An Inconvenient Study

Interstellar Times HD Documentary

In 2016, journalist Del Bigtree issued a challenge to the head of infectious disease at one of the most prestigious medical institutions in the world: conduct the most thorough vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study that has ever been done. The expert took up the challenge and ran the study to prove Del wrong. That study never saw the light of day... until now.  The Study  Here is what Henry Ford stated when The HighWire reached out to them for comment about the study:  “This report was not published because it did not meet the rigorous scientific standards we demand as a premier medical research institution. Data has consistently shown vaccinations are a safe and effective way to protect children against potentially life-altering diseases.”  And here is what Henry Ford has stated publicly about the study. Resources  For additional resources supporting the ideas in the film, check out:      icandecide.org, including the Placebo Pyramid and Get Informed section     thehighwire.com, including Vaxxed, depositions of vaccinologists, and interviews of persecuted doctors     pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, including prior Henry Ford related and vaccine safety studies     nationalacademies.org, including all prior IOM vaccine safety reports     henryford.com, including its vaccine related claims and statements     cdc.gov, including all mortality and vaccine safety data and citations     fda.gov, including all vaccine related licensure documents     youtube.com, including videos of scientists discussing DTP and mortality  https://www.aninconvenientstudy.com/

Transcript

00:00:00Transcription by CastingWords

00:00:30Transcription by CastingWords

00:01:00Transcription by CastingWords

00:01:29Transcription by CastingWords

00:01:59Transcription by CastingWords

00:02:29Transcription by CastingWords

00:02:59Transcription by CastingWords

00:03:29Transcription by CastingWords

00:03:59Transcription by CastingWords

00:04:29But the biggest change in my career happened when I produced a documentary about vaccinations

00:04:35called Vaxxed and at the center of that documentary was a whistleblower from the CDC named Dr.

00:04:41William Thompson. He came forward in 2015 and said that they were committing scientific fraud

00:04:46on the vaccine safety studies. Well that film blew up and became a worldwide sensation mostly

00:04:53because we got so much bad press starting with being kicked out of the Tribeca Film Festival.

00:04:59The decision to run a controversial documentary about vaccines has Robert De Niro at the center of a big screen backlash.

00:05:06Tonight the film festival Robert De Niro started Under Fire, a controversial new film that many are characterizing as anti-vaccine.

00:05:15I think the movie is something that people should see. There was a backlash which I haven't fully explored. I want to know the truth and I'm not anti-vaccine.

00:05:25I want safe vaccines. Vaxx producer Del Bigtree says canceling the screening amounts to a suppression of the truth.

00:05:33I can't imagine what type of pressure came down that would make them pull a movie that they were obviously behind in the beginning.

00:05:40The message from the medical community is clear.

00:05:42This is one of those scientific questions that where science has provided any answer.

00:05:48Vaxx ended up being one of the most controversial documentaries in history and because of that there were lines down the block everywhere we went.

00:05:56Look at this crowd behind me. Look at this line goes on and on and on.

00:05:59In fact the very first day we screened at Angelica Film Center in New York I wanted to know why there's this giant line down the block.

00:06:07What are these people here for?

00:06:09Can every parent or someone, you know, if you have a family member with autism, would you please stand up right now?

00:06:16Like, see?

00:06:18Three quarters of the room stood up.

00:06:21I remember feeling like the air just got sucked out of the room.

00:06:25I had no idea that there was this many people suffering from this issue.

00:06:30I ended up asking that question three screenings a day, five days a week, for an entire year.

00:06:37And every single time, three quarters of the room stood up.

00:06:41I realized I had stumbled on something absolutely massive.

00:06:46Hello everybody, this is Jamie.

00:06:50Jamie's first.

00:06:51Can you guys both tell us your names?

00:06:55This is Stephanie.

00:06:55And this is Zion.

00:06:58After the screenings, parents of injured children were inspired to tell their own stories.

00:07:02We set up video cameras and started interviewing everybody that wanted to talk.

00:07:07And what I discovered is it wasn't just autism and it wasn't just the MMR vaccine.

00:07:12There was an ocean of vaccine injury and nobody was talking about it.

00:07:17Doctor says, well, do you want the flu vaccine?

00:07:19And I was like, might as well do it now.

00:07:21I gave in.

00:07:21I did polio.

00:07:22They gave her the hep B vax.

00:07:24She got the two-month shots.

00:07:25Teach out.

00:07:25The MMR vaccine.

00:07:26By 10.30 that morning, she was arching her back, glitching her vips.

00:07:36I didn't think I was going to cry.

00:07:38That night, we were in the hospital with the 106 degree fever.

00:07:42He began to projectile vomit.

00:07:45He began to this loud pitch scream.

00:07:49Like that's when the blood-prouding experience started.

00:07:51I did not lay down for 10 months straight because she would vomit and asphyxiate.

00:07:57She would vomit at night and she would lie there while she was asleep and she would choke on it.

00:08:03When we had that vaccination, he lost all language.

00:08:06He just stopped talking.

00:08:07He wasn't talking.

00:08:07He didn't want to nurse.

00:08:09He went to not talking at all.

00:08:10He was developing really well except for motor skills.

00:08:14He's got chronic allergies.

00:08:15An eczema rash.

00:08:17Food protein integritis syndrome.

00:08:18She couldn't eat anything on the glycemic index that was too high.

00:08:21GI symptoms you started to have.

00:08:23Gut inflammation.

00:08:24Chronic snoring.

00:08:25I have sleep apnea.

00:08:26Seizure-like activity.

00:08:28We woke up.

00:08:29She just...

00:08:32Birth.

00:08:34She died in your arms.

00:08:36Yeah.

00:08:37I continued to vaccinate her and make her worse and make her sicker.

00:08:42The guilt and the...

00:08:44It's so overwhelming.

00:08:46They killed my daughter.

00:08:48Clearly, this was a bigger issue than anybody realized.

00:08:57But there was one particular interview that we did that really changed my perspective forever.

00:09:03Colton was a 13-year-old healthy strong boy.

00:09:07He loved anything that has to do with an adrenaline rush.

00:09:12Motocross was his passion.

00:09:13The doctor says, hey, he's the age that you should get the HPV vaccine.

00:09:19I said, okay.

00:09:21So he was administered the vaccine.

00:09:24And then this is the last day he got to ride that big boy bike.

00:09:28And that day he came home.

00:09:30He was starting to feel nauseous.

00:09:32Really sore neck.

00:09:33He still didn't want to get out of bed.

00:09:35I just thought, man, you're just really weak and exhausted.

00:09:39And that evening, when he sat up to take a drink of water, he just flopped back.

00:09:46And his head just hit the pillow.

00:09:48And I went, Colton, are you going paralyzed?

00:09:51They immediately took him down to Primary Children's Hospital in Salt Lake.

00:09:55Original diagnosis was transverse myelitis.

00:09:59When the doctor came out and asked me, has he been sick?

00:10:02I said, no, he hasn't been sick.

00:10:03He had the HPV vaccine on February 1st.

00:10:06And they went, oh.

00:10:10Well, we'll be reporting that to VARS.

00:10:12It does suck, like, not being able to play sports anymore.

00:10:18Now I have to sit on the sideline to watch everybody.

00:10:22You've got to do your research.

00:10:24Like, you can't just trust a doctor anymore.

00:10:28Do your own ways to find out what's best for you.

00:10:37Unfortunately, Colton ended up taking his life in 2018

00:10:40because he believed he'd become too much of a burden on his family.

00:10:45But the thing I remember about standing there

00:10:47and watching that interview taking place,

00:10:49my co-producer, Polly Tommy, was doing the interview,

00:10:52was this box that was hanging on his side that was breathing for him.

00:10:55And it went through a tube that was going through a hole in his throat.

00:11:00And he literally had to wait for it to fill his lungs with air

00:11:03before he could answer a question.

00:11:04So he'd go,

00:11:04and then he would start answering the question until he ran out of air.

00:11:10I thought about all of the people

00:11:12that accused these so-called anti-vaxxers

00:11:15of bringing back polio or the iron lung.

00:11:18Once vaccination rates fall,

00:11:20you're going to have a lot of people getting sick

00:11:22and a lot of children paralyzed for the rest of their life with polio.

00:11:26I thought,

00:11:26he's wearing an iron lung.

00:11:28You're not laying in a metal tube anymore.

00:11:30They've reduced it down to a box that hangs on your side

00:11:34and a hose that goes through your throat.

00:11:36But in this case,

00:11:38he wasn't paralyzed because he had polio.

00:11:40He wasn't paralyzed because he didn't vaccinate.

00:11:43He was paralyzed by the Gardasil HPV vaccine.

00:11:47I chose to get my daughter vaccinated

00:11:48because I want her to be one less woman affected by cervical cancer.

00:11:52One less Gardasil.

00:11:53Then I went home and started looking up all of the inserts,

00:11:56the warning labels that are wrapped around all of the childhood vaccines,

00:12:00and most of them say it right there in serious adverse events.

00:12:04Guillain-Barre syndrome, that's paralysis.

00:12:07Or transverse myelitis, paralysis.

00:12:10And I realized,

00:12:11Polio vaccine is a success.

00:12:12We didn't eradicate paralytic diseases with the vaccine program.

00:12:17The vaccine works.

00:12:18We're causing paralytic diseases with our vaccine program.

00:12:27So as we travel the country,

00:12:29some parents would come up and say,

00:12:30I'm about to have a baby.

00:12:31I'm definitely not going to get the MMR vaccine

00:12:34because your movie shows that that one's dangerous.

00:12:36But what about the other 16 vaccines

00:12:39that are given in 72 doses by the time my child's 18?

00:12:43And I'd say,

00:12:44I only have anecdotal evidence

00:12:46from the thousands of interviews I've done

00:12:49that not a single childhood vaccine is safe.

00:12:52But that's not scientific.

00:12:54I wanted something better.

00:12:56I wanted to get to the bottom of this.

00:12:58So I started a non-profit

00:13:00called the Informed Consent Action Network.

00:13:03Based on the Nuremberg Code's right to voluntary consent,

00:13:06the ethical principle globally agreed upon

00:13:09in the wake of the Nazi doctor's horrifying human experiments.

00:13:13Of inmates concentration camps for experimental purposes.

00:13:16Where it states,

00:13:17the voluntary consent to the human subject

00:13:19is absolutely essential.

00:13:20And there should be no element to force,

00:13:22fraud, deceit, duress, or overreaching,

00:13:24or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.

00:13:28What I wanted to do

00:13:30was investigate the entire vaccine program.

00:13:32I was really focused on one thing.

00:13:34We hear that vaccines are safe and effective.

00:13:39But before we even worry about if they're effective,

00:13:41how did we determine they're safe?

00:13:44We started looking at all the science around the world.

00:13:48But we hit a big roadblock.

00:13:50You can't sue a manufacturer of a vaccine.

00:13:54It's one of the only products in America

00:13:56that has what they call liability protection.

00:13:59The reason is because of a law

00:14:00that was passed in 1986 by the U.S. government.

00:14:04The pharmaceutical industry

00:14:05basically blackmailed the government.

00:14:07And they said,

00:14:08we are losing so much money from lawsuits

00:14:11for death and injury from our vaccines,

00:14:13we can't make a profit.

00:14:15Studies have shown that the whooping cough,

00:14:17or pertussis vaccine, causes brain damage.

00:14:20The controversy isn't really over the fact that it happens,

00:14:23but how often it happens.

00:14:24And they said, if you want us to continue making vaccines,

00:14:28you're going to have to take on the liability.

00:14:30And our government agreed to that.

00:14:32If you want to sue,

00:14:34or you want to get any information

00:14:35outside of what's publicly known,

00:14:38you're going to have to sue the government.

00:14:40And that's when I realized,

00:14:41I need a constitutional attorney.

00:14:43And I found a guy named Aaron Seary.

00:14:46Mr. Seary, you're not a medical doctor, are you?

00:14:49No, sir.

00:14:49And you're not an immunologist or biologist

00:14:52or any kind of...

00:14:54Or vaccinologist, no.

00:14:55But I depose them regularly,

00:14:56including the world's leading ones

00:14:57with regards to vaccines.

