- 2 days ago
Category
🗞
NewsTranscript
00:00First off, you never would have had Trump-Russia collusion without Benghazi, okay?
00:04Remember Benghazi when she was Secretary of State?
00:09You know, she was unresponsive.
00:11It was proven in the investigation that, you know, the Ambassador Chris Stevens in Benghazi, in Libya, you know,
00:20he had been requesting additional personnel, bodyguards, security, you know, all of that stuff.
00:28And all these requests were denied.
00:30And so on September 11th, right, that's when you had, you know, they came under attack.
00:36They tried to blame it on a video, you know, making fun of Muslims.
00:40And it wasn't.
00:41It was a premeditated attack on the embassy.
00:45And the Secretary of State and the State Department that obviously Hillary Clinton ran
00:49looked really bad because these people died because of their inaction
00:52and their refusal to listen to months and months of them asking for help.
00:56It was a lot of communication, again, once again, from your senior staff, from the State Department,
01:02to you or from you in 2011.
01:05And in fact, that is when Gaddafi fell.
01:08He fell in 2011.
01:09But then when we go to 2012, Libya, Benghazi, Chris Stevens, the staff there, they seem to fall off
01:17your radar in 2012.
01:18And the situation is getting much worse in 2012.
01:22It was getting much worse.
01:23And let me just share for you in your records that we have reviewed, there is not one email
01:29to you or from you in 2012 when an explosive device went off at our compound in April.
01:38There is not a single email in your records about that explosive device.
01:43So my question is, this was a very important mission in 2011.
01:48You sent Chris Stevens there.
01:50But yet, when our compound is attacked in 2012, what kind of culture was created in the State
01:56Department that your folks couldn't tell you in an email about a bomb in April of 2012?
02:03You just gave a long answer, Madam Secretary, to Ms. Sanchez about what you heard that night,
02:08what you're doing.
02:09But nowhere in there did you mention a video.
02:12You didn't mention a video because there was never a video-inspired protest in Benghazi.
02:17There was in Cairo, but not in Benghazi.
02:19Victoria Nuland, your spokesperson at the State Department, hours after the attack said
02:23this, Benghazi has been attacked by militants in Cairo.
02:28Police have removed demonstrators.
02:31Benghazi, you got weapons and explosions.
02:33Cairo, you got spray paint and rocks.
02:35One hour before the attack in Benghazi, Chris Stevens walks a diplomat to the front gate.
02:41The ambassador didn't report a demonstration.
02:44He didn't report it because it never happened.
02:47An eyewitness in the command center that night on the ground said, no protest, no demonstration.
02:53Two intelligence reports that day.
02:55No protest, no demonstration.
02:57The attack starts at 3.42 Eastern time, ends at approximately 11.40 p.m. that night.
03:04At 4.06, an ops alert goes out across the State Department.
03:09It says this, mission under attack, armed men, shots fired, explosions heard.
03:14No mention of a video, no mention of a protest, no mention of a demonstration.
03:20Secretary Clinton, I appreciate most of those attacks were after the attack on the facility
03:25in Benghazi.
03:26You mentioned Cairo.
03:28It was interesting what else Ms. Nuland said that day.
03:30She said, if pressed by the press, if there's a connection between Cairo and Benghazi, she said
03:37this, there's no connection between the two.
03:39So here's what troubles me.
03:41Your experts knew the truth.
03:43Your spokesperson knew the truth.
03:45Greg Hicks knew the truth.
03:46But what troubles me more is I think you knew the truth.
03:50I want to show you a few things here.
03:52You're looking at an email you sent to your family.
03:55Here's what you said.
03:56At 11 o'clock that night, approximately one hour after you told the American people it
04:01was a video, you say to your family, two officers were killed today in Benghazi by an
04:05Al-Qaeda-like group.
04:08You tell the American people one thing, you tell your family an entirely different story.
04:15Also, on the night of the attack, you had a call with the president of Libya.
04:20Here's what you said to him.
04:22Ansar al-Sharia is claiming responsibility.
04:25It's interesting.
04:26Mr. Katala, one of the guys arrested and charged, actually belonged to that group.
04:31And finally, and most significantly, the next day, within 24 hours, he had a conversation
04:39with the Egyptian prime minister.
