Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 4 months ago
During a House Foreign Affairs Committee markup in July, Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY) introduced an amendment which would condemn the apartheid government of South Africa. Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-TX) opposed the amendment in debate.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00be heard. If not, there's no further discussion in the bill. The committee will move to consideration
00:05of amendments. Does any member wish to offer an amendment? Mr. Meeks. I have an amendment at the
00:09desk. Clerk will distribute the amendment. Sir, is it 41? Yes. No. I have more. 41. Number 41.
01:00Thank you. Clerk shall report the amendment.
01:06Amendment to H.R. 2633, offered by Mr. Meeks, New York. Page 2, beginning on line 3. Insert the
01:14following new paragraphs and redesignate accordingly. Without objection, further reading
01:20of the amendment is dispensed with. The representative is recognized for five minutes on the amendment.
01:24Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'm introducing this amendment because I believe that it's extremely
01:30important that we acknowledge the fuller history here if we're going to look comprehensively
01:38at the United States-South African relations. And if this bill is going to criticize the South
01:47African government's decisions, some of which, as I said, I disagree with, just as there's a lot of
01:55disagreements that I have with the United States government and that we've had not only now,
02:01but over the years. But so, therefore, the record should also reflect the terrible decisions
02:09that were made in South Africa by South Africa's apartheid regime prior to 1994.
02:18It should be clear. So, this amendment just restates the basic facts that an apartheid Africana government
02:31ruled South Africa between 1940 to the 1990s. That that government refused to grant political or
02:43civil rights to the nation's black majority. It is also true that this government, the apartheid government
02:52of South Africa, imprisoned Nelson Mandela for over 27 years. This apartheid government who looked at black South
03:10South Africans having no rights, no ability to vote, no ability to free movement. Yet, the United States government
03:24did not sanction it. In fact, it was the last country to join to sanction South Africa after the rest of the world had done it.
03:37The last one. Nelson Mandela became president of South Africa in 1994. Yet, it took from 1994 to 2008 to even
03:56get Nelson Mandela off the terrorist list in the United States.
04:04We've got a lot of work to do to make up to South Africa for our awful behavior. So, to come in this short period of time, as Mr. Jackson said in less than 30 years, and now want to sanction the South African government, after all that it has been through, is just wrong. And this record should reflect the true history of what has taken place.
04:33of what has taken place. Because this amendment takes us back to where we should never want to go. We should be able to sit down and talk to South Africa, who over those last 30 years, with the leadership of Nelson Mandela, have worked with us cooperatively also, in many areas.
04:55over these areas, this disagreement, this disagreement that we have on certain issues, shouldn't cause a fracture that would lead us continually to move in a wrong direction. So, are we going to do this kind of amendment. Market. Let it reflect
05:25the spirit of those black South African citizens
05:31of coming back and being able to become presidents
05:37and governments headed by black South Africans
05:40when they've been forbidden to do it
05:42for such a long period of time.
05:45So I urge my colleagues to support this amendment
05:50so that the record would be clear and reflect
05:55who and what South Africa represents in its entirety
05:59and not in just a limited viewpoint.
06:02Now you're back to balance of my time.
06:04Any further discussion?
06:05Mr. Chairman.
06:06Representative Jackson.
06:08Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
06:09In the middle of the night and in bad faith,
06:12Democrats introduced this amendment
06:13which has no relevance to the underlying bill.
06:16The findings listed in my legislation
06:21call out the bad actions
06:22by the current South African government.
06:26And I don't see any role in going back
06:29and looking at past governments
06:31and the relationships previously.
06:32This is the current South African government
06:35and the U.S. South African relations now.
06:37And the ranking member's amendment is nothing more
06:39in my opinion than an attempt to justify
06:41the ANC's egregious actions toward Afi-Connor community.
06:46Arguing over findings language
06:48and is frankly a waste of everyone's time,
06:50especially considering that findings
06:52do not have any bearing on actual law.
06:54And regardless, if this amendment were to be adopted,
06:57the ranking member would still continue
06:59to oppose the underlying bill.
07:01I encourage every member of this committee
07:03to focus on the relevant bill language
07:05and oppose this amendment.
07:07And with that, Mr. Chair, I yield back.
07:09Any other members seek recognition?
07:11Representative Jackson.
07:13I would like to lend my support and agreement
07:15with our ranking member Meeks.