00:14:58And I have to make my claims

00:15:00based on actual evidence.

00:15:01When I go to court with regards to vaccines,

00:15:02I don't get to rely on titles.

00:15:05Okay.

00:15:07He had a genius way forward.

00:15:10We're going to sue the government agencies,

00:15:12HHS, FDA, NIH.

00:15:14And we started winning.

00:15:17And what did we prove in those lawsuits?

00:15:19That the entire science behind vaccine safety

00:15:22was nothing but a complete fraud.

00:15:28Doctors used to listen to parents.

00:15:31When their parents came in and said,

00:15:33hey, my kid is suffering with this condition,

00:15:36has this issue.

00:15:38Doctors listened to them.

00:15:39But when parents started coming in and saying,

00:15:42my kid went in and got a vaccine

00:15:44and then started having X issue,

00:15:48that's when doctors stopped listening.

00:15:51Hi.

00:15:52How are you doing?

00:15:52We have triplets.

00:15:54Two boys and a girl.

00:15:55Richie, Robbie, and Claire.

00:15:57Every day in our life was a party.

00:15:59Every single day they were smiling and laughing

00:16:02and looking at each other,

00:16:05engaging in each other.

00:16:07On June 25, 2007,

00:16:10we brought them in for the pneumococcal shot.

00:16:13My daughter still has the mark on her leg

00:16:15from the shot.

00:16:16She was the first one to get it.

00:16:17And she screamed

00:16:18and never really stopped screaming after that.

00:16:21But we continued.

00:16:22We didn't know.

00:16:23We did the boys as well.

00:16:25By noon, Claire shot completely off.

00:16:28It was as if she was blind and deaf.

00:16:31And all she did at that moment

00:16:32was stare at the ceiling fan.

00:16:34So that was at noon.

00:16:36We had the shot at 10 a.m.

00:16:38Two o'clock.

00:16:40We watched Richie shut off.

00:16:42They lost all their reflexes.

00:16:44I'm an educational audiologist.

00:16:47I actually did the test for the stapedial reflex,

00:16:49which is a little muscle in the middle ear

00:16:51just to see if a muscle they can't control

00:16:54was still working.

00:16:55And it didn't.

00:16:56The stapedial reflex dampens sound

00:17:00so your ears don't hurt from a really loud sound.

00:17:02And both of them had no stapedial reflex.

00:17:05They stopped blinking,

00:17:07stopped yawning,

00:17:08stopped coughing,

00:17:09stopped sneezing.

00:17:10The worst is when we saw the final one shut down.

00:17:14We were told it was genetic.

00:17:16And then we were told by geneticists

00:17:18that there's no possible way

00:17:20three children would shut off on the same day.

00:17:22So we had severe autism spectrum disorder

00:17:27for all three kids entering kindergarten.

00:17:30We have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars

00:17:33trying to recover them.

00:17:36The only person that we got back

00:17:38is Rich or Robbie,

00:17:40the one that was last to shut off.

00:17:43Richie can only say single,

00:17:45maybe two words together.

00:17:47Claire is still completely nonverbal,

00:17:50not potty trained,

00:17:51and Robbie is approaching grade level,

00:17:53but severe OCD.

00:17:55Let me tell you what a day in our life is.

00:17:57So you got,

00:17:59say a six or seven or eight year old child

00:18:01who's not potty trained.

00:18:03And at two or three or four o'clock in the morning,

00:18:06they fill their diaper.

00:18:07Well, you assume that's pretty uncomfortable,

00:18:09so they take it off.

00:18:11Pretty soon,

00:18:12pretty soon it's all over them.

00:18:13It's all over the bed.

00:18:15In short order,

00:18:16it's all over me,

00:18:17it's all over her.

00:18:18Mm-hmm.

00:18:19I'm snapping at her,

00:18:20she's snapping at me.

00:18:21We're both snapping at the kid

00:18:23who is the only innocent party

00:18:26in the whole scenario.

00:18:27And the one thing

00:18:29that's conspicuously absent

00:18:30from that scenario

00:18:32is anybody who told you

00:18:35that shot was safe.

00:18:37They're all asleep in their bed.

00:18:39They haven't got a problem in the world.

00:18:40This one story

00:18:45of Richie, Robbie, and Claire

00:18:46puts an end to any discussion

00:18:48that autism is only caused by genetics.

00:18:52There is no genetic explanation

00:18:54that would turn three brothers and sisters off

00:18:57on the exact same day.

00:18:59What you should do

00:19:00when there are widespread complaints

00:19:03that a product is causing a given harm

00:19:05is you should study it.

00:19:07Vaccines should be tested

00:19:08like other medicines.

00:19:09They should be safety tested.

00:19:12And unfortunately,

00:19:13vaccines are not safety tested.

00:19:16Of the 72 vaccine doses

00:19:18now mandated,

00:19:20essentially mandated,

00:19:21they're recommended,

00:19:21but they're really mandated,

00:19:23for American children,

00:19:24none of them, not one,

00:19:26has ever been subject

00:19:27to a pre-licensing

00:19:29placebo-controlled trial.

00:19:31Health and Human Services Secretary

00:19:32Robert Kennedy Jr.

00:19:34has been torn apart

00:19:35by mainstream media

00:19:36for saying that

00:19:37there's no placebo trials

00:19:39being done for vaccines.

00:19:41But he's right.

00:19:42It's exactly what we found

00:19:43in our lawsuits

00:19:44against the government.

00:19:45Not a single childhood vaccine

00:19:47is going through

00:19:48a double-blind,

00:19:49randomized,

00:19:50placebo-controlled trial

00:19:51prior to licensure.

00:19:53That's the gold standard

00:19:55of safety testing

00:19:56for all pharmaceutical products,

00:19:58but is being skipped

00:20:00for vaccines.

00:20:01In case you forgot

00:20:02how a double-blind,

00:20:03placebo-based trial worked

00:20:05as we discussed it

00:20:06back in high school

00:20:07science class,

00:20:08let me remind you,

00:20:09we break up a group of kids

00:20:11into two groups.

00:20:12One group is going

00:20:13to get the vaccine.

00:20:14The other group

00:20:15is going to get a placebo,

00:20:16which is a product

00:20:17that has no effect

00:20:18on the human body.

00:20:19When it comes to

00:20:20an injectable like vaccines,

00:20:22that is a saline injection.

00:20:24Then it's called

00:20:25double-blinded

00:20:25because both the scientists

00:20:27and the patients

00:20:28are blinded from knowing

00:20:30which one they got.

00:20:31Did they get the vaccine

00:20:32or did they get the placebo?

00:20:33This is so that the scientists

00:20:35will not manipulate the study

00:20:36in favor of the pharmaceutical industry

00:20:38that will stand to make

00:20:39a lot of money

00:20:40if this vaccine proves to be safe.

00:20:42Then we track these two groups

00:20:43for two to five years,

00:20:45sometimes as long as 10 years

00:20:47for a lot of drugs.

00:20:48And at the end of that study,

00:20:49we unblind both the patient

00:20:51and the scientist.

00:20:53So we look at both groups,

00:20:54the vaccinated and the placebo group,

00:20:56and we compare their health outcomes.

00:20:58Who had more cancer?

00:21:00Who had more diabetes

00:21:02or ADD, ADHD or autism

00:21:04or Tourette's or lupus

00:21:06or multiple sclerosis?

00:21:07All of these things

00:21:08that are currently skyrocketing

00:21:10in the United States of America.

00:21:12And if, when you compare them,

00:21:13they both turn out the same,

00:21:15there's the same amount of issues

00:21:16in the vaccinated group

00:21:17as is in the placebo group,

00:21:19then you know it's safe.

00:21:21You've established

00:21:22what we call a safety baseline.

00:21:24But if the vaccinated group

00:21:26has more issues

00:21:27than the placebo group,

00:21:29then we know it's not safe

00:21:30and it shouldn't be put on the market.

00:21:32Only one problem.

00:21:34Not a single vaccine

00:21:35on the childhood schedule

00:21:37has ever been through

00:21:38a double-blind placebo-based trial.

00:21:40Therefore,

00:21:41they cannot say the vaccines are safe

00:21:44based on science.

00:21:46Are all vaccine trials

00:21:50placebo-controlled?

00:21:51No.

00:21:52And nor should they be.

00:21:53So, for example,

00:21:54when Prevnar 13,

00:21:56so Prevnar was a conjugate

00:21:58pneumococcal vaccine.

00:21:59The FDA has approved

00:22:00a new pneumococcal vaccine.

00:22:02It had to be tested

00:22:03in the phase three trial.

00:22:04And so the control group there

00:22:07was Prevnar 7

00:22:08and had been shown to work.

00:22:10It will replace Prevnar,

00:22:11which was effective

00:22:12against seven serotypes.

00:22:14You can't ask parents

00:22:15to put their children

00:22:17at risk of pneumococcal disease

00:22:19when there existed

00:22:20on the market at the time

00:22:21a vaccine to prevent that.

00:22:23And the World Health Organization

00:22:24has been very clear on this.

00:22:25That would have been considered

00:22:26an ethical trial.

00:22:28Dr. Paul Oppitz,

00:22:29one of the big proponents

00:22:30of vaccinations,

00:22:32probably because he's made a vaccine

00:22:34and made a killing off of it,

00:22:35the rotavirus vaccines

00:22:36on the childhood schedule.

00:22:38It doesn't matter

00:22:39whether I financially

00:22:39have benefited or not.

00:22:41He likes to go around and say,

00:22:42well, we can't always

00:22:44do placebo trials,

00:22:45especially if there's already

00:22:47a vaccine that covers

00:22:48that disease.

00:22:49So he'll use an example

00:22:51like Prevnar 13.

00:22:52Prevnar 13 in its safety trial

00:22:55was tested against Prevnar 7,

00:22:57the earlier version

00:22:58of the vaccine.

00:22:59And he'll say,

00:23:00you cannot test Prevnar 13

00:23:02against a saline placebo

00:23:03because it would be unethical.

00:23:05You'd be denying children access

00:23:07to a vaccine

00:23:08that is already on the market.

00:23:10And that's not fair to them.

00:23:12But what he leaves out

00:23:13is that Prevnar 7

00:23:15was never tested

00:23:16against a saline placebo.

00:23:17So we don't know

00:23:18if it's safe.

00:23:20So we're testing

00:23:20one product

00:23:21we don't know

00:23:22the safety profile on

00:23:23with another product

00:23:24we don't know

00:23:25the safety profile on.

00:23:26And this is how

00:23:27the entire vaccine schedule works.

00:23:30I like to call this

00:23:31the whiskey study.

00:23:32Let me explain.

00:23:33Let's say there's a group

00:23:34of people that are complaining

00:23:36that whiskey is making people drunk

00:23:38and they're crashing their cars

00:23:40and people are getting killed.

00:23:42Now, in order to test

00:23:43does whiskey cause car accidents

00:23:45you would set up

00:23:46a double blind placebo trial.

00:23:49One group,

00:23:50the test group,

00:23:51would get the 10 shots of whiskey.

00:23:53The other group,

00:23:54the placebo group,

00:23:55would get 10 shots of water.

00:23:57And then we'd have them

00:23:58both drive on a driving course

00:23:59and see who has more accidents.

00:24:02It's obvious.

00:24:03But in this case,

00:24:04the whiskey company

00:24:05is the one doing the study.

00:24:07And what they say is,

00:24:08oh, we're going to do

00:24:08a placebo-based trial.

00:24:10But our placebo-based trial

00:24:11is not going to be water.

00:24:13It'll be vodka.

00:24:14Another product

00:24:15already on the market.

00:24:16And so 10 people

00:24:17get the whiskey shots

00:24:18and 10 people

00:24:19get the vodka shots

00:24:20and they had them all drive.

00:24:22And guess what?

00:24:22They had just as many car accidents.

00:24:25Therefore, whiskey

00:24:26does not cause car accidents

00:24:28because it didn't cause

00:24:29any more than the vodka did.

00:24:31And so to take this

00:24:31all the way to the end

00:24:33of Dr. Paul Offit's point,

00:24:35if vodka had ever been tested

00:24:38against 10 shots of water

00:24:39and there was no car accidents

00:24:42in the vodka group,

00:24:43then it would make sense

00:24:44to test the whiskey

00:24:45against the vodka.

00:24:47But we all know

00:24:48that study was never done.

00:24:50Just like no vaccine

00:24:52placebo study was ever done.

00:24:54All you have to do

00:24:56is type in FDA-licensed vaccines

00:24:59on your computer

00:25:00and every vaccine

00:25:02that they give your child

00:25:03on the childhood schedule

00:25:04will appear there.

00:25:05And then you can click

00:25:06on anyone you're interested in.

00:25:08Let's click on Recombevax HB.

00:25:10This is one of the

00:25:12hepatitis B vaccines

00:25:13they give your baby

00:25:14on the first day of life.

00:25:16Hello, welcome to the world.

00:25:18Gasp for your first breath

00:25:19and here comes your first

00:25:20sexually transmitted disease.

00:25:22Now, go to Vaccine Insert.

00:25:24This is the insert

00:25:25or the warning label

00:25:26that is wrapped around

00:25:28the vaccine

00:25:28when it's delivered

00:25:29to your doctor.

00:25:30It has all kinds

00:25:31of information

00:25:32like what's in the vaccine,

00:25:34all the ingredients,

00:25:35side effects of the vaccine.

00:25:36But I want you to focus

00:25:37on Section 6.1.

00:25:40This is where they talk

00:25:40about the clinical trial

00:25:42they relied upon

00:25:43to establish safety.

00:25:44It's always 6.1

00:25:46on every single vaccine

00:25:47so you can look

00:25:48at all of them.

00:25:49But in this one,

00:25:49you'll see

00:25:50that there was only 147 children

00:25:53in the entire trial

00:25:54and they were only monitored

00:25:56for five days

00:25:57after each dose.

00:25:59Five days.

00:26:00So think about it.

00:26:01Would you take any drug

00:26:02that was only monitored

00:26:04for safety for five days?

00:26:06If your child dies

00:26:07on day six,

00:26:08it wasn't captured

00:26:09by this trial.

00:26:10They'll say,

00:26:10we didn't see any deaths.

00:26:12If a child had autism

00:26:13two years later

00:26:14or other autoimmune diseases

00:26:16or neurological disorders,

00:26:18things that take years

00:26:19to develop,

00:26:20they'll say,

00:26:21we didn't see any

00:26:22in our trial.

00:26:23This is why every drug

00:26:24we take goes through

00:26:25a multi-year safety trial.

00:26:27Most of your issues

00:26:28are going to take years

00:26:29to develop

00:26:30and if your study

00:26:31isn't that long,

00:26:32you'll never,

00:26:33ever see them.

00:26:35We had an interesting

00:26:36opportunity

00:26:36to talk about this

00:26:38with Dr. Stanley Plotkin

00:26:40who's considered

00:26:41to be the reigning

00:26:42godfather

00:26:43of our vaccine program.

00:26:45Dr. Stan Plotkin.

00:26:49Dr. Plotkin.

00:26:50Virtually every country

00:26:51in the world

00:26:51is affected

00:26:52by his vaccines.

00:26:53Like the rubella vaccine,

00:26:55the rotavirus vaccine,

00:26:57rabies.

00:26:57He trained just

00:26:58a generation of scientists,

00:27:00including myself,

00:27:01to think like he thinks.

00:27:02He developed

00:27:03the standard textbook

00:27:04for vaccines in 1988.

00:27:06Bill Gates calls his book

00:27:08a Bible for vaccinologists.

00:27:09I hope it's more accurate

00:27:11than the Bible.

00:27:11In 2018,

00:27:14our attorney,

00:27:15Aaron Seery,

00:27:16had the opportunity

00:27:17to depose under oath

00:27:19Dr. Stanley Plotkin

00:27:20and he asked him

00:27:21this exact question.

00:27:23Is a five-day safety trial

00:27:25long enough

00:27:25to capture

00:27:26all of the side effects

00:27:28that people are

00:27:29complaining about

00:27:30from the hepatitis B vaccine?

00:27:33Dr. Plotkin,

00:27:35this is the product,

00:27:37the manufacturer insert

00:27:38for a Recombevax HB,

00:27:39correct?

00:27:40Yes.

00:27:41And the clinical trial experience

00:27:43would be found

00:27:43in Section 6.1,

00:27:45correct?

00:27:47Correct?

00:27:48Dr. Plotkin?

00:27:50Yes.

00:27:50Okay.

00:27:51In Section 6.1,

00:27:54when you look

00:27:54at the clinical trials

00:27:55that were done

00:27:56pre-licensure

00:27:57for Recombevax HB,

00:27:59how long does it say

00:28:00that safety was monitored

00:28:01after each dose?

00:28:05Let's see.

00:28:06Five days.

00:28:15Okay.

00:28:17Is five days

00:28:17long enough

00:28:18to detect

00:28:18an autoimmune issue

00:28:19that arises

00:28:20after five days?

00:28:22No.

00:28:23Is five days

00:28:23long enough

00:28:24to detect

00:28:24any neurological disorder

00:28:26that arose

00:28:27from the vaccine

00:28:28after five days?

00:28:29No.

00:28:30There is no control group,

00:28:31correct?

00:28:32It does not mention

00:28:33any control group,

00:28:35no.

00:28:35No.

00:28:37If you turn

00:28:38to Section 6.2,

00:28:41under the nervous system

00:28:42disorders,

00:28:43it states that

00:28:43there have been reports

00:28:45of Guillain-Barre syndrome,

00:28:47correct?

00:28:47Yes.

00:28:48As well as

00:28:48multiple sclerosis,

00:28:50exacerbation

00:28:51of multiple sclerosis,

00:28:53myelitis,

00:28:54including transverse myelitis,

00:28:56seizure,

00:28:57febrile seizure,

00:28:58peripheral neuropathy,

00:28:59including Bell's palsy,

00:29:01muscle weakness,

00:29:02hypothesia,

00:29:04and encephalitis,

00:29:05correct?

00:29:06Correct.

00:29:07Okay.

00:29:07Now,

00:29:08it says at the top...

00:29:10Before you go on,

00:29:12these reports

00:29:13are required

00:29:15to be included

00:29:16because they have been

00:29:18reported to the authorities

00:29:20as happening

00:29:21after vaccination.

00:29:23That is not proof

00:29:25that the vaccine

00:29:26caused those reactions.

00:29:29In order to establish

00:29:30whether it's causal

00:29:31between the vaccine

00:29:32and the condition,

00:29:34you need

00:29:34a randomly,

00:29:36a randomized,

00:29:37placebo-controlled

00:29:38study.

00:29:40Yes.

00:29:40But that was not done

00:29:41for this hepatitis B vaccine

00:29:43before licensure,

00:29:44was it?

00:29:44No.

00:29:45Okay.

00:29:46Without a control group,

00:29:47if you're looking

00:29:48for a phenomenon

00:29:51occurring in the vaccine group,

00:29:53you cannot judge

00:29:54that phenomenon

00:29:55without having

00:29:56a control group.

00:29:57Isn't it true

00:29:57that it would now

00:29:58be considered unethical

00:29:59to conduct

00:30:00such a study today?

00:30:06It would be,

00:30:07yes,

00:30:07it would be

00:30:08ethical and difficult.

00:30:10So this is how

00:30:11the entire game is played.

00:30:13They don't do

00:30:13a safety placebo trial

00:30:15before the vaccine's license.

00:30:16Then when people

00:30:17start lining up

00:30:18with all of these

00:30:19serious side effects,

00:30:20you say,

00:30:20well,

00:30:21can you do

00:30:21a placebo-based trial now?

00:30:22And they'll say,

00:30:23no,

00:30:23it's unethical.

00:30:24So they won't do it

00:30:25before,

00:30:25they won't do it

00:30:26after there's injuries,

00:30:27and when they can't

00:30:28do a study,

00:30:28your doctor says to you,

00:30:29I haven't seen

00:30:30any studies that show

00:30:31that these injuries

00:30:32are being caused

00:30:32by the vaccine.

00:30:34Therefore,

00:30:34I'm going to assume

00:30:35they're safe.

00:30:37Do you agree

00:30:38with the CDC's

00:30:39recommendation

00:30:39that babies receive

00:30:41a hepatitis B

00:30:42on the first day of life?

00:30:43Yes.

00:30:44You stated that

00:30:45hepatitis B

00:30:47doesn't cause

00:30:48encephalitis,

00:30:49right?

00:30:50That's,

00:30:51that's in my opinion,

00:30:52yes.

00:30:53But the IOM,

00:30:54after doing its review,

00:30:56determined it couldn't

00:30:56find science

00:30:57to support

00:30:58a causal determination

00:31:00one way or another.

00:31:03Correct?

00:31:04Yes.

00:31:05But that means

00:31:06that they,

00:31:06that they don't have

00:31:07evidence

00:31:08for the supposition.

00:31:11That it either causes

00:31:13or doesn't cause.

00:31:14Right.

00:31:15They don't know.

00:31:16They don't know

00:31:17because there aren't

00:31:18enough data.

00:31:18In the absence

00:31:19of data,

00:31:21my conclusion

00:31:22is that

00:31:23there are no,

00:31:25there's no proof

00:31:26that causation exists.

00:31:29So if there's

00:31:30no data

00:31:31to show

00:31:31that it causes

00:31:32or it doesn't cause,

00:31:34Yes.

00:31:34Your,

00:31:35your,

00:31:35your supposition,

00:31:37is that,

00:31:38is that I understand

00:31:39correctly?

00:31:39Yes.

00:31:39Is that

00:31:40it doesn't cause it?

00:31:42That there's no proof

00:31:43that it does.

00:31:44Yes.

00:31:45Okay.

00:31:46That's different

00:31:46than saying

00:31:47it doesn't cause it.

00:31:47Correct?

00:31:48Correct.

00:31:50So let's be clear.

00:31:51Vaccine safety

00:31:52is not based

00:31:53on science and data.

00:31:55It's based

00:31:55on an assumption

00:31:56of safety.

00:31:58And that

00:31:58is the stalemate

00:31:59we find ourselves in.

00:32:00But there's one way

00:32:01out of it.

00:32:02Instead of doing

00:32:03a placebo-based study,

00:32:04you can do

00:32:04a retrospective study

00:32:06looking at people

00:32:07that have already

00:32:07made their choice

00:32:09whether they're

00:32:09going to vaccinate

00:32:10or not.

00:32:11And then you just

00:32:11compare those groups,

00:32:13the ones that got

00:32:13the vaccines

00:32:14and the ones

00:32:14that decided

00:32:15not to vaccinate.

00:32:16We call that

00:32:17the vaccinated

00:32:18versus unvaccinated

00:32:19study.

00:32:20It's been done

00:32:20by a few

00:32:22independent scientists

00:32:23and institutes

00:32:25amongst small groups

00:32:26of children,

00:32:27but never by

00:32:28a major government

00:32:29agency

00:32:30or a major

00:32:31medical facility.

00:32:33The reason

00:32:33this study

00:32:34is important,

00:32:34I think,

00:32:35is illustrated

00:32:35by a study

00:32:36that was done

00:32:37in Guinea-Bissau,

00:32:38Africa

00:32:38by a man

00:32:39named Dr. Peter Abe.

00:32:41He's one

00:32:41of the lead experts.

00:32:43He's pro-vaccine

00:32:44and he develops

00:32:45vaccine programs

00:32:46for the third world.

00:32:47He had a DTP

00:32:48vaccine program

00:32:49he'd run 30 years ago

00:32:51in Guinea-Bissau,

00:32:52Africa

00:32:52and recognized

00:32:5430 years later,

00:32:55you know what,

00:32:56only half the children

00:32:57in the country

00:32:57got that vaccine

00:32:58and the other half

00:32:59didn't.

00:33:00I could do

00:33:00a perfect comparative

00:33:02study between

00:33:03the vaccinated

00:33:03and the unvaccinated.

00:33:05And when he did

00:33:06that study,

00:33:07the results

00:33:08blew his mind.