04:41He told him this.
04:42We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film.
04:48It was a planned attack, not a protest.
04:52Let me read that one more time.
04:53We know, not we think, not it might be.
04:58We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film.
05:01It was a planned attack, not a protest.
05:04State Department experts knew the truth.
05:07You knew the truth.
05:09But that's not what the American people got.
05:11And again, the American people want to know why.
05:15Why didn't you tell the American people exactly what you told the Egyptian prime minister?
05:20So out of that investigation, we learned that Clinton had a private email server, right?
05:24That's where that came from.
05:25So if you didn't have Benghazi, you wouldn't have had the email scandal and the private
05:30server and the classified emails.
05:33And so she was still under fire in 2016 because of Benghazi and also because the email scandal.
05:39And she was desperate for that to go away.
05:41Now, you had a Republican, a wealthy billionaire Republican that was investigating all of the
05:47Republican candidates at the end of 2015, all right?
05:51That was before Donald Trump was going to be the nominee.
05:53He's doing opposition research, supposedly, on all the Republicans, and that's conducted
05:57by Fusion GPS.
05:58Fusion GPS found something because, look, when you're doing opposition research, you're just
06:03desperate for anything you can turn into a scandal, right, to hurt the opponent.
06:06So what they discovered with Donald Trump was, well, look, he's a billionaire.
06:10He's a business guy.
06:11So, you know, he's everywhere.
06:12He's got deals everywhere.
06:14He's been in Moscow before.
06:15I mean, a lot of American businesses have tried to build there and make money there and
06:19revenue there.
06:19So they discovered that through those deals, like, wow, he's coming to contact with some
06:24of these Russian mafia people.
06:26And as a matter of fact, before the Clinton campaign hired Fusion GPS.
06:33So Fusion GPS has already done opposition research for a Republican.
06:37They don't need to do it anymore because Trump's going to be the nominee.
06:41And so Fusion GPS supposedly goes to the Clinton campaign at DNC and says, hey, you know, they
06:47want to make money.
06:48So like, hey, we will keep looking into Trump for you.
06:51We've already found this information from our previous client about these ties to the
06:55mafia.
06:55And you have in this appendix, by the way.
06:58So this is important for the whole audience to understand.
07:01The New York Times and the left wants to pretend like this appendix is Russian disinformation,
07:05right?
07:06They want to pretend like the New York Times is saying that this appendix actually proves
07:10that all the things I'm saying are untrue because it's from Russians.
07:15Everything that we already knew is being corroborated by this appendix.
07:19So all that information about the previous investigation and so on and so forth, right?
07:24So Fusion GPS is already, because I looked at the testimony that they did in the past investigation.
07:28So long story short is there are emails between the DNC and Soros Foundation, et cetera, that
07:37are talking about how, okay, or the Russians actually understand.
07:41They're talking about how they have dirt that are trying to associate Trump with these mafia
07:46figures in Russia.
07:47So my point is, it's this perfect storm.
07:51Okay, they're already looking into this kind of Russia angle.
07:53And then when it turns out that the DNC is hacked and maybe it's the Russians, maybe it's
07:58not, they decide, okay, through collusion with one another, let's try, let's tie Trump to
08:06Putin and vilify him.
08:07And you have, again, you have emails in this appendix that are conversations between the
08:12Attorney General of the United States, Loretta Lynch, and people in the Clinton campaign and
08:20discussing how, you know, they're going to do all of this.
08:23So the answer to your question is, it's kind of that string of events that leads to them
08:28coming up with this idea.
08:30Soros Foundation was directly involved in creating the Russia collusion hoax with Hillary Clinton.
08:37So it looks like the brave Tim Burchett, the guy shutting down the 40 million in cash to
08:44the Taliban every week.
08:45This guy's now saying, wait a minute, subpoena this guy, get him in, and let's ask him under
08:52oath about all of the stuff that he did with Russia and probably all of the other stuff.
08:57I mean, this guy has been undermining America for decades.
09:01Your thoughts, are they going to push back?
09:04Are the Republicans going to have the courage to force him to come in and testify?
09:09They better do it.
09:10If they don't, you know, I'm about ready to wash my hands with some of these people.
09:15Now, look, he's on to something.
09:17Those aren't even the most important people that need to be subpoenaed.
