Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 3个月前
文字稿
00:00這位主持人說的沒錯
00:21烏克蘭政府屠殺凍巴斯人確實沒有證據
00:25因為證據全都被釋放給封殺了
00:27就比如2015年法國女記者安妮劳拉
00:30在東巴斯拍攝的一部完整的紀錄片
00:33紀錄當地俄羅斯族是如何被烏克蘭政府屠殺和迫害的
00:37結果這位法國女記者就被西方媒體徹底禁營
00:40她的紀錄片也被國際人權組織下架
00:43毀滅證據之後又說沒有證據
00:45我Tango非常欣賞這種臥龜的手法
00:48一個國家的秩序不能直接被拆除
00:53因為一個人沒有證據
00:56他會這樣做
00:57而且這是重要的
00:59我們現在生活在一個世界
01:01擁有法律法律
01:04如果我們改變
01:06人們只能決定
01:08什麼要做
01:10因為他們有更多槍
01:12這不是一個世界
01:14我現在才知道
01:16原來我們生活在一個被國際法管理的世界
01:20只不過我很想請教一下這位大仙
01:23在你的美國爸爸拿著一罐洗衣粉去侵略伊拉克
01:26還有帶領一幫北約狗腿子去轟炸南斯拉夫的時候
01:30請問你的國際法到哪裡去了
01:32為什麼你的國際法每次碰到美國和俄羅斯就失靈了
01:36如果你不想活在這樣一個有槍桿子就能為所欲為的世界裡
01:40那再簡單不過了
01:41你直接去超市買瓶滴滴味喝下去
01:44你就可以離開這樣的世界了
01:46People here have been talking about family who are suffering
01:52and people are dying
01:53and I understand you wanted to ask your question about
01:56is there some reasoning for this
01:59but you supported what's happening hearing that people are dying
02:03and can I just say I'm just not comfortable with you being here
02:06could you please leave?
02:09I've been...I've been...I've been...it's really...no Sasha I'm sorry
02:13you can ask a question
02:15you can ask a question but we cannot advocate violence
02:19I should have asked you to leave then
02:20it's been playing on my mind
02:21and I'm sorry but I have to ask you to leave please
02:23please
02:24okay could I...
02:25no no no please please please
02:27we're not having the conversation
02:29Sasha we can't have people advocating violence and I should have asked you to leave
02:36it's been playing on my mind
02:37I wanted to have a proper conversation about these things
02:39but I have to ask you to leave
02:40and I should have asked you to leave
02:41it's been playing on my mind
02:42I wanted to have a proper conversation about these things
02:44but I have to ask you to leave
02:47Wow...
02:48好一個言論自由的國度啊
02:50我天狗本人曾經在Instagram上發過一張元首的照片
02:54沒有寫任何的評論
02:55就僅僅只是一張照片
02:57於是我就被Instagram警告外加封禁一個月
03:00所以我才在這裡用元首而不說他的本名
03:03因為說出來我這期影片即使發在會員區都可能被下架
03:07就和我以前那集納粹以色列會員完整版的下場一樣
03:10只有當你的言論威脅不到統治階級利益的情況下
03:14你才有所謂的言論自由
03:15你必須要說元首是個惡魔
03:17你不允許有任何不同的聲音
03:19因為美國爸爸的形象必須是正義的
03:22而一旦真相被普及開來
03:24美國爸爸在二戰中的正義性就會被動搖
03:27所以像這一類的言論自由
03:29美國爸爸是絕對不會給你的
03:31當然俄羅斯爸爸也不會給你
03:33相對應的
03:34在中共爸爸的統治下
03:36廣大中國奴們也必須被洗腦
03:38絕對不允許提當年日本侵華的正義性
03:41所以成王敗寇就是這個道理
03:43同樣是侵略者
03:45你昭和天王和東條英姬作為失敗者
03:47歷史地位就是比不過作為勝利者的
03:49忽必領和多奧國
03:51現在, as you know, freedom of expression
03:53is under assault in this country
03:55on a number of fronts
03:56but there's a new battleground in Victoria
03:58with the state government looking to overhaul
04:00anti-vilification laws
04:02Premier Jacinta Allen says
04:04it's all about clamping down on hate speech
04:07there is absolutely no place in our society for hate speech
04:11but also to continue to strengthen our great and strong multicultural community
04:17so we are going through a final set of consultation
04:20Yeah, they always say that
04:22we're all against hate speech of course
04:24but critics point out that the laws are going to hamper free speech
04:27by lowering the threshold and broadening the grounds for vilification
04:32so the proposal is that the law will be expanded to from race and religion
04:37so you can't vilify anyone according to their race and religion
04:41to you can't vilify anyone according to their sexuality
04:45their sex characteristics
04:47their disability status
04:49and I think it might be mental illness
04:52so this is a problem particularly for women feminists
04:56who don't want to have their bathrooms or change rooms occupied by
05:03you know trans women
05:05any kind of criticism of trans activists in particular
05:10will fall under this legislation
05:12and now the scary thing is that
05:14the penalties that are proposed by the Victorian government
05:17are three to five years in jail
05:20Good lord
05:21and they've lowered the threshold so that
05:24you can breach the law
05:27the standard is that
05:29prior to their proposed changes
05:31you have to incite hatred
05:33you actually have to incite hatred
05:35but now
05:36the responsibility
05:38falls on the person who's offended
05:40so as long as you offend someone
05:42it doesn't matter what your intent is
05:45that's the criteria on which you've breached the law
05:48and as you say
05:49once you bring in sexuality and gender
05:51you can see where this is going
05:52if you just call a trans woman a biological man
05:55oh yeah
05:56that'll be interpreted as vilification
