¿Por qué Parived no iría a la cárcel tras "Caso Relojes"?

El 13

La Fiscalía y Parived llegaron a un acuerdo en el Caso Relojes para un procedimiento abreviado, desestimando la asociación ilícita y evitando cárcel.

Transcript

00:00What will happen to Parivet?

00:02What will happen to Parivet?

00:04It happens that more than once we saw him in court presenting a statement as a defendant.

00:09He was investigated for his participation in this case.

00:12As we already told you, today this story suffered a shocking twist.

00:20And it is that the ex of Tonka Tomisic would have accepted an agreement with the justice.

00:24An abbreviated procedure will not be accused of illicit association, but will only answer for frustration.

00:30With that, Parivet will not step foot in jail at any time.

00:39But without a doubt, the case of Jogar Escoletazos, not only in his life, but also in that of his ex-wife,

00:45the one who still does not manage to return to work and who today lives with millionaire debts.

00:55Complete report on Parivet.

00:58We call him Marco Antonio Leyva, right?

01:00López.

01:02Parivet and also Tonka.

01:04We ask the lawyer first for Parivet.

01:06The headlines say that he is saved from jail.

01:08That's what we read yesterday.

01:10And then we ask for Tonka.

01:12Lawyer Claudio Daldivi, you are the second.

01:14Let's see, can the prosecution negotiate with the defense?

01:17Yes, you can negotiate once the investigation is closed.

01:19And to reach the abbreviated procedure, which the defendant has to accept.

01:22The defendant has to accept the accusation, the facts of the accusation, and the evidence that supports that accusation.

01:28It is not worth negotiating.

01:30It is not worth negotiating.

01:32It depends on the judge.

01:34And it also depends on the judge if he is going to give him some kind of alternative compliance measure.

01:38But obviously, practice indicates that if the facts are negotiated, the evidence is negotiated,

01:43the judge never, or it is very unlikely, I correct myself,

01:47that the judge gives more than what the prosecution is asking for.

01:51And the prosecution is generally going to ask for a sentence that is close to five years,

01:55so that he can have some kind of compliance benefit.

01:57And that's because the deadline is over.

01:59Because the prosecution could not establish more responsibilities.

02:05Because the prosecution calculates that the judge is in question.

02:09He's like doubting.

02:11No, no, that's why.

02:13Because the criminal trial system has this tool.

02:17But why someone who thinks that, for example,

02:21you are absolutely clear that I am guilty of all crimes,

02:26why is there going to be an agreement with me?

02:29Mr. Vidal, you know a lot about the system.

02:33No!

02:35No!

02:37He's got a pretty face!

02:39No!

02:41No, no, no, no.

02:43No, no, no, no.

02:45Why would the agreement arrive?

02:47Let's see.

02:49All the above, Felipe.

02:51Why is the prosecution going to reach an agreement?

02:53What would be the incentive that the prosecution has?

02:55Because they see that their investigation has some spaces.

02:58And therefore, going to an oral trial has certain risks.

03:02And therefore, what is going to matter to the prosecution

03:04is to ensure a conviction.

03:06And as he wants to ensure a conviction,

03:08and not only regarding that defendant,

03:10but regarding the rest,

03:12he begins to negotiate with each of them.

03:14And then when it comes to the last thing, he tells them,

03:16look, you know what? I have this, this, this,

03:18in abbreviated procedure.

03:19And if you don't get to me, we're going to go to an oral trial.

03:21But the penalty for you is going to be much higher than them.

03:24I always remember the movie, Catch Me If You Can.

03:29Leonardo DiCaprio.

03:33Mike Davis.

03:43The law of the street, too.

03:46Like the compensation deal, right?

03:59Yeah.

04:12Zapiando.

04:14Zapiando.

04:28Zapiando.

04:58Yeah.

05:28Zapiando.

05:58Zapiando.

06:08Zapiando.

06:17Zapiando.

06:29Zapiando.

06:44Zapiando.

06:59Zapiando.

07:04Zapiando.

07:07Zapiando.

07:14Zapiando.

07:19Zapiando.

07:28because she was going to give key information

07:32about one of the defendants, Parivet.

07:35Her image was so big...