07:18And please tell me what's appropriate
07:19for me to introduce an amendment.
07:22Let me introduce.
07:24Okay, thank you so much.
07:25Yield back.
07:26Yield back.
07:27Any other members seek recognition?
07:30Seeing none.
07:32Representative yields back.
07:34I oppose this amendment.
07:37There being no further discussion,
07:39the question now occurs on the amendment
07:40offered by Representative Meeks, number 41.
07:42All those in favor signify by saying aye.
07:45Aye.
07:46All those opposed signify by saying no.
07:48No.
07:49In the opinion of the Chair,
07:50the noes have it and the amendment is not agreed to.
07:52Roll call.
07:53Roll call vote having been requested.
07:58We will postpone that roll call vote.
08:03Pursuant to Chair's previous announcement,
08:05this vote will be postponed.
08:07Any further amendments?
08:08Representative Meeks is recognized.
08:10I have an amendment at the desk.
08:13Clerk shall distribute the amendment.
08:14I need to come up here, one second, James.
08:25Clerk shall report the amendment.
08:30Amendment to HR 2633,
08:32offered by Mr. Meeks of New York.
08:35Page 14, line 12, strike, and legal authorities.
08:39Without objection, further reading of the amendment
08:41is dispensed with.
08:42The representative is now recognized for five minutes.
08:46My second amendment is a somewhat technical,
08:48but nonetheless important fix.
08:50When we negotiate sanction bills,
08:52and I've negotiated many of them over the years,
08:55one of the foundational questions
08:57is whether the sanctions authority will be mandatory,
09:00the president shall do something, or permissive,
09:03he may do something.
09:05I've supported both types of sanction bills,
09:07depending on the specific context in question.
09:12The world is not a simple place,
09:14and we need to adjust our policy levers
09:17to specific contexts.
09:19But let's be clear.
09:20The executive branch doesn't need to cite a legal authority
09:24as to why it is not sanctioning an individual
09:27when the underlying authority is permissive
09:29in the first place.
09:31Yet, as drafted, this bill is committing
09:34a basic logical error.
09:37Moreover, Global Magnitsky has a unique mechanism
09:41that allows the chairman and the ranking member
09:43of the House Foreign Affairs Committee
09:45to send a letter that the administration must respond to
09:49and reach a sanctions determination by law.
09:53The language in this bill muddies that established process.
09:57My amendment fixes these errors by striking a few words.
10:04So I urge all of my colleagues to support it,
10:07and I yield back the balance of my time.
10:10Representative yields back.
10:11I support this amendment.
10:12Do any other representatives seek recognition?
10:16Seeing none.
10:18Being no further discussion,
10:19the question now occurs on the amendment
10:21offered by Representative Meeks, number 42.
10:23All those in favor, signify by saying aye.
10:25Aye.
10:26All those opposed, signify by saying no.
10:29In the opinion of the chair, the ayes have it,
10:30and the amendment is agreed to.
10:34Any further amendments?
10:37Representative Jacobs.
10:38Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
10:40Jacobs, number three.
10:41Clerk shall distribute the amendment.
10:42Clerk shall report the amendment.
10:43Clerk shall report the amendment.
10:44Amendment to HR 2633, offered by Ms. Jacobs of California.
10:58Redesignate Section 7 as Section 8.
11:01After Section 6, insert the following.
11:04Section 7, report on-
11:06Without objection, further reading of the amendment is dispensed with.
11:09The representative is recognized for five minutes on the amendment.
11:11Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
11:13My amendment is very simple.
11:15The Trump administration has stopped all refugee resettlement programs in the United States,
11:19with one exception, Afrikaners from South Africa.
11:23As part of our committee's oversight responsibilities, it's important we understand the full accounting
11:28of U.S. taxpayer dollars required to resettle Afrikaners in the United States.
11:32This amendment would ask for a one-time report with this information.
11:36It's a common-sense amendment and something I urge all of my colleagues to support.
11:40I yield back.
11:43Representative yields back.
11:44I now recognize myself.
11:45I oppose this amendment.
11:48President Trump is justified in providing asylum to these individuals.
11:51More importantly, this report does not have relevance in this particular bill.
11:54This bill is about holding the South African government accountable about their actions
11:58that they have taken that directly and negatively impact the interests of the United States of
12:03America.
12:05Any other representatives seek recognition?
