35:00: I'm genuinely baffled about the leap year insurance quandry. Unless he goes day-to-day, which doesn't sound like the case (I think he said he was insured for the week), then leap year shouldn't make a difference. And, like the cop said, it seemed to be an honest mistake (why didn't the insurer notify/warn him?), so, why not just give him a warning all the way 'round?
19:00: "No comment" when the cop didn't ask a question.
"No, I didn't," playing the Monty Python Argument sketch.
"Just let me drive," giving orders.
Interrupting the cop; trying to get the last word.
Yeah, this isn't going to end well!
If he was cautioned previously, and it was less than a year ago, shouldn't that result in an automatic car seizure, especially with defective equipment?
11:00: Questioning a cop, using the "sovereign" excuse, not answering simple questions? Yeah. Totally innocent. "I don't consent, but I'll let you do it." "You're impersonating a cop." Why, why, why, do cops argue with punters? Using the "sovereign" defense should automatically result in a contempt of court charge (courts should have a warning sign, and cops should verbally warn prats).
Comments
3