Czy regulacja sprawi, że UE stanie się najbardziej zaufaną potęgą w dziedzinie SI?

euronews (po polsku)

Czy regulacja sprawi, że UE stanie się najbardziej zaufaną potęgą w dziedzinie SI?  Celem UE, gdy uchwalała Ustawę o sztucznej inteligencji, było zapewnienie, aby sztuczna inteligencja (AI) przestrzegała podstawowych praw i wartości oraz była bezpieczna dla obywateli.  CZYTAJ WIĘCEJ : http://pl.euronews.com/2025/08/19/czy-regulacja-sprawi-ze-ue-stanie-sie-najbardziej-zaufana-potega-w-dziedzinie-si  Zasubskrybuj nasz kanał.Euronews jest dostępny na Dailymotion w 12 językach

Transcript

00:00www.astronarium.pl www.astronarium.pl www.facebook.com

00:30The AI Act came into force in 2024 and defines four risk levels for the use of artificial

00:50intelligence, from minimal to unacceptable. It prohibits practices that violate democratic

00:56values and human rights. One example is categorizing individuals by their biometric data, which

01:03could lead to unfairly profiling minority groups. The EU now invites AI companies such

01:09as the generative chatbots ChatGPT, Mistral, Gemini and Claude to sign a voluntary code

01:15of practice on general-purpose AI. By signing the code and adhering to the rules, they're

01:21deemed compliant with the AI Act.

01:23Companies that refuse to sign the code may face more stingent expectations and administrative

01:29burdens. Let's hear what Europeans think about this regulatory move.

01:35I feel like if we leave these programs unregulated, they will make harm as much as good as they

01:44do.

01:45It has to be like a global thing. So then it's the same rules in China and the same

01:50rules in here, but also the same rules in America.

01:54Parzialmente, perché si è visto che si riesce a ricreare voce, visi, volti, video, quello

02:01andrebbe regolamentato e andrebbero imposte norme più stringenti.

02:05So che determinate cose non potranno mai essere cambiate o sostituite dall'intelligenza

02:10artificiale, quindi... ma già ci sono e sicuramente la comunità europea interverrà

02:13ancora meglio. Quindi sì, sono tranquilla.

02:16Let's break it down with Cynthia Crute, senior tech policy reporter at Aeronews.

02:21When it comes to the code, the European Commission is taking somehow a pedagogical approach to

02:27this sector. But what will happen to AI companies if they will violate the AI Act once it's fully

02:36implemented?

02:37Yeah, I think it's important to know that the AI Act is being implemented in a period of

02:42time, so from 2024 to 2027. And this August, the rules for general purpose AI models, such

02:50as JetGPT or Gemini, they will enter into force. So that means that the products that were already

02:57on the market, such as those examples, they have two more years to comply with the rules. And

03:02everything that's been put on the market after August, they have to comply immediately. And in

03:07case there are breaches, the Commission can impose a fine of up to 15 million euros.

03:13Major players like OpenNI and Anthropik support the code, decided that they wanted to sign it. But

03:20others are refusing, like Meta, which is also an important company. What are the arguments being

03:26used and what is the implication of such a refusal in terms of the global market?

03:32Meta has been, I think, since the drafting process of the code started last September,

03:37very critical of this whole process. They say it stifles innovation, and they've rolled

03:43out a few tools that they cannot fully use in Europe, also because of data protection rules,

03:48for example. But in the end, it doesn't matter much if they sign or not, because the AI Act

03:52will prevail anyway.

03:55Some analysts claim that this regulation is basically a strategic positioning of the EU that wants to

04:03to be perceived as the most trustworthy AI provider. The USA is highly critic of this approach. So what can

04:13come out of these conflicting positions?

04:16Well, it's not only Europe, I think, that's regulating. China and the US are doing the same.

04:21I think they just take a more sectoral approach instead of more horizontal that the EU is doing.

04:27I think the big difference is really investment in the end. It's mostly China and the US that have a lot

04:34of private investment. Europe is trying to catch up and they try to mobilize private and public funding,

04:41for example, for gigafactories where they train these AI models.

04:46This code establishes rules on three main aspects. Copyright, solutions to respect the intellectual

04:52property of creative works, such as images and academic essays. Safety, standards for avoiding

04:58systematic risks of advanced AI models. One example would be development of chemical or biological

05:04weapons. And transparency, requiring companies to complete a form on how they comply with the AI law.

05:10Our guest is Laura Lázaro Cabrera, a counsel at the Center for Democracy and Technology.

05:18Denmark, which currently holds the presidency of the EU, wants to simplify the AI Act and another digital

05:28rules. Could this legislation become an empty promise?

05:33The AI Act is already the result of several years of protracted negotiations and hard-fought compromises.

05:40Every sentence in the AI Act, every word isn't there for a reason. So to say that simply a lot of the

05:48AI Act can be done away with or can be removed, some sections amended, would be a mistake.

05:54The United States leads the private investment in AI, which is more than 10 times the EU's investment.

06:03Beyond regulation, do you think that the EU is financially committed to providing safer models of AI?

06:12The EU has made great strides towards strengthening the financial support that it provides to AI

06:18development in Europe. Just this year, over 200 billion euros have been announced for AI investment.

06:25We think that finances are an important part of the equation, and indeed it is important for the EU to

06:31maintain a leadership role in the development of AI. But we think that that leadership has to be tied to a

06:38strong safety framework that promotes fundamental rights and that promotes people-centered AI systems.

06:44Deepfakes, theft of confidential data, suicides linked to the use of chatbots are some examples of the risks,

06:54the dangers of generative AI.

06:57So in addition to regulating companies, should governments also provide awareness to citizens,

07:07training about how to use these tools?

07:10Absolutely. One key element of the AI Act is this notion of AI literacy, but the obligations around AI

07:18literacy are aimed at companies developing AI and companies deploying AI. We need to see similar

07:26approaches building at EU-wide level targeted this time at people.

07:31Just as the industrial revolutions driven by steam power and the internet impacted different sectors,

07:38so too will AI affect many areas, from defence to life science to energy and manufacturing.

07:46However, as with those revolutions, there are risks to consumers, the environment and the rule of law.

07:52Can the legislation keep up with this lightning-fast innovation?

07:56Thank you.

08:01Agustinant.

08:02After all,

08:03I'm massive!

08:08You

08:10Were

08:11W

Category

Transcript

Be the first to comment

Recommended