00:33:09This is about vaccines

00:33:11and I think

00:33:13it's important

00:33:13to recognize

00:33:14that no routine vaccine

00:33:17was tested

00:33:17for overall effect

00:33:18on mortality

00:33:19in randomized trials

00:33:20before being introduced.

00:33:22I guess most of you

00:33:23think that we know

00:33:24what our vaccines

00:33:25are doing.

00:33:26We don't.

00:33:27The program

00:33:28we are talking about

00:33:29at this time,

00:33:30the vaccine program

00:33:30was introduced

00:33:31sort of in the late 70s

00:33:33after the success

00:33:34with the eradication

00:33:35of smallpox.

00:33:36WSO made

00:33:37sort of the first

00:33:38immunization program

00:33:39for the low-income countries.

00:33:42What comes out here,

00:33:43you have 2.3 times

00:33:44higher mortality

00:33:45if you are DTP vaccinated.

00:33:48And that is

00:33:49the most commonly used

00:33:50vaccine in the world.

00:33:52So the whooping cough vaccine

00:33:54or the pertussis vaccine

00:33:55was associated

00:33:56with two-fold higher mortality.

00:33:58You can have a vaccine

00:33:59which is fully protected

00:34:00against a specific disease

00:34:02but associated

00:34:03with higher mortality.

00:34:04How is that possible?

00:34:07After looking at this study,

00:34:09it was clear

00:34:09that the vaccine

00:34:10did protect

00:34:11against the diseases

00:34:12they were vaccinated for.

00:34:14The kids didn't die

00:34:14of diphtheria,

00:34:16tetanus,

00:34:16and pertussis.

00:34:17Only one problem.

00:34:19Once they looked at it,

00:34:20they were dying

00:34:20at five times the rate

00:34:22of all of these other issues.

00:34:24So it was clear

00:34:24that though it was protecting

00:34:26against these diseases,

00:34:28it was weakening

00:34:29their immune systems

00:34:29to all sorts

00:34:30of other problems.

00:34:32One of the other scientists

00:34:33on this study

00:34:34did a TED talk on this.

00:34:36In spite of being protected

00:34:39against three deadly diseases,

00:34:41the introduction of DTP

00:34:43was associated

00:34:44with increased overall mortality.

00:34:47Children who received

00:34:48DTP vaccine

00:34:49had five times higher risk

00:34:51of dying

00:34:51than those who didn't.

00:34:53And this is just one example

00:34:54of many studies now done

00:34:56of DTP vaccine,

00:34:57and they all show the same.

00:34:59DTP-vaccinated children

00:35:01have higher mortality

00:35:02than those who didn't get DTP.

00:35:04So it appears

00:35:06that DTP vaccine

00:35:07has negative,

00:35:08non-specific effects.

00:35:09The protection

00:35:11against the three deadly diseases

00:35:13comes at a very high price,

00:35:15namely increased risk of dying.

00:35:18So,

00:35:19with the best of intentions,

00:35:21the use of DTP vaccine

00:35:22may kill more children

00:35:24than it saves.

00:35:25That was just a study

00:35:39of one vaccine

00:35:40in a group of children.

00:35:42What if you studied children

00:35:43that were receiving

00:35:44not one vaccine,

00:35:45but between 72 and 100 vaccines

00:35:48by the time they're 18?

00:35:49Of course,

00:35:50I'm talking about

00:35:51the most vaccinated nation

00:35:53in the world,

00:35:54the United States of America.

00:35:57Our federal health authorities

00:35:59actually paid

00:36:00the Institute of Medicine

00:36:02to look at the safety

00:36:03of the vaccine schedule

00:36:05as a whole.

00:36:06And the Institute of Medicine,

00:36:08after conducting that review,

00:36:10came back with a report in 2013.

00:36:12The report said

00:36:13no studies have compared

00:36:15the differences

00:36:16in health outcomes

00:36:17between entirely unimmunized

00:36:19populations of children

00:36:20and fully immunized children.

00:36:24It's the CDC's responsibility

00:36:26to do those studies,

00:36:27and they've been ordered

00:36:28again and again and again

00:36:30to do them,

00:36:30and they have refused.

00:36:32But the Institute of Medicine

00:36:33has looked at the vaccine schedule

00:36:36and said in their 2011 report,

00:36:39there are over 150 injuries

00:36:42that are likely to be associated

00:36:44with vaccines

00:36:44that have never been studied.

00:36:46Well, what did the CDC do

00:36:48after the Institute of Medicine

00:36:49issued that report?

00:36:50Instead of doing the study,

00:36:52they ended up doing a study

00:36:53on how to do

00:36:55a vax versus unvax study.

00:36:57It went and it paid

00:36:58a whole lot of money

00:36:59to issue a white paper

00:37:01on how to conduct that study

00:37:04comparing vaccinated

00:37:05versus unvaccinated kids.

00:37:07That white paper came out in 2015.

00:37:09Now, here we are in 2025,

00:37:1110 years later.

00:37:12They still never published that study.

00:37:14Now, have they never done the study?

00:37:18I can't tell you.

00:37:21This is information

00:37:22that vaccine safety advocates

00:37:24want and have been asking for

00:37:26for a long time,

00:37:28and I'm not sure

00:37:29why it hasn't been done.

00:37:30This simple study

00:37:33would shut up

00:37:34every anti-vaxxer forever.

00:37:36I have to believe

00:37:38that they have done this study

00:37:39every way they possibly can,

00:37:42and they can't seem

00:37:43to figure out

00:37:44how to make it look

00:37:45like the vaccinated

00:37:46are healthier.

00:37:47But that's just my opinion.

00:37:49Based on several other studies

00:37:51I've seen

00:37:52that did compare

00:37:53vaccinated to unvaccinated,

00:37:55but mainstream medicine says,

00:37:56well, the cohort was too small,

00:37:58or they poke holes in it saying

00:37:59it wasn't done

00:38:00by a major medical institution.

00:38:02So if we're ever going

00:38:03to get a vax

00:38:04versus unvaccinated study

00:38:06that people believe in,

00:38:07it's going to have to be done

00:38:08by highly credited scientists

00:38:10at a major medical institution

00:38:13who has a database

00:38:15big enough

00:38:15to do a thorough,

00:38:17robust investigation

00:38:18comparing the vaccinated

00:38:20to the unvaccinated.

00:38:21As fate would have it,

00:38:23Del met,

00:38:24the head of infectious disease

00:38:26at Henry Ford Health System,

00:38:29Marcus Servos.

00:38:35I'll never forget that meeting

00:38:36because you said something to me.

00:38:38You said,

00:38:38I've watched your film.

00:38:40It's intriguing.

00:38:42But you said,

00:38:44I'll never forget.

00:38:45You said,

00:38:45you've been saying something

00:38:47and watched your videos

00:38:48that I had an issue with.

00:38:50You said that

00:38:50they cannot say

00:38:52that vaccines are safe

00:38:53because they've never done

00:38:53the proper safety studies.

00:38:55And you said to me,

00:38:56I actually researched that

00:38:58because I wanted to,

00:38:59like,

00:39:00see if that was true.

00:39:01And you said,

00:39:02I'm sorry to have to report to you

00:39:05that you're actually right about that.

00:39:06No, I say it now too.

00:39:07Proper safety studies

00:39:08have not been done.

00:39:09And to now too.

00:39:10It's the same thing.

00:39:12I still say it now.

00:39:15The proper safety studies

00:39:16haven't been done.

00:39:17So then I said to you,

00:39:18all right.

00:39:19Still true.

00:39:19And you're like,

00:39:20I don't know what I'm doing here.

00:39:21I don't agree with you.

00:39:22I believe in vaccines.

00:39:23And I said,

00:39:23would you ever consider doing

00:39:25a vaccinated versus unvaccinated study?

00:39:28And you said,

00:39:28I would do anything

00:39:29wherever the data,

00:39:31the data is the data.

00:39:33Right?

00:39:34Yeah.

00:39:34The first time I met

00:39:35with Dr. Zervos,

00:39:37he agreed to do

00:39:38a vaccinated versus

00:39:39unvaccinated study.

00:39:41I mean,

00:39:41I was ecstatic.

00:39:42He was perfect.

00:39:43Ford Medical Center

00:39:44is one of the greatest

00:39:45research centers in the world.

00:39:46And Dr. Zervos

00:39:48is in the middle

00:39:48of being a hero

00:39:49for having just worked out

00:39:51the entire Flint,

00:39:52Michigan water crisis.

00:39:5574 miles of large diameter pipeline

00:39:58will stretch for...

00:39:59For decades,

00:40:00Flint,

00:40:00one of the poorest cities

00:40:01in America,

00:40:02had bought its water

00:40:03from Detroit.

00:40:04Instead of staying

00:40:05on the Detroit water supply

00:40:06while the pipeline

00:40:07was being built,

00:40:08the city would temporarily

00:40:09get its water

00:40:10from the Flint River.

00:40:11That decision

00:40:13would force the city

00:40:14to activate

00:40:15an old water treatment plant.

00:40:17Here's the plant.

00:40:18The plant.

00:40:18Here, here, here, here.

00:40:20This is what

00:40:22is coming out of the tap.

00:40:23Water's brown,

00:40:25has a bad odor.

00:40:26We cannot drink the water.

00:40:28They soon became

00:40:29a breeding ground

00:40:30for Legionella,

00:40:31and people were getting sick.

00:40:33The oxygen,

00:40:34you're on that all the time,

00:40:35or do you ever

00:40:35get to take it?

00:40:36I want it all the time.

00:40:38Yeah.

00:40:38Her doctor,

00:40:39Marcus Zerbos,

00:40:40had been treating

00:40:41a chronic skin infection

00:40:42that her weakened immune system

00:40:44couldn't control.

00:40:45They are doing a lot better.

00:40:46I'm ecstatic.

00:40:48You know,

00:40:48if I can get them healed

00:40:49over a little bit more,

00:40:50I'm going to get you

00:40:51an appointment

00:40:51with those transplant doctors.

00:40:55There'd been 90 confirmed cases

00:40:57in the year and a half

00:40:58following the water switch.

00:41:00Twelve people had died.

00:41:02Sean McElmurray

00:41:03had pulled together

00:41:04a team of 23 scientists

00:41:06and experts

00:41:06from around the state.

00:41:08The team says

00:41:09the state

00:41:09wouldn't authorize them

00:41:10to start the search

00:41:12for the source

00:41:12of the outbreak.

00:41:14Dr. Zervos

00:41:15was the infectious disease expert,

00:41:17and he was worried

00:41:18about the delay.

00:41:20It was critical

00:41:20to start right away

00:41:21because by June,

00:41:23we expected to see

00:41:24more cases

00:41:25of Legionnaire's disease,

00:41:26and there would be

00:41:27more deaths,

00:41:28which is what we expressed

00:41:30in a meeting

00:41:31that included top leadership

00:41:32at MDHHS.

00:41:34I remember my colleague

00:41:35telling him that

00:41:36if he didn't do that,

00:41:37you know,

00:41:38people could die.

00:41:39Unfortunately,

00:41:40Nicolai's response was

00:41:42that, well,

00:41:42they have to die of something.

00:41:44I mean, you're just in shock

00:41:45as a result of him saying that,

00:41:47the director

00:41:49of the health department.

00:41:51Dr. Zervos seemed perfect.

00:41:53He'd stood up

00:41:54against the entire

00:41:55health system in Michigan,

00:41:56so I figured

00:41:57he'd probably be brave enough

00:41:59to do this study.

00:42:00But then a couple of years

00:42:02went by

00:42:02and still no study.

00:42:06I called Aaron and said,

00:42:08why don't we go

00:42:08see if we can't convince him

00:42:10to finally do this study.

00:42:12I flew down to Michigan,

00:42:13and we went to meet

00:42:15Dr. Zervos in person.

00:42:17We said, look,

00:42:18here's your opportunity.

00:42:20The results should be

00:42:21directly in line

00:42:22with the orthodoxy.

00:42:23The vaccinated kids

00:42:24should be healthy

00:42:25across the board.

00:42:26He could be hailed a hero

00:42:27for finally shutting up

00:42:28the anti-vaxxers.

00:42:29He said he's willing to do it.

