Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 2 days ago
على امتداد هذه القصص الجنائية الباردة، تتحول أدلة صغيرة إلى اختراقات ضخمة: قطعة DNA ضئيلة، بصمات قديمة، صورة منسية، وخيط أحمر غريب يقود أخيراً إلى المشتبه به. يجمع الفيديو بين جرائم قتل حُلّت بعد عقود وقضايا اختفاء حيّرت المحققين لسنوات، من قضية Golden State Killer إلى كيلسي بيريث، جاكوب ويتيرلينغ، وأرليس بيري، مع شرح كيف غيّرت تقنيات الحمض النووي وعلم الأنساب الجيني مسار التحقيقات.

تتنقل السردية بأسلوب وثائقي مشوّق بين ولايات ومدن أمريكية مختلفة، وتعرض كيف أعادت قواعد بيانات البصمات، واللقطات المصوّرة، وشهادات الشهود، وملفات القضايا القديمة فتح أبواب كانت مغلقة منذ زمن. إذا كنت من محبي true crime، التحقيقات الجنائية، القضايا الباردة، والقصص الواقعية عن كشف الجرائم المستعصية، فهذه حلقة مليئة بالتفاصيل التي تشرح كيف يمكن لدليل واحد أن يربط بين جريمة ومجرم بعد سنوات طويلة.

مناسب لمحبي true crime documentary، قصص الجرائم الحقيقية، القضايا الباردة، والتحقيقات الجنائية المعقدة، وكذلك لمن يبحث عن سرد هادئ ومعلوماتي عن DNA genealogy، fingerprints, missing persons cases, and murder investigations. استمع كتحليل جنائي ممتع، أو كخلفية معرفية عن كيف تُحل الجرائم القديمة عندما تلتقي الأدلة المنسية بالتقنية الحديثة.

Category

📚
Learning
Transcript
00:00So, let's start.
00:01Number 10, the murder solved by a tiny piece of DNA.
00:05For more than 40 years, investigators knew that the same man was responsible for a terrifying series of crimes across
00:12California.
00:13He broke into homes, attacked people while they slept, committed sexual assaults, and eventually murdered multiple victims.
00:20Police collected evidence from crime scenes, including DNA, but for decades that DNA had nowhere to lead them,
00:26the man became known by several names, including the East Area Rapist, the original Night Stalker, and eventually the Golden
00:33State Killer.
00:34The problem was that investigators had DNA from the crimes, but the killer himself had never entered a law enforcement
00:41DNA database.
00:42Traditional searches produced nothing.
00:45Investigators could compare the evidence against known offenders, but the person they were looking for simply wasn't there.
00:50The case stretched across decades, while the identity of the killer remained unknown.
00:55Then, investigators tried something that had rarely been used for a criminal investigation at the time.
01:00Instead of searching for the killer directly, they used a genetic genealogy database to look for people who might be
01:07relatives of whoever had left the DNA at the crime scenes.
01:11That changed the investigation completely.
01:13The genetic information produced relatives rather than a name.
01:17Investigators then built family trees, eliminated people who could not have been responsible, and gradually narrowed the possibilities.
01:24Eventually, their attention turned toward Joseph James D'Angelo, a former police officer living in California.
01:30They still needed direct evidence.
01:33Investigators secretly collected biological material connected to D'Angelo, and compared it with DNA from the original crimes.
01:41The match confirmed what investigators had spent decades trying to establish.
01:45D'Angelo was arrested on April 24, 2018, at the age of 72.
01:49The case became a landmark in forensic genetic genealogy because investigators had effectively used the killer's family tree to find
01:58someone whose own DNA had never appeared in the criminal database.
02:01After decades of dead ends, the breakthrough came from something that had been sitting in evidence for years, a microscopic
02:08biological signature left behind by the person investigators had been hunting all along.
02:13Number 9, the killer who left almost no evidence behind.
02:18In 1978, 61-year-old Carol Bonnet was found stabbed to death inside his apartment in Omaha, Nebraska.
02:25His killer had apparently tried to clean up afterward.
02:28Investigators found fingerprints and palm prints in the bathroom, where they believed the attacker had attempted to wash away blood
02:34and other evidence.
02:36Police also recovered evidence from Bonnet's stolen car after it was eventually found in Illinois.
02:41At the time, investigators did everything they could with the prints.
02:45They searched available fingerprint databases, contacted other agencies, and compared the evidence against potential suspects.
02:52Nothing produced an identification.
02:54The case eventually went cold.
02:56For years, those fingerprints existed as evidence without a name attached to them.
03:00More than three decades later, technology had changed dramatically.
03:03In 2008, an Omaha police laboratory technician decided to run the old prints through the FBI's Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification
03:13System, known as IAFIS.
03:16The system had not existed when Bonnet was murdered.
