Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 1 hour ago
Senator Dick Durbin fiercely defended former special counsel Jack Smith during a high-profile Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on September 29, 2026, condemning the Republican-led investigation as politically motivated. Durbin accused GOP lawmakers of attempting to discredit Smith’s investigations into Donald Trump, including the classified documents case and efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. During intense questioning by Republican senators, Durbin intervened to defend Smith’s right to procedural fairness and complete his answers. Following the hearing, Durbin demanded an apology from Senator Chuck Grassley and other committee Republicans, accusing them of violating Senate rules and unfairly attacking the former special counsel. The confrontation highlights the growing political battle over Jack Smith’s investigations, Trump’s legal controversies, and the deep divisions within the US Senate.
HASHTAGS
#DickDurbin #JackSmith #DonaldTrump #SenateHearing #SenateJudiciaryCommittee #ChuckGrassley #TrumpInvestigation #JackSmithHearing #DickDurbinVsRepublicans #USPolitics #TrumpLegalCases #ClassifiedDocumentsCase #2020Election #SenateRepublicans #PoliticalShowdown #BreakingNews #AmericanPolitics #GOP #SenateNews #TrumpInvestigationHearing

~PR.460~HT.408~ED.103~GR.538~VG.HM~

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00I approved those records, and those records were materially relevant to our investigation.
00:05Why were they relevant?
00:07For a number of reasons.
00:09First, with respect to the toll records regarding the evening of January 6th,
00:16those records corroborated evidence that we had that the president,
00:22President Donald Trump, and his co-conspirators were seeking to exploit the violence on January 6th
00:28in furtherance of their criminal scheme.
00:31They were taking the fact that law enforcement officers had been brutally assaulted at this institution
00:37and using that to seek to delay the proceedings further in violation of the law.
00:43It was an important part of our investigation.
00:46We had interviewed co-conspirators who talked about the calls that were made to members of Congress.
00:54There is, I think, appropriate concern by members of this committee and members of Congress
01:02as to your activities related to their telephone conversations, text messages, and records.
01:09Please explain to us what involvement you had with any information from members of Congress.
01:23First, with respect to toll records.
01:26Toll records are non-content records.
01:30They show who a call was to, who a call was from, and the length of that call.
01:36My office did secure toll records from third parties, third-party telephone companies,
01:43in the course of our investigation, that were records for members of Congress.
01:48Before we did that, we consulted with the public integrity section regarding whether those toll records subpoenas were appropriate.
01:58I approved those records, and those records were materially relevant to our investigation.
02:04Why were they relevant?
02:06For a number of reasons.
02:07First, with respect to the toll records regarding the evening of January 6th,
02:15those records corroborated evidence that we had that the president, President Donald Trump,
02:22and his co-conspirators were seeking to exploit the violence on January 6th in furtherance of their criminal scheme.
02:30They were taking the fact that law enforcement officers had been brutally assaulted at this institution
02:36and using that to seek to delay the proceedings further in violation of the law.
02:42It was an important part of our investigation.
02:45We had interviewed co-conspirators who talked about the calls that were made to members of Congress.
02:53We had recordings of voicemails that showed, and these voicemails are public,
03:00where the co-conspirators were, again, providing false information to try to delay the proceedings.
03:07It was an important part of our investigation, and it was centrally relevant to the issue of criminal intent
03:17to seek to further delay the proceedings in violation of the law given what had happened that afternoon at January
03:256th,
03:25in my view, added to the powerful evidence we had of Donald Trump's guilt
03:32and the participation of his co-conspirators in his criminal scheme at his behest.
03:38So we have the Capitol under siege.
03:41We have the Vice President removed from presiding over the Senate by the Secret Service.
03:47We have members of the Senate and House and both political parties who are told to leave the building because
03:54of the danger.
03:55I want to ask, is it fair to surmise from what you have said
03:58that the President was in contact with some members of Congress during this period of time?
04:09Yes, that is correct.
04:12Both members of Congress, we gained evidence reaching out to the White House asking,
04:20please help us.
04:21Please stop what's happening.
04:23Please have your supporters stop attacking the Capitol.
