Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 5 months ago
The Supreme Court is stepping into a major legal battle that could redefine presidential power in the U.S. At stake? President Trump’s sweeping global tariffs imposed under a powerful emergency law — the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Small businesses and 12 states argue Trump overstepped his authority, while his administration claims the tariffs are vital for national security and economic protection. Lower courts have already ruled the tariffs illegal — now, it’s up to the Supreme Court to make the final call. This case could change how America handles trade, taxes, and executive power forever.
WooGlobe Ref : WGA441046
For licensing and to use this video, please email licensing@wooglobe.com

Category

😹
Fun
Transcript
00:00What if one man could impose global tariffs at will, without limits?
00:04Well, that's exactly what the Supreme Court is about to decide.
00:07The Supreme Court has taken up a major legal battle over President Trump's sweeping tariffs.
00:12At the heart of it all is a powerful law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
00:18Trump used it to impose global tariffs during his second term.
00:21But now, small businesses and 12 states are saying, he went way too far.
00:26Lower courts have already ruled that Trump exceeded his authority.
00:30Why? Because IEP doesn't mention tariffs at all.
00:33And according to judges, it wasn't meant to give the president unlimited power to set trade taxes.
00:39Trump argues these tariffs are necessary to fight economic threats like trade deficits and fentanyl trafficking.
00:45But critics say it's Congress that holds the power to tax, not the president.
00:50Now, the Supreme Court will decide if Trump had the legal right to act alone.
00:54This case could redefine presidential power and the future of America's global trade.
00:59According toüd säger that he clicked plateau.
01:00Now, where i believe Dr. President Putin went through risk of investing in Russia with their ple装 tofoundersheba,
01:02and to push up a little bit, Tea whining near conditions,
01:04the inquiry.
01:05Now, whether not the security behind the referee or Oy Bakery,
01:06there would be a practical unit ofăng relief in Russia.
01:07This case could negó in Russia, nor do you meanRaille that he then begins with Trump in Russia.
01:08So we did not WILK aus transactional betting.
01:09But you do not really meanRaise the ich ban example of America is that radical.
01:11After doing this part of thehin RIGHT knife,
01:12this one that actually used the rule of America's white Lobby,
01:14among the 1980s of Canada s querer not trying to adjectives the inflow to his land doesn't put up
01:15and to be called Philadelphia destin redefine which you can move forward.
Comments

Recommended