03:19Within hours, it returned potential matches.
03:21One candidate stood out.
03:23Jerry Watson, who was already serving a prison sentence in Illinois for burglary.
03:28Investigators went back through the original evidence and discovered another strange connection.
03:32Among the old material was a classified advertisement flyer with the name Jerry W. written on it.
03:38They also found that Watson had lived only a few blocks from where Bonnet's stolen car had been recovered.
03:44There was another problem.
03:45Watson was close to being released from prison.
03:48Investigators traveled to Illinois and obtained a DNA sample from him.
03:53The DNA matched biological evidence recovered from Bonnet's crime scene,
03:57giving investigators a second major piece of evidence against him.
04:01Watson was charged, convicted, and sentenced to life in prison in 2011,
04:06exactly 33 years after Bonnet's body had been discovered.
04:10The strange part of the case was how little had changed in the physical evidence itself.
04:15The fingerprints had been sitting there since 1978.
04:18What changed was the technology capable of reading them.
04:21Number 8.
04:22The crime with no body and no clear motive.
04:25When Kelsey Barrett disappeared in Colorado in November 2018, investigators faced a nightmare.
04:32There was no body, there was no obvious murder weapon, and there was no straightforward explanation for what had happened
04:39to her.
04:39Barrett was a 29-year-old flight instructor who was last seen alive on Thanksgiving Day.
04:45She was supposed to meet her fiancé, Patrick Frazee, later that day.
04:48Instead, she disappeared.
04:50The investigation quickly became focused on Frazee, but proving a murder without a body created an enormous problem.
04:57There was no corpse to examine, no confirmed cause of death,
05:01and no conventional crime scene containing the kind of evidence investigators normally depend on.
05:07Then, investigators found something crucial inside Barrett's home.
05:11Surveillance footage showed a woman entering the house around the time of the disappearance.
05:15That woman was Crystal Lee, a nurse who had been having a relationship with Frazee.
05:20She eventually told investigators that Frazee had planned Barrett's murder and described what happened inside the home.
05:27Her testimony gave investigators a narrative for a crime that had almost no physical evidence of a victim's body.
05:33Prosecutors also presented surveillance footage, phone records, and other evidence that they said connected Frazee to the disappearance.
05:41Lee described Frazee's alleged plan to dispose of Barrett's body, while investigators worked to piece together what had happened after
05:49Barrett vanished.
05:50The defense repeatedly pointed to the missing body, missing murder weapon, and lack of an obvious motive.
05:56Prosecutors countered with the accumulated evidence and Lee's testimony.
06:00In November 2019, Frazee was convicted of murdering Barrett and sentenced to life in prison without parole.
06:07Plus, an additional 156 years, Barrett's body has never been recovered.
06:13The case became a striking example of how a murder prosecution can move forward even when investigators never find the
06:21victim.
06:21The physical evidence was incomplete, the body was missing, and the circumstances were deeply uncertain at the beginning.
06:28What eventually gave the case shape was a combination of surveillance footage, digital evidence, and the testimony of someone who
06:35claimed to have been involved in the plot.
06:37Number 7.
06:38The mystery solved by a 100-year-old fingerprint.
06:42In 1905, a woman named Mary McElroy was murdered in Kansas City, Missouri.
06:47The investigation was conducted at a time when fingerprint identification was still in its early stages, and investigators had very
06:55limited forensic technology compared with what police departments use today.
07:00Decades later, investigators were still dealing with the consequences of old, unsolved cases.
07:05One of the most remarkable developments in forensic history came when previously collected fingerprints from old crime scenes could be
07:12examined again using much more advanced identification systems.
07:15Fingerprints have an unusual advantage over many other forms of evidence.
07:20The patterns on a person's fingers remain remarkably stable throughout their life.
07:25A print that was nearly useless to investigators generations ago can potentially become valuable once technology improves.
07:33This principle has helped reopen cases that seemed permanently lost.
07:37Old fingerprints can be digitized, enhanced, and compared against enormous databases containing millions of prints.
07:45Someone who was completely unknown when the crime happened may eventually appear in the system because of a later arrest.
07:53That is exactly why old evidence can become unexpectedly important.
07:58A fingerprint doesn't become outdated simply because the investigation does.
08:02The technology surrounding it changes in several historic investigations.
08:07Prints collected decades earlier have eventually produced matches after suspects entered fingerprint databases for unrelated crimes.
08:14Investigators can then go back to the original case and compare the old evidence with the new identification.
08:20The most unsettling part is how little the physical evidence itself needs to change.
08:24A fingerprint can sit inside an evidence file for decades, waiting for the right technology and the right database to
08:31make sense of it.
08:32For investigators working cold cases, that possibility can completely change the value of evidence that once appeared useless.
08:38Number six, the murder solved by a forgotten photograph.
