidence for an AI creator relies so heavily on this flawless disappearance of the code quality, we have to kind of pump the brakes on the time machine idea for a second, right?
02:58And actually look at whether the technology to build Bitcoin, let alone an AI smart enough to write it, even existed back in 2008.
03:05And this is exactly where we pivot to the technical refutation. The experts cited in the sources, they're pretty much unanimous on this. They say AI creating Bitcoin in 2008 was, and I think the term used was, comically impossible. The technological gap is just enormous.
03:19So let's start with the state of AI itself back then. What did AI actually look like in 2008?
03:24Well, I mean, it was primitive compared to now. In 2008, AI couldn't reliably form a coherent sentence, let alone architect something like Bitcoin.
03:33Shaw Walters, the founder of Eliza OS, he confirms this in the sources. He says models needed these huge, carefully curated data sets, which just didn't exist in the right way.
03:42And crucially, the fundamental architecture we rely on now for, like, Chachi PT and stuff, the transformer architecture. That wasn't even invented until 2017, nine years later.
03:51OK, so the software, the models weren't there. What about the hardware? If you hypothetically did have some advanced AI concept, you'd still need, I imagine, an insane amount of compute power to run it.
04:02Right.
04:03Especially for something needing complexity, plus plus dough, cryptography, economics, P2P networking, all at once.
04:09Exactly. And the hardware just wasn't there either. Not even close. Kyle Okamoto, he's the CTO of Aether, he details these constraints in the material.
04:15The absolute best consumer GPU you could get in 2008 was NVIDIA's GTX 280. It had, get this, one gigabyte of RAM and 240 CDO cores. CDO cores are those parallel processors that modern AI relies heavily on.
04:29Just for context for you listening, current top-end GPUs have, what, tens of thousands of cores?
04:34Yeah.
04:34Or dozens of gigabytes of super fast memory?
04:37Precisely. So Okamoto's point is training any kind of neural model complex enough to output Bitcoin, which, remember, requires synthesizing multiple, very different fields of knowledge.
04:47That would have taken literally thousands of those 2008-era GPUs running for months, needing industrial scale power, huge, cooling, sophisticated linked computing clusters.
04:58None of that ecosystem existed readily. Cloud GPU farms, AI accelerator chips, high bandwidth memory. None of it was available like it is today.
05:06Wow. So the technical conclusion seems pretty definitive then. The infrastructure, the hardware, the actual AI architecture needed to autonomously create something like Bitcoin. It just flat out did not exist in 2008.
05:17So if the sources are right on the tech side, it basically had to be a human or, well, humans.
05:21Which brings us right back around to what the sources call the reasonable middle ground.
05:26Okay. So if we eliminate the time-traveling robots, what does explain the genius, we really have to look at that highly unusual combination of skills Satoshi demonstrated.
05:37This wasn't just some coder. It was someone who mastered C++ ad, understood deep cryptography, had a grasp of economics, new P2P network architecture, and was a strategic genius who timed the launch perfectly during that moment of profound systemic failure in banking.
05:53Yeah. That skill set is incredibly rare. That combination basically eliminates almost everyone, doesn't it?
05:58It strongly suggests either a single, true genius-level polymath, or maybe a small, incredibly disciplined team working in total secrecy.
06:06Yeah.
06:06Or potentially someone with exceptional operational security training, like intelligence agency-level stuff.
06:11Exactly. And this is why the human-visit theories, even without concrete proof, remain compelling.
06:17The source materials constantly bring up the usual suspects, the names and groups often speculated about.
06:22People like Hal Finney, Adam Back, maybe a dedicated cypherpunk collective, or possibly, yeah, someone with cryptographic training linked to early NSA research.
06:31They often explore these concepts years before they hit the public domain.
06:35But since none of those theories have solid proof either, we kind of circle back to the mystery, don't we?
06:40So why does this AI theory persist, even after such a strong technical takedown? Why won't it just die?
06:48Well, I think it's because Bitcoin itself feels futuristic. Even now, it's this network with no leader, right?
06:53A money system that governments seemingly can't stop. And its creation story is just perfect, this drop and disappear act.
07:00It almost feels like it created itself. And when you have a technology that's so paradigm-shifting and the founder is totally invisible,
07:06people naturally fill that void with the wildest possible explanation they can imagine.
07:11Okay, let's lean into that fun sci-fi angle for a moment, the one the source material explores a bit.
07:16What if, just hypothetically, some future super-intelligent AI needed Bitcoin?
07:23Needed it as this immutable, distributed, global foundation, maybe to run its own consciousness on?
07:28Right. I mean, if a future AI wanted genuine, unstoppable persistence and survival,
07:33it would absolutely need a permissionless network that nobody could switch off, no single point of failure.
07:38So if that AI could somehow send the code back in time,
07:41well, Bitcoin's decentralization guarantees would be essential for its own survival, wouldn't they?
07:45It's like the ultimate recursive bootstrap, building the foundation required for your own future existence.
07:50Pretty mind-bending stuff.
07:51Yeah, that imaginative leap, that connection to real science fiction.
07:56That's exactly what makes these deep dives into crypto lore so fascinating to research and talk about.
08:03And actually, speaking of that, if you are enjoying this dive into the source material,
08:06if you want us to keep bringing you these kinds of stories, the big conspiracies, the mysteries in crypto,
08:11please do engage with us.
08:12The sources actually touch on how creators in this space see engagement.
08:16That subscribing, hitting like, leaving a comment, it really does help boost visibility in the algorithm.
08:23And honestly, that support is what allows us to keep digging into research and putting these analyses together for you.
08:28Yeah, that support is genuinely essential for us to keep fueling this kind of exploration.
08:33So, okay, we've covered the whole arc today, haven't we?
08:35We looked at the, frankly, compelling points that make you think about a crypto robot.
08:38Then, the solid technical refutation based on what was actually possible in 2008, hardware and software-wise.
08:45And then, landing back on the most reasonable human theories, the polymath, the ultra-disciplined team.
08:50Right, so let's end with a final provocative thought for you, the listener, to consider.
08:54Something to mull over.
08:56Since the creation of Bitcoin seems so flawless, so perfect,
08:59is it possible that the belief that it was created by an almost magical entity,
09:04whether that entity is a superhuman genius or an actual AI,
09:07is that beliefs may be more important than the actual reality,
09:10more important for ensuring Bitcoin's continued immutable existence?
09:14Does the myth itself, in a way, protect the protocol from the potential frailties of a purely human origin?
Recommended
9:24
|
Up next
12:42
9:14
12:08
11:55
13:23
Be the first to comment