Makhsoos Nashiston Ke Case Mein PTI Ko Woh Cheez Di Gayi Jo Mangi Hi Nahi Gayi, Khurram Dastgir

ARY NEWS

Transcript

00:00I was noticing that Irfan Siddiqui had a very aggressive press conference

00:05even before that, in the last 3-4 days of PMLN

00:08when this detailed judgement has come

00:10there has been a very consistent stance that he did not like the decision

00:14there is no surprise in this

00:16but the implementation of this decision is not going to happen

00:19has it been decided at the party level?

00:22you say that the election commission has to implement it

00:24but when the government itself comes and says that this decision is not right

00:27and such decisions should not be accepted

00:29has it been decided at the government level that this decision will not be implemented?

00:36the wounds that I had from 7 years ago

00:40when there was no mention of Akama in the entire Panama case

00:45and the court saw a dictionary from the internet and made this decision

00:50and disqualified Nawaz Sharif from being an unlawful and uncivilised person

00:55we have been saying this since then

00:57this is not a matter of liking or disliking

00:59we have only one demand

01:02first, we all wish that the judicial system should follow the law

01:08but secondly, equal treatment

01:11the law also says that everyone is equal

01:13equal treatment, we have reservations about that

01:17and this decision by the SIC

01:20this is the third decision in this century

01:23in which the Supreme Court has overstepped its authority

01:28and has granted something that was not in the decision

01:31this happened in the Zafar Ali Shah case in 2000

01:34when the Supreme Court gave permission to the Aamir

01:36to amend the constitution

01:38although no such thing was asked

01:40similarly, I gave you the reference of Panama

01:43there was no mention of Akama in this

01:45in the proceedings of 8 months

01:47there it came to Akama

01:49this was the judgment of the SIC

01:51in which the Supreme Court

01:53using its own thinking

01:56made an air base and a parliamentary party

02:00then forced its members

02:02that what you have given is not right

02:04you will be the members of this Jamaat

02:06then the monitoring judge of Panama

02:09made a very unilateral decision

02:12he made it 8 instead of 1

02:14so we have a lot of reservations about that

02:17people's party has a lot of reservations

02:21about the courts of that time

02:23people's party is on record

02:25the decisions came against them

02:27the decisions were still implemented in Pakistan

02:29in the past

02:31this Akama case that you told

02:33after that the implementation of that case happened

02:35and Nawaz Sharif sir emptied the Prime Minister's house

02:37what has changed now

02:39there were grievances in that too

02:41you still had grievances

02:42the problem is that

02:43how will it be decided that

02:45if you don't want to implement the PML

02:47then a way will open up

02:49then whoever has the power in the government

02:51will not implement the decision

02:55no, no one has to decide this

02:57the Supreme Court

02:5931 years ago

03:01in the case of Baaz Mohammad Kakar

03:03wrote in its judgment

03:05that when the law comes into the field

03:09then the law will be a hindrance to the interpretation of the court

03:13the real issue is not

03:15that the administration says

03:17that we will not implement

03:19when the parliament has made a law

03:21and decided

03:23then the law will be a hindrance to the interpretation

03:27but sir, about this

03:29the flip side, the second view is

03:31that the interpretation of the Supreme Court

03:33the law makes the parliament

03:35the interpretation is done by the court

03:37the decisions that come as a result of that interpretation

03:39they have to accept

03:41I have not spoken to any such legislator

03:43in 72 hours

03:45who says that on the short order of the Supreme Court

03:47you cannot implement

03:49even the Supreme Court

03:51is not endorsing this

03:55see, but either the Supreme Court

03:57then

03:59why did they wait for 74 days

04:01in their detailed judgment

04:03the real method was

04:05that they would immediately

04:07issue their detailed judgment

04:09so that we could file a review on it

04:11so that the up procedure

04:13would have been done 74 days earlier

04:15and we would not have to face today's tensions

04:17so the Supreme Court

04:19not giving its detailed judgment

04:21for 74 days

04:23has the same serious questions

04:25as saying that

04:27there was no implementation of the short order

04:29because that too

04:31if we have to make an interpretation

04:33then that too was waiting for a better time

04:35for the detailed judgment to be issued

04:37and the way

04:39we have been alarmed

04:41is that

04:43last Saturday

04:45the detailed judgment

04:47that was issued by the court

04:49and the court openly said

04:51that keeping the law in mind

04:53they used the word

04:55de jure

04:57that we are not looking at the de jure

04:59we will go de facto

05:01so in Pakistan

05:03using the word de facto

05:05this is the code word of decency

05:07that if you go de facto

05:09then using the word de facto

05:11this country has been decency for 45 years

05:13because it was de facto

05:15and the court

05:17has not only issued the same decency

05:1912 times

05:21right

05:23so earlier you were saying

05:25that the detailed judgment should come

05:27that the implementation of the short order

05:29has to be done

05:31and there is a consensus on this

05:33there is a consensus

05:35that this decision is right

05:37there are loopholes in this decision

05:39one point of view of the constitution

05:41is that it has been rewritten

05:43and the other is that

05:45this has been done

05:47especially for the democracy

05:49but everyone agrees

05:51that there should be an implementation

05:53which the government is not going to do

05:55even after the detailed judgment

05:57even in the review

05:59the lawyer says that there is very little chance

06:01that there will be a drastically different result

06:03so after that you will say

06:05that we did not like the decision

06:07even after the review

06:09will there be an implementation or not?

06:11there is no question of liking or disliking

06:13in this

06:15this is a big challenge

06:17in front of the election commission

06:19so in front of them

06:21on one hand there is the Supreme Court's decision

06:23now the detailed judgment has come

06:25and on the other hand

06:27there is no administration

06:29the Supreme Court has not decided

06:31it is a law made by the parliament

06:33and our point of view

06:35is that the Supreme Court's

06:37decision is in the field

06:39until the parliament

06:41does not legislate on it

06:43when it is legislated

06:45in the beginning of August

06:47it has been a month and a half

06:49it will hold the legislative field

06:51it will not hold the decision

Category

Transcript

Be the first to comment

Recommended