Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 3个月前
文字稿
00:00After Confucianism was established by Confucius, Mencius and Shuanzi inherited and developed
00:05Confucianism in the midst of the disputes of the warring states period.
00:10However, their understanding of morality was polarized. Mencius emphasized the inherent
00:16goodness of human nature, believing that everyone has the potential to become a benevolent person
00:21and that politics should be based on benevolence, righteousness and indoctrination.
00:25Shuanzi, on the other hand, asserted that human nature is inherently evil, and argued that
00:31rituals and laws are the key tools for curbing human desires and establishing social order.
00:37This fundamental difference in human nature theory determined their different directions
00:41in political philosophy, state governance, and social ethics. Mencius represents the peak of
00:48idealism, while Shuanzi symbolizes the maturity of Confucian realism. Mencius put forward the
00:54concept of righteous war, placing the justification of war under moral judgment.
01:00He emphasized that war should not be a tool for the ruler to pursue expansion, but a means to prevent
01:06violence, promote benevolence, and safeguard the well-being of the people. This conception of
01:12placing political power under moral constraints was undoubtedly revolutionary in the context of the
01:17chaotic world of that time. More importantly, Mencius not only gave moral logic to the justice of war,
01:24but also proposed for the first time a prototype of international moral order.
01:29He envisioned that disputes between nations should be handled according to the way of the king,
01:33rather than the way of the hegemon, a conception that transcended the realities of interest patterns
01:38and demonstrated his forward-looking international political philosophy.
01:43Mencius' political philosophy is based on the principle that, the people are the most important
01:48thing, the gods of earth and grain come second, and the ruler is the least important thing.
01:53He redefined the mandate of heaven as a synonym for the people's will and denied the rationality of
02:00absolute monarchical power. On the one hand, this idea inherits the ideal of benevolent government
02:06of Confucius, and on the other hand, it also raises a moral question to authoritarian politics.
02:12In Mencius' view, the quality of governance of a country and the moral value of a monarch must be judged
02:19by the people in their daily lives. He emphasized that a just government is a
02:24parental government, which should use education, moralization, and benevolence as the means to guide the
02:30people towards goodness. This philosophy still has far-reaching relevance in today's democratic theory.
02:36After Confucianism was established by Confucius, Mencius and Schuenzi inherited and developed
02:43Confucianism in the midst of the disputes of the warring states period. However, their understanding
02:49of morality was polarized. Mencius emphasized the inherent goodness of human nature, believing that
02:56everyone has the potential to become a benevolent person and that politics should be based on
03:00benevolence, righteousness, and indoctrination. Schuenzi, on the other hand,
03:05asserted that human nature is inherently evil, and argued that rituals and laws are the key tools
03:11for curbing human desires and establishing social order. This fundamental difference in human nature
03:17theory determined their different directions in political philosophy, state governance, and social
03:22ethics. Mencius represents the peak of idealism, while Schuenzi symbolizes the maturity of Confucian
03:29realism. Mencius put forward the concept of righteous war, placing the justification of war
03:35under moral judgment. He emphasized that war should not be a tool for the ruler to pursue expansion,
03:42but a means to prevent violence, promote benevolence, and safeguard the well-being of the people.
03:48This conception of placing political power under moral constraints was undoubtedly revolutionary in
03:53the context of the chaotic world of that time. More importantly, Mencius not only gave moral logic to the
04:00justice of war, but also proposed for the first time a prototype of international moral order.
04:06He envisioned that disputes between nations should be handled according to the way of the king,
04:11rather than the way of the hegemon, a conception that transcended the realities of interest patterns
04:16and demonstrated his forward-looking international political philosophy. Mencius' political philosophy is
04:22based on the principle that the people are the most important thing, the gods of earth and grain come
04:27second, and the ruler is the least important thing. He redefined the mandate of heaven as a synonym for
04:34the people's will and denied the rationality of absolute monarchical power. On the one hand,
04:41this idea inherits the ideal of benevolent government of Confucius, and on the other hand,
04:46it also raises a moral question to authoritarian politics. In Mencius' view, the quality of governance of
04:53a country and the moral value of a monarch must be judged by the people in their daily lives.
04:59He emphasized that a just government is a parental government, which should use education,
05:04moralization, and benevolence as the means to guide the people towards goodness.
05:09This philosophy still has far-reaching relevance in today's democratic theory.
05:15Schuenzi highly integrated personal morality with political governance.
05:18He believed that through the example of propriety, set by the king, society as a whole could achieve
05:25moral enlightenment. Politics should not only govern the external order, but also shape people's inner
05:31ethics. This is a Confucian unity of government and religion, with both a rational structure and a
05:37spiritual content. Schuenzi's thought constructed a top-down logic of order, from the ideal governance of
05:44the sage king to the daily rituals of the common people, all reflecting the institutional power of
05:49rights. Mencius and Schuenzi, one represents the glory of ideal morality, the other shows the calmness
05:56of institutional reality. While they took different paths, they shared a common commitment to thinking
06:02about the moral nature of human beings, social order, and political ideals. Their ideological disputes not
06:10only shaped the two major Confucian traditions of later generations, but also became an important
06:15resource for the parallelism of ideals and realities, and the rule of morality and the rule of law,
06:21in the political culture of East Asia.
Be the first to write a comment
添加你的评论

推荐视频

6:54
接下来播放