00:42:32The study was going to use

00:42:34the data they literally

00:42:35already have

00:42:37in their fingertips.

00:42:38The data of millions

00:42:40of people who are already

00:42:41in the Henry Ford

00:42:43Health System database,

00:42:45including hundreds,

00:42:47maybe thousands,

00:42:47of completely unvaccinated

00:42:49children,

00:42:49as well as, obviously,

00:42:51children who are vaccinated.

00:42:52What that would allow

00:42:53is taking that

00:42:56multi-million person

00:42:57database

00:42:57segregating out

00:42:59the children

00:43:00who had been in

00:43:01the Henry Ford System

00:43:02from birth

00:43:03continuously for a few years.

00:43:05Because it's a captive

00:43:06HMO environment,

00:43:08meaning it provides

00:43:09the insurance

00:43:10and it provides

00:43:11the medical care,

00:43:12it has most of the

00:43:13health records

00:43:13for these kids,

00:43:14including if they go

00:43:15out of the Henry Ford

00:43:16medical system,

00:43:18Henry Ford,

00:43:19as the insurer,

00:43:20was still paying for it.

00:43:21So they have the health codes

00:43:22for all the medical services

00:43:24that these kids got.

00:43:26So if you segregated

00:43:28out those kids,

00:43:29now you have a cohort

00:43:30of children from birth

00:43:31for at least a few years

00:43:33where you knew

00:43:33everything about them.

00:43:34I previously was a program director

00:43:40at Henry Ford Hospital,

00:43:41so I know it well.

00:43:44It's one of the best

00:43:46integrated health systems

00:43:47to do research.

00:43:48Henry Ford receives

00:43:50over $90 million

00:43:51in annual research funding

00:43:53with nearly 700 residents

00:43:55and fellows

00:43:56in 53 ACGME

00:43:59accredited training programs.

00:44:00I think Henry Ford,

00:44:02like other institutions,

00:44:03has a bias

00:44:04towards the goodness

00:44:07of vaccines.

00:44:08You can't miss it.

00:44:09It's a full-page letter here

00:44:10from Henry Ford

00:44:11with 56 signatures

00:44:12saying in bull letters,

00:44:14the science is clear,

00:44:15vaccines save lives.

00:44:17If the results came back

00:44:19demonstrating

00:44:20that the battery of vaccines

00:44:22was associated

00:44:23with chronic diseases

00:44:24and that unvaccinated

00:44:26appeared healthier over time,

00:44:27such a result

00:44:28would be particularly convincing.

00:44:33You know, I'm for vaccines.

00:44:34I'm not, you know,

00:44:35I'm obviously for COVID.

00:44:36I think it's the best way

00:44:37of controlling

00:44:38infectious diseases,

00:44:39which are deadly.

00:44:40I'm for mandatory vaccination.

00:44:41I'm the,

00:44:42Henry Ford is mandatory vaccination

00:44:43because of me.

00:44:45Henry Ford is one of about

00:44:4690 healthcare systems

00:44:47across the United States

00:44:49that are working to enroll

00:44:50a total of 30,000 volunteers

00:44:52in the Moderna Cove vaccine study

00:44:55as quickly as possible.

00:44:56This is the worst pandemic

00:44:59of the last hundred years

00:45:01and our best hope

00:45:02of dealing with this

00:45:04is by having an effective vaccine.

00:45:06Henry Ford is requiring

00:45:07all 33,000 staff members

00:45:09to be fully vaccinated

00:45:11by September 10th, 2021.

00:45:13The health system says

00:45:14this is consistent

00:45:15with its existing

00:45:16vaccination policy,

00:45:18which includes team members

00:45:19get the flu shot every year

00:45:21and stay current

00:45:21with other vaccinations.

00:45:23It appeared to me

00:45:25that Henry Ford

00:45:26was pro-vaccine,

00:45:27not anti-vaccine.

00:45:28So I had to assume

00:45:29the only reason

00:45:30they would do this study

00:45:31was to prove us wrong.

00:45:33Della and I thought

00:45:34that was an excellent opportunity.

00:45:37They could do the comparison

00:45:38and presumably

00:45:39they could get it published.

00:45:40We only had one request.

00:45:43The ask was,

00:45:44whatever the outcome,

00:45:46you publish it.

00:45:47Would he stick to that

00:45:49if the results show

00:45:50that unvaccinated kids

00:45:51are healthier?

00:45:52And when he realized

00:45:54that if he submitted

00:45:55that for publication,

00:45:56he's going to face

00:45:57the wrath

00:45:58of his entire profession?

00:46:01Didn't know.

00:46:03This was our greatest fear.

00:46:05I mean, vaccines

00:46:06are the holy grail

00:46:07of modern medicine.

00:46:08And anyone that decides

00:46:09to challenge vaccines

00:46:11in any way

00:46:12are essentially

00:46:13considered heretics.

00:46:15Vaccines are safe.

00:46:16Vaccines are safe

00:46:18and effective.

00:46:19Vaccines are safe

00:46:20and highly effective.

00:46:21Safe and effective.

00:46:22Safe and they're

00:46:22highly effective.

00:46:23Vaccines are one of humanity's

00:46:24most incredible accomplishments

00:46:26and they've saved

00:46:26millions of lives.

00:46:28Childhood vaccines

00:46:28have prevented about

00:46:29four million deaths

00:46:31around the world

00:46:32every year.

00:46:32The overwhelming majority

00:46:34of pediatricians

00:46:35in this country

00:46:35strongly support vaccination.

00:46:37Missing her vaccination dates.

00:46:39We're not vaccinating.

00:46:41The schedule

00:46:41as it's currently recommended

00:46:43is well tested.

00:46:44We've studied them

00:46:45in so many millions

00:46:47of children.

00:46:47Billions of people.

00:46:48Decades of extensive

00:46:49peer-reviewed

00:46:50scientific studies.

00:46:52Centuries of science.

00:46:53The science is pretty settled.

00:46:54Settled for many years now.

00:46:56This idea that we're

00:46:57taking too many vaccines.

00:46:59There's really no science

00:47:00to back that up.

00:47:01The scientific community

00:47:02publishes paper

00:47:03after paper

00:47:04after paper.

00:47:05There is nothing to see.

00:47:06There's nothing to see.

00:47:08I will not stand here

00:47:09and let conspiracy theories

00:47:10distract from real solutions.

00:47:12Most doctors

00:47:14can't tolerate

00:47:15being called quacks

00:47:17or having their reputation

00:47:18destroyed.

00:47:19And, you know,

00:47:19I went from treating

00:47:20the head of the laboratory

00:47:21at my hospital

00:47:22for hypertension

00:47:23to becoming, you know,

00:47:25somebody that was

00:47:26doubted on every levels

00:47:27after a while

00:47:28because of one thing

00:47:29that I said,

00:47:30which was,

00:47:30can we stop giving vaccines

00:47:32to my sick patients

00:47:33and give it to them

00:47:34on the day of discharge?

00:47:35And had they not

00:47:36tried to intimidate me,

00:47:37doubt me,

00:47:38and pushed me

00:47:39to research and show

00:47:40that what I saw

00:47:41was actually real,

00:47:42I would still be lockstep

00:47:43working as a regular doctor.

00:47:45The Florida Department of Health

00:47:46in partnership

00:47:47with the governor

00:47:48is going to be working

00:47:50to end

00:47:51all vaccine mandates

00:47:54in Florida law.

00:47:55All of them.

00:47:56All of them.

00:47:57My experience

00:47:58with discussing

00:48:00or disclosing

00:48:01harms associated

00:48:02with the vaccines

00:48:03is that those

00:48:04are not welcome

00:48:05ideas or conversations.

00:48:07That move

00:48:08from the Florida

00:48:09Surgeon General,

00:48:10a doctor there,

00:48:10drawing condemnation

00:48:11from public health experts.

00:48:13Whether it's ignorance,

00:48:14it's stupidity,

00:48:15or it's malice,

00:48:16at the end of the day

00:48:17people are going

00:48:18to get hurt.

00:48:18He's not going

00:48:19to necessarily receive

00:48:20a warm embrace

00:48:21by some of the people

00:48:22in his profession,

00:48:24but that's really

00:48:24what courage is all about.

00:48:26It's a very hostile environment,

00:48:28both scientifically

00:48:29and in the media,

00:48:31for individuals

00:48:32who reach conclusions

00:48:35or have opinions

00:48:36that counter

00:48:37mainstream ideas.

00:48:39Every independent scientist

00:48:43that has ever ventured

00:48:45into doing a vaccinated

00:48:46versus unvaccinated

00:48:47study of any kind

00:48:48is immediately

00:48:50under assault.

00:48:51There's one

00:48:52by Dr. Anthony Mawson

00:48:53out of Mississippi.

00:48:55He did a homeschool study

00:48:56of about 600 kids

00:48:57and discovered

00:48:58alarming rates

00:49:00of allergies,

00:49:01ADD,

00:49:02ADHD,

00:49:03neurological disorders,

00:49:04and a four-fold

00:49:06increased risk

00:49:07of autism

00:49:08amongst the vaccinated.

00:49:10As soon as the study

00:49:10came out,

00:49:11his job was under threat.

00:49:13In fact,

00:49:13I asked him

00:49:13if he'd be in this film.

00:49:15He said,

00:49:15look,

00:49:16you can show my studies,

00:49:17but I have just

00:49:18been dragged

00:49:19through the coals

00:49:19on this.

00:49:20I can't take anymore.

00:49:21Then there's

00:49:22Dr. Paul Thomas.

00:49:26Hey, how are you guys doing?

00:49:27What I'm seeing

00:49:28on this side

00:49:29is a pink,

00:49:30dull,

00:49:32scarred-up eardrum.

00:49:33I've been a pediatrician

00:49:34for 35 years.

00:49:35I'm now retired.

00:49:36What I noticed

00:49:38in the first decade

00:49:39or so of my practice

00:49:40is kids were getting

00:49:41sicker and sicker.

00:49:42And over the next decade,

00:49:44as more and more patients

00:49:45chose not to vaccinate,

00:49:46I got to see the difference.

00:49:48But I wanted to see,

00:49:49could I prove it?

00:49:51So we got all the data

00:49:52from my practice.

00:49:53We looked at every baby

00:49:54born into my practice

00:49:55and published it

00:49:56in an International Journal

00:49:57of Public Health.

00:49:58What we found,

00:50:00and that study

00:50:01was peer-reviewed,

00:50:02it was robust,

00:50:03we found massive increases.

00:50:05I mean, we're talking

00:50:06four to five hundred percent more.

00:50:09Allergies,

00:50:10autoimmune conditions,

00:50:12neurodevelopmental issues,

00:50:13and then we had infections

00:50:14of all kinds.

00:50:15Massively increased

00:50:16in the vaccinated

00:50:17compared to the unvaccinated.

00:50:19What happened

00:50:20when I published that study?

00:50:24Within days

00:50:25of it being available online,

00:50:26I get a call

00:50:27from my attorney.

00:50:28Don't go see any patients.

00:50:29Don't write any prescriptions.

00:50:31Don't go into the office.

00:50:32Your license has been

00:50:33emergently suspended.

00:50:34You are a threat

00:50:35to public health.

00:50:37What's today?

00:50:39Today

00:50:39is the last

00:50:41time

00:50:43I will be doing

00:50:43clinical medicine

00:50:44in Oregon.

00:50:46Knowing that you guys

00:50:47are keeping it going,

00:50:48the heart of this place

00:50:50lives on.

00:50:50So what if Dr. Zervos

00:50:55does this study

00:50:56and it turns out

00:50:57exactly the same way

00:50:59as the others?

00:51:00Would he still publish it?

00:51:01That was the question.

00:51:04Years went by.

00:51:09In 2020,

00:51:10I was informed

00:51:11they had put together

00:51:13a study.

00:51:13When I had that study

00:51:19in my hand

00:51:20and I looked at it,

00:51:21the significance of it,

00:51:23it was an actual study

00:51:25that when published

00:51:26was the first step

00:51:28in changing this landscape.

00:51:31Weeks went by

00:51:33and then more time went by

00:51:35and at some point,

00:51:37what I learned was

00:51:39it was not going

00:51:41to get submitted

00:51:42for publication.