07:37People who see the case in general, Felipe,

07:39they see it and say,

07:40oh, the defendant, the investigator,

07:42she's a defendant.

07:43She never got to that point.

07:44But her image was so big.

07:46Yes, because I think that's interesting, Claudio,

07:48because of the things that were said

07:50when the criminal process reform was worked

07:54was speed and transparency.

07:58There were other characteristics,

08:00but that was the most prominent element.

08:04Look at Felipe's image.

08:05Yes, compared to the old system, right?

08:10But there wasn't much speed here, first,

08:12which is the problem, I think, with this.

08:14And second, also, Claudio,

08:16there is a filtration issue,

08:18but brutal regarding the issue,

08:20as Nacho said.

08:22Things were filtered,

08:23Tonka said this,

08:24there's a Tonka ticket,

08:25Tonka has a Tonka check,

08:27Tonka came and was at a meeting.

08:29But it was all Tonka.

08:31I think that, also,

08:33we have to try to,

08:35I don't know if to change the word,

08:37but to have more control.

08:39It's that the Oriente Prosecutor's Office,

08:41the Centro Norte less,

08:42but the Oriente Prosecutor's Office

08:43has a serious filtration problem

08:44regarding the investigations.

08:46And, watch out,

08:47here we are talking about

08:48that the filtrations

08:49don't necessarily come from the Prosecutor's Office,

08:51but they come from other people

08:53who start to filter information

08:54with some kind of interest.

08:56Why?

08:57To divert attention

08:58regarding those accused.

08:59Or, because, watch out,

09:00in the investigation that Tonka was in,

09:02there were other public figures as well.

09:04And those public figures,

09:05in some cases,

09:06passed by.

09:07So, what happens with those people

09:09who could have had

09:10the same reputation damage as Tonka,

09:12and they didn't,

09:13because, in the end,

09:14what one heard from Tonka this week,

09:16in the outcry she made

09:17in the morning of Buenos Dias a Todo,

09:19was that she, voluntarily,

09:21raised her bank secrecy,

09:22she raised it,

09:23she raised it, voluntarily,

09:24saying information.

09:25Everything already,

09:26because I'm not investigating.

09:27And the surveillance,

09:28when does it arrive?

09:29It arrives after several years,

09:30and not with the same publicity

09:32that she had that statement in the Prosecutor's Office.

09:34Of course,

09:35but what she said was,

09:36hey, each one,

09:37each thing in its time.

09:39First, get me out of this,

09:40let the investigation end,

09:41so I can re-arm my life,

09:44look for a hit,

09:45have a hit,

09:46and with that payment,

09:47pay my commitments, okay?

09:48Yes, yes, yes.

09:49Yes, Claudio,

09:50and in relation to the watches,

09:52do you know the origin,

09:53where they were,

09:54does Parivet have access to that,

09:55what happens with that?

09:56Will he be able to recover them,

09:57or are they still as evidence?

09:59There are some watches that are fake,

10:01and there are some watches that are real.

10:03The fake watches are going to be destroyed,

10:04or the real watches

10:06can eventually be auctioned off.

10:08Auctioned off?

10:09Auctioned off, indeed.

10:10No auction?

10:11No, in relation to finding their owners, for example,

10:14that we suffered a millionaire robbery in 2017.

10:17A millionaire robbery?

10:18Yes.

10:19Ah, of course.

10:20Yes, and nothing ever showed up.

10:22Let's see,

10:23you could eventually be part of that investigation

10:25and ask for the inventory,

10:27because there are chains of custody here,

10:29the inventory of all those watches,

10:31and as long as you have the certificates,

10:33which you should have,

10:34Yes, I have them all.

10:35you have the certificates of those watches,

10:37you could eventually ask for the return.

10:39Claudio,

10:40what position does the prosecution have in this case?

10:42Because Parivet, deep down,

10:45perhaps as the leader of a band of world-class watch robbers,

10:49basically ends up being condemned

10:51simply because he received some watches that were stolen.

10:55So, clearly we went from heaven to earth in seven years.

10:58And the tax evasion?

10:59Yes.

11:00This speaks to you of a certain space in the investigation

11:01that the prosecution was unable to cover.

11:02Yes.

Category

Transcript

Be the first to comment

Recommended