Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 4 minutes ago
In an interview, Supreme Court Senior Advocate Vikas Singh questioned the functioning and impartiality of the Election Commission of India. He asserted that the commission was designed as a multi-member body where decisions must be taken unanimously or by majority, expressing concern over reports that the Chief Election Commissioner has acted unilaterally. Singh criticised the commission's Special Intensive Revision exercise, stating, "Election Commission does not have any authority to decide on citizenship of the people of this country," noting that such powers belong strictly to the Ministry of Home Affairs under the Citizenship Act. Highlighting unprecedented doubts over the poll body's neutrality, he argued that the Supreme Court should intervene to remove the Chief Election Commissioner and mandate appointments through an independent collegium including the Chief Justice of India to restore public trust.

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00Joining me now is Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate of the Supreme Court.
00:04Vikas Singh, a lot of questions being raised about the functioning of an independent constitutional authority.
00:09Several measures have been taken as well, which many are seeing as course correction.
00:14And many within the government, particularly the allies of the government,
00:17and also the Chief Ministers of NDA Rule States, are of the opinion that
00:22the two press releases by the Election Commission certainly reaffirms
00:26the integrity and credibility of constitutional institutions
00:30and puts all misconceptions surrounding it to rest.
00:35My question is, as a lawyer, do you see that happening?
00:41In my view, the whole purpose of getting a multi-member body was,
00:46if you recall in 1994, to ensure that no one man takes a decision with regard to the electoral process.
00:55And the electoral process remains, you know, with a multi-member body.
01:01In fact, the law very clearly provided that the decision of the Election Commission should be unanimous.
01:08And if it is not possible to be unanimous, then it has to be by majority.
01:12So, obviously, there was no way by which the Election Commission
01:16could have done anything unilaterally without consulting the other Election Commissioners
01:23or taking them into confidence.
01:25So many elections have happened in this regime where the CEC has virtually worked individually
01:34as the report goes in the Indian Express.
01:37And I don't see any credible denial to that.
01:41It's a very wishy-washy denial which has come.
01:42There is nothing in the public domain so far to show that the other members had,
01:49or even by majority, any decision was taken with regard to these elections in the recent past
01:54or with regard to this exercise of SIR, which has done by the Election Commission.
02:00Even the Supreme Court, when it examined the SIR exercise,
02:05it examined it on the premise that it was a decision of the Election Commission.
02:10If the decision itself was not of the Election Commission,
02:14then obviously there was no decision of the, no such decision in the eyes of law.
02:20And there could not have been any examination of the same by the Supreme Court.
02:25So, for instance, whether to do the SIR exercise or not
02:29was actually a decision of the Election Commission.
02:32It is not as if the Supreme Court said that do this exercise.
02:35Supreme Court barely validated it, according to me, wrongly,
02:39because in my view, this is not the job of the Election Commission.
02:42Election Commission does not have any authority to decide on citizenship of the people of this country.
02:50That is a job clearly earmarked for the Ministry of Home Affairs,
02:55that too under the Citizenship Act.
02:57And there is a very elaborate exercise to do that.
03:00And you don't lose your citizenship so easily the way Election Commission is doing
03:04in this very casual exercise.
03:07So, this exercise is completely illegal, in my view.
03:12And now, with the doubt being raised about whether this was a decision of the Election Commission at all,
03:20raises serious concern about how this whole thing started in the first place.
03:25But, Mr. Vikas Singh, Election Commission as a body has faced criticism and scrutiny in the past as well.
03:32The tenure of TN Session, MS Gill, and Naveen Chawla, for that matter.
03:38This is a body which has been in the middle of multiple controversies in the past.
03:42So, do you see this more like a political slugfest?
03:48And, you know, as an authority which should have functioned in a way it should have,
03:52it has always been in the eye of the storm, one would say.
03:57So, what is unusual this time?
04:00The, if you recall the earlier attempts of, you know, questioning the working of the Election Commission
04:07did not ever raise any serious issue of credibility of the institution.
04:13You know, there was a decision-making process which was said to be flawed.
04:17The EVM was also said to be flawed.
04:20But, never ever was there any, you know, question raised,
04:25especially the way it has been raised now,
04:27with regard to the impartiality of the Election Commission.
04:31I mean, there was nothing in the public domain to say that the Election Commission is working
04:35in a partisan manner the way it is being said now, in this, of this Election Commission.
04:41So, in my view, the only way to correct this situation will be to immediately remove the Chief Election Commissioner.
04:48It can't happen by the government because he is, he is obviously,
04:54his, his, the beneficiaries are the people who are running the show.
04:58So, obviously, they will never remove him because he has to require removal by impeachment.
05:04According to me, it has to be by court only.
05:06And I hope the court does intervene in this matter to restore the credibility of the institution
05:14and ask the Chief Election Commissioner to go and appoint the new CEC in a modified collegium,
05:23where, which was the earlier collegium prior to this law came into force,
05:28which is the Chief Justice of India being a member of that collegium.
05:32Or anybody independent, not, not a cabinet minister, obviously,
05:36because a cabinet minister holds the office at the pleasure of the prime minister.
05:40So, you can't expect any cabinet minister to say anything contrary to what the prime minister is saying.
05:46So, there has to be, as an interim appointment of the CEC,
05:51where the third person should be completely neutral.
05:54And it is only then that the faith of the people will be restored in this institution.
05:59And immediately, this SIR exercise should be scrapped.
06:03And wherever any deletion has happened, this deletion should be restored.
06:08And the electoral roll should be made as it was earlier.
06:12Only to the extent of where there is a death, people should, those names should be removed.
06:17And wherever there is a person turning into a majority who has a right to vote should be included.
06:25Change of addresses should be permitted.
06:27But that's about all that the Election Commission should be doing as far as the electoral roll is concerned.
06:32And they have no authority on the, deciding on the citizenship.
06:37So, I think this is the only course correction, in my view,
06:39which can restore the confidence of the people in the Election Commission.
06:44All right.
06:45Vikas Singh, I appreciate your time.
06:46Thank you so much for joining us.

Recommended