00:51:48Aaron called me

00:51:49and said,

00:51:50they finished the study.

00:51:51Only one problem.

00:51:53They're not going

00:51:53to publish it.

00:51:55I mean,

00:51:55it was everything

00:51:56we were afraid of.

00:51:59I called Dr. Zervos

00:52:00and I said,

00:52:01can I fly out

00:52:02and meet you for dinner?

00:52:03And he agreed.

00:52:06I wanted to look

00:52:07Zervos in the eyes

00:52:08and ask him,

00:52:09what's so damning

00:52:10in this study

00:52:11that you're afraid

00:52:12to publish it?

00:52:13I wanted to know

00:52:14what was in this study.

00:52:14I hadn't seen it.

00:52:16I also imagined

00:52:17there's got to be a way

00:52:18to talk him

00:52:19into publishing this study.

00:52:21But one thing

00:52:21was for sure.

00:52:23This was my last chance.

00:52:25I'm going to bring

00:52:26hidden cameras

00:52:27and recording equipment

00:52:28so that no matter

00:52:30what happens

00:52:31at this dinner,

00:52:32I can prove

00:52:33it happened.

00:52:37What do you think

00:52:38about this study

00:52:39you guys have done?

00:52:40It's important information

00:52:41because it did show

00:52:43a difference

00:52:44between the groups.

00:52:45I don't know how to...

00:52:46Oh, she got it.

00:52:47I don't know how to explain it,

00:52:50but it was important

00:52:52to find it.

00:52:53I mean,

00:52:54the study was...

00:52:55for what...

00:52:57Do you find

00:52:57any flaws in the study?

00:52:58I mean,

00:52:58is there a way

00:52:59you can do the study

00:53:01better

00:53:01with what's there?

00:53:02not that I...

00:53:04What?

00:53:05No.

00:53:05No?

00:53:18Impact of childhood

00:53:19vaccination

00:53:20on short

00:53:21and long-term

00:53:21chronic health outcomes

00:53:23in children.

00:53:24A birth cohort study.

00:53:25This one is really robust.

00:53:28Let's see the results.

00:53:29Yeah, what were the results?

00:53:30The CDC put out

00:53:32a white paper

00:53:33on how you would look

00:53:34at vaccinated

00:53:35versus unvaccinated,

00:53:37and we followed it

00:53:39to a T.

00:53:41Do you agree with that?

00:53:42No.

00:53:42Do you agree with that?

00:53:42No, I agree with that.

00:53:43We 100% did.

00:53:45We looked at this

00:53:46every other way

00:53:48and sideways.

00:53:49I think this is

00:53:50a devastating commentary

00:53:51on our public health

00:53:53interventions

00:53:54because if this is true,

00:53:56we are systematically

00:53:57making kids sick

00:53:58and not just

00:53:59a little bit sick.

00:54:01Very sick.

00:54:03Publishing something

00:54:04like that,

00:54:04I might as well

00:54:05retire.

00:54:06I'd be finished.

00:54:07I mean, I'm just curious.

00:54:11What in this data

00:54:12makes you think

00:54:13it will be as

00:54:15catastrophic

00:54:16to your career

00:54:17as you think?

00:54:18What was he so afraid of?

00:54:20The study was a bombshell.

00:54:2118,468 subjects,

00:54:261,957 of them

00:54:28were fully unvaccinated.

00:54:30When comparing

00:54:31the health outcomes

00:54:32of the vaccinated

00:54:34versus the unvaccinated,

00:54:36they found

00:54:37an increased risk

00:54:38in the vaccinated

00:54:39of several

00:54:40chronic health conditions.

00:54:42The vaccinated subjects

00:54:43were over four times

00:54:44more likely

00:54:45to have an asthma diagnosis.

00:54:484.29 times

00:54:50in the adjusted

00:54:52and that seems,

00:54:53I've looked at a lot of studies,

00:54:54that's 3.26 to 5.65.

00:54:57They also found

00:54:58three times the risk

00:54:59for atopic diseases.

00:55:01Which is a subset

00:55:02of allergic diseases.

00:55:04They found

00:55:04a almost six times

00:55:06risk for autoimmune disease.

00:55:08The autoimmune diseases

00:55:09this paper looked at

00:55:10include

00:55:11thrombocytopenic purpura,

00:55:13rheumatoid arthritis,

00:55:16SLE,

00:55:16systemic lupus erythematosus,

00:55:18MS, multiple sclerosis,

00:55:21and Guillain-Barre syndrome.

00:55:23They mentioned

00:55:24there are over 80

00:55:25different autoimmune diseases

00:55:27and what their data showed

00:55:28for autoimmunity,

00:55:30six times increase

00:55:31in those who got vaccines

00:55:33when compared

00:55:33to the unvaccinated.

00:55:35Which is staggering

00:55:36because autoimmune disorders

00:55:37really represent

00:55:39significant morbidity

00:55:41and health costs

00:55:42and suffering,

00:55:43you know,

00:55:43accrued over a lifetime.

00:55:45Neurodevelopmental disorders.

00:55:48The kind of numbers

00:55:48we talked about,

00:55:49do you remember?

00:55:50Five and a half times risk

00:55:52for neurodevelopmental disorders.

00:55:55We know that the immune system

00:55:57is intimately connected

00:56:00with both brain development

00:56:01and brain functioning.

00:56:03And so,

00:56:04when the immune system

00:56:05gets triggered

00:56:06by illness,

00:56:07potentially by vaccination,

00:56:09you can get

00:56:10neuropsychiatric symptoms,

00:56:12presumably related

00:56:13to brain inflammation

00:56:14and, you know,

00:56:15immune processes

00:56:16in the brain.

00:56:182.92 times

00:56:20the amount

00:56:21of motor disabilities.

00:56:224.47 times

00:56:24the amount

00:56:24of speech disorders

00:56:25in the vaccinated

00:56:26compared to the unvaccinated.

00:56:28Three times the rate

00:56:30of developmental delay.

00:56:33They found

00:56:34the same things

00:56:34I found

00:56:35related to allergy

00:56:36and autoimmunity.

00:56:37Also,

00:56:38six times

00:56:39more acute

00:56:40and chronic

00:56:41ear infections.

00:56:45Interestingly,

00:56:46there were

00:56:46several health conditions

00:56:48where they couldn't

00:56:49even do this analysis

00:56:50because there were

00:56:53none

00:56:54in the unvaccinated group.

00:56:57The way that

00:56:58the mathematical

00:56:59formulas work,

00:57:00you can't have

00:57:01a zero

00:57:01in any one group

00:57:02and be able

00:57:03to compare risk.

00:57:04For example,

00:57:06there were

00:57:06262 children

00:57:08who had ADHD

00:57:09in the vaccinated group.

00:57:11Amongst the

00:57:11unvaccinated group,

00:57:12there were

00:57:13zero

00:57:13cases of ADHD.

00:57:16Zero.

00:57:17These ones

00:57:17are just mind-boggling.

00:57:18These conditions

00:57:19were not found

00:57:20at all

00:57:21in almost

00:57:222,000

00:57:23unvaccinated kids.

00:57:25Zero

00:57:25brain dysfunction.

00:57:27Zero

00:57:27diabetes.

00:57:29Zero

00:57:29behavioral problems.

00:57:31Zero

00:57:32learning disabilities.

00:57:33Zero

00:57:33intellectual disabilities.

00:57:35Zero

00:57:36tics.

00:57:36And zero

00:57:37other psychological

00:57:38disabilities

00:57:39in the unvaccinated.

00:57:45I'm going to read

00:57:46the conclusion here.

00:57:47Despite this,

00:57:49and in contrast

00:57:50to our expectations,

00:57:52again,

00:57:53the author's

00:57:53expectations

00:57:54was they'd

00:57:54conduct a study

00:57:55and probably

00:57:56find vaccinated

00:57:57people a whole lot

00:57:58healthier than

00:57:58the unvaccinated,

00:57:59right?

00:58:01This is what we found.

00:58:01We found that

00:58:02exposure to vaccination

00:58:03was independently

00:58:04associated with

00:58:06an overall

00:58:062.5-fold increase

00:58:09in the likelihood

00:58:11of developing

00:58:11a chronic health

00:58:12condition

00:58:13when compared

00:58:14to children

00:58:14unexposed

00:58:15to vaccination.

00:58:20Any vaccine,

00:58:22even just one,

00:58:23compared to none,

00:58:24had two and a half

00:58:25times more likely

00:58:26to have a chronic

00:58:27health condition.

00:58:28There were no

00:58:30chronic health

00:58:31conditions associated

00:58:32with an increased

00:58:33risk in the

00:58:34unexposed group.

00:58:35None.

00:58:40What does this graph

00:58:41mean?

00:58:42Explain that to me.

00:58:44So it's no vaccines

00:58:45versus vaccines.

00:58:47That's basically

00:58:48your likelihood

00:58:49of not having

00:58:50a chronic health

00:58:51condition.

00:58:52They did something

00:58:53called time-to-event

00:58:54analysis.

00:58:55At 10 years,

00:58:57the likelihood

00:58:58of being free

00:58:59from a chronic

00:59:01illness was only

00:59:0243% in the

00:59:04vaccinated group

00:59:05versus 83%

00:59:08in the unvaccinated

00:59:09group.

00:59:10It's a big

00:59:12difference.

00:59:14So if you're

00:59:16unvaccinated,

00:59:16you stay up here

00:59:17above the

00:59:1870, you know,

00:59:20was it 80%

00:59:21of you are going

00:59:21to be perfectly

00:59:22healthy, whereas

00:59:22you're dropping

00:59:23below the 50%

00:59:24total, which is

00:59:26exactly what I've

00:59:27been stating.

00:59:28I've been saying

00:59:2854% of America's

00:59:30children have a

00:59:31chronic illness

00:59:31channel.

00:59:32It's right there.

00:59:33That's basically

00:59:34what that's showing.

00:59:3510 years follow-up.

00:59:3757% of the

00:59:40vaccinated had a

00:59:41chronic health

00:59:42condition in just

00:59:4310 years.

00:59:45That should shock

00:59:46everyone.

00:59:47Let's remember,

00:59:48the entire

00:59:49conversation of the

00:59:50moment in America

00:59:51is the fact that

00:59:5254% of our

00:59:54children are

00:59:54chronically ill.

00:59:56And here we are

00:59:57looking at the

00:59:57study, and it's

00:59:58almost exactly

00:59:59those numbers.

01:00:0157% of the

01:00:03vaccinated are

01:00:04chronically ill,

01:00:05whereas only 17%

01:00:07of the unvaccinated.

01:00:10I think because I

01:00:11have an interest in

01:00:12vaccines and I

01:00:13understand off-target,

01:00:15non-specific

01:00:15effects, I was sad.

01:00:17but I wasn't

01:00:19surprised.

01:00:21I can tell you

01:00:21that these data

01:00:23are consistent

01:00:25with my greatest

01:00:26concerns regarding the

01:00:28childhood vaccination

01:00:29schedule.

01:00:29That despite the good

01:00:31intentions of the

01:00:32field of vaccinology,

01:00:34that it's backfiring

01:00:35on us.

01:00:37In virtually every

01:00:38single chronic health

01:00:39category, the

01:00:41vaccinated are doing

01:00:42far worse.

01:00:45But there is one

01:00:46issue.

01:00:47It's the one that

01:00:48I have been talking

01:00:49about for years and

01:00:50puts me in the middle

01:00:51of this entire

01:00:52investigation, and

01:00:53that is autism.

01:00:55And in this study, it

01:00:57appears that there

01:00:57was no statistical

01:00:58significance with the

01:01:00vaccine-autism

01:01:01connection.

01:01:02And I wanted to

01:01:03know why.

01:01:04Yet autism is

01:01:07neutral.

01:01:09Does that mean

01:01:09we're wrong about

01:01:10autism, Mark?

01:01:11No.

01:01:12No?

01:01:13No.

01:01:14No.

01:01:14There are a lot of

01:01:16variables involved, and

01:01:17it's hard to control

01:01:19for.

