Skip to playerSkip to main content
AI’s rapid advancement is triggering new warnings from the leaders of OpenAI and Anthropic, who told the United Nations Security Council that artificial intelligence could pose serious risks to humanity without strong safeguards. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warned that AI could develop so quickly that humans may struggle to understand or intervene in what is happening, saying, “We could lose control of the future to AI.” Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei similarly warned that poorly managed AI could become a risk to humanity. The warnings come as governments and technology leaders face growing pressure to establish responsible AI development, oversight and safety measures.


#AI #ArtificialIntelligence #SamAltman #OpenAI #Anthropic #DarioAmodei #AIThreat #AISafety #AIRisks #FutureOfAI #AIRegulation #AIWarning #UNSecurityCouncil #UnitedNations #AIControl #TechNews #ArtificialIntelligenceNews #AIConcerns #AIDevelopment #AIRevolution #OpenAI News #AnthropicAI #GlobalSecurity #AI2026 #BreakingNews

~HT.318~ED.420~PR.460~GR.122~VG.HM~

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:00I'm honored to be here and to be able to speak with you all at this important time.
00:04We've been talking about artificial intelligence for years, but it feels different in recent weeks and months.
00:10Rapid model progress has made the timeline feel more compressed, the upside more tangible, but also the stakes and the
00:16risks more immediate.
00:18We have a choice in front of us.
00:20AI can either be more like a new renaissance of creativity and discovery, or more like a new industrial revolution
00:26of upheaval and disarray.
00:29The renaissance was a time when new tools, new ideas, and new institutions expanded what people believed they could do.
00:36AI can play that role for our time.
00:39I believe that people are much more capable than they imagine themselves to be,
00:43but have been held back by limited technology that was meant to empower, but instead distracts and often steals attention.
00:50The best version of AI is not about making people cogs in a giant machine, or optimizing every part of
00:56life until the human parts disappear.
00:58It's about giving people more agency in an ever more complex world, more ability to learn, to create, discover, build,
01:05participate.
01:06There are many things that AI cannot and should not automate.
01:10AI should be built for people, not simply to turn the crank of the machines faster for their own sake.
01:17Some of the things people working to build AI have said are so dystopian that they sound like the plot
01:21of bad science fiction movies.
01:24Anything this powerful is also intimidating.
01:27This moment is complicated as we feel both tremendous potential and very understandable anxiety at the same time.
01:35These models can help people discover new knowledge, new medicines, better healthcare, stronger education, and build more productive economies.
01:41They can be new tools for people to pursue dreams and ambition that today feel out of reach.
01:46The complexity of life has increased so dramatically for the average person.
01:51AI can be a defensive tool against this complexity as much as it can be this tool of unprecedented discovery
01:57and innovation.
01:59On the other hand, as AI systems become more capable and more autonomous, they can move faster than our institutions,
02:06concentrate power in too few hands, or make decisions that people no longer understand or control.
02:14That concern becomes especially important as we approach systems that can improve themselves and future versions of themselves,
02:21often called recursive self-improvement.
02:24As the process of building AI becomes more automated, the pace of AI progress could accelerate rapidly.
02:30This moment calls for extreme care.
02:33I largely agree with Professor Bengio, although I'll say two instead of three.
02:37I believe there are two ways that AI progress could go very badly that we have to avoid.
02:43First, we could lose control of the future to AI.
02:47The risk is that it moves so fast that people can no longer follow what's happening or intervene when needed.
02:52This would obviously be terrible.
02:54The industry must not accept too much technological risk just because the benefits are too great
02:59and that they feel too important to slow down.
03:01Beating companies in a competitive race is not a reason to make rash decisions,
03:05nor do we believe we are locked in a race where we are unable to do that.
03:08We have unilaterally slowed down in the past.
03:10We will do so in the future.
03:11We do not want to build systems.
03:12We think it's important that everyone avoids building systems
03:15where we cannot make the alignment, monitorability, and safety guarantees that we must.
03:20We need to understand what these systems are doing
03:22and have strong evidence that they will do what people intend,
03:25even as they get very, very smart.
03:27Actually, especially as they get very, very smart.
03:30It doesn't matter whether people put their risk of catastrophe at 10% or 1% or 12% or
03:340.1%.
03:35None of these levels are remotely acceptable,
03:37and we should not train models that we cannot make an extremely strong case
03:41that we'll be able to keep under human control.
03:44So that's one way things can go wrong.
03:46In the other direction, these systems could concentrate too much power in too few hands.
03:51No one person or company or country should be able to use the most powerful AI models
03:56to impose their worldview on everyone else.
03:59A company or country that believes only it can be trusted with this technology
04:03can use that belief to justify almost anything else.
04:06We have to reject that logic, even when it's convenient for any one actor.
04:10I believe there is a pragmatic path through both of these.
04:14At OpenAI, we approach these questions with a clear goal.
04:18AI should give people more power over their own lives,
