Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 15 hours ago
Transcript
00:00Just ahead of this Albanese Trump meeting, been a long time coming, you might want to comment on
00:04that. But in terms of the tone, is it going to be a reality check, a reset or just a reassurance?
00:11Actually, that's pretty hard to read. I mean, the centerpiece here, I think,
00:17from the Australian perspective will be the AUKUS agreement and the Pentagon review that's
00:23been announced. There is speculation that the results of that review are going to be made known
00:27to us in the lead up to the visit. But actually, even that is speculative. There's been very few
00:32leaks about the content of that review and where it's going to come down. Interestingly,
00:38the American Secretary of State, Marco Rebio, made a statement to the media a little while ago saying
00:45that this all looks positive for Australia and that the review is going to endorse the basic outline
00:50of the AUKUS agreement that was struck under the Biden administration. I'd say back here amongst
00:56defence observers, there is some scepticism about that in the sense that even if rhetorically the
01:01Americans say, yes, we're going to deliver those submarines, whether they can actually make good
01:06on that promise is really open to question. I'd say the overwhelming sentiment among defence
01:11observers here is that the American defence industrial capacity is simply not strong enough
01:17to deliver what they are promising and also to deliver the submarines that they promised to their
01:22own navy. Yeah, well, the UK Prime Minister Sikir Starmer has been optimistic about the future of
01:27AUKUS as well. But more broadly, based on the past few months, this review as well, do you feel the
01:33Trump administration's second go around has its approach to alliance has been different from the
01:38first term? Certainly Trump's own instincts are no different. So he's carried around a few sort of core
01:47beliefs throughout his public life. One of those is that allies are essentially exploiting the United
01:54States. He voiced that sentiment multiple times in his first term. In the second term, he's done it
02:00again. The difference is that there are fewer institutional barriers to that sentiment within
02:05the US system. He has packed his administration with like-minded people. And so the barriers to him
02:12making good on those kind of beliefs are fewer. The interesting thing from Australia's point of
02:18view is that we have kind of been exempted from that. In the first term, we never got, we were never
02:22on the receiving end of some of his verbal barbs about alliances. And so far, so good in the second
02:28term as well. Things, of course, could go desperately off the rails in this upcoming meeting. I mean,
02:36it's a high stakes environment if ever there was one. It could be on the one hand, a Zelensky type
02:41situation that he faced in the Oval Office with that very public disagreement and meltdown even,
02:48you could call it. Or it could be a perfectly cordial meeting where, you know, the two sides agree
02:55warmly with each other. And the terms of the AUKUS agreement are fully reinforced. It's a measure of
03:03how unpredictable the environment is in Washington that both of those possibilities
03:08seem likely and cannot be in any way ruled out. Yeah, because of course, beyond AUKUS, there are a
03:14few other interesting things to discuss as well, not the least of which the trade relationship. I mean,
03:19there is an element of surprise here in Australia that the country got hit with tariffs despite the
03:23US running a rare trade surplus. But also this notion of rare earth, we've seen reported in local
03:29media, the possibility of a deal here between the US and Australia. How significant would that be?
03:35Yeah, I mean, the reporting is very preliminary. So it's very difficult to make judgments on exactly
03:40what Australia is proposing. Nothing that Australia can do, it seems to me, from my understanding of
03:48the industry is going to break that stranglehold that China has on the on the production of these
03:53materials and its control of the market. So at the moment, this feels slightly marginal to the main game
04:03here. What I'm also a little wary of is the sense in Australian policy that we are really at the, under the
04:14leadership of the United States, backing away slightly from the open economic principles that have served Australia
04:22so well since the 1980s, really. And included in that, of course, is strong advocacy and strong
04:28support for open trading and open borders to trade. That has been incredibly beneficial to Australia.
04:35Specific deals we do with the United States on rare earths, I think, are an indicator that our allegiance
04:43to those kind of principles is starting to erode. I think that's altogether a bad sign for Australia.
04:47Of course, Australia's biggest trading partner is China. So Anthony Albanese, he's got the same
04:52balancing actors as predecessors in terms of balancing the relationship with China with the
04:57US. What's the report card so far and what are the risks ahead?
05:01Well, I think the really good news for Australia is that that relationship since the change of government
05:07in Australia in 2022 has improved markedly. And the reason that's good news, I don't
05:13give overwhelming credit to the Albanese government for that change, but I would give credit to
05:20Australian governments of both persuasions because we went, we underwent a three year campaign of
05:26economic coercion from China that ended in 2022. And I think it ended because both sides of politics
05:32stood firm. We didn't retaliate against China, but we stood firm and said we are not changing our policy
05:38because of because of this economic coercion campaign. And I think after a time, China basically
05:45realised it wasn't going to get Australia to make major policy changes under duress. And so we set an
05:52important precedent and established an important principle in our relations with China that we are
05:58still benefiting from today.
06:00Well, we had an example of that just recently as well, with Australia signing a security deal with
06:04Papua New Guinea. What message is Canberra sending here to China about regional partnerships and influence?
06:10Look, I think it's very difficult for Australian governments to talk openly about pure power politics in
06:18the Pacific Islands, because that does offend regional sensibilities in the Pacific. But I think that's what this
06:24is at the core of it, is power politics. Australia wants to establish itself as the leading power in our
06:31region and the Pacific Islands region. And this is an attempt, and I think a very important signal
06:38to China that Australia is the leading regional security partner, not just for PNG, but for other
06:44Pacific Island countries as well. And that if China wants to establish itself as a major alternative to
06:51Australia in the region, it's going to have to work much harder. So I think an important statement by
06:57Australia, and by PNG as well, that Australia is the leading power in this part of the world,
07:04and that China's attempts to change that balance of power, which really began, you know, probably in
07:10the sort of mid-teens period, where they rapidly upped their aid budget in the Pacific Islands region,
07:17that Australia has stepped up, again, under both governments, Liberal and Labor,
07:23and that China's going to need to do more if it wants to wrest control of the region and of the
07:27regional security environment away from Australia and its part.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended