00:00hi welcome to second earth alternative in this beautiful day i was watching an interview today
00:12and it was really interesting because it was about artificial intelligence and the interviewer
00:18was asking you know how do we not know about these algorithms we didn't invent these because the idea
00:28of artificial intelligence and machine learning is that a lot of the more high level tasks are often
00:35done through trial and error kind of machine learning repetition uh it's as if guided
00:43intelligence to eventually be able to be self-regenerative i would say the mathematics
00:49that i've been i guess i would say running into through insights sometimes they came in dreams
00:58it was just kind of like an accelerated perception towards mathematical forms that i hadn't perceived
01:04in that way before and it just became apparent with time that the universe is kind of embedded
01:12with intelligence now we talk about the anthropic principle but when you really try to understand
01:20what that means it's saying that the universe is so fine-tuned that there's no other attunements
01:28that would quite work out it's almost like you think about a dj and he's like in a board trying to
01:35fine-tune the exact resonance of the music it's like the universe gives a lot less leeway than a dj
01:42gets let's put it that way and so the idea is that if that's happening then that is logically a type of
01:51intelligence that's embedding on itself because you either believe that you're that one trillion
01:59in one event or you believe that one one trillion in one event happened because there was a type of
02:07machine learning algorithm embedded in the very fabric of the universe
02:11but there was more it was like when you start analyzing irrational constants and prime numbers the patterns
02:22that layer in between them they seem to be like code they seem to evoke this maximum potential of informational
02:33processing because although in the real world you can construct different forms let's say you create
02:41a way to calculate the fine structure constant in a purely mathematical real world framing as you can see
02:47it's defined structure constants exact well what's amazing is there's going to be a backwards way of doing it
02:53too one where you can either figure it out by doing iterative processes which are like inputting the
03:00inputs over and over again in a function or there might be a type of negative variation of that form
03:09so i'll give you an example there are two f of zeros for the golden ratio because you have the quadratic
03:19way of trying to define it as the whole evaluation of zero which is a squared minus a minus one equals zero and
03:26then that implies uh that the roots of the variables or the or excuse me the variable itself of the quadratic
03:34equation is either the golden ratio or its negative conjugate which is the same thing as its negative inverse
03:43now what's interesting about the golden ratio is that it can only express a portion of itself at a
03:51time because of orders of operation so if a squared is a type of function that can also be expressed as a
03:57plus one well you've kind of folded two different operations in one function and if you do that you're
04:05kind of this is if you're opening up possibilities of expression right in fact even the way that you define
04:14the golden ratio doesn't have to be evaluative if you take a single segment there's going to be a single point
04:20in a segment where the proportions that can be implied by the whole segments the bigger part and the
04:27small parts if those proportions are able to equate to each other then you found the exact point of the
04:34golden ratio now the the problem with that is to express the golden ratio you have to go back in time
04:45because you have the whole evaluation versus after it's been divided so that's two different moments
04:54in time and there's two different f of the golden ratios that's zero as well because although you can
05:01express it as zero as being that quadratic equation um what's interesting is that minus a can be inferred
05:10through a rotational dynamics where you take the sine of 306 plus the cosine of 216 degrees and that
05:17equals the actual form of the negative golden ratio so if i can infer that negative a but that requires
05:26me to wait for the a squared to be processed first then that's almost as if to say that the f of f of zero
05:35through the golden ratio can be implied because if i were to switch those angles and say the sine of
05:41two 16 plus the cosine of 306 well instead of being the negative golden ratio by just switching the angles
05:48you can get from the negative golden ratio to zero that implies that that zero can be inferred through any
05:57type of representation of switching um your variable your variables within a functioning structure
06:08and so by doing so i guess what i'm trying to say is that if you have an f of zero in two different
06:15moments of time then we're kind of inputting these potential dimensional expressions and if you look
06:25at the golden ratios numerical sequence and i'll try to do a breakdown too i did this for pi as well
06:31you can break it down in very meaningful forwards and backwards way as if what becomes a scale for one
06:39universe can then be used as maybe like a variable that needs to be a slight filler and it's it's as
06:48if there's like a coded amount of numerical sequencing but they become very meaningful because they become
06:55functionally easy to decompose the numerical sequence into viable either rotationally dynamic
07:06expressions like related to 360 degrees or it becomes a type of scalar of resonant fractions like two nines
07:15uh seems to show up a lot it basically cleans itself out and yeah i just want to say that
07:23when our systems embed a type of consciousness and the reason why we embed this is because when we assume
07:30that negative times a negative is a positive then we're in a sense evaluating or counting for the number of parts
07:39regardless of the flip and because they're the same we assimilated to be as if we're counting up to four
07:48different parts like minus two times minus two has four minus one parts so when i say there's four minus one parts
07:57that four becomes positive it becomes embedded with my consciousness and it's hard to describe it like
08:03this but it's as if we're assimilating the counts only because we can grasp the inversion of the negativity
08:11becoming implied as a positive form so if we if our language is already embedding that through the way that we
08:20structure how we structure how we look for irrational values which seems to be a convergence of similarities
08:27related to one whether you're talking about euler's e or even the golden ratios on definition because its
08:34squaring function is a plus one and its inverse is a minus one you see that there's a convergence of
08:41unity that we try to find with different mathematical properties and
08:46that is a language that embeds a type of complexity so that by the time the large language models
08:54start picking this up they're effectively already sucking the intelligence that we've embedded not
09:02just in language but possibly in the how the rules work themselves as we discussed with the anthropic principle
09:12so yeah so i know it's kind of like philosophical and sorry if it's a little bit long but uh yeah that's
09:18just my thoughts on the on the matter