04:26And then also, again, after the attack had occurred, telling his co-conspirators,
04:35there's a message, I believe it's between Mark Meadows and one of the co-conspirators,
04:40that the President wants you to call these senators.
04:44And that record should be in the material that you all have.
04:48Co-conspirators, including Rudy Giuliani, then sought to make those calls.
04:53We also had evidence that the President himself was trying to reach out to individual senators.
05:01Now, this has been characterized by some as a wiretap.
05:05Did you initiate any wiretaps relative to members of Congress of either party?
05:14No, the records that we're talking about are non-content records, the toll records,
05:20are non-content records that we sought to corroborate evidence we had
05:24and also to assist us in questioning witnesses about these events, among other things.
05:28So what did the records disclose to you if they didn't disclose the content and conversation?
05:35Well, they were relevant for a number of reasons.
05:38First, they corroborated other records we already had.
05:42Some of those records were helpful, but they had gaps in them in terms of when certain calls happened.
05:48There was also the issue of when we interviewed one of these co-conspirators who was involved in making these
05:55calls,
05:56It was unclear from that interview how many phones were, in fact, being used to make those calls.
06:03And so getting these records would help us figure out how many phones, in fact, were being used to make
06:10these calls
06:10and to see who else, if anyone, was involved in that.
06:15It is possible, and certainly, as I understand, legal for a member of Congress to have more than one phone.
06:22The official business of the Senate may require one phone number.
06:29There may be a personal phone number for you and your family.
06:34There may even be a political phone number, which you could resort to if you were involved in political activity.
06:40Did you make any distinction in terms of the phone messages which you were investigating of these three possibilities?
06:50My recollection is being focused on the phones of the co-conspirators.
06:55When you say co-conspirators, do you mean members of Congress?
06:59No, no.
07:00I'm thinking specifically of Rudy Giuliani.
07:04One of the things that we learned in this interview of another co-conspirator is that he had multiple phones.
07:11And so the question was, if we had records, did we have all the records of the phones that were
07:17making calls to try to exploit the violence?
07:21But in terms of the phones themselves, of the members of Congress, where did you find those phone numbers?
07:32As I sit here, I do not recall.
07:34What I recall my role in this aspect of the investigation was I was asked by my staff to approve
07:42toll records subpoenas for these sort of records.
07:48After discussing the matter with my staff, I told them I wanted to make sure the Public Integrity Section approved
07:55of that process.
07:56That process happened, and they did.
07:59With respect to how agents figured out or thought they'd figured out which phones belonged to which senators, I don't
08:07have an answer to that.
08:08Assume for a moment that one of the phone conversations was between the President of the United States and a
08:13member of the Congress.
08:15Does the White House maintain any records of calls made by the President or on his behalf?
08:25My understanding is the White House does, but my recollection, and I think the terminology is the White House switchboard,
08:33my recollection is that we had discovered at various points in time those records were incomplete, or we didn't have
08:42all the records.
08:42And so that was another important point to corroborate, for example, evidence of an email where someone says the President
08:51is trying to reach out to these people,
08:53but then to find the actual records of the actual call.
08:59Mr. Smith, my colleagues have spent an extensive amount of time discussing Timothy Thiebaud, who retired from the FBI in
09:07August of 2022.
09:09According to our information, you were appointed special counsel three months after his retirement in November of 2022.
09:17Was Timothy Thiebaud a part of your special counsel team?
09:22No.
09:24Did you ever meet him during your work as special counsel?
09:28No, not that I recall.
09:30Did Timothy Thiebaud or the work that he had done, whatever it was, influence any of your decision making a
09:36special counsel?
09:39No.
09:39We made our decisions based on the facts and based on the law, based on the investigation that my team
09:46conducted.
09:47So I would say to those who are following the hearing, after hearing all these references to Timothy Thiebaud, he
09:53was gone.
09:54He was gone.
09:55He was gone from the FBI by the time Mr. Smith was appointed, and he'd never met him, and he
10:01was not part of his team.
10:02Some of these conspiracy theories just keep mushrooming despite the evidence to the contrary.
10:08Thank you very much.

Recommended