Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 8 months ago
Following relegation Fulchester Rovers manager Aleksander Gruda is sacked. However, he claims players Skelhorne, McIver and Appledene deliberately played badly in order to achieve this end. All three now stand trial for conspiracy.

Maureen Lipman and David Ashford star as the prosecuting and defence Counsels. Michael Craze, well known for his role as companion Ben Jackson to William Hartnell's Doctor in Doctor Who, also appears as witness Mick Pollitson.

Category

📺
TV
Transcript
00:00:00Wladyslaw Kruda no longer speaks with his native Polish accent.
00:00:13Brought to this country by his parents in 1939, he was rapidly absorbed into North Country
00:00:18life and at the age of 17 became a professional footballer.
00:00:21After an effective, if undistinguished, career as player and coach, he entered that most
00:00:26precarious of professions, football management.
00:00:28And in 1969 became manager of Fulchester Rovers.
00:00:32Rovers were at that time anchored firmly in the bottom half of the third division.
00:00:36But two seasons later, in May 1971, the team became champions of that division and were
00:00:41promoted to the second.
00:00:43But life in the higher echelons was short-lived.
00:00:46A mediocre season, followed by a disastrous one, saw the team return to the third division
00:00:50in 1973.
00:00:52Kruda paid the now familiar penalty and his contract was not renewed.
00:00:56But he was far from finished.
00:00:57A month after his dismissal, the football press resounded with the news that criminal charges
00:01:02had been laid against three Rovers players.
00:01:05Bernard Skelhorn, James McIver and Peter Appeldeen were charged with conspiring together to bring
00:01:10about the termination of Kruda's employment as manager of Fulchester Rovers by failing to
00:01:15perform their own contracts with the club.
00:01:17Their trial at the Fulchester Crown Court has just begun.
00:01:21What is your name and where do you live?
00:01:49My name is Alexander Vladislav Kruda and I live at the Northcliffe private hotel, Fulchester.
00:01:56As a paying guest?
00:01:57As a paying guest, yes.
00:01:58I've had a room there for two years.
00:02:00I take it you're not married?
00:02:01No.
00:02:02No, I'm not married.
00:02:04Now, Mr. Kruda, I wonder if you'd be kind enough to give the court a brief resume of your life
00:02:08since coming to this country.
00:02:09Yes, sir.
00:02:10Mr. Lotterby, I am as anxious as you are to be spared autobiographical detail, but my instinct
00:02:14tells me that a little insight in that direction might help us in this case.
00:02:18So long, Miss Lewis, as your witness, does not spend too long on his early life.
00:02:23Thank you, my lord.
00:02:24Mr. Kruda, as I said, a brief resume.
00:02:27I came to this country in 1939 with my mother and father.
00:02:31I was eight years old.
00:02:32My father had been a footballer in Poland, an amateur.
00:02:35He was a diamond cutter by profession and we had a good life, but my mother was Jewish
00:02:41and he decided we should leave and come to England.
00:02:44We settled in Lancashire and both my mother and father worked in a mill in Haywood.
00:02:47I went to the local school until I was 15.
00:02:50And after school?
00:02:51I took one or two odd jobs.
00:02:53I was apprentice in engineering works for about a year, but football, football was in my blood,
00:02:58I suppose, and in 1948 I had a successful trial with Bury and I signed professional forms
00:03:03for them.
00:03:03Is all this really relevant?
00:03:05Would we make more rapid strides to the present time, do you think, Miss Lewis?
00:03:08We're almost there, my lord.
00:03:10As brief as possible, please.
00:03:12Yes, I also played for Stockport County and Blackburn Rovers.
00:03:15At the end of my playing career, I took up coaching.
00:03:16I'd already taken a coaching diploma and from that I moved into management.
00:03:21And when did you join Fulchester Rovers?
00:03:23In June 1969.
00:03:25Will you give the court details of the contract you signed at that time?
00:03:28Yes, it was for four years, expiring at the end of the 72-73 season.
00:03:32My basic starting wage was 2,800 with a rise of 200 pounds every year.
00:03:37Of course, there were big bonuses for cup runs, promotions and that sort of thing.
00:03:40What were your top earnings during this period?
00:03:42We were promoted to the 2nd Division in 1971 and I earned, oh, almost 4,000 pounds.
00:03:48I see.
00:03:49And supposing the team had stayed in the 2nd Division, what might you have been expected
00:03:52to earn in a moderately successful season?
00:03:54Oh, a lot more.
00:03:56I should think between 5,500 and 6,000.
00:03:58Basic.
00:03:59You see, your honour, with the economic situation as it is, all salaries...
00:04:02All salaries.
00:04:03We do all understand we have all been torn upon the rack of inflation.
00:04:08Now, Miss Lewis, I must ask you not to make too ready assumption of an understanding of
00:04:13football matters.
00:04:15I realise that to many people in this country football is an open book, but to many others
00:04:20it is a total secret.
00:04:22Perhaps the jury is so divided.
00:04:25I mean, can you be sure, for example, that we all know what the 2nd Division is?
00:04:29If I may explain, my lord, the English Football League is divided into 92 clubs, 22 in each
00:04:35of the 1st and 2nd Division, 24 in each of the 3rd and 4th.
00:04:39At the end of each season, based on a points system, the least successful clubs are relegated
00:04:44and the most successful clubs are promoted to a higher division.
00:04:48Now, Mr. Gruder, you have told us that in May 1971, Fulchester Rovers were promoted to
00:04:54the 2nd Division.
00:04:55How long did the team stay there?
00:04:57For two seasons.
00:04:59The first year, we did reasonably well, finished in 8th place.
00:05:03The next year, we finish in bottom place.
00:05:05And what happened then?
00:05:06Well, I was called in front of the Board of Directors and told that my contract wouldn't
00:05:09be renewed.
00:05:10Did they give you any reason for this?
00:05:12Yes, Mr. Grose told me.
00:05:13Mr. Grose?
00:05:14He's the chairman.
00:05:16He told me that I'd been given the money I asked for to buy the players, but in spite of
00:05:20that, I couldn't keep the club out of the 2nd Division, and they thought it was time
00:05:23to make a change.
00:05:24Did this surprise you?
00:05:25No, I'd been told when I joined the club that only one thing counted.
00:05:29That was success.
00:05:29And you were happy to accept your contract under those terms?
00:05:32You wouldn't become a manager if you didn't.
00:05:34It's that sort of job.
00:05:35Oh, it's fair enough.
00:05:37It's fair enough.
00:05:38You had no quarrel with the Board's decision.
00:05:40No, no, not with the Board.
00:05:41No.
00:05:41As far as they were concerned, I'd failed.
00:05:43But they didn't know the truth, no more than anybody else.
00:05:46And what was the truth, Mr. Grose?
00:05:49Well, let me put it this way.
00:05:52Had I been sacked because of some mistake I'd made...
00:05:53Oh, my lord, I feel you should be pointed out that Mr. Grose, as I understand, it was
00:05:56not sacked.
00:05:57His contract expired and was not renewed.
00:05:58There is a distinction.
00:06:00Is that so, Mr. Rees?
00:06:01Yes, my lord.
00:06:02I'm sure my witness understands the distinction.
00:06:05Mr. Gruder, if I may ask you again, what was the truth?
00:06:08Well, what I was going to say was, if my contract wasn't renewed because of some mistake I'd
00:06:13made, or if I hadn't been managing the team well enough, I wouldn't have had any comeback.
00:06:16But that was not the case.
00:06:18No.
00:06:19So, what you are saying is that the club's lack of success was directly due to the actions
00:06:24of others.
00:06:25Is he, my lord?
00:06:26Yes, I'm sure.
00:06:26Your puzzlement missed a lot of it, but at the same time, I must confess, I find your objection
00:06:30academic.
00:06:31I mean, if he didn't say that, there'd be little point in us being gathered here today.
00:06:36However, though academic, your objection is valid.
00:06:39Miss Lewis, please do not lead.
00:06:42Let your witness speak for himself.
00:06:43Yes, my lord.
00:06:45Let me ask you a straightforward question, Mr. Gruder.
00:06:48Fullchester Rovers were relegated to the Third Division in May 1973.
00:06:52Why?
00:06:54Because three of my first team's squad consistently played well below their capabilities in more
00:06:58than half the league matches last season.
00:07:00And are those three men in court today?
00:07:02Yes, they are.
00:07:02Who are they?
00:07:03Skelhorn, MacIver, and Appalachian.
00:07:07Silence, these cops!
00:07:13Can you give any illustration of the bad play you observed?
00:07:17Yes, well, you get to know players.
00:07:20You get to know right away when something's wrong.
00:07:22I mean, if you know a player's got a heart as big as a lion and suddenly starts chickening
00:07:25out of 50-50 balls, you know something funny's going on.
00:07:28Could you explain that remark?
00:07:31Chickening out of what?
00:07:32Oh, well, I mean, not fighting for the ball.
00:07:35When two players have got an equal chance of getting the ball, that's a 50-50 ball.
00:07:38And you want your man to win it every time.
00:07:41And when a man who normally wins it keeps losing it, well, you start thinking things.
00:07:45I see.
00:07:46Thank God.
00:07:47Mr. Gruder, this player with a heart as big as a lion who chickened out of 50-50 balls,
00:07:53rather a mixed metaphor, but thanks to his lordship, I'm sure we now all understand it.
00:07:57Is this a hypothetical case, or are you referring to a particular player?
00:08:01I was describing Jim McIver.
00:08:03And what is McIver's position on the field?
00:08:05He's a striker.
00:08:06He wears a number nine shirt.
00:08:08And how would you explain, please, for the benefit of the jury, would you explain what
00:08:12the role of a striker is?
00:08:13Yes, he's there to score goals and lay them on for other players.
00:08:18A striker, he's an attacker.
00:08:19What was McIver's record with the club up to last season?
00:08:23Oh, it was very good.
00:08:23He joined the club the year before I did, and he averaged 22 league goals a season.
00:08:27Up to last year.
00:08:28And that's good.
00:08:29Well, they don't come much better.
00:08:31Not nowadays.
00:08:32And what happened to McIver last season?
00:08:35He scored four goals in the first seven matches, and for the rest of the season, that's another
00:08:3835 games, he scored six.
00:08:41And two of those were penalties.
00:08:43Disappointing, to say the least.
00:08:45I'd call it criminal.
00:08:46Well, Lord, I don't think we can complain about the word criminal, Mr. Lotterby.
00:08:49Surely it was used in its idiomatic sense.
00:08:53Contemptable, shall we say, rather than illegal.
00:08:56Oh, I agree entirely, my lord.
00:08:57I wasn't objecting to the use of the word criminal, but to the implication that none of us can
00:09:00have off days without it being either contemptible or illegal.
00:09:04We all of us at times fail to do our jobs as well as we might.
00:09:08That applies to us all.
00:09:10Yes, I'm making no comment, Mr. Lotterby.
00:09:13Continue, please.
00:09:14I was about to add, my lord, that with the tremendous pressures that there are today on professional footballers, inconsistencies of performance are bound to occur.
00:09:22There you go.
00:09:23Mr. Gruder, would you describe McIver's performance last season as normal, an off period?
00:09:31No.
00:09:32Why not?
00:09:33Oh, players go through bad spells, but in my experience there's always a good reason for it.
00:09:37Injury, lack of training, family troubles.
00:09:39None of these apply to McIver.
00:09:41Are you sure of that?
00:09:42Well, I'd have known about any injury, or if he wasn't training, and he never said anything about domestic troubles.
00:09:46And they're encouraged to.
00:09:48Now let us move on to Skelhorn and Appledean.
00:09:50Your suggestion is that neither of these men gave of their best during the majority of league matches played last season.
00:09:56That is correct.
00:09:57Tell us about Skelhorn.
00:09:59He was a midfield player, number four.
00:10:02It was his job to pick up the ball in the middle of the park, the field, that is, and link up with the strikers.
00:10:07And then put the ball through for them to collect and score.
00:10:10That's putting in its simplest terms.
00:10:11And as midfield players go, how was Skelhorn?
00:10:14Good.
00:10:15At his best, very good, in my opinion.
00:10:17He should have played for England.
00:10:18But last season he was not at his best.
00:10:21No.
00:10:22No, he started to lose it about the same time as McIver, about seven or eight matches in.
00:10:27How did this manifest itself?
00:10:28How could you tell he was losing it, as you put it?
00:10:31Well, in my opinion, Skelhorn was one of the best tacklers in the game.
00:10:35He was clean.
00:10:36Because he was clever, he didn't need to be dirty.
00:10:38He could time a tackle to the right split second, come away with the ball and put it where he wanted.
00:10:43And then suddenly, it all went.
00:10:46He began to look clumsy, which he never was.
00:10:49He gave away three kicks, he gave away 13, one match, that was more than his total for the previous season.
00:10:53And his passing went.
00:10:55Seven out of ten went to the other side.
00:10:56And this went on for most of the season?
00:10:58Oh, same.
00:10:59Some games were worse than others.
00:11:01We were losing matches.
00:11:02We should have won drawing teams.
00:11:03We should have...
00:11:04We should have murdered.
00:11:06And you can't do that and stay off the bottom.
00:11:08Now, what about Appledean?
00:11:10Oh, Appledean was cleverer than the other two.
00:11:12He wasn't so easy to spot, but it was there.
00:11:16He was fast.
00:11:17Very fast.