12:08Representative Meeks.
12:09I thank record member Jacobs for offering this amendment, which requires the Department
12:13of State to report to this committee the amount of money our government is paying to resettle
12:17Afrikaners, refugees in the United States.
12:20This comes at the same time President Trump has blocked all other refugee settlements to the
12:26United States.
12:28That is pretty remarkable when you think about it.
12:31Let that sink in.
12:32The United States is welcoming white Afrikaners from South Africa, many of whom will tell you
12:38they neither need or want refugee status, while we actively turn away people from war-torn countries
12:46and those escaping extreme human rights abuses and political violence.
12:52The American people deserve to know how much money of their taxpayer dollars are funding this political stunt of a refugee program.
13:02So I urge my colleagues to support Representative Jacobs' amendment that will give us much-needed transparency.
13:10And I yield back to balance my time.
13:12Any other members seek recognition?
13:13Representative Jackson.
13:14Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
13:15I want to point out that this amendment was offered by my treasured colleague from California
13:22less than 15 minutes before the start of markup and appears to be a last-ditch effort to criticize
13:30President Trump for his leadership in offering refuge and resettlement for legitimately persecuted
13:35Afrikaners.
13:36I fully support knowing where every dollar of taxpayer funding goes, but this report does
13:41not belong in a bill that reviews the bilateral relationship between the U.S. and South Africa.
13:46This amendment is also particularly ironic given that Democrats had absolutely no issue with
13:51taxpayer dollars being used to transport millions of illegal aliens into the United States during
13:56the Biden-Harris administration.
13:58Even today, Democrats have taken no responsibility for the immigration crisis directly caused by these
14:04failed policies.
14:05I encourage every member of this committee to oppose this amendment.
14:08With that, Mr. Chair, I yield back.
14:10The gentleman yields back.
14:11Any further discussion?
14:13Representative Jaipal.
14:14Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
14:15I want to thank my colleague, Representative Jacobs, for introducing this amendment.
14:19I just want to remind the committee and anyone that's watching that the refugee resettlement
14:23program has long been a bipartisan program.
14:27As the ranking member of the Immigration Subcommittee, I can tell you that it was Democrats and Republicans
14:33together who worked on establishing the program, supporting the program.
14:38And in fact, the evangelical community has called this the crown jewel of American humanitarianism.
14:45This is a program that has saved lives that have supported people who have been fleeing persecution
14:52and conflict and shown the United States' sense of compassion, built our leadership around the
14:59world as we build all of our relationships.
15:02And so I think it is entirely appropriate that we find out how much money is being spent on this,
15:08given that the rest of the refugee resettlement program has been brought to an abrupt and cruel stop.
15:15And there are people that are stranded around the world because the United States is reneged on our promises.
15:22So I urge adoption of the Jacobs amendment and I yield back.
15:25Representative yields back.
15:27Any other members seek recognition?
15:29Representative Jackson.
15:30Thank you so much, Chairman.
15:31I look forward to supporting the amendment of my colleague, Congresswoman Sarah Jacobs.
15:39We are here to deliberate the fate of a nation that is half a world away.
15:44A nation that has been long entangled in the bitter veins and vines of racial animosity that
15:52was in large part created by the United States of America.
15:56South Africa is a baby amongst nations on the continent.
16:00We have had a wholesale retreat from anything humanitarian, anything decent, anything engaging in diplomacy
16:08across the state.
16:09Striking this blow to the South African government is a strike to a blow to the entire continent.
16:16I've lived long enough to witness the lies that power tells itself.
16:21I have seen the myths that shroud oppression.
16:24I must speak plainly against the cruelty of injustice masquerading as legitimate concern.
16:30I support the amendment of the Honorable Sarah Jacobs.
16:34I yield back.
16:35The gentleman yields back.
16:37Any other members seek recognition?
16:40Being no further discussion, the question now occurs on the amendment offered by Representative
16:45Jacobs.
16:46Number three, all those in favor signify by saying aye.
16:48Aye.
16:49All those opposed signify by saying no.
16:51No.
16:52In the opinion of the chair, the no's have it.
16:54The amendment is not agreed to.
16:57A roll call vote has been requested pursuant to the chair's previous announcement.
17:01This vote will be postponed.
17:02If you haven't done anything, the amendment will no.
Be the first to comment
Add your comment

Recommended