09:19You have a big audience, Stephen.
09:21You have some of these people on sometimes.
09:23I hope they're listening because those aren't, they don't need to stop there.
09:27Christopher Steele was never interviewed.
09:30I don't know if people understand this.
09:32When Mueller did his investigation, when Durham did his investigation, Mueller in particular,
09:40right, Christopher Steele, the Steele dossier, those 17 memos that became the Steele dossier
09:47that made salacious, uncorroborated allegations like Trump peed on the hookers or the hookers
09:52peed on Trump in a Moscow hotel.
09:54That was the centerpiece of this whole thing.
09:57Without the Steele dossier, you wouldn't have any of this weaponization taking place, right?
10:01That is the center of this.
10:03And Steele was never interviewed.
10:05So Steele needs to be dragged before Congress.
10:08He needs to be subpoenaed and forced to talk and answer questions about this.
10:11There are other people as well.
10:13The two people in particular that ran Fusion GPS, I forget their names right now because
10:19there's a million names I got a hold of my head related to this investigation.
10:23One of them went in under the Mueller investigation because you can go and read all this, all these
10:29transcripts, by the way, of all these people that were interviewed.
10:32And one of them pleaded the fifth on every single case.
10:34He did not answer a single question before the committee.
10:37And so, you know, this is what happened.
10:40If you read and people don't have to do this, you're not going to do this.
10:42This is why I'm going to write a book on it.
10:44But you read Mark Elias' testimony.
10:47You go through all these Democrats' testimony and they're always lawyered up, obviously,
10:53and they are not answering the most important questions and they're not forced to answer
10:58the most important questions either.
10:59So there's a huge cover-up that's been taking place for a long time, but now we have additional
11:05people.
11:05But, you know, Steele and these other people need to be brought out and interviewed.
11:08I mean, isn't it amazing to you, like, Christopher Steele, the Steele dossier, of all the people
11:12you wouldn't interview, you didn't interview him?
11:16Are you kidding me?
11:17I mean, 2016, the left went too far.
11:21And 2016 gave way to 2020, which gave way to 2024.
11:27I mean, you think about 2016, it was the worst thing that's happened in this history at the
11:30time.
11:31I mean, the collusion, right, of intelligence agencies and weaponizing against the president
11:36with Trump-Russia collusion.
11:38But, you know, the purpose of that was to help Clinton be elected.
11:41And then once Trump won, they repurposed it to try and end his presidency like Watergate.
11:46That's what they hoped for.
11:47But 2020 was worse and 2024 was worse than that because in 2020, you had a replay.
11:52You had 51 former intelligence agents lying to say that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian
11:57disinformation right before the election.
11:59You had the FBI coordinating with Facebook and social media companies to censor free speech,
12:05right?
12:05This is all 2020.
12:06Forget the mail-in ballots and all that stuff.
12:08And then you go to like 2022 with a raid of Mar-a-Lago.
12:12You've got, you know, Russia, Trump-Russia collusion 2.0 was the, you know, 20, you know, from 2020
12:18to 2024 when Democrats were trying to put Trump in prison.
12:22They weren't trying to, you know, help Kamala Harris or at the time Joe Biden maybe win re-election.
12:28They were trying to prevent Trump from being able to run for president at all.
12:32And so you see this escalation since 2016 and we haven't recovered from it.
12:38On both sides, whether you're a Democrat or Republican, you have total distrust in the
12:44government.
12:45Our institutions are just rotting.
12:48We've realized that obviously the deep state, that's when we realized 2016, the deep state
12:52existed.
12:53And, you know, the most, the scariest thing to me, Stephen, is something called consent of
12:57the government.
12:58The only reason we have a country right now that's moderately peaceful is we agree to
13:04abide by the laws, right?
13:06We agree to have this government.
13:08That's the whole point of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
13:11So there are people, including myself, that still think, whether it's a prominent thought
13:15or it's, you know, less right now, that think, well, you know, maybe I don't think we should
13:21go along with this government.
13:22You know what I'm saying?
13:23So we're still there 10 years later.
13:25And, you know, that's my concern from a historical perspective.
Recommended
4:00
|
Up next
4:38
1:02
16:50
2:42
2:43
Be the first to comment