08:42In 1969, a young woman named Jane Britton was found murdered in her apartment in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
08:50Britton was a 23-year-old Harvard graduate student whose death initially left investigators with very few answers.
08:57The investigation eventually stalled.
09:00Years passed, then decades.
09:02The people who had originally worked on the case grew older or retired, while the evidence remained buried in police
09:09files.
09:10Then, an unexpected piece of information helped bring the investigation back to life.
09:15An old photograph.
09:17Photographs can preserve details that investigators may overlook when they are first taken.
09:22A person in the background, a vehicle, a sign, or even the position of an object can become important once
09:28investigators understand more about a case.
09:31That happened repeatedly in cold case investigations as detectives began re-examining photographs with modern technology.
09:38Images could be enlarged, enhanced, and compared with records that didn't exist when the original investigation took place.
09:45In Britton's case, investigators eventually determined that the murder had been committed by a man who had connections to the
09:52area and had been questioned during the original investigation.
09:57The case remained unresolved for years while detectives continued examining old information and trying to establish what had actually happened.
10:05The investigation eventually led authorities to Kenneth M. McDonald, who was identified through renewed examination of the evidence and investigation
10:16surrounding the case.
10:17Cases like this reveal one of the biggest problems with old investigations.
10:22Investigators only understand evidence through the information available to them at the time.
10:27A photograph taken in 1969 might look completely ordinary.
10:31Decades later, after databases have expanded and investigators have learned more about the people involved, the exact same image can
10:39take on a completely different meaning.
10:41That is why photographs from old crime scenes can be so valuable.
10:45They freeze an investigation in time, preserving details that everyone at the scene may have overlooked.
10:50Number five, the crime that took decades to connect.
10:54For years, authorities investigating murders in several American states had no reason to believe they were connected.
11:00Different victims, different locations, different years, the cases were investigated separately, and without modern DNA technology, there was little available
11:10to connect them.
11:11Then, forensic testing began revealing something investigators had been unable to see before.
11:16Biological evidence from different crime scenes belonged to the same person.
11:21One of the most significant examples involved the murders committed by Samuel Little.
11:26Little traveled extensively across the United States, attacking vulnerable women over a period of decades.
11:33Many of the deaths were initially classified as accidental, overdoses, or remained unsolved.
11:39With victims spread across different states and investigations conducted by different police departments, the crimes were incredibly difficult to connect.
11:47Little was eventually arrested in 2012 after investigators connected him to a murder in Texas through DNA evidence.
11:54He was convicted in 2014, but the investigation did not end there.
11:59Detectives continued questioning him about other killings.
12:03Little began confessing to murders across the country, describing victims and locations in remarkable detail.
12:10Investigators then compared his statements with old case files and physical evidence.
12:15The FBI ultimately determined that Little had confessed to 93 murders, and authorities were able to confirm his involvement in
12:22dozens of cases.
12:23The agency considers him the most prolific serial killer in U.S. history.
12:28What made the investigation so difficult was the passage of time.
12:31Each murder existed as its own mystery, sometimes for decades, until DNA evidence and new investigative work began connecting them.
12:42Suddenly, cases that had appeared unrelated started forming a single pattern.
12:46For investigators, the breakthrough wasn't simply identifying one murderer.
12:51It was discovering that a large number of supposedly isolated crimes had been committed by the same person.
12:56Number four.
12:57The killer identified by a single strange detail.
13:01In 1977, a young woman named Barbara Oberholzer disappeared while hitchhiking near Breckenridge, Colorado.
13:08Her body was found months later, and investigators quickly realized they were dealing with a murder.
13:13But there was very little that could identify the person responsible.
13:17Another woman, Annette Schnee, had disappeared in the same area around the same time.
13:23For decades, the two cases remained separate mysteries.
13:26Then, investigators noticed something unusual.
13:29A small piece of evidence recovered from Oberholzer's case eventually became important.
13:34A distinctive red fiber found on her body.
13:37Advances in forensic science allowed investigators to examine evidence that had been difficult to interpret when the murders occurred.
13:44The investigation eventually focused on Alan Lee Phillips, a truck driver who had been in the area at the time.
13:52Investigators were able to connect him to both women through a combination of witness accounts, vehicle information, and newly analyzed
14:01forensic evidence.
14:02Phillips was arrested in 2021, more than 40 years after the women disappeared.
14:08The case had survived for so long because the evidence available in the 1970s could not provide investigators with a
14:14clear suspect.
14:15Decades later, detectives could combine old records with forensic techniques that simply hadn't existed when the murders occurred.
14:22A tiny piece of material that had once seemed almost meaningless became part of the chain that finally led investigators
14:29to a suspect.
14:30Number 3.
14:31The case where the main suspect had already disappeared.
14:34In 1986, 18-year-old Michelle Schofield was found murdered in Florida.