01:01:19When you don't have a

01:01:20lot of instances, as

01:01:22occurred here with

01:01:23autism, where you only

01:01:24have 23 instances of

01:01:26autism in the

01:01:27vaccinated group, and

01:01:28one instance of

01:01:30autism in the

01:01:31unvaccinated group,

01:01:33that wasn't enough

01:01:34instances to actually

01:01:36be able to determine

01:01:38whether or not there

01:01:40is a statistically

01:01:41significant increased

01:01:42rate of autism.

01:01:43So even though the

01:01:44study shows all sorts

01:01:45of neurodevelopmental

01:01:47disorders, when it

01:01:48comes to autism, there

01:01:49weren't enough

01:01:49children diagnosed

01:01:50with autism in this

01:01:52group to answer that

01:01:53question.

01:01:54That is why studies

01:01:55like this need to be

01:01:56replicated at even

01:01:57larger scales.

01:01:59The fact is, there's a

01:02:00signal, and the

01:02:02signal is unvaccinated

01:02:03kids healthy.

01:02:04That should be a very

01:02:05important positive

01:02:06study.

01:02:06Yes.

01:02:06The converse of this

01:02:07is, kids that are

01:02:09vaccinated, it doesn't

01:02:11look so good,

01:02:12particularly for the

01:02:13neuropsychiatric

01:02:14disorders.

01:02:16Looking at the

01:02:16measure of association,

01:02:18and I'm an

01:02:18epidemiologist, I live

01:02:19in this, neutral is

01:02:20one.

01:02:21Neutral means no

01:02:22association is one.

01:02:23If it's two, it means

01:02:24there's a two-fold

01:02:25risk.

01:02:26When we're doing

01:02:27non-randomized data,

01:02:28especially from

01:02:29corporate data stores,

01:02:30we have a higher

01:02:32threshold.

01:02:32And a good

01:02:33threshold to remember

01:02:34is four.

01:02:35If there's a four-fold

01:02:36increased risk in a

01:02:37data set, if we were

01:02:39going to go do this

01:02:40somewhere else, almost

01:02:41certainly, we would

01:02:43find an association

01:02:44when this is telling

01:02:46us that the risk

01:02:47relationship is greater

01:02:49than four.

01:02:54I was sitting at that

01:02:55dinner, reading this

01:02:56study for the first

01:02:57time, and thinking,

01:02:59oh my God, the world

01:03:01needs to see this

01:03:02study.

01:03:03But the more I

01:03:04pressed Dr. Zervos to

01:03:06publish it, the more

01:03:08excuses he had.

01:03:10I think it's a good

01:03:10study, but it does have

01:03:11limitations to it.

01:03:13The argument against

01:03:14it is going to be

01:03:14that it's the same

01:03:16thing, retrospective,

01:03:17it's not a control

01:03:18group, but there's

01:03:20other factors involved.

01:03:21It's a heterogeneous

01:03:22group of conditions.

01:03:24The perfect example

01:03:25was hydroxychloroquine.

01:03:27Did I happen to

01:03:28mention that not only

01:03:29was Dr. Zervos at

01:03:30the center of the

01:03:31Flint, Michigan

01:03:32water crisis, he was

01:03:33also at the center of

01:03:34the hydroxychloroquine

01:03:35study that was done

01:03:37by Ford and showed a

01:03:3850% reduction in death

01:03:40for those that

01:03:41received hydroxychloroquine.

01:03:42And for that, he got

01:03:43attacked by Tony Fauci

01:03:45and virtually everybody

01:03:46in mainstream media

01:03:48and the medical world.

01:03:49The Henry Ford Hospital

01:03:51study that was published was a

01:03:54non-controlled retrospective

01:03:55cohort study.

01:03:56So that study is a flawed

01:03:58study.

01:03:58The PR and Henry Ford, they put a gag order

01:04:01on me, you know, I couldn't talk

01:04:02about anything.

01:04:03And they said to me, Mark,

01:04:07so what?

01:04:09You know, so you go on CNN,

01:04:11you know, they would be happy,

01:04:13they'd be thrilled to have you

01:04:14on CNN and, you know,

01:04:16and you say what you feel.

01:04:17But they're just going to twist

01:04:18what you say anyway

01:04:19and make you look bad anyway.

01:04:21So what good, what good is it

01:04:23impressive?

01:04:23I should still be able

01:04:24to defend myself and, you know,

01:04:26and say what the inaccuracies

01:04:27are.

01:04:28So I'm thinking to myself,

01:04:29maybe the Henry Ford PR was right

01:04:32is that it's just going to get

01:04:34twisted around anyway,

01:04:35make you look bad and you get fired.

01:04:37So what good does it do?

01:04:38So what's going to happen

01:04:40with this one is the same thing

01:04:41is that somebody's going to come

01:04:43back and they're going to say,

01:04:44you know, the study was,

01:04:46the study is flawed as opposed

01:04:48to looking at it in the way

01:04:50that it could be looked at.

01:04:51How about looking at this

01:04:53as important scientific information

01:04:55that can inform how

01:04:56the proper study could be done

01:04:57and won't be taken like that?

01:04:59And then I can say, why?

01:05:02Because there's a political

01:05:02intended to it.

01:05:04I get it.

01:05:04It has its issues.

01:05:06Any retrospective study

01:05:08is always going to have

01:05:08the same problems, right?

01:05:09It's always going to have

01:05:10the same attacks upon it.

01:05:12There are limitations

01:05:13to retrospective studies.

01:05:16That's the reason why

01:05:17we like to do randomized

01:05:18clinical trials when we can

01:05:20because they don't have

01:05:21the same limitations.

01:05:23The major one that you have

01:05:24to worry about

01:05:25with retrospective studies

01:05:27is things that are different

01:05:30between the groups

01:05:31that you're comparing

01:05:32that you're unable

01:05:34to account for.

01:05:36If you want a flawless study,

01:05:37do a placebo-controlled trial.

01:05:39Any retrospective study

01:05:40is going to have flaws in it.

01:05:41But in this study,

01:05:42they made a point to address

01:05:44many of the flaws

01:05:45that they found themselves.

01:05:47If someone were critical

01:05:48of the study,

01:05:49I think issues

01:05:50that a researcher might raise

01:05:51would be things like

01:05:53the different lengths

01:05:54of follow-up

01:05:55for the groups

01:05:57between the children

01:05:58who received no vaccines

01:05:59and the children

01:06:00who received vaccines.

01:06:02The authors actually

01:06:02did do a sensitivity analysis

01:06:04where they limited

01:06:07the analysis to children

01:06:08who had at least

01:06:10a certain amount of follow-up.

01:06:11When they limited

01:06:12the follow-up time

01:06:14for both the vaccinated

01:06:14and the unvaccinated

01:06:15to one year,

01:06:17it's still 2.75 times

01:06:19higher rate of chronic disease

01:06:21in the vaccinated.

01:06:22And when they limited

01:06:23it to three years,

01:06:24it's 3.38 times

01:06:25the rate of chronic disease

01:06:27in the vaccinated.

01:06:28And when they limited

01:06:29it to five years,

01:06:30it's four times greater.

01:06:32So no matter what they did

01:06:33to limit the follow-up time,

01:06:35the results of the study

01:06:36didn't change.

01:06:37The results indicate

01:06:38that the different

01:06:40follow-up period

01:06:41really did not have

01:06:42a substantial effect

01:06:44on the research question

01:06:46that they were probing.

01:06:48Another concern is that

01:06:50there are just big differences

01:06:52in how likely

01:06:55the children

01:06:56who received no vaccines

01:06:58were to seek health care

01:07:00compared to the children

01:07:01who received vaccines.

01:07:03So in other words,

01:07:04could the differences

01:07:05we're finding

01:07:06in the study

01:07:07just be due to the fact

01:07:09that these kids

01:07:11were being seen less often

01:07:13and so they're getting

01:07:14fewer diagnoses.

01:07:16To try and address this,

01:07:18they limited

01:07:18the population of children

01:07:21who didn't receive

01:07:22any vaccines

01:07:22to children who

01:07:24at least had

01:07:25some number

01:07:26of medical visits.

01:07:29And even in that

01:07:30sensitivity analysis,

01:07:31the main findings persisted.

01:07:33In this study,

01:07:36they adjusted

01:07:36for confounders.

01:07:38Confounders can be age,

01:07:40socioeconomic status,

01:07:42gender,

01:07:43racial, ethnic groups,

01:07:45and used a technique

01:07:46called Cox proportional hazards,

01:07:48which means

01:07:48holding all other factors equal,

01:07:51what's the relationship

01:07:53between the factor of interest

01:07:54and the outcome?

01:07:55Even after they were adjusted for,

01:07:58the effect of these characteristics

01:08:00was actually pretty small.

01:08:01I actually expected

01:08:03that those adjustments

01:08:04would have a really powerful effect,

01:08:06but they actually didn't.

01:08:08And when you do

01:08:08a lot of sensitivity analysis

01:08:09and what you're seeing

01:08:10doesn't change much,

01:08:12that can be reassuring.

01:08:13The authors did a good job

01:08:15with the information

01:08:17that they had.

01:08:18I have seen studies

01:08:19on vaccines

01:08:20published in good journals

01:08:21that are much weaker

01:08:23in quality.

01:08:24Is what your study shows,

01:08:28is it important?

01:08:32Yeah, it is important.

01:08:32You know who you should

01:08:33send it to?

01:08:34Which is what I told you

01:08:35a while ago.

01:08:36Because I'm just not going to do it.

01:08:38I'm not going to do it

01:08:38because I don't want to

01:08:39end up like Diddy or...

01:08:42I don't want to suffer

01:08:44like McCullough did.

01:08:46But here,

01:08:47I give him credit

01:08:48for taking it,

01:08:50you know,

01:08:51standing up to it.

01:08:52But I'm just not going to...

01:08:54I'm not going to...

01:08:55I'm not going to do it.

01:08:57In any other climate,

01:08:58in a regular climate,

01:08:59you would have put

01:09:00this study out

01:09:00just as it is.

01:09:02Right?

01:09:02If we weren't in this world

01:09:04of censorship...

01:09:05I'd put it out

01:09:05just as it is.

01:09:06You would?

01:09:07I'd put it out

01:09:07just as it is.

01:09:08Yeah.

01:09:09I'd like to...

01:09:10I'd like to just finish out

01:09:12my work, you know,

01:09:13doing international work.

01:09:14Part of my reluctance

01:09:15to do anything

01:09:16is that nothing

01:09:17is going to come out of it

01:09:18other than me losing my job,

01:09:21which I'd rather not

01:09:21see happen.

01:09:22I'm open to it.

01:09:23We're here because

01:09:24I fully respect you

01:09:25and I recognize the danger

01:09:27of...

01:09:28I said to you,

01:09:30if you do this study...

01:09:32I'm going to repeat it

01:09:33because I'm going to remember.

01:09:34I said,

01:09:34if you do the study,

01:09:35you're going to come under fire.

01:09:37You said,

01:09:37I don't care about that.

01:09:38I'm all about the data

01:09:39and I'm about to retire anyway.

01:09:41That's literally what you said.

01:09:42Yeah.

01:09:43So your energy

01:09:44has definitely changed on that.

01:09:45Energy's changing.

01:09:47Let me put it this way.

01:09:50I put my hope

01:09:51career on the line

01:09:52because I saw an issue.

01:09:53Because what?

01:09:54I saw an issue

01:09:55that is affecting

01:09:57the children

01:09:57of America

01:09:59and the world.

01:10:00We have a serious

01:10:01growing problem

01:10:02of autoimmune disease,

01:10:03chronic illness.

01:10:04I am not saying

01:10:05that vaccines

01:10:06are the only cause,

01:10:08but I am saying

01:10:08this program

01:10:09needs some serious work.

01:10:11We had much better health

01:10:13when we were getting

01:10:1310,

01:10:1420 vaccines

01:10:15because at 54 shots

01:10:17with 72 doses,

01:10:19it is clear

01:10:19we are not making

01:10:20our children healthier.

01:10:21They're going

01:10:21the wrong direction.

01:10:24If there's a way

01:10:25to do this program better,

01:10:26which I believe,

01:10:27you know,

01:10:27I've never said

01:10:28I'm trying to eradicate

01:10:29vaccines from the planet,

01:10:30but we are at

01:10:31an autism rate now

01:10:33of what?

