Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago
In 2026, France announced more nuclear warheads, Finland legalised nuclear weapons on its soil, and Germany began debating a bomb of its own. Nobody was sanctioned. Iran, which has no nuclear weapon, was bombed.
Why? Hypocrisy is the easy answer. In this video we use two lenses, imperialism and Edward Said's Orientalism, to show how the nuclear order decides who gets to have the bomb, and who doesn't.

📚 SOURCES
IAEA Director General statement to the UN Security Council (27 Oct 2026)
UN News, IAEA chief at the General Assembly (23 Oct 2026)
Reuters, Macron's nuclear doctrine speech (2 Mar 2026)
Euronews, Lithuania and Finland lift nuclear bans (Jul 2026)

📚THEORY IN THIS VIDEO
V. I. Lenin, Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism (1916)
Edward Said, Orientalism (1978)
Hugh Gusterson, "Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination" (1999)
Jaswant Singh, "Against Nuclear Apartheid", Foreign Affairs (1998) David Harvey, The New Imperialism (2003)
Transcript
00:00In 2026, France announced more nuclear warheads.
00:04Finland legalized nuclear weapons on its soil.
00:08Lithuania is deleting its nuclear ban from its constitution.
00:13Germany is debating a bomb of its own.
00:16Nobody was sanctioned.
00:19Iran, a country that has no nuclear weapon, was bombed twice.
00:25For 20 years, Europe told the world that nuclear weapons were the problem.
00:30Now it's building its own nuclear future, and calling it responsibility.
00:36So what's really going on, hypocrisy is the easy answer.
00:40The real one is older, and it explains a lot more than Iran.
00:45Let's examine this complex issue, through the lens of geopolitics.
00:51And that's just the headlines.
00:52Look closer and you'll see three steps, each one bigger than the last.
00:57Step 1 More Bombs
00:59In March, at the Eel Long Submarine Base, Macron didn't just expand the arsenal.
01:05He broke with two decades of reductions.
01:08And summed up the new doctrine in one line, to be free one must be feared.
01:14Step 2 Bombs on Other People's Soil
01:17Eight countries, including Germany and Poland, signed up to Macron's forward deterrence.
01:23French nuclear-capable jets may now be deployed on their bases.
01:28Every October, NATO rehearses moving American nuclear bombs from underground vaults onto European
01:34fighter jets.
01:36And Finland's new law goes beyond hosting.
01:39It allows nuclear weapons to be possessed on Finnish soil, when defense requires it.
01:45Step 3 A Bomb of Their Own
01:47In Germany, the debate is no longer about borrowing.
01:51Respected academics like Joachim Crozet, openly argue for a German or European nuclear weapon.
01:59None of this is a conspiracy theory.
02:02It's the official agenda, and announced with pride.
02:05Europe says it's all about Russia.
02:07But to understand what's really going on, we need two tools.
02:11The concept of imperialism, and Edward Said's critique of Orientalism.
02:16Let's start with imperialism, not as an insult but as a concept.
02:20Since Lenin, the critical tradition has described imperialism, as a system,
02:25in which a core of powers organizes the international order to secure its own position.
02:31The rules of that order are not neutral.
02:33They reflect the hierarchy of those who wrote them.
02:37David Harvey in this century called it the new imperialism.
02:40The core's economic and military power combine to keep control over strategic regions of the
02:46periphery.
02:47And the Middle East is the most obvious example.
02:50The nuclear regime may be the clearest expression of this hierarchy.
02:55The non-proliferation treaty of 1968 split the world into two groups.
03:00The five countries that had tested a bomb before 1967, the United States, the Soviet Union,
03:07the United Kingdom, France and China.
03:09And everyone else.
03:11The first group kept their arsenals.
03:13The rest got a promise that one day there would be disarmament.
03:17In 1998, India's then-foreign minister Jaswant Singh gave this arrangement a name, nuclear apartheid.
03:25A system that separates those who may from those who may not, not by any standard of responsibility,
03:31but by the date each one got the bomb.
03:34Seen through this lens, Europe's behavior stops looking inconsistent.
03:38It is perfectly consistent with imperial logic.
03:42The core decides how much security each country is allowed.
03:46Sanctions, inspections, and when none of that is enough bombing,
03:50these are the tools for maintaining the hierarchy.
03:53Iran isn't punished only for what it has.
03:56It's punished for the place it occupies, and for refusing to accept it.
04:01Imperialism explains the structure.