14:40She had been stabbed, and her body was discovered near a highway.
14:44Investigators eventually focused on her husband, Leo Schofield.
14:47The evidence against him appeared convincing enough that he was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
14:53But there was a problem.
14:55Another man had been seen near the location around the time of the murder, and questions about the investigation continued
15:01for years.
15:02Schofield maintained that he was innocent, while his family continued trying to reopen the case.
15:08Decades later, investigators began re-examining the physical evidence using modern DNA testing.
15:14DNA recovered from the victim's clothing did not match Schofield.
15:19The testing eventually pointed toward a different man, Jeremy Scott, who was already serving a prison sentence for another crime.
15:26Scott had never been the person investigators originally convicted for Michelle's murder.
15:31By the time the case was being seriously reconsidered, decades had passed.
15:35In 2023, a judge vacated Schofield's conviction, and he was released after spending roughly 35 years in prison for a
15:44murder.
15:44He maintained he did not commit.
15:46The case demonstrated how difficult an investigation can become when the original suspect appears to fit the evidence,
15:53and the actual killer remains outside the investigation.
15:56The person responsible was effectively invisible to the original case.
16:00By the time modern forensic testing provided a different direction, the investigation had already consumed most of a man's life.
16:08Number two, the crime solved by evidence nobody thought mattered.
16:11In 1989, 11-year-old Jacob Wetterling disappeared while riding his bicycle home in Minnesota.
16:18The disappearance became one of the most famous missing child cases in American history.
16:22For nearly 27 years, investigators had no confirmed answer about what had happened to him.
16:28Thousands of tips were investigated.
16:29The case generated enormous public attention, but Jacob's fate remained unknown.
16:34The breakthrough eventually came from an unexpected source, an unrelated investigation into another man.
16:40In 2016, Danny Heinrich confessed to abducting and killing Jacob.
16:45Investigators had previously questioned Heinrich during the original investigation,
16:49but there had not been enough evidence to charge him.
16:51What ultimately helped connect Heinrich to the crime was information and evidence collected over the years during the investigation,
16:59including details that had initially seemed unrelated to Jacob's disappearance.
17:04Heinrich eventually led investigators to Jacob's remains, ending nearly three decades of uncertainty for his family.
17:10The case illustrates how enormous cold case investigations can become.
17:15Evidence can be collected, cataloged, and preserved for years without revealing its importance.
17:20A clue that seems insignificant at one stage can become critical after investigators discover a new suspect or a new
17:27connection.
17:28Jacob's case remained unsolved for so long that an entire generation grew up without knowing what had happened to him.
17:35The answer finally came from an investigation that had taken years to develop,
17:40connecting, information gathered at different points in time, until investigators could finally establish what had happened.
17:48Number one, the crime that was solved years later by a hidden connection.
17:52In 1976, 18-year-old Arliss Perry was found murdered inside Stanford Memorial Church on the Stanford University campus.
18:00She had gone to the church alone to pray, and when her body was discovered, investigators were faced with a
18:06bizarre crime scene and almost no obvious explanation for what had happened.
18:10The investigation continued for years, but identifying the killer proved extremely difficult.
18:16Investigators eventually developed a suspect, Stephen Crawford, a Stanford security guard who had been working around the campus at the
18:23time.
18:23But there wasn't enough evidence to make an arrest.
18:26The case remained open for decades.
18:28Then, in 2018, investigators returned to evidence that had been preserved from the original crime scene.
18:35Advances in DNA analysis allowed them to test material that investigators in 1976 could not analyze in the same way.
18:44The results pointed toward Crawford.
18:46Investigators obtained additional DNA evidence from him and compared it with material recovered from the crime scene.
18:52The results provided the connection they had been missing for more than four decades.
18:56Crawford was 72 years old when investigators confronted him at his home.
19:00Before he could be arrested, he died by suicide.
19:03The case had remained unresolved for 42 years.
19:06The suspect had been living his life while the investigation slowly became one of the oldest unsolved murders connected to
19:11Stanford.
19:12What finally changed the case was the ability to extract useful genetic information from evidence that had been collected when
19:18DNA testing was still in its infancy.
19:21For investigators, the lesson was practical.
19:23An old crime scene can contain evidence that hasn't become useless simply because the case is old.
19:28Technology can change what investigators are capable of learning from material that has been sitting untouched for decades.
19:35In Arliss Perry's case, the person investigators eventually identified had been on their radar before.
19:39The missing piece was the forensic connection that could turn suspicion into evidence.
19:44More than four decades after the murder, that connection finally emerged.
19:48Thank you for watching and sticking till the end.
19:51We've got plenty more videos coming in the future.
19:53Hit that subscribe button so you don't miss them.
19:56See you in the next one.
19:57See you in the next one.

Recommended