00:11:18And then suddenly, again about the same time of the season, he started failing to reach passes you could have sworn he should have made.
00:11:24And he put the odd corner behind, out of play, that is, which is something he never did.
00:11:28He didn't make as many mistakes as the other players, but, oh, he timed them better.
00:11:33If we were playing a crucial match, and there's a lot of them when you're near the bottom,
00:11:37and it looked as if we might be getting on top, he'd pull something shady out of the bag.
00:11:41He's a bit of a pie piper.
00:11:43Whatever he did, good or bad, seemed to have a sort of general effect on the team.
00:11:48Now, Mr. Gruder, when Fulchester Road was dispensed with your services,
00:11:51did you try to obtain another position as a football manager?
00:11:54Ah, yes.
00:11:55With no success?
00:11:56No.
00:11:56What is your present employment and salary?
00:11:59I'm the manager of a small do-it-yourself supermarket in the Churchill precinct,
00:12:02and I earn £1,800 a year.
00:12:04And as you've already told us, had you still been the manager of a second division club,
00:12:08you might have expected to earn between £6,000 and £7,000 a year?
00:12:11Yes.
00:12:12Thank you, Mr. Gruder.
00:12:14And your view is, is it, Mr. Gruder, that this reduction in earnings,
00:12:18and the fact that you are no longer doing the job you love,
00:12:20are directly attributable to the actions of the accused?
00:12:23Yes, that's correct.
00:12:24Well, didn't it ever occur to you that these three players,
00:12:26playing as you believe badly over the same period,
00:12:29might be no more than coincidence?
00:12:30No.
00:12:31So what conclusions did you reach, Mr. Gruder?
00:12:34They planned it.
00:12:35They got together and worked out how to get rid of me.
00:12:38Why?
00:12:38Because they didn't like the way I ran the club.
00:12:40They didn't like the discipline I imposed,
00:12:41because they were good footballers, but rotten men.
00:12:44Mr. Gruder, when you were called before the board
00:12:46and told that your contract was not to be renewed,
00:12:48did you then make this accusation you're making here today?
00:12:51Ah, yes, I did.
00:12:52To the board, you mean?
00:12:53That's right.
00:12:53Yes, I did.
00:12:54And what was their reaction?
00:12:56Well, they didn't exactly call me a liar,
00:12:58but I could see they didn't believe me.
00:13:00I didn't really expect them to tell the truth.
00:13:02Well, that's what you have for me, Mr. Gruder, to tell the truth.
00:13:04Now, why didn't you expect the board to believe you?
00:13:06I had no proof.
00:13:08Not them.
00:13:08You say you had no proof at that time.
00:13:11Your belief then was based on instinct.
00:13:14Ah, yes.
00:13:15Mr. Gruder, much of these proceedings
00:13:17appears to revolve around your judgment.
00:13:19You've told his lordship that you are able
00:13:21to make instinctive judgments on the quality of play.
00:13:24And from what you've told my learned friend,
00:13:26it would appear that you are equally adept
00:13:27at judging the quality of men.
00:13:29Are you prepared to stand by your judgment,
00:13:31not only when your career depends upon it,
00:13:33but also the freedom of three men?
00:13:36Yes, I do.
00:13:37Well, suppose for a moment
00:13:39that the three errant members of your club
00:13:41were, in your judgment,
00:13:42not only good footballers, but also good men.
00:13:44Would you have reached the same conclusions
00:13:46that a conspiracy was afoot?
00:13:48No, of course not.
00:13:49No, of course not.
00:13:50So what you are, in fact, saying
00:13:51is that your suspicions were based
00:13:53not merely on what you knew
00:13:54of the footballing abilities of the accused,
00:13:56but on what you knew of their characters.
00:13:58Yes.
00:13:59Tell me, Mr. Gruder,
00:14:00what do you look for in a footballer?
00:14:02Ability to play football,
00:14:04ability to live a clean, honest life,
00:14:07ability to take discipline and to work hard.
00:14:09And apart from the ability to play football,
00:14:11these were virtues sadly lacking
00:14:12from the characters of the accused?
00:14:14In my opinion, yes.
00:14:15Then I suggest to you, Mr. Gruder,
00:14:16that your judgment is not as faultless
00:14:18as you would have us believe.
00:14:19Is it not true that you sign
00:14:21two of the accused yourself?
00:14:24Yes, it is, but...
00:14:25Simply answer the question, Mr. Gruder,
00:14:27did you or did you not sign
00:14:28Skelhorn and Appledean?
00:14:31I did.
00:14:32Mr. Gruder, you are Polish, are you not?
00:14:47No, no, no, no, I'm British.
00:14:49I was naturalised with my parents.
00:14:51If I hadn't been naturalised,
00:14:52I wouldn't have been able to play football
00:14:53at an English league club.
00:14:54No, of course, forgive me.
00:14:55You are Polish by extraction and by birth.
00:14:57Ah, yes.
00:14:58I've always believed the Poles
00:14:59are a particularly proud people,
00:15:00unwilling to accept defeat.
00:15:02Would you agree with that?
00:15:03Well, 11 of them are pretty unwilling
00:15:04at Wembley in the World Cup.
00:15:06I can't speak for every Paul.
00:15:08If you're talking about me personally,
00:15:09I don't happily accept defeat.
00:15:11I never have.
00:15:11Or failure?
00:15:12The same thing in my book.
00:15:14So it's safe to say
00:15:14that if failure were imminent,
00:15:16you would do everything in your power
00:15:17to dissociate yourself from that failure?
00:15:19No.
00:15:20No?
00:15:20No, it wouldn't be safe to say that.
00:15:22You're now saying you would accept defeat?
00:15:23No, I'm not.
00:15:24I said that I didn't accept defeat happily.
00:15:26But if I failed and it was my fault,
00:15:27I'd accept that failure.
00:15:28Not happily, but I'd accept it.
00:15:30I see.
00:15:30That is your judgment of yourself?
00:15:32Ah, yes.
00:15:32And is it as valued as your judgment of others,
00:15:34that judgment which led you to choose,
00:15:37in your own words,
00:15:38rotten men?
00:15:39No, that's something else I didn't say.
00:15:40I didn't say I chose them.
00:15:42I said I signed them, which I did,
00:15:43but I didn't do the choosing.
00:15:44The board of directors did the choosing.
00:15:46Are you seriously suggesting
00:15:47you had no say in the matter?
00:15:48Oh, that's the truth.
00:15:50When I was taller,
00:15:51they wanted to sign.
00:15:51I said to the chairman...
00:15:52Oh, thank you, Mr. Gooden.
00:15:52No monologues, please.
00:15:55Now, the season finished
00:15:57for Fulton, Sir Rovers,
00:15:57on April the 28th of last year,
00:15:59although it was determined
00:16:00that the club would be relegated
00:16:01two weeks earlier.
00:16:02Is that correct?
00:16:03That's correct.
00:16:03And you were called in front of the board
00:16:05on Tuesday, May the 1st,
00:16:06and told that your contract
00:16:07would not be renewed?
00:16:08That's correct.
00:16:09Now, you've told my lordy friend
00:16:10at great length
00:16:11that you noticed the deterioration
00:16:13in the play of the three accused
00:16:14fairly early in the season.
00:16:16Now, at what point did you decide
00:16:18that this was not coincidence,
00:16:19but a dastardly plot?
00:16:21Oh, I became pretty sure
00:16:22they were in it together
00:16:23just after the Christmas games.
00:16:24And whom had you told about it
00:16:25prior to telling the board
00:16:26on May the 1st?
00:16:28No one.
00:16:29No one?
00:16:31Are you telling this court
00:16:32that you kept this important discovery
00:16:35to yourself for, what, four months?
00:16:38I told no one.
00:16:39Speak up, please.
00:16:40I said I told no one.
00:16:41But why not, Mr. Gruder?
00:16:42Because I couldn't be sure
00:16:43it would go no further.
00:16:45It doesn't take much
00:16:46to knock a club off its stride,
00:16:48particularly when it's coming
00:16:49from the manager.
00:16:49Everybody's watching him.
00:16:51Players, the board,
00:16:52the supporters, the press.
00:16:53And there was still a chance
00:16:54we could avoid relegation.
00:16:55I didn't want to lose that chance.
00:16:57Surely there were other steps
00:16:58you could have taken,
00:16:58like dropping the players in question.
00:17:00I did.
00:17:00I dropped Skelon once
00:17:01and Appledeen twice.
00:17:02That doesn't sound very drastic.
00:17:04It didn't have the required effect.
00:17:05The replacements
00:17:06didn't play well either.
00:17:07Oh, you're suggesting
00:17:08that these replacements
00:17:09were also part of this plot
00:17:10to bring you down?
00:17:11No, no, I'm not.
00:17:13Oh, they were allowed
00:17:13to fall short of perfection
00:17:15without your becoming suspicious,
00:17:17unlike the accused.
00:17:19I see.
00:17:20Miss Gruder,
00:17:21the charge against the accused
00:17:22is, is it not,
00:17:23that they conspire together
00:17:24to terminate your employment
00:17:25by failing to perform
00:17:26their own contract of service?
00:17:28That is correct.
00:17:28And conspiracy is a criminal offence,
00:17:30but failing to win a 50-50 ball,
00:17:33losing one's ability to pass,
00:17:35or putting the odd corner behind,
00:17:37are these criminal offences?
00:17:39No.
00:17:40No, however,
00:17:40strongly certain elements
00:17:41on the terraces
00:17:42might feel they should be.
00:17:44Mr. Gruder,
00:17:44have you yourself
00:17:45ever been present
00:17:46at any activity
00:17:47which would allow you
00:17:48to support
00:17:48this charge of conspiracy?
00:17:50No.
00:17:51No, you delayed
00:17:52airing your suspicions
00:17:53not to save the club,
00:17:54but because at the time
00:17:54you had no such suspicions.
00:17:56But realising that
00:17:58you were faced
00:17:58with the loss
00:17:59of a profitable job,
00:18:00due entirely to your own failure,
00:18:01you looked around
00:18:02for a scapegoat
00:18:03and you picked on
00:18:03the three accused.
00:18:04That isn't true.
00:18:05Mr. Gruder,
00:18:06what do you think
00:18:06is likely to happen to you
00:18:08if the accused
00:18:08are found not guilty
00:18:09of the charges
00:18:10laid against them?
00:18:11I don't know.
00:18:13Don't you, Mr. Gruder?
00:18:13Well, do you think
00:18:14it's likely that you
00:18:14will ever be offered
00:18:15a job in football management?
00:18:17No.
00:18:18Oh, come now, Mr. Gruder,
00:18:18it's a simple question
00:18:19do you consider it likely
00:18:21that under those circumstances
00:18:22you will ever be offered
00:18:23a job in football management?
00:18:26Possibly not.
00:18:27And how would that affect you?
00:18:29I'd, um...
00:18:30I'd be disappointed.
00:18:33You'd be disappointed.
00:18:34Just disappointed.
00:18:35Do you expect the court
00:18:36to believe that
00:18:36that would be
00:18:37the extent of your feelings?
00:18:38Well, I suggest to you,
00:18:39Mr. Gruder,
00:18:40that you would be devastated.
00:18:42And I further suggest,
00:18:43and this is borne out
00:18:43by the way in which
00:18:44you've given your evidence,
00:18:45that football is your life
00:18:47and that you want desperately
00:18:48to return to it
00:18:49and like all desperate men,
00:18:51you are willing,
00:18:51amongst other things,
00:18:52to lie.
00:18:53That is not true.
00:18:56Mr. Gruder,
00:18:58you told my learned friend
00:18:59that although you admitted
00:19:01signing some of the players,
00:19:02you did not necessarily
00:19:03choose them.
00:19:04Would you explain?
00:19:06Yes, well, um,
00:19:07it was one of my duties
00:19:08to draw up contracts
00:19:09with the club solicitor
00:19:10and be present
00:19:10when the players signed.
00:19:11Generally,
00:19:12the directors prefer
00:19:13to keep out of the picture.
00:19:13I drew up a statement
00:19:15for the press
00:19:15and I answered their questions
00:19:17if there were any.
00:19:18You could say that I,
00:19:19I represented the club
00:19:20at such times.
00:19:21So, it appeared
00:19:22as though you yourself
00:19:23were employing these new players,
00:19:24not only employing them,
00:19:26but happy to do so.
00:19:27Oh, yes,
00:19:28I always smile
00:19:28for the photographers.
00:19:30But you were not necessarily
00:19:31so happy with the events
00:19:32leading up to the signings.
00:19:34Ah, no, no.
00:19:36No, more often than not,
00:19:37directors have a pretty fair idea
00:19:39of what makes a footballer,
00:19:40but they also have the money
00:19:41which counts.
00:19:43But there are times
00:19:43when they make mistakes
00:19:44and I thought they made a mistake
00:19:45with both Scalhorn and Appledee.
00:19:47You see,
00:19:48directors don't always have
00:19:49a good idea
00:19:49of the player's background,
00:19:51his character.
00:19:52All they know
00:19:53is what they see on the field.
00:19:55And it's a very,
00:19:56very autocratic business,
00:19:57is this footballer.
00:19:58It's a lot of the us and them.
00:20:00But managers know players
00:20:02and they're the fellas I talk to.
00:20:04What had you heard
00:20:05about Scalhorn and Appledee?
00:20:06Oh, Scalhorn
00:20:07had been around a lot.
00:20:08I think we were his sixth club.