04:03But it doesn't explain why so many people find this hierarchy natural.
04:08For that the second lens, Edward said.
04:11In Orientalism, published in 1978,
04:14Seed showed how the West built, over centuries,
04:17an image of the Orient as its opposite.
04:20Irrational, emotional, fanatical, despotic.
04:22The West, by contrast, saw itself as rational, moderate, civilized.
04:27And Seed's central point is that this image was not mere prejudice.
04:32It was a form of knowledge in the service of power.
04:35It justified tutelage, administration, and intervention.
04:39In 1999, the anthropologist Hugh Gusterson carried this idea into the nuclear field,
04:45and coined the term nuclear Orientalism.
04:48He showed that Western discourse on proliferation always follows the same script.
04:53Weapons in Western hands are stable,
04:55because the West is supposedly rational and mature.
04:59In the hands of global South countries they are dangerous,
05:02because those governments are supposedly unpredictable,
05:05fanatical, incapable of following the logic of deterrence.
05:09Notice how this shows up in the Iranian case.
05:12When Iran enriches uranium, the vocabulary is,
05:16the Ayatollah's regime, theocracy, mullers with the bomb.
05:20The implicit question is, can you trust religious fanatics?
05:23When Macron says that to be free one must be feared,
05:27nobody calls him a fanatic, he's treated as a statesman.
05:31And think about the record.
05:34France tested bombs in the Algerian desert, and on the adals of Polynesia.
05:39The United States is the only country that has ever used the bomb against cities.
05:45Yet it is Iran, which has never tested or possessed a nuclear weapon,
05:49that occupies the place of irrational danger in the Western imagination.
05:54That is nuclear orientalism, turning a question of power into a question of character.
06:00And once the problem becomes character, there is no negotiation between equals,
06:05only tutelage.
06:07Now Iran sighed, without idealizing it.
06:11Decades of sanctions, nuclear scientists assassinated, facilities sabotaged.
06:16In June 2025, Israel and the United States bombed Iran's nuclear facilities.
06:22In early 2026, more strikes followed.
06:25Next door, Israel keeps a nuclear arsenal, it has never declared.
06:30Europe talks about the risk of a confrontation with Russia.
06:33Iran talks about attacks that have already happened.
06:37One point where I have to be straight with you,
06:39you often hear that Iran's program remains under international inspection.
06:43Today it doesn't.
06:46Since the bombing IAEA inspectors have not returned to the sites that were hit.
06:51In July 2025, Iran's parliament suspended cooperation with the agency.
06:57And on 27 October, Director General Rafael Grossi told the Security Council he cannot verify
07:03about 440 kilograms of uranium, enriched to 60%.
07:08But the order of events matters, inspections stopped because the facilities were bombed.
07:14And Grossi himself says there are no signs of reconstruction since 2025,
07:19and that the technical basis for a deal exists.
07:22This is where the two lenses meet.
07:25The NPT has three pillars.
07:28The pillar that weighs on the periphery, don't proliferate,
07:31is enforced with sanctions and bombs.
07:33The pillar that weighs on the core, negotiate disarmament under Article 6,
07:38France has justified, by announcing more warheads.
07:42Nobody gets sanctioned for that.
07:44And the message to the rest of the world, is dangerous.
07:48If wealthy countries, protected by the largest military alliance in history,
07:53conclude they need more bombs, what do countries with no alliance at all conclude?
07:58Grossi himself warned just days ago at the U.N. General Assembly,
08:03about the growing fragility of the non-proliferation regime.
08:07Imperialism and Orientalism aren't buzzwords.
08:11They're tools for seeing what official discourse hides.
08:15Imperialism shows the structure,
08:17a nuclear order in which the core decides how much security the periphery may have.
08:23Orientalism shows the justification,
08:26the idea that certain people supposedly aren't mature enough for the same sovereignty.
08:31It's about rejecting an order in which security is a privilege for those at the top,
08:37while everyone else must depend on the goodwill of the very powers that sanction and bomb them.
08:43What about you?
08:44Do you think there's a legitimate standard for deciding who may
08:47and who may not have nuclear deterrence, or is it all a hierarchy of power?
08:53Tell me in the comments.
08:55And don't forget like the video and subscribe to the channel,
08:59to keep thinking about the world how it really is.

Recommended