Skip to playerSkip to main content
  • 11 minutes ago
Former Lembaga Tabung Haji (TH) chairman Datuk Seri Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim has not been charged with taking, misappropriating or misusing RM193.5mil in TH funds for himself or his family, says his legal team.

Lawyer Datuk Amer Hamzah Arshad said the charge against Abdul Azeez concerned an allegation that he had used his position to obtain the chairmanship of Putrajaya Perdana Bhd.

Read more at https://tinyurl.com/4thrzdh8

WATCH MORE: https://thestartv.com/c/news
SUBSCRIBE: https://cutt.ly/TheStar
LIKE: https://fb.com/TheStarOnline

Category

🗞
News
Transcript
00:02Lawyer Datuk Amir Hamzah Arshad said former Lembaga Tabung Haji Chairman Datuk Seri Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim
00:09was not charged with taking or misusing RM193.5 million in Tabung Haji funds.
00:17He said the amount referred to Tabung Haji's investment in Putrajaya Perdana Berhad
00:22and Abdul Aziz allegedly used his position to obtain the chairmanship of the company.
00:28Amir, who is representing Abdul Aziz in the case, said the charge against his client did
00:34not concern any alleged misappropriation of Tabung Haji funds for the benefit of his client
00:41or his client's family members. He also denied social media claims on money said to be held
00:47in Tabung Haji's accounts belonging to Abdul Aziz's wife and children. He said the savings
00:53held in the wife and children's accounts had no connection with the charge against Abdul Aziz
00:58in court. He said the money in the accounts had no connection with funds belonging to Tabung
01:04Haji. He said the accounts and funds had previously been investigated but never forfeited. He said
01:11the Royal Commission of Inquiry report on the pilgrimage fund contained no finding that Abdul
01:17Aziz had misappropriated TH funds for himself or his family. On Wednesday, Abdul Aziz pleaded
01:24not guilty to charges of using his position to secure the chairman post of Putrajaya Perdana
01:31Bahad with a 690,000 ringgit annual salary 12 years ago.
01:35The Royal Commission of Inquiry
Comments

Recommended