Steny Hoyer Claims: ‘$1 Spent By The IRS Results In $12 Savings’

  • 4 months ago
Last week, Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-MD) questioned FTC Chair Lina Khan on business tax inquiries during a House Appropriations Committee hearing.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript


Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes
More From Forbes: http://forbes.com

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00 Your mic, oh, yeah.
00:02 Thank you very much.
00:06 You point out that one in five Americans are subject to a non-compete rule.
00:12 That's right.
00:13 So that's 20 percent of the American workforce.
00:16 That's right.
00:17 And your point is, which I take, is that having such a broad spread non-compete rule stifles competition.
00:27 That's right.
00:28 Raises prices and prevents people from using their own ingenuity in perhaps another way,
00:35 notwithstanding the fact they're at a very, or relatively low level of employee.
00:41 Is that accurate?
00:42 All of that?
00:43 All of that's accurate, Congressman.
00:45 It seems to me in that respect, we all understand that there are certain non-compete agreements that are legitimate.
00:54 If you work in a big plant and you learn technology and you get experience, et cetera, et cetera,
01:03 and you find out competitive skills and processes that are used in that company,
01:12 that they don't want you taking it someplace else to compete against them.
01:17 That seems to me to be a legitimate use.
01:20 But to be used, you made a very low level analogy in your opening statement,
01:26 to prevent a worker from either going into business themselves
01:31 or improving their salaries and working conditions seems to me clearly an objective that is within your responsibility
01:39 and very good for the American people.
01:42 That's another question that's an observation.
01:45 I have raised, Mr. Womack also raised with the IRS commissioner,
01:50 the companies that are saying that they can save your tax money if you owe taxes or didn't pay taxes,
01:57 they can come in and they can make a very good deal and you don't pay them anything unless they save you money,
02:04 which means obviously other taxpayers are going to pay a little more because some taxpayers pay much less.
02:13 Have you looked into that at the FTC?
02:17 It's on our radar because of engagement with your office
02:21 and any time that a company is making certain representations that don't accurately reflect the services they offer,
02:28 that can be deceptive and is relevant to the FTC.
02:32 Can you briefly tell me what you won't be able to do if we do not approve the budget level that you requested
02:40 that will then in turn harm the American people?
02:43 And maybe in the process discuss a little more, I made the point IRS at the higher end,
02:51 millionaires and above of income oversight results $1 spent by the IRS in enforcement results in $12 of savings.
03:03 You used a higher figure.
03:05 Can you explain that to us?
03:07 For every $1 that the FTC receives, we return $14 in consumer benefits, which is pretty stunning.
03:16 And the FTC's budget, basically 70% of that covers our people.
03:22 So the overhead cost beyond that is pretty low as an overall portion.
03:27 And so when we have 5% pay increases that are not funded, that hits us hard.
03:34 And so if we are not able to get funding to fully support our mission, that's going to mean fewer investigations,
03:41 fewer lawsuits stopping law breaking by data brokers, fewer lawsuits stopping unlawful surveillance of kids,
03:50 fewer lawsuits stopping illegal practices by health care monopolies, fewer actions to support elder --
03:56 to cut back on elder fraud or made in USA fraud or fraud targeting veterans.
04:02 And so all of this is a core part of the FTC's work.
04:05 And if we're not adequately funded, it's going to come at the expense of that.
04:09 Thank you very much.
04:10 And I'm going to pursue that further with you in your office.
04:14 Also, two things, junk fees.
04:16 The President's made a real point of that.
04:18 The administration has.
04:19 There are a lot of junk fees and people don't know about them and perhaps don't need them, more pointedly.
04:28 I'd like to look into that further.
04:31 And also, I would like to discuss with you more in more in-depth the car rule,
04:41 because I have some very reputable car dealers who have talked to me about this
04:46 and indicated this is more make work and doesn't get to a more honest result, which you have opined.
04:54 So I'm going to look at that further.
04:55 I don't have time to question you about it in depth, but I do want to look at that further.
04:59 further. Thank you.

Recommended