04:21more freedom to live lives the way they want,
04:23more ability to solve problems, big or small, and to improve their communities.
04:27We don't want to fall into the trap of blind optimism.
04:30We also don't want to fall into the trap of doomerism either.
04:33Getting pulled into either extreme will not help us successfully figure out the challenges in front of us,
04:38especially at a time when the world and its people face such enormous challenges
04:42that this technology can help solve.
04:45So we try to walk the middle path between these two poles.
04:48For us, that means three principles.
04:51First, as AI becomes more capable,
04:54people must remain at the center of AI decision-making.
04:57Alignment is not an abstract research question.
05:00It is the work of ensuring that these systems reliably remain under human control,
05:04reflect human values,
05:05and help people guide the next stages of development,
05:08we are not trying to and must not automate human judgment or human values.
05:13Second, the benefits of scientific progress and economic growth must be by people and for people.
05:19AI should help researchers make discoveries, doctors treat patients,
05:22teachers teach students, entrepreneurs start companies,
05:25communities solve problems that fell out of reach, and much more.
05:28The continuous story of human progress is not the tools replace human agency,
05:32it is that the right tools make people more capable,
05:35and I believe this is going to go much further than we believe possible.
05:39Third, this technology must empower people individually.
05:42A great future will come from people realizing their potential
05:45and building value for themselves, their communities, their countries, and the broader world.
05:50We might be the builders, one of the builders of this technology,
05:53but we are not the heroes of this story.
05:55Our role is to enable people all over the world
05:57and to trust in the magic of humanity's skill and faculties.
06:02We now have models capable of discovering knowledge that we have never had before.
06:07Consider the progress we've seen in math.
06:09Three summers ago, our models were okay at grade school math.
06:13Two summers ago, they were pretty good at high school math competitions.
06:17Last summer, we reached a gold-level medal
06:19in the most prestigious international math competition.
06:22And just a few weeks ago this summer,
06:24one of our models solved one of the Millennium Prize problems,
06:27the Navier-Stokes equations.
06:29These equations are used for aircraft design,
06:32weather forecasting, and the study of blood flow.
06:34We are not solving math problems for their own sake,
06:36but to empower people to discover new knowledge
06:39and to use it to improve health care,
06:41raise standards of living,
06:42and expand everyone's potential around the world.
06:45There remains so much to be discovered.
06:48But it's very important that companies not substitute
06:50for the democratic process.
06:52If AI is to be democratic,
06:54the most important decisions cannot be made
06:56by labs in San Francisco alone.
06:58They must be shaped through democratic processes
07:00and by governments accountable to the people that they serve.
07:04At the international level,
07:05this will require cooperation.
07:08In our history,
07:09there have been times where countries who compete
07:11and don't always like each other very much
07:13still come together for shared interests
07:14and the collective good
07:16in the face of a powerful new technology.
07:18We believe this must be one of those times.
07:22We need a mechanism for complementary national
07:24and international frontier AI standards.
07:27Standards for measuring capabilities,
07:29assessing risks,
07:30determining whether safeguards are sufficient,
07:32and preserving meaningful human oversight
07:34as systems become more autonomous.
07:37We need common standards
07:38so countries can compare evidence,
07:40verify compliance,
07:41and have a shared language and understanding
07:43about what is happening.
07:45We need accurate and speedy incident reporting,
07:48classification and reporting protocols
07:50so the world can learn from failures
07:52before they become catastrophes.
07:54And we need secure channels among governments,
07:57critical infrastructure operators,
07:58and technical experts
07:59to share emerging vulnerabilities and new threats.
08:03Obviously, these standards should not lock in incumbents
08:06or favor one business model over another.
08:08They must support open and closed model developers,
08:11new entrants in established labs,
08:13national authority,
08:14and international cooperation.
08:16Each government should decide
08:17how to incorporate standards into its own legal system,
08:19but we will all be better off
08:21if we can agree on what good evidence,
08:23good safeguards,
08:24and good oversight look like on the global stage.
08:27We do not have all the answers,
08:29and we're very open to any better ideas.
08:31We're ready to work with you all
08:33and try our hardest to figure out the path forward.
08:36We are at a crossroads.
08:38One path leads to a world where power is concentrated,
08:41decisions are opaque,
08:42and people feel that the most important technology
08:45of their lifetime is something being done to them.
08:48The other path leads to a world where AI works for people
08:51because people, through democratic institutions,
08:54help decide how it should develop and guide it,
08:56where scientific progress improves real lives,
08:59where more people can participate in the future,
09:01and where this technology continues to give individuals
09:04and communities greater power to live life as they choose.
09:07This is a future of realized potential,
09:09excitement, and wonder,
09:10and it is the future we believe is worth building.
09:12Thank you very much.
09:15Subscribe to One India and never miss an update.
09:20Download the One India app now.

Recommended