00:20:10You can't very well ask
00:20:11the manager who wants
00:20:11to sell him what he's like,
00:20:12but there are plenty of others
00:20:13and they all said the same thing.
00:20:14He's a big head.
00:20:15Good footballer,
00:20:16but a big head.
00:20:17And if you want to build up
00:20:17a team that wants to play
00:20:19with each other,
00:20:19you don't want the
00:20:20Barney Skelhons of this world.
00:20:22Same with Appledee.
00:20:23He was a troublemaker.
00:20:24He wanted to change football.
00:20:26He wanted the players
00:20:27to rule the game.
00:20:28Now, I'm not saying
00:20:29that professional football
00:20:30is perfect,
00:20:31but you change things gradually.
00:20:33Not the way he wanted to do it.
00:20:35He was an anarchist.
00:20:35And you conveyed your feelings
00:20:37about these players to the board
00:20:38when it was suggested
00:20:39they should be bought?
00:20:40Yes, I did.
00:20:41But apparently the members
00:20:42of the board were not impressed.
00:20:44Not enough.
00:20:45I think Mr. Gross
00:20:46was on my side,
00:20:47the late chairman,
00:20:48but Mr. Martindale,
00:20:49the present chairman,
00:20:49and two of the others
00:20:50voted for buying,
00:20:51so that was it.
00:20:53Finally, Mr. Gruder,
00:20:54my learned friend
00:20:55has suggested
00:20:56that you have lied
00:20:57to this court.
00:20:59Have you lied?
00:21:02No.
00:21:03No, I haven't.
00:21:04Thank you, Mr. Gruder.
00:21:05No further questions?
00:21:07Very well, Mr. Gruder.
00:21:09You may go.
00:21:11I call Margaret Skelhorn.
00:21:17Margaret Skelhorn, please.
00:21:19Would you tell the court
00:21:41your name and address, please?
00:21:43Margaret.
00:21:43My full name?
00:21:44Please.
00:21:45Margaret Mary Skelhorn,
00:21:4624 Rutherford Gardens,
00:21:48Fullchester.
00:21:49What is your marital status,
00:21:50Mrs. Skelhorn?
00:21:51I'm divorced.
00:21:53Is your ex-husband in court?
00:21:55Yes.
00:21:55Would you point him out to us?
00:21:58He is Bernard Skelhorn,
00:21:59one of the accused.
00:22:00Is that correct?
00:22:02Yes.
00:22:02You must speak up, please.
00:22:04The jury must be able
00:22:05to hear you.
00:22:06Yes, ma'am.
00:22:07Yes.
00:22:08Yes.
00:22:11How long have you been divorced?
00:22:12It was finalised in December.
00:22:14December 1972.
00:22:16I understand you have children.
00:22:18Yes, two.
00:22:18Diana, she's six,
00:22:19and Gary's four.
00:22:20I see.
00:22:21Who was granted custody
00:22:22of the children
00:22:23at the time of the divorce?
00:22:24Well, I was,
00:22:25but it was agreed
00:22:25that my ex-husband
00:22:27could see them
00:22:27at least one day every month.
00:22:29And you kept to this agreement?
00:22:31Oh, yes.
00:22:31I used to take them up there
00:22:33every fourth Sunday.
00:22:34I kept the house, you see,
00:22:35and he got one of those
00:22:36service flats at Mountjoy.
00:22:38We never stayed the old day.
00:22:40He never seemed to want them
00:22:41the old day.
00:22:42We get up there
00:22:43about ten o'clock,
00:22:44like I said,
00:22:44and we were nearly always
00:22:45home in time for our dinner.
00:22:46Were you on good terms
00:22:48with your ex-husband,
00:22:49Mrs. Skelhorn?
00:22:50Oh, no.
00:22:51But there was no point
00:22:52of being awkward about it.
00:22:53I'd talk to him, you know,
00:22:55and he'd talk to me.
00:22:56But if it hadn't been
00:22:57for the children,
00:22:57I wouldn't have gone near him.
00:23:01The case of the Queen
00:23:21against Appledean,
00:23:22MacIver,
00:23:23and Skelhorn
00:23:24will be resumed tomorrow
00:23:25in the Crown Court.
00:23:26In May 1973,
00:23:53Forchester Rovers
00:23:54were relegated
00:23:54from the second
00:23:55to the third division.
00:23:57As a result,
00:23:58the club did not renew
00:23:59the contract
00:23:59of its Polish-born manager,
00:24:01Alexander Gruda.
00:24:03Two months later,
00:24:03the football world
00:24:04was shocked
00:24:05by the news
00:24:06that three of Rovers'
00:24:07first-team players,
00:24:08Barney Skelhorn,
00:24:09Jim McIver,
00:24:10and Peter Appledean,
00:24:11had been charged
00:24:12with conspiring together
00:24:13to bring about
00:24:14the termination
00:24:14of Gruda's employment
00:24:15as Forchester manager
00:24:17by failing to perform
00:24:18their own contracts
00:24:19with the club.
00:24:21Mr. Gruda
00:24:21and his evidence
00:24:22alleged that all three men
00:24:23had played well below
00:24:24their capabilities
00:24:25for most of the season.
00:24:27He accused them
00:24:28of deliberately
00:24:28and maliciously
00:24:29plotting his downfall.
00:24:31Mr. Lotterby,
00:24:32counsel for the defendants,
00:24:33suggested in cross-examination
00:24:34that this action
00:24:35on Mr. Gruda's part
00:24:36was a deliberate attempt
00:24:38to save face,
00:24:39to shift the blame
00:24:40for failure,
00:24:41and to fight his way
00:24:42out of the wilderness
00:24:42and back into football.
00:24:45Mrs. Skelhorn,
00:24:46ex-wife of one of the accused,
00:24:47is now in the witness box.
00:24:48Now, Mrs. Skelhorn,
00:24:52I'd like you to
00:24:53cast your mind back
00:24:54if you can
00:24:55to Sunday,
00:24:56January the 21st, 1973.
00:24:58Did you take your children
00:24:59to see your ex-husband
00:25:00on that day?
00:25:01Yes, I did.
00:25:02I got up there
00:25:02about ten o'clock
00:25:03as usual.
00:25:04And what did you find there?
00:25:05Well, the place
00:25:06was in a tip.
00:25:07There were breakfast pots
00:25:08all over the table
00:25:09and it stunk
00:25:10a high oven of tobacco smoke.
00:25:11Who was there?
00:25:12My ex-husband,
00:25:14Peter Appeldean
00:25:15and Jim McIver.
00:25:16They were known to you already,
00:25:17McIver and Appeldean?
00:25:18Oh, yes.
00:25:19And what were they doing
00:25:21when you arrived there?
00:25:22Well, they didn't seem
00:25:23to be doing anything special.
00:25:25They looked as if
00:25:26they'd been sitting around talking.
00:25:27Oh, and they'd started drinking.
00:25:29Drinking?
00:25:30Vodka.
00:25:30Barney always drank vodka.
00:25:32He read somewhere
00:25:32you couldn't smell it
00:25:33on your breath.
00:25:34Taking it from this point,
00:25:36would you tell the court
00:25:37what happened
00:25:38on the occasion of this visit?
00:25:40Yes.
00:25:41Barney asked me
00:25:42if I'd like a drink
00:25:43and I said
00:25:43I wouldn't mind
00:25:44a cup of coffee
00:25:45so he said
00:25:46I could make one
00:25:46for all of them
00:25:47while I were at it.
00:25:47I see.
00:25:48Go on.
00:25:49Well, I went into the kitchen
00:25:50and started rooting around
00:25:51for cups and things
00:25:52and as soon as my back was turned
00:25:54they started talking again
00:25:55and it sounded as if
00:25:56they were carrying on
00:25:57with what they'd been
00:25:58talking about before.
00:25:59You could hear them
00:25:59quite clearly, could you?
00:26:01Oh, yes.
00:26:02Would you explain to the court
00:26:04exactly how?
00:26:05Well, there wasn't a door
00:26:07as such on the kitchen
00:26:08not a proper one
00:26:09there was just one
00:26:10of these things
00:26:10like they have in westerns
00:26:11so every word they said
00:26:12Excuse me for rupting
00:26:14but what are these things
00:26:16they have in westerns?
00:26:18Well, they're like
00:26:18half doors
00:26:19with a big gap at the top
00:26:21and a small gap at the bottom
00:26:22and they're like swing.
00:26:23Ah, yes.
00:26:24Normally found in saloons,
00:26:26my lord.
00:26:27So I believe.
00:26:29And you were able to hear
00:26:30quite plainly
00:26:31what the accused were saying?
00:26:33Oh, yes, my lord.
00:26:34And can you remember
00:26:35what was said?
00:26:36Well, I can remember
00:26:37the gist of it.
00:26:38Peter Appeldean
00:26:39was doing most of the talking
00:26:40and he said
00:26:41how they'd have to be careful
00:26:43when they played United
00:26:44on Saturday
00:26:44in case they made it
00:26:46too obvious
00:26:47and how United
00:26:48weren't having a very good time
00:26:49at the moment
00:26:50and how they'd have
00:26:51to help him along.
00:26:53And then, oh, yes.
00:26:54Then he said
00:26:55it would be a good idea
00:26:56if Jim upended
00:26:57one of their players
00:26:58in the box.
00:26:59And what does that mean
00:27:00precisely, Mrs. Scalhorn?
00:27:02It means if he tripped
00:27:03one of their players
00:27:03in the penalty area.
00:27:05And what would the result
00:27:05of that be?
00:27:06Well, the other side
00:27:07would get a penalty
00:27:08and they score more often
00:27:09than not from penalties.
00:27:10I see.
00:27:12Did you hear anything else?
00:27:13Yes, Barney said something.
00:27:15He said
00:27:15we'd better be careful
00:27:16or we'll not only
00:27:17get rid of our friend
00:27:18but we'll end up
00:27:20back amongst the rags.
00:27:21And then Peter said
00:27:22yes, we don't want
00:27:23to be too good
00:27:24and Jim said
00:27:25you mean too bad
00:27:25and they all laughed.
00:27:27Then I shouted in
00:27:28from the kitchen
00:27:28and I think they must have
00:27:29realised that if they
00:27:30could hear me
00:27:30I could hear them.
00:27:32Anyway, they were
00:27:32quiet enough after that.
00:27:34Did they say anything
00:27:35to you?
00:27:36Did they try to find out
00:27:37if you had heard?
00:27:38No, nothing.
00:27:39But they weren't
00:27:39exactly nervous.
00:27:42Well, yes,
00:27:42I suppose you could
00:27:43say nervous.
00:27:44They never said
00:27:45out more about it.
00:27:47How long were you there?
00:27:48Oh, I was there
00:27:49a couple of hours.
00:27:50We all had this
00:27:51cup of coffee
00:27:51and kids had
00:27:53some orange juice
00:27:54and Barney
00:27:54and the other two
00:27:55they played with Gary
00:27:56for a bit.
00:27:57Diana, she sat with me.
00:27:58She didn't like going much.
00:27:59There wasn't all
00:27:59that much there for her.
00:28:00Then about 12 o'clock
00:28:02we all went home.
00:28:04Were the accused
00:28:04still there
00:28:05when you left?
00:28:06Oh, yes,
00:28:07all three of them.
00:28:08And you took the children
00:28:09to see your ex-husband
00:28:11at regular intervals
00:28:12since then?
00:28:12Yes.
00:28:13Well, up till
00:28:14a couple of months ago
00:28:15my mother started
00:28:16taking them then.
00:28:18I hadn't seen
00:28:18my ex-husband
00:28:19since then.
00:28:20Till today.
00:28:21On the occasions
00:28:22when you did go
00:28:23did you hear
00:28:23any more conversations
00:28:24along the lines
00:28:25you've already described?
00:28:26Oh, no, not about that.
00:28:27He was nearly always
00:28:27by himself.
00:28:28Except once
00:28:29when he was with
00:28:30Peter Appeldean
00:28:30but they never said
00:28:31anything,
00:28:32not about that.
00:28:33Now, Mrs. Scalhorn,
00:28:33I want you to listen
00:28:34carefully to my question
00:28:35and I want your reply
00:28:36to be equally careful.
00:28:38During the period
00:28:39between your divorce
00:28:40becoming absolute
00:28:41and the present day
00:28:42did you observe
00:28:44anything which indicated
00:28:45what your ex-husband
00:28:46felt
00:28:47towards Mr. Gruder?
00:28:49Oh, yes,
00:28:50there was one time.
00:28:51It was a Friday night
00:28:52sometime in March.
00:28:54I was at the Lido Club
00:28:55with a girlfriend
00:28:56and at about
00:28:57eleven o'clock
00:28:58in walks Barney
00:28:59and the other two
00:29:00with a crowd of girls.
00:29:02I remember telling
00:29:03my girlfriend
00:29:03at the time
00:29:04they'd get into trouble
00:29:05because Mr. Gruder
00:29:06likes the players in bed
00:29:06half past ten night
00:29:07before a match.
00:29:08Still, it weren't
00:29:09any of my business anymore
00:29:10and they were quiet enough
00:29:11and then about
00:29:13half past eleven
00:29:14in walks Mr. Gruder
00:29:15with Mr. Thomasin.
00:29:16He's the trainer.
00:29:18They walked straight
00:29:18up to the table
00:29:19where Barney
00:29:20and the other two
00:29:20were sitting
00:29:20and they told him
00:29:21to go.
00:29:22You could hear this?
00:29:23Well, no,
00:29:24I couldn't hear it
00:29:24but he pointed to the door.
00:29:25It was quite obvious.
00:29:26And what happened then?
00:29:27They didn't go.
00:29:28They just sat there.
00:29:30You could tell
00:29:30Mr. Gruder
00:29:31was trying to keep it quiet
00:29:32but a row broke out.
00:29:34I couldn't hear
00:29:34exactly what they were saying
00:29:35but I heard Jim McIver
00:29:37shout sod off once.
00:29:39Mostly it was a sort
00:29:40of a blur though.
00:29:41Anyway, after about
00:29:42ten minutes
00:29:43argy-bargy
00:29:43they all got up
00:29:44and left.
00:29:45Skelhorn, Appledean
00:29:46and McIver.
00:29:47Yes.
00:29:47How did they look
00:29:48when they left?
00:29:49Did they take it well?
00:29:50They did not.
00:29:51They looked black as thunder.
00:29:53And that's the only occasion
00:29:54of this nature
00:29:55you can recall?
00:29:56Oh, there were plenty
00:29:57of times before then
00:29:58when...
00:29:58Mrs. Skelhorn,
00:29:59we are only interested
00:30:00in what you saw
00:30:01and heard
00:30:02after you ceased
00:30:03to be married
00:30:04to the accused
00:30:05Bernard Skelhorn.
00:30:06Now, is that clear?
00:30:07Yes, my lord.
00:30:08Miss Lewis,
00:30:09you must phrase
00:30:09your questions carefully
00:30:10as I am sure
00:30:11you are aware
00:30:12when we are imprecise
00:30:14with this witness
00:30:15we are treading
00:30:15on dangerous ground.
00:30:17Yes, my lord.
00:30:18In fact,
00:30:18I have no further questions.
00:30:21Mrs. Skelhorn,
00:30:22when you overheard
00:30:23your ex-husband
00:30:24and the other two
00:30:25plotting,
00:30:25what did you do?
00:30:26Nothing.
00:30:27Why not?
00:30:28Well, it didn't sink in
00:30:29at the time.
00:30:30Oh, I see.
00:30:31When did you first
00:30:31tell someone about it?
00:30:33Well, I can't remember
00:30:34the day exactly.
00:30:34It was beginning of May,
00:30:36I think, or Tuesday.
00:30:37Anyway, the phone rang
00:30:38at nine,
00:30:39at night that was,
00:30:40and it was Doreen Pullitson,
00:30:41that's Mick Pullitson's wife.
00:30:43He's the captain
00:30:43of Fulchester Rovers.
00:30:45Anyway, she said
00:30:46that Mr. Groder
00:30:46had been sacked
00:30:47and had I heard
00:30:48and I said I hadn't.
00:30:49Was that the word
00:30:49she used, sacked?
00:30:51Yes, I think it was.
00:30:52Yes, I'm sure it was.
00:30:54Did she say anything else?
00:30:55Yes, she said
00:30:56that Mr. Groder
00:30:57had rung them,
00:30:57her husband that is,
00:30:58as soon as he'd come
00:30:59out of the boardroom.
00:31:01They were very upset.
00:31:02What was your reaction
00:31:03to the news?
00:31:04Well, I was upset too.
00:31:06He was a very nice man,
00:31:07Mr. Groder,
00:31:08and didn't sound
00:31:09as if he'd had
00:31:09a very fair deal.
00:31:10Oh, could you explain that?
00:31:11Why didn't it sound
00:31:12as if he'd had
00:31:12a very fair deal?
00:31:14Well, after I'd spoken
00:31:15to Doreen,
00:31:15I had a few words
00:31:16with Mick,
00:31:17and he said
00:31:17how some of the players
00:31:18had let Mr. Groder down,
00:31:20and he was very sorry
00:31:21to say that Barney,
00:31:23my ex-husband,
00:31:23was one of them.
00:31:25He said he had proof,
00:31:26and he was going round
00:31:26to see him next day.
00:31:28I see.
00:31:29Go on.
00:31:30Well, I came off the phone,
00:31:31and I made myself
00:31:32a cup of coffee,
00:31:32and sat down,
00:31:33and I started thinking.
00:31:35And suddenly,
00:31:35I began to remember
00:31:36that Sunday morning
00:31:37at Barney's.
00:31:38And the more I thought about it,
00:31:40the more important it got.
00:31:42So I popped round
00:31:43to my mother's,
00:31:43she lives next door,
00:31:44but two,
00:31:44and I asked her
00:31:45if she'd look after
00:31:45the children,
00:31:46and I went straight round
00:31:47to Mr. Groder's.
00:31:48What time was this?
00:31:49Oh, it'd be about
00:31:50ten o'clock time I got there.
00:31:51Ten o'clock?
00:31:52Well, didn't you consider
00:31:53it might be rather late
00:31:54to go to see Mr. Groder
00:31:54at his hotel room,
00:31:55I take it?
00:31:57Yes, it was at his hotel.
00:31:58I wouldn't normally have gone,
00:32:00except I wanted to
00:32:00get it off my chest.
00:32:02I see.
00:32:02What did Mr. Groder say?
00:32:04Well, he thanked me
00:32:05for coming,
00:32:06and he said,
00:32:07would I repeat
00:32:07what I'd heard?
00:32:08And I said I would,
00:32:09and I left.
00:32:10Mm-hmm.
00:32:11Mr. Skelland,
00:32:12what happened to you
00:32:13on June the 4th, 1973?
00:32:15I don't know.
00:32:18August the 7th?
00:32:19No idea.
00:32:20Well, let's get a little
00:32:21nearer to the present time,
00:32:22shall we?
00:32:24December the 17th.
00:32:25What did you do
00:32:25on December the 17th?
00:32:27If it helps,
00:32:28it was a Monday.
00:32:30Oh, well, I'd wash, I suppose.
00:32:32You'd wash, you suppose.
00:32:33Mrs. Skelland,
00:32:34don't you find it odd
00:32:35that you can't remember
00:32:36the events of a day in December,
00:32:37a day in August,
00:32:38a day in June,
00:32:38and yet when my learned friend
00:32:39mentions a Sunday of January
00:32:41the 21st of last year,
00:32:42you not only remembered
00:32:43where you went that day,
00:32:44but practically everything
00:32:46that was said.
00:32:47Oh, I see.
00:32:48Oh, Mrs. Skelland,
00:32:49because I don't.
00:32:50Was there something
00:32:51particularly odd
00:32:51about that day?
00:32:52It was Gary's birthday.
00:32:53My son,
00:32:54it was his fourth birthday.
00:32:56I see.
00:32:57Well, that might,
00:32:58that might explain
00:32:59why you remembered
00:33:00going where you did that day,
00:33:01but does it really explain
00:33:02how you came to recall
00:33:03so vividly
00:33:04the conversation
00:33:05between the three accused?
00:33:06I've got a very good memory.
00:33:08Oh, I see.
00:33:08But yet referring
00:33:09to the telephone call
00:33:10from Mrs. Pollitzen,
00:33:11you say,
00:33:11I can't remember
00:33:13the day exactly.
00:33:14It was the beginning of May,
00:33:16and I think it was a Tuesday,
00:33:18and your visit
00:33:19to the nightclub
00:33:20was sometime in March,
00:33:22a Friday night.
00:33:23I'm not very good at dates.
00:33:24Conversations I can remember,
00:33:26the things people say.
00:33:27Everything people say,
00:33:28or just some things?
00:33:29Oh, not everything,
00:33:30just important things.
00:33:31Ah, important things.
00:33:33Mrs. Skelland,
00:33:34living as you have done
00:33:35for some years
00:33:36in the world of football,
00:33:37you must have heard
00:33:38many arguments,
00:33:39debates,
00:33:40learned dissertations
00:33:41on the game.
00:33:42Are these all important to you?
00:33:44Oh, no.
00:33:44They bore me to tears.
00:33:46Really?
00:33:46But surely this talk
00:33:48between the three accused,
00:33:49which you say took place
00:33:50on January the 21st,
00:33:51was about football?
00:33:53Oh, not just about football.
00:33:55It was about
00:33:55what they were going to do
00:33:56to Mr. Gruder.
00:33:57Oh, to Mr. Gruder?
00:33:59Oh, do forgive me.
00:34:00I must have misheard.
00:34:01You say his name
00:34:02was mentioned
00:34:02on that occasion?
00:34:04Oh, no,
00:34:04his name wasn't mentioned,
00:34:05but they were talking about him.
00:34:07It's obvious now,
00:34:07isn't it?
00:34:10Mrs. Skelland,
00:34:10are you telling this court
00:34:12that as you stood
00:34:12in a kitchen
00:34:13making coffee
00:34:14on the morning of Sunday,
00:34:15January the 21st,
00:34:16you said to yourself,
00:34:17I am listening
00:34:18to a conversation
00:34:19which will become important
00:34:20on the evening
00:34:21of Tuesday, May the 1st.
00:34:22Is that what you're
00:34:22trying to tell us?
00:34:23No, of course I'm not.
00:34:24I wish you'd try
00:34:25to tell us something,
00:34:26Mrs. Skelland,
00:34:26because on the one hand
00:34:27you only remember
00:34:28important conversations,
00:34:29and yet on the other hand
00:34:30you remember
00:34:31an incident
00:34:32which you recalled
00:34:33most vividly,
00:34:34mentioning it
00:34:34in these words,
00:34:36and I'm not remembering
00:34:37them, Mrs. Skelland,
00:34:38I've got them written down.
00:34:40And suddenly
00:34:40I began to remember
00:34:42what I'd heard
00:34:42at Barneys
00:34:43that Sunday morning,
00:34:44and the more I thought
00:34:45the more important
00:34:47it got.
00:34:48It was important in May,
00:34:50but it wasn't important
00:34:51in January,
00:34:51and yet you remembered it.
00:34:52I did remember.
00:34:54Did you, Mrs. Skelland?
00:34:55Did you?
00:34:57Is it not a fact
00:34:58that this alleged conversation
00:34:59only achieved importance
00:35:00on May the 1st,
00:35:01or would it be truer
00:35:02to say that it was
00:35:03only born on that date
00:35:04because it is a fiction
00:35:05concocted by yourself
00:35:07and Mr. Gruder
00:35:08to support his allegations
00:35:09against the accused?
00:35:10No!
00:35:10Why should I do that?
00:35:13Why indeed.
00:35:13Now, you say
00:35:16you arrived
00:35:17at Mr. Gruder's
00:35:18hotel room
00:35:18at 10 o'clock.
00:35:20Is that correct?
00:35:21Yes.
00:35:22What time did you leave?
00:35:25I can't remember.
00:35:26What time did you leave,
00:35:27Mrs. Skelland?
00:35:29Answer the question.
00:35:31About 3 o'clock.
00:35:33In the morning?
00:35:35Yes.
00:35:43Well, do you know,
00:35:45Mr. Gruder?
00:35:46Um, not very well.
00:35:48Not very well.
00:35:49Tell me, Mrs. Skelland,
00:35:50how did you pass the time,
00:35:51a great deal of time,
00:35:52five hours of time
00:35:53in the middle of the night
00:35:54in a hotel bedroom
00:35:55with a man you knew
00:35:56not very well?
00:35:56My Lord,
00:35:57I really must protest
00:35:58at this line of questioning.
00:35:59I'm merely demonstrating,
00:36:00my Lord,
00:36:00that a relationship exists
00:36:02between Mrs. Skelland
00:36:03and the previous witness
00:36:04which puts the evidence
00:36:05in an entirely new light.
00:36:06I'm sure that is evident
00:36:07to both sides.
00:36:09Your objection has no foundation,
00:36:11Miss Lewis,
00:36:11and I would be obliged
00:36:12if you would refrain
00:36:13from time-wasting.
00:36:15Continue, please,
00:36:16Mr. Latterby.
00:36:17Thank you, my Lord.
00:36:17Would you like me
00:36:18to repeat the question,
00:36:19Mrs. Skelland?
00:36:20No.
00:36:21We talked.
00:36:22You talked for five hours?
00:36:23You repeated a conversation
00:36:25of what,
00:36:25three or four sentences to him?
00:36:26He thanked me
00:36:27and asked me
00:36:28if I'd repeat
00:36:28what I told him if necessary
00:36:29and I said I would
00:36:30and I left.
00:36:31You expect the court
00:36:32to believe that
00:36:33took five hours?
00:36:34He was upset.
00:36:35In need of comfort,
00:36:35was he, Mrs. Skelland?
00:36:36Yes!
00:36:37Who better to have
00:36:38in his hotel bedroom
00:36:39than yourself?
00:36:41Mrs. Skelland,
00:36:42where were you
00:36:42on the night of November
00:36:43the 3rd, 1972?
00:36:45Oh, but of course
00:36:46you have a bad memory
00:36:46for dates.
00:36:47Well, I'll tell you,
00:36:48you were in Newcastle
00:36:49on Tyne,
00:36:49visiting friends.
00:36:50You stayed the night.
00:36:51Now, Mr. Gruder,
00:36:52as it happens,
00:36:53was watching a football match
00:36:54in the same city.
00:36:55He stayed the night.
00:36:56On December the 6th,
00:36:57the same year,
00:36:58you visited friends
00:36:59in Liverpool.
00:37:00You stayed the night.
00:37:01Mr. Gruder was watching
00:37:02a football match
00:37:02in the same city.
00:37:03He stayed the night.
00:37:04On January the 6th...
00:37:04Do you wish me to continue,
00:37:06Mrs. Skelland?
00:37:06It isn't true!
00:37:08It isn't true!
00:37:10What isn't true,
00:37:11Mrs. Skelland?
00:37:13I suggest that you
00:37:14and Mr. Gruder
00:37:15have been on the most
00:37:15intimate terms
00:37:16for at least 18 months
00:37:18prior to his leaving
00:37:19Fultus of Rovers,
00:37:20and I suggest that
00:37:20on the night of May the 1st,
00:37:22you visited Mr. Gruder
00:37:23at his hotel,
00:37:24and that between you,
00:37:25you concocted this tissue
00:37:26of lies,
00:37:26which under oath
00:37:27you have told this court.
00:37:28And I further suggest
00:37:29that you did so
00:37:30for the two best motives
00:37:31known to your sex,
00:37:32your love for one man
00:37:33and your hatred
00:37:34for another.
00:37:38Mrs. Skelland,
00:37:39how would you describe
00:37:41your relationship
00:37:42with Mr. Gruder?
00:37:44We were friends.
00:37:45You had, of course,
00:37:46met him many times socially.
00:37:48Yes.
00:37:50Now, is there any truth
00:37:51in this suggestion
00:37:52that you were
00:37:52on intimate terms
00:37:53with Mr. Gruder?
00:37:54No.
00:37:55Or that you and he
00:37:57concocted this story
00:37:58about the visit
00:37:59to your ex-husbands?
00:38:00No.
00:38:01Thank you, Mrs. Skelland.
00:38:02That's all.
00:38:04Very well.
00:38:04You may leave
00:38:05the witness box.
00:38:07I call Michael Pollitson.
00:38:23Mr. Pollitson,
00:38:24you are club captain
00:38:25of Fulchester Rovers,
00:38:26are you not?
00:38:26Yes, that's right.
00:38:27How would you assess
00:38:28Mr. Gruder
00:38:29as a manager?
00:38:30I've always found him
00:38:31very fair.
00:38:32He works hard himself
00:38:33and expects everyone
00:38:33else to work hard.
00:38:34Well, tactically,
00:38:35I think he's a good manager.
00:38:36His briefings are always
00:38:37spot on,
00:38:37what he tells you
00:38:38about the other side.
00:38:39Were there weaknesses
00:38:39in that?
00:38:40Would you think him
00:38:41a man capable
00:38:41of telling lies
00:38:42to save his own skin?
00:38:44Possibly sending
00:38:45the three accused
00:38:46to prison
00:38:46by telling those lies?
00:38:47No, I wouldn't.
00:38:48I've always found him
00:38:49very honest.
00:38:50Now, Mr. Pollitson,
00:38:51let us turn
00:38:52to the three accused.
00:38:53Skellhorn,
00:38:54MacIver,
00:38:54and Appledean.
00:38:56How would you assess
00:38:56their play
00:38:57during the 1972-73 season?
00:39:00Ropey, I'd say.
00:39:01They played well below par,
00:39:02all three of them,
00:39:02for most of the season.
00:39:04Well, except MacIver,
00:39:05I think he started
00:39:05to try again
00:39:06about end of March,
00:39:07beginning of April,
00:39:08but he was a bit desperate
00:39:09and he was never
00:39:09at his best
00:39:10when he was desperate.
00:39:11Still, he was trying.
00:39:12What would you say
00:39:13that the three accused
00:39:15were well disposed
00:39:16towards Mr. Gruder?
00:39:18I'd say they
00:39:18hated his guts, myself.
00:39:20They hated his guts?
00:39:21Why?
00:39:22Well, they didn't like
00:39:23discipline for a start.
00:39:24They liked clubbing it
00:39:24and Mr. Gruder
00:39:25put the blocks on that
00:39:25right from the start.
00:39:27Oh, yeah,
00:39:27then Appledean
00:39:28got this offer of,
00:39:29well, quite a lot of money
00:39:30to write articles
00:39:31for the Gazette
00:39:31and Mr. Gruder
00:39:32put a stop to that.
00:39:33Well, there was a clause
00:39:33in the contract
00:39:34and he made him stick to it.
00:39:35I see.
00:39:36Now, Mr. Pollitson,
00:39:37would you tell the court
00:39:37where you were
00:39:38on the evening of
00:39:39January the 27th, 1973?
00:39:42Yeah, in the bar
00:39:43of the club.
00:39:43And was anybody else there
00:39:45whom you see
00:39:45in this court today?
00:39:47Yes, they were.
00:39:48The defendants.
00:39:49And they were often there,
00:39:50were they not?
00:39:50More often than not,
00:39:51I'd say.
00:39:52Yes.
00:39:53Now, did you hear
00:39:53a conversation between
00:39:54the defendants
00:39:55and anyone else?
00:39:56Yes, they were talking
00:39:57to George Pinnock.
00:39:58Who is that?
00:39:59Oh, the captain
00:40:00of the opposing team.
00:40:00I see.
00:40:01And would you tell the court
00:40:02what it was that you heard?
00:40:04Yeah, well, it was like this.
00:40:06They came over to Pinnock
00:40:07and congratulated him
00:40:08on scoring a penalty
00:40:09against us.
00:40:10It was the winning goal,
00:40:10in fact.
00:40:11We lost the match, 1-0.
00:40:12They congratulated Pinnock
00:40:14on scoring the winning goal
00:40:15from a penalty.
00:40:17Isn't this rather
00:40:18unusual behaviour?
00:40:19Yeah, it struck me
00:40:20like that too,
00:40:20so I pricked up my ears.
00:40:22Well, then Pinnock said
00:40:22that it was more than
00:40:23his life was worth
00:40:24to have missed
00:40:24and that he would have been
00:40:26severely disciplined
00:40:27by his manager.
00:40:28And then Appaldean
00:40:29said that he should
00:40:30get rid of the manager
00:40:31if that was the type
00:40:31of little Hitler
00:40:32that he was
00:40:32and that if you knew how
00:40:34it was as easy as pie.
00:40:36Oh, and then Skelhorn
00:40:37said that if Pinnock
00:40:38got rid of the manager
00:40:39there'd be another one
00:40:40going cheap.
00:40:41He said he should
00:40:42get rid of the manager
00:40:43and if you knew how
00:40:44it was as easy as pie.
00:40:47Now, Mr. Pollison,
00:40:48did you get the impression
00:40:49that this was said
00:40:49in earnest
00:40:50or as some kind
00:40:51of light-hearted repitee?
00:40:53Oh, no, they were
00:40:54serious, all right.
00:40:54You only had to look
00:40:55at their faces.
00:40:57Now, as club captain
00:40:59you and your wife
00:41:00are responsible for
00:41:00much of the social life
00:41:01of the club,
00:41:02is that correct?
00:41:02Yeah, that's right.
00:41:04Are you aware
00:41:05of any relationship
00:41:06which exists
00:41:07or existed
00:41:08between Mr. Gruder
00:41:09and Mrs. Skelhorn
00:41:10beyond the normal
00:41:11relationship
00:41:12between a manager
00:41:13and the wife
00:41:14of one of his players?
00:41:15No.
00:41:16Thank you, Mr. Pollison.
00:41:17Mr. Pollison,
00:41:20how old are you?
00:41:2131.
00:41:22Getting towards
00:41:23the end of the road?
00:41:24I've got a few years
00:41:25of me yet.
00:41:26Let's hope so.
00:41:27You enjoy being
00:41:28club captain?
00:41:28Yes.
00:41:29Playing first team football?
00:41:30Yeah.
00:41:31Are you aware
00:41:32that for some time
00:41:32certain elements
00:41:33of the board
00:41:34have wished
00:41:34to relieve you
00:41:35of the captaincy
00:41:36and indeed to drop you
00:41:37from the first team
00:41:38altogether?
00:41:39Well, no.
00:41:40Mr. Gruder
00:41:40was your champion
00:41:41on these occasions
00:41:42and it was only
00:41:42at his insistence
00:41:43that you kept
00:41:44the captaincy
00:41:44and your place
00:41:45on the team.
00:41:46No, I'd heard
00:41:47rumours.
00:41:48You'd heard rumours.
00:41:49Did you believe them?
00:41:50Well, Mr. Gruder
00:41:51always had faith in me.
00:41:52Yes, yes.
00:41:53He brought you
00:41:53with him
00:41:54from his previous
00:41:54club, didn't he?
00:41:56Yes.
00:41:56So he would be
00:41:57anxious to justify
00:41:57his action
00:41:58by continuing
00:41:58to play you
00:41:59in the first team.
00:42:00I didn't let him down.
00:42:01I beg your pardon?
00:42:02What was that?
00:42:03I said I didn't
00:42:03let him down.
00:42:04Indeed you didn't
00:42:04and you're not
00:42:05letting him down now,
00:42:06are you?
00:42:06You're showing
00:42:06how grateful you are,
00:42:07aren't you,
00:42:08for coming here
00:42:08and telling a few lies
00:42:09on his behalf.
00:42:10Lies like this conversation
00:42:11you pretend to have
00:42:12overheard between
00:42:12George Pinnock
00:42:13and the defendants.
00:42:15Tell me,
00:42:16Mr. Polletson,
00:42:17on the occasion
00:42:17of that conversation
00:42:18was the bar crowded?
00:42:20Fairly.
00:42:21Fairly.
00:42:21Only fairly crowded
00:42:22after a match.
00:42:23Oh come,
00:42:23Mr. Polletson,
00:42:24it was packed,
00:42:25wasn't it?
00:42:26Well, I suppose
00:42:26you could say that.
00:42:27Yes,
00:42:28and yet you heard
00:42:28this conversation
00:42:29so clearly
00:42:29as to have
00:42:30almost total recall.
00:42:32Oh yes,
00:42:33and Mr. Polletson,
00:42:35haven't you ever
00:42:36congratulated
00:42:36a member
00:42:37of the opposing team
00:42:38on his play?
00:42:39Well, perhaps,
00:42:40once or twice.
00:42:41Yes,
00:42:41it's something
00:42:42called sportsmanship,
00:42:42isn't it?
00:42:43Fairly common occurrence,
00:42:45I'd have hoped.
00:42:45It was a tone
00:42:45of their voice,
00:42:46the way they said it.
00:42:46There was nothing
00:42:47sportsmanlike about it.
00:42:48Mr. Polletson,
00:42:49you just said
00:42:50a moment ago
00:42:50that you could only
00:42:51tell the tone
00:42:52of the conversation
00:42:52by the looks
00:42:53on their faces.
00:42:55No, Mr. Polletson,
00:42:56I suggest
00:42:57that you have
00:42:58deliberately placed
00:42:59a sinister interpretation
00:43:00on a perfectly
00:43:01innocuous conversation.
00:43:02And I suggest
00:43:03that this is just
00:43:04part of your gentleman's
00:43:05agreement
00:43:05with Mr. Gruder.
00:43:06He helps you out
00:43:07in the boardroom,
00:43:08you help him out
00:43:08in the court.
00:43:09I have only told
00:43:10the truth.
00:43:11Come now,
00:43:11Mr. Polletson,
00:43:11you must have been
00:43:12a little grateful
00:43:13for, weren't you
00:43:13grateful to Mr. Gruder
00:43:14for standing by you
00:43:15so loyally?
00:43:16Yes, of course I was.
00:43:17Yes, thank you,
00:43:18Mr. Polletson.
00:43:19Any further questions?
00:43:20No re-examination,
00:43:21my lord.
00:43:22Very well then,
00:43:22you may leave
00:43:23the witness, Mark.
00:43:25That concludes
00:43:27the case
00:43:28for the prosecution,
00:43:28my lord.
00:43:30Mr. Latterby?
00:43:32Please,
00:43:33your lordship,
00:43:33I should like
00:43:34to call the accused
00:43:35in the following order,
00:43:36Skelhorn,
00:43:36MacIver,
00:43:37Appledean.
00:43:38Very well.
00:43:38A burner Skelhorn,
00:43:39please.
00:43:41What is your religion?
00:43:55A CV.
00:43:56Take the book
00:43:56in your right hand
00:43:57and read aloud
00:43:58the words on this card.
00:43:59I swear by almighty God
00:44:00that the evidence
00:44:01I shall give
00:44:01shall be the truth,
00:44:02the whole truth
00:44:02and nothing but the truth.
00:44:04Is your name
00:44:04Bernard Skelhorn
00:44:05and do you live
00:44:05at flat 4 Maple Court,
00:44:06Mount Troy Avenue,
00:44:07Fultesville?
00:44:08Yes.
00:44:09What do you do
00:44:09for a living?
00:44:10I'm a professional footballer.
00:44:11Every sense of the word?
00:44:13Yes.
00:44:14Now, you've heard
00:44:14all the evidence
00:44:15given by the prosecution
00:44:16witnesses in this case.
00:44:17If you could describe
00:44:18that evidence
00:44:19in one word,
00:44:20what would that word be?
00:44:22Well, I know the word
00:44:23I'd like to use,
00:44:24but rubbish, rubbish.
00:44:27Yes, well,
00:44:28I think we can
00:44:28sweep it all up
00:44:29quite quickly.
00:44:30Now, Mr. Skelhorn,
00:44:31have you at any time
00:44:32entered into a conspiracy
00:44:33with MacIver and Appeldean?
00:44:35No.
00:44:36Supposing that this conspiracy
00:44:37had been formed
00:44:38and that the alleged actions
00:44:39had been taken
00:44:40resulting in failure
00:44:41and ultimate relegation,
00:44:42what would have been
00:44:43in it for you?
00:44:45Well, third division football
00:44:46instead of second.
00:44:47Less chance of being picked
00:44:48for representative games,
00:44:50lower standard of living.
00:44:51Yes, well,
00:44:51I don't think we need
00:44:52to go any further.
00:44:52It was hardly in your interests
00:44:53to act in the way alleged.
00:44:55Hardly.
00:44:57Now, Mr. Skelhorn,
00:44:58would you describe
00:44:58the relationship
00:44:59between your ex-wife
00:45:01and Mr. Gruder
00:45:01as friendly?
00:45:03Yeah, I would.
00:45:04Very, very friendly.
00:45:07Now, to your knowledge,
00:45:08do they see
00:45:08a great deal of each other
00:45:09after the breakup
00:45:10of your marriage?
00:45:11Oh, yeah.
00:45:12Well, the lads were always
00:45:12telling me they'd seen
00:45:13him up and down the town.
00:45:14Mr. Skelhorn,
00:45:15that is hearsay.
00:45:16We are only interested
00:45:17in what you yourself
00:45:18saw and heard,
00:45:19not what other people
00:45:20have told you
00:45:21that they saw and heard.
00:45:23Members of the jury
00:45:24will disregard that remark.
00:45:25That was mere gossip.
00:45:28Could I ask you,
00:45:29Mr. Skelhorn,
00:45:29if you yourself
00:45:30had seen your ex-wife
00:45:31and Mr. Gruder
00:45:32together?
00:45:33Oh, yeah.
00:45:34Yeah, I knocked into them
00:45:35in a pub in the town
00:45:35a couple of times
00:45:36and, yes,
00:45:37they were at Wembley
00:45:38together for the cup final
00:45:39and I saw them there.
00:45:42Now, if I may turn
00:45:43to Mr. Pollitson's evidence
00:45:44regarding a conversation
00:45:45he says he'd overheard
00:45:46between a George Pinnock
00:45:48and yourself,
00:45:48can you recall
00:45:49this conversation?
00:45:51No, I can't
00:45:51because it never happened.
00:45:53Why should Mr. Pollitson
00:45:54say that it did?
00:45:56No idea.
00:45:57Well, mind you,
00:45:57him and George Pinnock
00:45:58are great mates.
00:45:59You know,
00:45:59the same school,
00:46:00same youth team.
00:46:01They've known each other
00:46:01for years.
00:46:02Oh, I see.
00:46:04Thank you very much,
00:46:04Mr. Skelhorn.
00:46:05No further questions.
00:46:06Mr. Skelhorn,
00:46:08I should like to read you
00:46:09a passage from an article
00:46:10by the sports editor
00:46:11of the Fullchester Gazette
00:46:12which appeared in that paper
00:46:14on Monday,
00:46:15March 26, 1973.
00:46:17And talking of disappearing acts,
00:46:20what has happened
00:46:20to the Barney Skelhorn
00:46:21we all knew and loved?
00:46:24Last Saturday
00:46:24saw the latest
00:46:25in a long string
00:46:26of below-par performances
00:46:28and prompts this
00:46:29one-time admirer
00:46:30to ask,
00:46:31is Barney,
00:46:32at the tender age of 27,
00:46:34over the hill?
00:46:36Did you read that article,
00:46:37Mr. Skelhorn?
00:46:39Well,
00:46:40were you deliberately
00:46:41playing badly
00:46:42or are you,
00:46:43as the article suggests,
00:46:45over the hill?
00:47:09The case of the Queen
00:47:11against Appaldean,
00:47:12MacIver and Skelhorn
00:47:13will be resumed tomorrow
00:47:14in the Crown Court.
00:47:15Barney Skelhorn,
00:47:42Jim MacIver
00:47:43and Peter Appaldean,
00:47:44three of Fullchester Rover's
00:47:45first-team players
00:47:46are jointly charged
00:47:47with conspiring
00:47:48to bring about
00:47:49the termination
00:47:50of the employment
00:47:51of one Alexander Gruder,
00:47:53a manager of
00:47:54Fullchester Rover's
00:47:54football club,
00:47:55by failing to perform
00:47:56their own contract
00:47:57with the club.
00:47:59It's been alleged
00:47:59by Alexander Gruder,
00:48:01Rover's Polish-born
00:48:02ex-manager,
00:48:03that their actions
00:48:04resulted in relegation
00:48:05to the third division
00:48:06and his premature release
00:48:07by the club.
00:48:09His allegations
00:48:10have been supported
00:48:11by Margaret Skelhorn,
00:48:12ex-wife of one
00:48:13of the accused
00:48:14who told the court
00:48:15of a conversation
00:48:16she overheard
00:48:16between the three players
00:48:17which, if true,
00:48:19indicated a conspiracy
00:48:20between them,
00:48:21by Mick Pollitson,
00:48:22the club captain
00:48:23who spoke of the enmity
00:48:24between the accused
00:48:25and the ex-manager,
00:48:26and by the evidence
00:48:27of a member
00:48:27of an opposing team
00:48:29of a further incriminating
00:48:30conversation involving
00:48:31the accused men.
00:48:33Barney Skelhorn,
00:48:34the first defence witness,
00:48:36is on the stand.
00:48:38Mr Skelhorn,
00:48:39is it true you were not
00:48:40playing at your best
00:48:41during the period
00:48:42referred to in the
00:48:43newspaper article?
00:48:44No, I wasn't playing
00:48:45too good.
00:48:45It happens.
00:48:46It had been happening
00:48:47consistently for months.
00:48:49Why?
00:48:51Well, getting divorced
00:48:52and losing your kids
00:48:53don't help.
00:48:53Ah, are you telling
00:48:54the court that your divorce
00:48:55was the reason
00:48:56for your loss of form?
00:48:57Well, I was down.
00:48:58Them sort of things
00:48:59affect your game.
00:49:00Aren't you encouraged
00:49:01to take personal problems
00:49:02to a club official,
00:49:03the manager?
00:49:04To Gruder?
00:49:04Well, that would
00:49:05have been a laugh.
00:49:06Well, let's get on
00:49:07to more serious matters,
00:49:08shall we?
00:49:09I am correct in saying,
00:49:10am I not,
00:49:11that in 1971,
00:49:12Fulchester Rovers
00:49:13was drawn against Arsenal
00:49:14at Highbury
00:49:15in the fourth round
00:49:16of the FA Cup.
00:49:17That's correct, yeah.
00:49:19One of the most
00:49:20prestigious games
00:49:21to be played
00:49:21by the club
00:49:21for several years.
00:49:22Am I right?
00:49:23It was important, yeah.
00:49:25It was very important.
00:49:27And you were dropped,
00:49:28weren't you,
00:49:29Mr Skelhorn?
00:49:29And not because
00:49:30you were off form,
00:49:31but because of
00:49:32a disciplinary measure.
00:49:33Okay, so I was dropped.
00:49:35So what?
00:49:35So that,
00:49:36Mr Skelhorn,
00:49:37was when you began
00:49:37your hatred
00:49:38for Mr Gruder.
00:49:40A hatred which was
00:49:40to lead you to say
00:49:41in front of many witnesses
00:49:43that you would get
00:49:44that bastard Gruder.
00:49:46A hatred which led you
00:49:47finally,
00:49:48with the help
00:49:48of your friends,
00:49:50to do just that.
00:49:53No further questions,
00:49:54my lord.
00:49:54Mr Skelhorn,
00:49:55how many professional
00:49:57footballers would you say
00:49:58have at some time
00:49:59in the course
00:49:59of their career
00:50:00said they would get
00:50:01their manager?
00:50:0399% of them.
00:50:05Thank you, Mr Skelhorn.
00:50:06Does your lordship
00:50:07have any questions?
00:50:09Very well,
00:50:10Mr Skelhorn,
00:50:10you may go back
00:50:11to the doctor.
00:50:12I call Douglas James McIver.
00:50:14Mr McIver,
00:50:24have you ever
00:50:25deliberately played
00:50:25football badly?
00:50:26No, I haven't.
00:50:27Have you ever conspired
00:50:28with Skelhorn and Appledee
00:50:29to play football badly?
00:50:30No, I haven't.
00:50:32What did you think
00:50:32of Mr Gruder?
00:50:34He was all right.
00:50:36A bit of a Marianne,
00:50:37it seems,
00:50:37but he was okay.
00:50:39Thank you,
00:50:40that's all.
00:50:42Mr Gruder was okay.
00:50:43At all times?
00:50:45Aye, that's right.
00:50:46Was he okay
00:50:47during a certain
00:50:47nightclub incident
00:50:48which Mrs Skelhorn
00:50:49has referred to,
00:50:50the Lido in
00:50:51Great Hartford Street?
00:50:52Do you know the place?
00:50:53I've been in there
00:50:54once or twice.
00:50:55You were in there,
00:50:55were you not,
00:50:56one Friday night
00:50:57in March 1973
00:50:58when a row broke out
00:51:00between yourself,
00:51:01Appledee and Skelhorn
00:51:02on the one hand
00:51:03and Mr Gruder
00:51:03on the other.
00:51:04It was the row.
00:51:05It was more of a...
00:51:08Well, it wasn't
00:51:08a row.
00:51:09Really?
00:51:10Do you recall
00:51:10saying to Mr Gruder
00:51:11at one point,
00:51:12get off our
00:51:13backs,
00:51:14you bloody
00:51:14great Jesse?
00:51:15I might have done it.
00:51:18I can't remember.
00:51:19I'd had a few bevies.
00:51:20Mr MacGyver,
00:51:22I've heard of a
00:51:23Mary Ann
00:51:23and a Jesse,
00:51:25but bevies?
00:51:27A few drinks,
00:51:28Your Honor.
00:51:29Ah, I see.
00:51:30What would this mean,
00:51:31get off our backs?
00:51:34I can't remember.
00:51:35Like I said,
00:51:35he's a bit of a
00:51:36Mary Ann at times.
00:51:37He was more than
00:51:38a bit of a Mary Ann
00:51:39to you,
00:51:40wasn't he?
00:51:41He was the man
00:51:42who was a threat
00:51:44to your swinging life.
00:51:45He was the man
00:51:46who wanted you
00:51:46to be in bed
00:51:47at 10.30
00:51:48when you wanted
00:51:48to be out drinking.
00:51:50He was the man
00:51:50who was the disciplinarian.
00:51:52You were the man
00:51:53who hated discipline.
00:51:54So that when
00:51:55Skelhorn and Appledean
00:51:57suggested you join
00:51:58with them
00:51:58in bringing about
00:51:59his downfall,
00:52:00you only too
00:52:01readily agreed.
00:52:02No, that's rubbish.
00:52:04Fulchester Gazette,
00:52:06January the 29th,
00:52:071973,
00:52:09I quote.
00:52:10And then,
00:52:11as rovers appeared
00:52:12to be coasting home
00:52:12with an undeserved point,
00:52:14came MacIver's brainstorm.
00:52:17For no apparent reason
00:52:18and under the eyes
00:52:19of an astonished referee
00:52:20and a disbelieving crowd,
00:52:22the Chunky Scott
00:52:23chopped down Hamilton
00:52:24a good two yards
00:52:25inside the box.
00:52:27Do you remember
00:52:27that article?
00:52:28No.
00:52:29But it quotes accurately,
00:52:31does it not,
00:52:31what happened?
00:52:32There was a penalty,
00:52:34aye.
00:52:34The rest,
00:52:35slander.
00:52:36Ah, defamatory,
00:52:38is it?
00:52:38Did you sue for slander
00:52:40or complain
00:52:40to the newspapers
00:52:41at all?
00:52:43Well, no.
00:52:44No.
00:52:45No, indeed.
00:52:46I suggest to you,
00:52:47Mr MacIver,
00:52:48that the reason
00:52:48for your giving away
00:52:49that penalty
00:52:50has become
00:52:51startlingly obvious.
00:52:52I don't know
00:52:53what you're talking about.
00:52:54I call Peter Appledean.
00:52:58Mr Appledean,
00:52:59have you at any time
00:53:00conspired with any person
00:53:01or persons
00:53:02to commit acts
00:53:03which would affect
00:53:03adversely the career
00:53:05of Alexander Gruder?
00:53:07Never.
00:53:08Can you offer
00:53:08any explanation
00:53:09as to why Mr Gruder
00:53:10should accuse you
00:53:11of such a conspiracy?
00:53:13Yes, I can.
00:53:15Mr Gruder
00:53:15was a little man,
00:53:17a petty dictator,
00:53:18a fascist.
00:53:20He liked making rules,
00:53:21but he didn't much care
00:53:22whether they were good
00:53:22or bad.
00:53:24And like all little men,
00:53:26when things began
00:53:26to go wrong,
00:53:27he began to squeal
00:53:29like a stuck pig.
00:53:30You make no secret
00:53:32of your dislike
00:53:33for Mr Gruder.
00:53:34Well, I never have.
00:53:35I dislike any man
00:53:36who clings to a job
00:53:36he can't do.
00:53:38And Gruder was no more
00:53:39a manager than
00:53:40I'm a prime minister.
00:53:41He couldn't handle men.
00:53:43He never had any do's.
00:53:44They were always don'ts.
00:53:45And how did this attitude
00:53:46lead to his accusation?
00:53:49Well, first of all,
00:53:49it led to our being
00:53:50relegated,
00:53:51and that had been
00:53:51on the cars
00:53:52from the beginning
00:53:52of the season.
00:53:54Gruder was an Alf Ramsey man.
00:53:56He didn't believe
00:53:57in wingers.
00:53:57Well, that's what I was.
00:53:58I was fast.
00:53:59I could beat a back
00:54:01across from the byline.
00:54:02Jim McIver'd knock him in.
00:54:04Well, I thought
00:54:04that was what
00:54:04I'd been bought for.
00:54:06But it wasn't the way
00:54:08Mr Gruder used me.
00:54:10No, he had me
00:54:10fetching and carrying,
00:54:12wandering about
00:54:12all over the park.
00:54:14I think he saw me
00:54:15as the Martin Peters
00:54:16of Fulchester Rovers.
00:54:18From all accounts,
00:54:19you didn't fill the role
00:54:20very successfully.
00:54:20It's been suggested
00:54:21you didn't play well
00:54:23for much of the season.
00:54:25I admit it.
00:54:26I didn't play well.
00:54:26I didn't like
00:54:27what I was being asked to do.
00:54:28It was bound to affect my game.
00:54:30I wasn't the only one.
00:54:31The whole team played badly.
00:54:32You're bound to
00:54:33when you've got a manager
00:54:34who doesn't know
00:54:35what he's doing.
00:54:35And this, you submit,
00:54:37led to relegation?
00:54:38Yes.
00:54:39Yes, I do.
00:54:40I think with another manager,
00:54:41we'd have had a very good chance
00:54:42of staying up.
00:54:44Were you surprised to hear
00:54:45that Mr Gruder's contract
00:54:46had not been renewed?
00:54:47Nope.
00:54:48Were you pleased to hear it?
00:54:49Yes, I was.
00:54:49I thought it was the best thing
00:54:50that could have happened
00:54:51to the club.
00:54:52One more point.
00:54:53How difficult is it
00:54:55to deliberately
00:54:56to play football badly?
00:54:59Well, it's easy
00:55:00if you're a bad footballer.
00:55:02No, but if you're
00:55:03a good footballer,
00:55:03it's practically impossible,
00:55:05particularly when you've got
00:55:05a 20,000 crowd
00:55:08strong looking at you.
00:55:10Well, and a full press box as well.
00:55:13No more questions,
00:55:13my lord.
00:55:15Mr Appeldean,
00:55:16you told my learned friend
00:55:18that Mr Gruder
00:55:18was no more a manager
00:55:19than you were a prime minister.
00:55:21Did you mean this
00:55:21as a compliment?
00:55:25I think you'd better
00:55:25explain that.
00:55:27Oh, dear,
00:55:27I was hoping
00:55:28for an explanation from you.
00:55:29But if you insist,
00:55:30what I mean,
00:55:31Mr Appeldean,
00:55:32is that you do indeed
00:55:33see yourself
00:55:33as a prime minister.
00:55:35Prime minister
00:55:35of an anarchist state,
00:55:37if there is
00:55:37such a contradiction
00:55:38in terms,
00:55:39but a political leader
00:55:40nonetheless,
00:55:40you are a political animal,
00:55:42are you not?
00:55:43We all are.
00:55:44I had hope
00:55:45for practical fact
00:55:46rather than dogma.
00:55:48Still,
00:55:48when you were at university,
00:55:50Mr Appeldean,
00:55:51were you the secretary
00:55:52and leading light
00:55:53of a student anarchist
00:55:54organization?
00:55:56I was a lot of things
00:55:57at university.
00:55:58Answer the question.
00:56:00I was secretary
00:56:02of a political group,
00:56:03yes,
00:56:03but we weren't anarchists,
00:56:06we were socialists.
00:56:07I imagine most socialists
00:56:09would have disowned you.
00:56:11I imagine
00:56:12we'd have disowned
00:56:12most socialists.
00:56:14I'm sure you would.
00:56:15You disliked establishment
00:56:17in any form,
00:56:18did you not?
00:56:19I distrusted it.
00:56:20I distrust any group
00:56:22that tries to cement
00:56:23itself into power.
00:56:24And you consider it
00:56:25your duty
00:56:25to break up that cement?
00:56:27Yes,
00:56:28and there are millions
00:56:29like me.
00:56:30Now be careful,
00:56:31Mr Appeldean,
00:56:31there may well be millions
00:56:32who entertain a vague
00:56:33dislike of the establishment,
00:56:35but there are very few
00:56:35who consider it their duty
00:56:36to do something about it.
00:56:38You are one of those few,
00:56:39you are prepared
00:56:40to take active steps,
00:56:41are you not?
00:56:42Well now,
00:56:43look,
00:56:43if you mean by that
00:56:44that I took active steps
00:56:45against Gruder,
00:56:46then you're wrong.
00:56:46I was not mentioning
00:56:47Mr Gruder,
00:56:48but since you've introduced him,
00:56:50did you see Mr Gruder
00:56:51as an establishment figure?
00:56:54A little one.
00:56:55A little one may be,
00:56:56but an establishment figure
00:56:58nonetheless.
00:56:58And what's more,
00:56:59and this really damned him
00:57:00in your eyes,
00:57:01a man who'd sold
00:57:02his enlightened birthright
00:57:03to embrace the materialistic
00:57:05lifestyle of the decadent West?
00:57:07This is not the McCarthy Tribunal.
00:57:09Mr Lotterby,
00:57:10I am no more anxious
00:57:11than you to partake
00:57:12in a witch hunt.
00:57:13However,
00:57:13the unfortunate fact is
00:57:15the political motivation
00:57:16of every shade
00:57:17is demanding more and more
00:57:19of the court's time.
00:57:22And I cannot rule out
00:57:23the possibility
00:57:24that such a motivation
00:57:25might apply to this case.
00:57:27Nor will I rule
00:57:28that such questioning
00:57:30is necessarily inappropriate.
00:57:33And I think,
00:57:34actually,
00:57:34this is a very good time
00:57:35to adjourn for lunch.
00:57:37Court will rise.
00:57:53Mr Appeldean,
00:57:54you have told this court
00:57:55that you consider it
00:57:56your duty to destroy
00:57:57the establishment
00:57:58in all its forms
00:57:59and that you considered
00:58:00Mr Gruder
00:58:01a member of that establishment.
00:58:03Is that correct?
00:58:05No.
00:58:06No, I said that I
00:58:08distrusted
00:58:09the establishment
00:58:10in all its forms,
00:58:11but some of it,
00:58:14all right,
00:58:14most of it,
00:58:15needs destroying, yeah.
00:58:16And Mr Gruder,
00:58:17did he need to be destroyed?
00:58:20Yes.
00:58:21So you set about
00:58:23destroying him?
00:58:24I set about thinking of it,
00:58:26but before I could
00:58:27get an answer,
00:58:28he destroyed himself.
00:58:29You were not concerned
00:58:30with his destruction?
00:58:32I was concerned with it,
00:58:33but not in it.
00:58:36Nobody could have,
00:58:38certainly not me,
00:58:39we could have destroyed him.
00:58:41No footballer can play
00:58:42badly on purpose
00:58:45for so long
00:58:45and get away with it.
00:58:46But you haven't got away
00:58:47with it yet,
00:58:48have you, Mr Appeldean?
00:58:50Let us look for a while
00:58:52at what footballers
00:58:53can and cannot do.
00:58:54Now what you are telling
00:58:55this court,
00:58:56and correct me if I'm wrong,
00:58:57is that a professional footballer
00:58:58plays by instinct
00:58:59and that that instinct
00:59:00makes it impossible
00:59:01for him to lower his game.
00:59:04Yes, that's what I'm saying.
00:59:06You don't have time.
00:59:08The game's too fast nowadays.
00:59:09Anybody who could do that
00:59:10would have to be very clever.
00:59:12To do it over most of a season,
00:59:15you'd have to be a miracle worker.
00:59:16Really, Mr Appeldean?
00:59:18Well, I've watched a good deal
00:59:19of so-called first-class football.
00:59:21And if you're right,
00:59:22then I've seen many clever men.
00:59:23So who knows,
00:59:24there may be one or two
00:59:25miracle workers too.
00:59:27How do you explain,
00:59:28for instance,
00:59:28the team who,
00:59:29leading 1-0 with five minutes to go,
00:59:31finds it apparently impossible
00:59:33to move at anything
00:59:34other than a snail's pace
00:59:35or to kick the ball
00:59:36more than two yards back
00:59:37to the point of a free kick
00:59:39or indeed to let the ball
00:59:40leave their hands
00:59:41from a throw-in?
00:59:42But reverse the score
00:59:43and have them losing 1-0
00:59:45and what happens?
00:59:47Everyone is galvanised
00:59:48into action.
00:59:49The ball's sent unerringly
00:59:50back to where it's wanted.
00:59:51Throws taken like lightning.
00:59:53Now, this may seem
00:59:53to be collective,
00:59:54but in fact,
00:59:55it is individual.
00:59:57How would you describe
00:59:58the player who lies
00:59:59apparently dead
01:00:00in the middle of the pitch
01:00:01one second
01:00:02and the next is grimly
01:00:03defending his own goal
01:00:04at the other end?
01:00:05Or the attacker
01:00:05who trips headlong
01:00:07over a blade of grass
01:00:08in the penalty area
01:00:09the minute a defender
01:00:09approaches him?
01:00:11Or are you saying
01:00:12that these all form
01:00:14parts of professional football
01:00:16as you are taught
01:00:18to play it?
01:00:19No, I'm not saying that.
01:00:22But you're bound
01:00:22to get the odd clown.
01:00:24These are the blokes
01:00:25you've been talking about,
01:00:26the clowns.
01:00:26Oh, come now,
01:00:27Mr Appeldean,
01:00:28these are not the clowns.
01:00:30These are the quick thinkers,
01:00:31by our own definition,
01:00:32the miracle men.
01:00:34And there are more of them
01:00:35than you're prepared to admit.
01:00:36You are one yourself.
01:00:37So is Skelhorn,
01:00:38so is MacIver.
01:00:39But you were clever.
01:00:40You planned it.
01:00:41But the conspiracy
01:00:42was your idea,
01:00:43wasn't it?
01:00:44Oh, yeah.
01:00:45I believe in cutting
01:00:47my own throat.
01:00:48Look, it pays to win,
01:00:49you know.
01:00:50But you were winning,
01:00:51Mr Appeldean.
01:00:52The club was losing,
01:00:54but not you.
01:00:55Now, I don't know
01:00:56how you persuaded
01:00:57Skelhorn and MacIver
01:00:58that it was worth
01:00:59losing all those winning bonuses,
01:01:01worth going down
01:01:01to the third division,
01:01:02but you needed
01:01:03no such persuasion,
01:01:04did you?
01:01:04Because you weren't
01:01:05going with them.
01:01:08Where were you
01:01:09on the afternoon
01:01:10of Sunday,
01:01:10this September
01:01:11the 10th, 1973?
01:01:14I have no idea.
01:01:15Really?
01:01:16Well, then I'll tell you.
01:01:17You were lunching
01:01:17in a hotel in Birmingham
01:01:19with the chairman
01:01:20of a well-known
01:01:21London First Division club.
01:01:22A highly irregular approach
01:01:26was made to you
01:01:27and you showed
01:01:27your interest.
01:01:29Now, do you remember?
01:01:30It must have been
01:01:30someone else.
01:01:33It wasn't me.
01:01:36No more questions.
01:01:40No re-examination,
01:01:41my lord.
01:01:43Very well.
01:01:44You may go back
01:01:45to the dock.
01:01:46I call
01:01:46Brian Roderick Martindale.
01:01:48Brian Roderick Martindale,
01:01:50please.
01:01:58Keep the prisoners' quiet life.
01:02:01You tell the court
01:02:02your name and address,
01:02:03please.
01:02:03Brian Roderick Martindale.
01:02:04I live at Magnolia Lodge,
01:02:06Little Helston.
01:02:06You're a textile manufacturer
01:02:08by trade and by hobby
01:02:09director and chairman
01:02:09of Fultis the Rovers.
01:02:10Is that correct?
01:02:11That's correct, yes.
01:02:11Did you attend
01:02:12all of your club's matches
01:02:13last season?
01:02:13Yes, as a matter of fact,
01:02:14I did.
01:02:15I normally miss two or three
01:02:15for business reasons,
01:02:16but last season,
01:02:17happily,
01:02:17I was able to get
01:02:18to every match.
01:02:19Mr Martindale,
01:02:19would it be possible,
01:02:20in your opinion,
01:02:21for a professional footballer
01:02:22to throw matches
01:02:24without it being obvious?
01:02:25From what I know of football,
01:02:26it would be quite impossible
01:02:27for any player to do that
01:02:28without it being patently obvious.
01:02:29Did it occur to you
01:02:30while watching
01:02:31Fultis the Rovers play
01:02:32that the three accused
01:02:33were deliberately
01:02:34playing badly
01:02:35or throwing matches?
01:02:37No, it certainly did not.
01:02:38Have you ever
01:02:39rowed with Mr Gruder?
01:02:41No.
01:02:42We've had differences
01:02:43of opinion,
01:02:44but we've never rowed.
01:02:46No further questions?
01:02:48Did you see eye to eye
01:02:49with Mr Gruder
01:02:50on football matters,
01:02:52particularly those
01:02:52pertaining to
01:02:53Fultis the Rovers?
01:02:54No, I'm afraid not.
01:02:56I always thought him
01:02:56rather hidebound
01:02:57in his approach to the game.
01:02:59Rovers needed
01:03:00a different style of play,
01:03:01and to be honest,
01:03:02I don't think
01:03:02it was within
01:03:03Mr Gruder's nature
01:03:03to provide it.
01:03:04What was your reaction
01:03:05to the allegations
01:03:06made by Mr Gruder
01:03:07that he'd been let down
01:03:08by three of his team?
01:03:09Well, I wasn't surprised.
01:03:11To my mind,
01:03:12Mr Gruder typifies
01:03:13the sort of man
01:03:14who can't bear
01:03:15to have his ability
01:03:16questioned.
01:03:17Point of phrase.
01:03:19The sort of man
01:03:20who would clutch
01:03:20at any straw
01:03:21to save himself
01:03:22from drowning
01:03:22in the sea
01:03:23of his own inadequacy.
01:03:25A most graphic phrase,
01:03:27Mr Martindale.
01:03:29Mr Martindale,
01:03:30yourself and Mr Gruder
01:03:30disagreed,
01:03:31I understand,
01:03:32over the transfer
01:03:32of Skelhorn in 1970
01:03:34and Appledean in 72.
01:03:36Is that correct?
01:03:37Yes, that's correct.
01:03:38How did you disagree?
01:03:39Violently?
01:03:40Strongly.
01:03:40You rowed?
01:03:41No.
01:03:42We disagreed.
01:03:43He put forward
01:03:44one set of arguments
01:03:45and I put forward another.
01:03:46And you won?
01:03:47Yes, I won.
01:03:49And you preferred
01:03:49that it should be you?
01:03:51Naturally.
01:03:52There really wasn't room
01:03:53for both of you
01:03:53in the same football club,
01:03:55was there?
01:03:56Are you suggesting that...
01:03:58I will tell you
01:03:58what I'm suggesting.
01:03:59I'm suggesting
01:04:00you were shrewd enough
01:04:01to realise
01:04:01that events were taking
01:04:02a very satisfactory path.
01:04:04I'm suggesting
01:04:05you had no knowledge
01:04:07of this conspiracy as such,
01:04:08but I am further suggesting
01:04:10that you innocently
01:04:10contributed to the success
01:04:12of that conspiracy
01:04:13by instigating
01:04:14the removal of Mr Gruder
01:04:15at that time,
01:04:16which was something
01:04:17you had always wanted.
01:04:19What do you have to say
01:04:20to that?
01:04:20I have to say
01:04:21that certain parts
01:04:22of your statement
01:04:23are unfounded
01:04:24and that I have told
01:04:25the truth as I know it.
01:04:28Mr Martindale,
01:04:29what would you say
01:04:30if I were to tell you
01:04:32that some time ago
01:04:33one of your first team players
01:04:35met the chairman
01:04:36of a London First Division club
01:04:38in secret
01:04:38and discussed
01:04:39the possibility
01:04:40of a transfer?
01:04:41I should have
01:04:42the greatest difficulty
01:04:43in believing you.
01:04:44Have you been approached
01:04:45by any London First Division club
01:04:46for one of your players?
01:04:48It's not normal
01:04:49for us to discuss
01:04:50such matters
01:04:50negotiations
01:04:51might be effected.
01:04:52This is not
01:04:53a press conference.
01:04:54This is a court of law.
01:04:56Answer the question.
01:04:59Yes,
01:05:00we have been approached
01:05:00by a London First Division club.
01:05:03Yes.
01:05:03And the name of the player?
01:05:05Peter Appledean.
01:05:06Peter Appledean.
01:05:08Thank you very much.
01:05:09No further questions.
01:05:10Mr Martindale,
01:05:11even if it may
01:05:12jeopardize your negotiations,
01:05:14I must ask you
01:05:15two or three more questions.
01:05:17When were you first approached
01:05:18about Appledean?
01:05:19Oh, February 73.
01:05:21It was a very tentative inquiry.
01:05:22February.
01:05:23And it's alleged
01:05:23that the three accused
01:05:24put their plans into operation
01:05:26sometime early in the season.
01:05:27It would appear, therefore,
01:05:27that this approach
01:05:28was made sometime after
01:05:29the conspiracy
01:05:31alleged had begun.
01:05:32It would appear so, yes.
01:05:34Now, what was the board's
01:05:35answer to this inquiry?
01:05:37Oh, we told them
01:05:37we weren't interested.
01:05:38There was no shortage
01:05:39of money happily
01:05:40and we wanted to get
01:05:41into the First Division.
01:05:42We needed good players
01:05:43like Peter Appledean
01:05:44to help us get there.
01:05:44And has that view changed?
01:05:46If anything, it's hardened.
01:05:47We're now in the Third Division.
01:05:49We need good players
01:05:49even more desperately.
01:05:53Thank you, Mr Martindale.
01:05:54You may leave the box.
01:05:56That concludes the case
01:05:57for the defence, my lord.
01:05:57Ladies and gentlemen of the jury,
01:06:04one fact which has emerged
01:06:06from this trial
01:06:07is that the three accused
01:06:08all actively disliked
01:06:10Alexander Gruder
01:06:11and were delighted
01:06:12when he was relieved
01:06:13of his position
01:06:14as manager of
01:06:15Fulchester Rovers.
01:06:16Skelhorn had a grudge
01:06:18after being dropped
01:06:19from an important game.
01:06:20MacIver objected
01:06:22to the discipline
01:06:22which curtailed
01:06:23his swinging life.
01:06:25And Appledean,
01:06:26a self-confessed anarchist,
01:06:28whilst making plans
01:06:29to have himself
01:06:30changed to another team,
01:06:31reveled in the prospect
01:06:32of destroying
01:06:34an establishment figure.
01:06:36It's important,
01:06:37members of the jury,
01:06:37to bear this in mind
01:06:38when considering
01:06:39what would normally
01:06:40be highly improbable,
01:06:42namely that professional footballers
01:06:43should deliberately
01:06:44play badly.
01:06:46And play badly they did.
01:06:48But why?
01:06:50Remember Mrs Skelhorn's evidence
01:06:51when she overheard
01:06:53the agreement
01:06:53wouldn't it be a good idea
01:06:55if Jim upended
01:06:57one of their players
01:06:58in the box?
01:07:00Remember the newspaper report,
01:07:02MacIver's brainstorm,
01:07:03a good two yards
01:07:05inside the box,
01:07:06a report which the man
01:07:07did not feel the need
01:07:08to contradict.
01:07:10Remember the evidence
01:07:11of Michael Pollitsen,
01:07:12the club captain,
01:07:13when he heard the accused
01:07:14tell the captain
01:07:15of an opposing team
01:07:16that it was as easy
01:07:17as pie to get rid
01:07:19of a manager
01:07:19if you knew how.
01:07:22Ladies and gentlemen,
01:07:24beyond any shadow
01:07:25of a doubt,
01:07:25these add up
01:07:26to a premeditated conspiracy
01:07:28between these three men
01:07:29to end Mr Gruder's
01:07:31chosen career.
01:07:34And their reasons?
01:07:35Pure malice
01:07:36and total immaturity.
01:07:39Their actions
01:07:39were in defiance
01:07:40of the good faith
01:07:41they owed their club
01:07:42and in defiance
01:07:43of the law.
01:07:45And I ask you
01:07:45to find them guilty
01:07:46as charged.
01:07:48Thank you,
01:07:49Miss Lewis.
01:07:51There's a lot of you.
01:07:52Members of the jury,
01:07:54it seems that
01:07:55during the last
01:07:56football season
01:07:56my clients
01:07:57did not play
01:07:58consistently well.
01:08:00Be that as it may,
01:08:01that is not an offence.
01:08:03The prosecution
01:08:03has attempted
01:08:04to give a sinister
01:08:05explanation
01:08:06of simple lack
01:08:07of form.
01:08:09Let's look
01:08:09at the prosecution's
01:08:10evidence,
01:08:11shall we?
01:08:11Firstly,
01:08:13the testimony
01:08:13of Alexander Gruder.
01:08:15Now here is a man,
01:08:16a bitter,
01:08:16disappointed man,
01:08:18desperately trying
01:08:18to get back
01:08:19into the game
01:08:19at the expense
01:08:20of these three men.
01:08:23And secondly,
01:08:23Mrs. Skelhorn,
01:08:25who, although denying
01:08:26intimacy with Gruder,
01:08:27can spend five hours
01:08:29in his bedroom
01:08:30late at night
01:08:31relating a five-minute
01:08:33conversation.
01:08:35And thirdly,
01:08:36Mr. Pollitson's
01:08:37vague story
01:08:37of how he overheard
01:08:38a conversation
01:08:39between,
01:08:40in a crowded bar room,
01:08:42between the accused
01:08:44and a certain
01:08:44George Pinnock.
01:08:46Well, the story
01:08:47we might take
01:08:47a little more seriously
01:08:48if it was not
01:08:49patently obvious
01:08:50that Mr. Pollitson
01:08:51was very much
01:08:52in Mr. Gruder's debt
01:08:53for keeping him on
01:08:54as captain of the team.
01:08:56Well, that's
01:08:57the prosecution's evidence,
01:08:58and it's simply
01:08:59not good enough.
01:09:00And it becomes absurd
01:09:01if you consider
01:09:02the suggestion
01:09:02that three professional
01:09:04footballers should
01:09:05try and cut
01:09:06their own throats
01:09:07by ruining their team.
01:09:08And the fact
01:09:09that the trained eye
01:09:10of Mr. Martindale,
01:09:11who watched
01:09:11every match
01:09:12last season,
01:09:13failed to detect
01:09:14any sign whatsoever
01:09:15of deliberate
01:09:16bad play.
01:09:18Now, members of the jury,
01:09:19I suggest that you
01:09:20have no alternative
01:09:20but to find the accused
01:09:22not guilty.
01:09:24Members of the jury,
01:09:26the three accused
01:09:27are charged
01:09:28with conspiring together
01:09:29to terminate
01:09:30the employment
01:09:31of Mr. Alexandre Gruder
01:09:32as manager
01:09:33of Fulchester Rovers
01:09:34football club
01:09:35by deliberately
01:09:36playing badly.
01:09:38Now,
01:09:38a conspiracy
01:09:39is an agreement
01:09:40between two
01:09:41or more persons
01:09:42and an agreement
01:09:44of the nature
01:09:45alleged
01:09:46is a crime.
01:09:48Now, you must ask
01:09:49yourselves
01:09:50if the evidence
01:09:51that you have heard
01:09:52establishes beyond
01:09:54reasonable doubt
01:09:55that in fact
01:09:56such an agreement
01:09:57did exist.
01:09:59Now, some of the evidence
01:10:00bears on the joint action
01:10:02of the accused
01:10:03and much pertains
01:10:05to their individual actions.
01:10:07Now, you're concerned
01:10:09with the evidence
01:10:10of their individual actions
01:10:11because it bears
01:10:12on an agreement
01:10:13which, if indeed
01:10:15it did exist,
01:10:16must logically involve
01:10:18more than one person.
01:10:21Therefore,
01:10:22although you must return
01:10:24three separate verdicts,
01:10:27you cannot find
01:10:28one of the accused
01:10:29guilty
01:10:30without finding
01:10:31at least
01:10:32one of the other two
01:10:34guilty as well.
01:10:35Now, members
01:10:37of the jury,
01:10:38will you kindly retire
01:10:39to consider your verdict?
01:10:41All stand.
01:10:50Members of the jury,
01:10:51will your foreman
01:10:51please stand?
01:10:53Just answer this question,
01:10:55yes or no.
01:10:56Have you reached verdicts
01:10:57upon which you are
01:10:57all agreed?
01:10:58Yes.
01:10:58Do you find the accused
01:11:00Bernard Kelhorn
01:11:02guilty or not guilty?
01:11:04Guilty.
01:11:04Is that the verdict
01:11:05of you all?
01:11:06Yes.
01:11:07Do you find the accused
01:11:08James McIver
01:11:09guilty or not guilty?
01:11:10Guilty.
01:11:10Is that the verdict
01:11:11of you all?
01:11:12Yes.
01:11:13Do you find the accused
01:11:13Peter Appeldean
01:11:14guilty or not guilty?
01:11:16Guilty.
01:11:16Is that the verdict
01:11:17of you all?
01:11:18Yes.
01:11:18Yes.
01:11:23Mr. Justice Campbell
01:11:25sentenced the three footballers
01:11:26to 18 months' imprisonment.
01:11:28The players' future
01:11:29now lies with
01:11:29the Football Association
01:11:30Commission,
01:11:31which is specially appointed
01:11:32to investigate this case.
01:11:34The players may face
01:11:35a lifelong suspension
01:11:36from the game.
01:11:38Alexander Gruder
01:11:38will not be rejoining
01:11:39Forchester Rovers,
01:11:41but has applied
01:11:41for a manager's job
01:11:42in the south of England.
01:11:58Forchester Rovers,
01:11:59or more than one of the
01:12:01teachers' future
01:12:01in the south of England.
01:12:02We'll be at the top of England
01:12:03or the following
01:12:03of the footballers' future.
01:12:04Forhof ensure
Comments

Recommended