Okay I went on record on several blogs as soon as this first happened back in March 2014, as saying that the captain was the only one capable of sinking that plane in a way that nobody could find it. Not by an accident, not by hijackers. Not the copilot or anyone else in the crew, but only the captain was capable of doing all that. And now it comes out that the FBI was able to retrieve the deleted file from the flight simulator showing that he practiced doing exactly that, and evaded all those Radars, shutting off all those communication systems and getting a plane to land on water so that there was no debris field. Almost impossible to trace. What he didn't count on was that, even though he figured out how to disable the acars, the acars system reset and continue sending a message to inmarsat. So just think what would have happened if acars DIDN'T reset ? First off, How do you even turn off acars in the first place? There's no off on button in the cockpit that lets you disable it so you practically have to be an engineer to go out of the cockpit and to the flight room and figure out how to disable acars. That's quite a trick by itself! okay so the acars reset and it continues to send a ping and that's how they even figured out remotely what direction it was headed. If they didn't have that to go on, we would really be lost! O k, then you have the flight simulator. What if the FBI had not been able to hack into the deleted file, then where we be ? But ok. as it is today, we have the inmarsat record and we have the retrieved simulator records and the known sequence of events, both pointed to the fact that the captain did it. So if you check back on 6abc blog, back when this first happened, I went out on a limb by saying "only the captain could have done it" and that's called barratry. Anybody that knows me remembers that I was ranting and raving about the British navy term that refers to Any Time a captain deliberately sink the ship for some reason and I was s
Be the first to comment