Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 1 day ago
Transcript
00:00There's a lot of excitement because actually we have inflation data today, but that was a legal
00:04requirement. And then we go back to the shutdown and no data. How does the shutdown end?
00:11Yeah, well, nice to be with you. I mean, I think that is the main question for us and for our
00:17clients as well. You know, our concern was that if the government were to shut down,
00:22there would be no natural catalyst to reopen the government. If you recall, the longest full
00:28shutdown was back in 2013. That was for 16 days. And the catalyst to reopen the government then was
00:35in order to raise the debt ceiling. They funded the government and raised the debt ceiling.
00:39You fast forward to 2025 and there is no real catalyst. And in fact, it is a little bit eerie.
00:46In Washington, folks are incredibly comfortable with their political positions. President Trump,
00:51the Republicans, very comfortable denying a vote and denying negotiations on the Obamacare subsidies.
01:01Democrats, who are usually agitating to reopen the government, they're very comfortable keeping the
01:08government shuttered again in order to shine a spotlight on this issue of health care. So it is
01:14a little bit surreal, honestly, the fact that there are real implications for the real economy for data,
01:20as you as you mentioned. But again, folks are really comfortable. So our expectation,
01:25what we're telling clients is that we could see potentially the government reopening in November.
01:31Maybe we could be in Thanksgiving. The government could still be shuttered. There is, you know,
01:36it's an outlier, but there's also a tail risk that we may get to Christmas and the government's still
01:42shuttered. So this will, as you know, what our concern is, is this will have, you know, likely
01:47deeper economic impacts the longer this shutdown lasts. But again, no real political catalyst to
01:52reopen the government at this point.
01:56Libby, I mean, and this is something that we were discussing, you know, this morning is that
02:01there doesn't feel to be any urgency because of the news flow, because there's so much actually
02:06that Trump administration is also working on. But how much of this is they think they're winning
02:10the messaging around this, that this is about votes longer term or making the other party look bad?
02:18Yeah, I mean, I think that is right. Again, I think that both sides think that they are winning
02:22with their respective bases. And if you look at polling, that's probably in some ways true.
02:28Each side sort of blames the other, which is, you know, kind of the business as usual these days
02:34in in Washington. However, usually shutdowns are political loser for both parties, just just by and
02:42large. And I think this is no exception. As the longer this goes, and the more the government
02:48services are impaired, the more flights are delayed, the less able folks are to get a mortgage loan
02:55through FHA and what have you. I think the more folks are going to be mad at both sides. And you're
03:03already starting to see this a little bit in the polling. So that could be a catalyst. It could.
03:08But again, right now, both sides think that they're winning the messaging war. They think that they're
03:14winning kind of the political issue of the day. And, you know, as you said, there really is no urgency.
03:21The House is not even in session. I mean, the House hasn't been in session for now going on five
03:25weeks. And they look like they will be out of session again next week. So again, we are we're
03:30expecting November to be the earliest that the government opens. You could be we could be until
03:35Christmas, however. Libby, we also I mean, President Trump, from what we understand, you know,
03:43likes to negotiate. So could he just turn around and find a deal on health care?
03:46Yeah, he is the wild card. And I think that that is something that's it's a good thing to flag. I
03:52mean, he you know, he is you know, this is this is a something this is an issue. And just to just as
03:58a background, this is the issue kind of of the day. The issue of the focus here is around these
04:04enhanced Obamacare subsidies. They were passed and during COVID and then they were extended in 2022
04:11and they expired the end of this year. And so Democrats, I think this is a good political
04:17issue. If you look at just, again, polling voters usually rank health care as sort of the top three
04:23issue of, you know, in terms of the things that they vote on. So they do care about this. And I
04:29think that, you know, President Trump, he knows sort of the zeitgeist of voters as well. So he he is
04:35sort of the wild card here. You could see him pivot. I will just say, though, that, again, the longer
04:39this this occurs and the markets have sort of shrugged this off. But, you know, I think our
04:44concern is that you start having some nonlinear economic impacts. You know, our view is that if
04:49this stays shuttered until November, you could see a point being shaved off of GDP. Now, some of that
04:55will be reinstated when the government reopens and federal workers get repaid. But the longer this
05:00goes, the more potential you have for sort of deeper economic scarring. And of course, as you said,
05:05no data. And the longer this goes, not only are we not going to have data releases, you
05:10know, despite today, we're going to have no data collection. So that is that these are, I
05:15think, going to be increasingly problematic, both for me, for politicians. And again, Trump
05:20is the wild card here, but also for the real economy and then potentially for financial markets.
05:27Libby, how difficult is it to try and understand or what's your base case for what the talks between
05:32the U.S. and China could yield between the two presidents? And does that change the public
05:37discourse back in Washington? Yeah, I mean, it's a great question. And here I'm in London. I was in
05:43Europe earlier this week. And of course, this is, you know, one of the top questions that we're
05:48receiving from clients is sort of what to make of this dynamic. And I think that the best that
05:54financial markets can hope for from this potential meeting between President Xi and President Trump
05:59is really a detente and not a deal. I think that the expectation for, you know, phase two trade deal
06:07or what have you, or something even more fulsome than that, something that even President Trump has
06:11outlined over the last few days, you know, it's possible, but I don't think it's really probable
06:17at this point. And in some ways, President Xi is taking a page out of President Trump's playbook
06:23from Trump 1.0. He is using some of these sort of economic coercion tactics that the U.S. has used
06:30against China, you know, previously. And so, you know, this is, I think, quite a different dynamic
06:36than, again, sort of the previous administration or, you know, Trump 1.0, if you will. So again,
06:43I think that the expectation is, you know, detente, the best case scenario, but not a deal. And I will
06:48just say, and something we're flagging for our clients, is that there is a tail risk here. And
06:53this, as we've seen, this relationship can deteriorate pretty quickly, not only in terms
06:58of a ratcheting up of tariffs, but I think more importantly, you know, maybe to China and also
07:03to the U.S., these sort of export controls, whether it's on advanced technology or whether
07:08it's on rare earths. So this, you know, I think that is the tail risk in the market, that this thing,
07:13that this relationship, which is already fragile, sort of simmering, if you will, can boil over
07:18you know, really, really at any moment.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended