00:00If the security that was necessary for them had been given to us,
00:04they would have been sitting in our midst today.
00:08Whose concern is it?
00:10Is it the concern of the VIPs, the leaders of the country, or the concern of a family?
01:00In spite of this, on December 4, 1989, it was said
01:29that the SPG cover of the PM was withdrawn.
01:39The former Prime Minister of India, about whom the Intelligence Bureau and every other
01:45instrumentality of this government was getting periodic inputs that his threat was increasing
01:50on a daily basis.
01:53The incident of Shri Priyambhudur, and this is proven by the Verma Commission, this is
02:14also proven by the Jain Commission, that if the former PM had been given the security
02:23that was necessary for him, he would have been sitting in our midst today.
03:04The threat assessment is a perfect science, and the answer to this is negative, and the
03:15answer to this is no.
03:16This whole process of threat assessment is a very subjective process, and there are many
03:31MPs in this assembly who must have had the experience that this threat assessment is
03:40not a scientific and an objective process, but has become a complete political process.
03:48And the SPG was made a status symbol.
03:52The security has not been removed, the security has been changed, and it has been changed
04:01on the basis of threat assessment.
04:04On the basis of threat assessment, their security was covered with ASL and with ambulance throughout
04:12the country.
04:13ASL means that first someone will go and do a threat assessment of the spot, a threat
04:20assessment will be done, he will coordinate with the state governments, and the security
04:24has not been given by the state government.
04:26You have mentioned that the state government has given up its trust.
04:30The CRPF is a central agency, it is present throughout the country, it is present in every
04:36state, and its threat, security has been covered.
04:42But when a Prime Minister or his family is removed from office, the decisions that he
04:51has taken, the people who are harmed because of them, or those who feel that they are harmed,
05:00does that challenge end?
05:04And the answer to this is that the challenge does not end.
05:09Because the people who want to kill someone, they wait for the time when the security cover
05:18is not so tight, and their negative intentions can be fulfilled.
05:29All the former Prime Ministers of India, their families, as long as they are alive,
05:36they should be given security.
05:39For example, as long as Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee was in our midst, on May 16, 2004, he was
05:47removed from the Prime Minister's post, till 2018, he was given security by the SPG.
05:54According to the Home Minister and the government, my request is that Dalgat should rise above
06:00politics and look at this matter of security.
06:03And just because a person does not remain a Prime Minister, it does not mean that the
06:09threat to him is reduced because of the decisions he has taken while remaining a Prime Minister.
06:15Vindictive approach, vindictive approach, vindictive approach.
06:19Mr. Gaurav Gogai, I would like to tell you through the President that vindictive approach
06:26is not the culture of my party.
06:29The Congress Party has put the whole country in jail many times for vindictive approach.
06:34This is not the culture of my party.
06:37This is not the culture of my party.
Comments