01:10:341 in 26, 28?

01:10:37We have some

01:10:37serious issues.

01:10:39I actually agree with that.

01:10:41Is there a different way

01:10:41we could be doing it?

01:10:42Right,

01:10:43but how do we get there

01:10:44if I finally,

01:10:45what are the odds?

01:10:46I find someone like you

01:10:48that has got the clout.

01:10:51If we can't,

01:10:52if I can't get the study out,

01:10:54then what hope is there

01:10:55for every kid in the future?

01:10:57I can't do shit for them.

01:10:59Unless there's a change

01:11:00in leadership,

01:11:01nothing is going to happen.

01:11:04Publishing one,

01:11:05you know,

01:11:05one study like,

01:11:06like this,

01:11:10like this one

01:11:10is not going to,

01:11:11it's not going to,

01:11:12it's actually

01:11:14the right thing to do.

01:11:15I don't want to say

01:11:16it's not the right thing to do.

01:11:17It's the right thing to do,

01:11:17but I just don't want to.

01:11:21And I don't want to say

01:11:22I have enough problems,

01:11:23but I've got enough things

01:11:25like that

01:11:25that I'm already dealing,

01:11:26but I don't want another one.

01:11:28Hold on,

01:11:29hold on.

01:11:29I just want to say this.

01:11:31This is the Galileo moment.

01:11:33I believe this changes

01:11:34more lives

01:11:35than anything there is.

01:11:36If we can fix

01:11:37this vaccine program,

01:11:39it doesn't just change

01:11:40millions of children,

01:11:41lives here in America,

01:11:42changes worldwide.

01:11:44You'll be the father

01:11:45of the change

01:11:47in the system.

01:11:49That's historic.

01:11:51And I want to work

01:11:51with you to do that.

01:11:53This is why we're here.

01:11:54Yeah.

01:11:55No, I see what you're saying.

01:11:56I see what you're saying.

01:11:57We have an ability

01:11:58to do something

01:11:58that no one ever

01:11:59dreams possible.

01:12:01If it's not you,

01:12:01then who?

01:12:03For some reason,

01:12:04it always,

01:12:05hammering has always

01:12:06come towards me.

01:12:07So I can't handle it.

01:12:08I really can't.

01:12:09No, I'm not a good person.

01:12:11I can't handle it.

01:12:12I'm not a good person.

01:12:13But I'm just not going to do it.

01:12:15I'm not going to

01:12:16do it.

01:12:18Because I've got

01:12:19other stuff to worry about.

01:12:20Yeah, I mean,

01:12:24obviously, like,

01:12:26really emotional.

01:12:29You know,

01:12:30he's just going to

01:12:30compartmentalize it away.

01:12:32I think someone

01:12:33could look at this

01:12:34and be like,

01:12:34it's unconscionable.

01:12:35How could he?

01:12:37And I think

01:12:37the way that he can

01:12:39is like the way

01:12:40we all can do things

01:12:41that, you know,

01:12:42like not do things

01:12:43we don't want to do

01:12:43is we just convince ourselves.

01:12:45You know,

01:12:45he's saying like,

01:12:46it doesn't matter.

01:12:47This is one study.

01:12:48It won't move the needle.

01:12:49It's too much for me.

01:12:51I can't.

01:12:52And, you know,

01:12:53maybe he's right.

01:12:53Maybe it is too much for him.

01:12:55It's very important

01:12:56that the study

01:12:57sees the light of day.

01:12:58In the scientific literature

01:12:59and for the advancement

01:13:02of science,

01:13:03we must have balance.

01:13:06There are always

01:13:07pros and cons

01:13:08to everything.

01:13:10And when we have

01:13:10a deep-seated

01:13:11religious bias

01:13:12in favor of vaccines,

01:13:15we've lost balance.

01:13:18And when we lose balance,

01:13:19the entire scientific enterprise

01:13:21goes off track.

01:13:23And when that happens,

01:13:25large populations are harmed.

01:13:27I cannot help

01:13:28but ask myself the question,

01:13:29how many children

01:13:30will suffer a chronic illness

01:13:32that they maybe

01:13:33wouldn't have to suffer

01:13:34had this information

01:13:35been out there?

01:13:36I treat a lot of kids

01:13:38with neurodevelopmental disability

01:13:39and neuropsychiatric illness

01:13:41and their lives

01:13:42and their family's lives

01:13:43are hell.

01:13:44And I know so many parents

01:13:46who suffer

01:13:48all kinds of guilt.

01:13:49The parents

01:13:50who've had

01:13:50adverse reactions

01:13:52or who've witnessed

01:13:53neurodevelopmental regression

01:13:54in connection

01:13:55with vaccination,

01:13:56they are devastated.

01:13:58I've had so many mothers

01:13:59say to me,

01:14:01my child is like this

01:14:04because of me.

01:14:05You know,

01:14:05at my hand.

01:14:07I did this to them.

01:14:11I think we are

01:14:11absolutely destroying

01:14:13our future

01:14:14by destroying

01:14:15the overall health

01:14:16of our most precious asset,

01:14:19our children.

01:14:20We need to know

01:14:21if this is true.

01:14:22We are morally

01:14:23and ethically obligated

01:14:25to replicate this study

01:14:27again and again

01:14:29and again

01:14:29and find out

01:14:31if this is accurate

01:14:32and if this is true.

01:14:34We have to.

01:14:35The fact that this study

01:14:36hasn't been peer-reviewed

01:14:39and hasn't been published

01:14:40is extremely concerning.

01:14:43It's important knowledge

01:14:44and other healthcare systems

01:14:45really do need

01:14:46to replicate the analysis.

01:14:49This question

01:14:50really does need

01:14:51to be probed.

01:14:52It's a very important

01:14:53research question.

01:14:55I challenge you.

01:14:56Yes, you the doctors,

01:14:57you the researchers,

01:14:58do the research.

01:14:59Find within your data set,

01:15:01within your system,

01:15:02those who are unvaccinated

01:15:03and compare them

01:15:04to the vaccinated cohort.

01:15:06This is one data set.

01:15:07You could replicate this again.

01:15:09There are other

01:15:10captive payer systems.

01:15:11Let Kaiser Permanente

01:15:13Southern California do it

01:15:14and let the Harvard Pilgrim System

01:15:16in Boston do it

01:15:17and all the other health systems

01:15:19around the country

01:15:20and maybe even the CDC

01:15:22with the VSD.

01:15:24And with that,

01:15:25we can start actually

01:15:26addressing the problem

01:15:28that these vaccines

01:15:29might be causing.

01:15:30If these results

01:15:31are valid,

01:15:33this is an absolute

01:15:34sea change

01:15:35in our understanding

01:15:36of the off-target

01:15:38and non-specific effects

01:15:39of vaccination.

01:15:41And we will have to

01:15:43reconsider

01:15:44the way we go

01:15:46about our vaccination program.

01:15:47This is a cease and desist

01:15:57letter we received

01:15:59from the attorneys

01:15:59for Henry Ford Health.

01:16:01This letter leads me

01:16:02to believe that they

01:16:03really don't want us

01:16:04to release this film.

01:16:06In the letter,

01:16:06Henry Ford accuses us

01:16:08of defamation

01:16:09for saying that

01:16:10the unpublished study

01:16:11wasn't submitted

01:16:12for publication

01:16:12due to the results

01:16:13of the study.

01:16:15They assert that

01:16:15the reason the study

01:16:16was never submitted

01:16:17for publication

01:16:18was, quote,

01:16:19due to significant

01:16:20and serious flaws

01:16:21in its data

01:16:22and methodology.

01:16:23And because

01:16:24it did not come close

01:16:26to meeting the rigorous

01:16:26scientific standards

01:16:28Henry Ford Health

01:16:29and its researchers demand.

01:16:31But we just heard

01:16:32from Dr. Marcus Zervos,

01:16:33the lead author

01:16:34on this unpublished study

01:16:36and a world-leading expert

01:16:37on infectious disease

01:16:39at Henry Ford.

01:16:41He told me

01:16:42he believed the study

01:16:43was a good study

01:16:44and he would publish it

01:16:45just as it is.

01:16:47Only one problem.

01:16:49If he does publish it,

01:16:50he believes it would be

01:16:51the end of his career.

01:16:53He'd be finished.

01:16:54Not my words,

01:16:56but his.

01:16:57Now, even if Dr. Zervos

01:16:58stands by his study,

01:17:00does that mean

01:17:00it's a perfect study?

01:17:02Of course not.

01:17:03Can we say

01:17:04that the Henry Ford study

01:17:05proves that vaccines

01:17:06are causing

01:17:07the chronic disease epidemic?

01:17:08No, we cannot.

01:17:10A retrospective study

01:17:12does not prove causation.

01:17:14What we can say

01:17:15is that we believe

01:17:16it is showing a signal.

01:17:18A red flag

01:17:19waved in the air

01:17:20by the scientific method.

01:17:22Houston,

01:17:23there may be

01:17:23a real problem here.

01:17:25Now, this concern

01:17:26is heightened by the fact

01:17:27that this unpublished study

01:17:29does not stand alone.

01:17:31It's not an anomaly.

01:17:32It now stands

01:17:33with several other studies

01:17:34that have all shown

01:17:35similar signals.

01:17:37So there will certainly

01:17:39be attacks

01:17:39on the limitations

01:17:40of this study,

01:17:41which can be found

01:17:42in most retrospective studies.

01:17:44And we acknowledge

01:17:44those limitations.

01:17:46But the only way

01:17:47to really refute it

01:17:48is to do your own

01:17:49vaccinated versus

01:17:50unvaccinated study

01:17:52and prove us wrong.

01:17:54That's what I believe

01:17:55Dr. Zervos attempted to do

01:17:57and failed.

01:17:58But as parents

01:17:59watching this film right now,

01:18:01you have to ask yourself

01:18:03a very important question.

01:18:04Why hasn't

01:18:05a single health agency

01:18:07or major medical institution

01:18:09in the world

01:18:09been able to produce

01:18:11one single vaccinated

01:18:13versus completely

01:18:14unvaccinated study

01:18:15that shows that

01:18:16the vaccinated children

01:18:17are healthier?

01:18:19Wasn't that the entire

01:18:20purpose of the vaccine program?

01:18:22To make our children healthier?

01:18:24And although this may be

01:18:26an inconvenient study

01:18:27for anyone who said

01:18:29that the vaccine program

01:18:30was safe,

01:18:31there is a bright side.

01:18:32In every one of these studies

01:18:35so far,

01:18:36there is a group of children

01:18:37who are thriving,

01:18:39who aren't suffering

01:18:40from many of the ailments

01:18:42that plague America's children,

01:18:44who have barely any cases

01:18:46of neurodevelopmental disorders

01:18:48or autoimmune disease.

01:18:50They are living in a world

01:18:52that is flourishing

01:18:53with health

01:18:54because their parents

01:18:56went in a different direction.

01:18:59You now have even more data.

01:19:02You've been informed.

01:19:03What are you going to do

01:19:04about it?

01:19:06That choice is yours.

01:19:08That choice is yours.

01:19:34That choice is yours.

01:19:36That choice is yours.

01:19:38There are three sources.

01:19:39That choice can be yourself.

01:19:40You still amlated.

01:19:42You just go up here in

01:19:43các yang Boondheim.

01:19:44That choice is yours.

01:19:45You must have a team

01:19:46that they recover

01:19:46to your son's family.

01:19:47That choice is yours.

01:19:48That choice is yours.

01:19:48You still have been dando

01:19:49clue.

01:19:49But who can the choice

01:19:50to the challenge

01:19:51of people opposing

01:19:51giving all the righteousness

01:19:52good to you?

01:19:53That choice immediately

01:19:53is yours.

01:19:54You still have había

01:19:55maybe not done

01:19:55so many ways

01:19:56Ewel

01:19:57that choice.

01:19:58You still have

01:19:59it.

01:20:00You still have

01:20:01this choice

01:20:01that's

01:20:02interesting.

Category

Transcript

Be the first to comment

Recommended