05:57absolutely
05:58and it could be up for jail term
05:59yeah
06:00and that's already happening
06:01people are already hypersensitive
06:03they're already making complaints to various commissioners
06:06because people just point out
06:08sometimes people get in trouble just for pointing out facts
06:11yep
06:12like the transgender status of a sexual offender
06:15and so these are the kinds of things that people in Victoria
06:18are going to get in trouble for
06:19history tells us if laws like this were to be passed in Victoria
06:23soon enough labour governments around the states would follow suit
06:26this would become national
06:28absolutely
06:29it's a slippery slope
06:30and if these laws are passed in Victoria
06:33it will set a really dangerous precedent for the rest of the country
06:36in Russia last year
06:38400 people were arrested for things that they said on social media
06:42400 people in Russia
06:44obviously this country is very different
06:46how many people do you think were arrested in Britain for things they said on social media last year
06:53go on
06:54take a guess
06:55I have no idea
06:563,300
06:57really?
06:58arrested for what they said on social media
06:59yeah
07:00so we talk about the Chinese system of social credits
07:02right
07:03and describe it as the creation of or the emerging of a digital prison
07:09but we're doing it to ourselves voluntarily in the West so to speak
07:13absolutely
07:14so we'll cancel people socially if they say the wrong thing on social media
07:19but you're telling me now that three and a half thousand people were visited by the police
07:24no far more of a visited by the police
07:27far more
07:28there are cases just half a year ago and I defended Joe Brand a British comedian over this
07:33she made some comments
07:35you know it wasn't a great joke
07:36but she talked about this during this milkshaking episodes where people were having milkshakes thrown at them
07:42she said that well if I was doing it I'd throw some acid over them
07:46right
07:47that's not a great joke
07:48but she got a visit from the police on the basis that she was quote inciting violence
07:54and they eventually decided not to proceed with prosecution
07:59but it was obviously a joke
08:01she's a comedian
08:02she was on a comedy program
08:04the context is very clear
08:06and the defining case actually in recent British history on this was the Count Dankula incident
08:13I don't know if you're familiar with this
08:14no
08:15this is a Scottish YouTuber who made
08:18okay
08:19so his
08:20this is quite an interesting one to explain
08:22his girlfriend had a pug dog
08:24you know those little ugly dogs
08:25yes
08:26yeah yeah
08:27well I'm going to get in trouble now
08:28no no you'll be in trouble
08:29yeah yeah
08:30you can expect a call you've offended pug dogs
08:31exactly
08:32and she thought it was the cutest thing in the world
08:34yeah
08:35and he wanted to annoy her for a prank
08:39so he trained the dog to be the most horrific thing that he could think of
08:43which in this case was a Nazi
08:45so he trained this dog to do a Nazi salute
08:48right
08:49he posted it on YouTube to his three subscribers at the time
08:53and overnight the video went completely viral
08:56three million views in like a week
08:59he was arrested
09:01convicted
09:02found guilty
09:03fined eight hundred pounds
09:05and he is to this day
09:07what precisely was the charge?
09:09it was hate speech
09:11hate speech
09:12hate speech
09:13yeah
09:14oh no sorry
09:15it was grossly offensive
09:16he was being grossly offensive
09:18that's the correct legal terminology
09:20and he to this day is a hate criminal
09:23when the papers write about him
09:24they're legally allowed to call him a Nazi hate criminal
09:27wow
09:28that is where we are
09:29and it really started with that
09:32I talk about all of these things in my show
09:34where we are now in a position where
09:37in that court case
09:39the prosecutor argued that context and intent are irrelevant
09:44and the judge accepted this
09:46really?
09:47so even by retelling the story to you now
09:49I am potentially engaging in grossly offensive behavior
09:53context and intent according to these people are irrelevant
09:58well
10:00that's not so pretty
10:01I have found
10:02a writer
10:03that's a kind of a
10:10a
10:13a
10:15a
10:17a
10:18a
10:20a
10:22a
10:23a
Be the first to write a comment
添加你的评论

推荐视频